Javelin vs NLAW - Which is the anti-tank king?

Подписаться 859 тыс.

Просмотров 710 тыс.

50% 1

Play Call of War for FREE on PC, iOS or Android:
💥 callofwar.onelink.me/q5L6/Jav...
Receive an Amazing New Player Pack, only available for the next 30 days!
The Javelin and the NLAW are two of the hottest anti tank systems around right now. At least the media seems to be pitting them one against the other.
Most of the articles written so far have been about two anti-tank systems. So… Our video tries to answer how do they compare? Are they even competitors? Which one is better? And just how suitable are they for the job at hand?
Music by Matija Malatestinic www.malatestinic.com
Images used in the thumbnail:
Xi Jinping by Kremlin.ru, CC BY 4.0 creativecommons.org/licenses/..., via Wikimedia Commons
Joe Biden by Gage Skidmore from Peoria, AZ, United States of America, CC BY-SA 2.0 creativecommons.org/licenses/..., via Wikimedia Commons
Dice by pixabay.com
If you want to watch our videos without ads, if you want quick replies to any questions you might have, if you want early access scripts and videos, monthly release schedules - become our Patron.
More here: / binkov
Suggest country pairs you'd like to see in future videos over at our website: www.binkov.com
You can also browse for other Binkov T-Shirts or Binkov merch, via the store at our website, binkov.com/
Subscribe to Binkov's channel for more videos! / binkovsbatt...
Follow Binkov's news on Facebook! / binkovsbattl...
Follow us on Twitter: / commissarbinkov

Опубликовано:

10 май 2022

Ссылка:

Скачать:

Готовим ссылку...

Добавить в:

Мой плейлист

Посмотреть позже

Комментарии : 3,7 тыс.

@Binkov 2 года назад

Play Call of War for FREE on PC, iOS or Android: 💥 callofwar.onelink.me/q5L6/JavelinvsNLAW Receive an Amazing New Player Pack, only available for the next 30 days!

@yeasashikder3704 2 года назад

🇨🇳🤝🇷🇺💪💪💪👊👊👊✌✌✌

@prezmrmthegreatiinnovative3235 2 года назад

id like to see a video about VIETNAM WAR

@julianshepherd2038 2 года назад

Got anything on battlefield nukes Mr Putin has ? How much damage can they do ? They sound scuckin farey

@DaaronIrwing 2 года назад

U Forgot about STUGNA-P ukrainian made

@RealNeutronStar 2 года назад

If Modern Greece acquired Greek Fire as a military weapon and used it in modern naval operations. Condition, it would get in modern times, in Greece they would discover its chemically original formula, by conducting archaeological excavations. And go to War, to regain control of Cyprus. And in many other current NATO Wars and Operations. Also in some more historical Wars of hatred. Of course, this would become a Greek secret. Again after a very long time! It would become a Greek secret. And their Nation, would probably, be one of the strongest in Naval Warfare. Thoroughly improving it to modern standards. How would this affect the operation of war at sea? Provided, it would be used in a possible War. As much as possible! How many massive benefits would it bring militarily and collectively? How would this Ancient Super Weapon affect Modern Warfare? Who would dominate the battlefield? How can it be technically used in today's battlefield? This weapon is super powerful, it cannot be denied by anyone. It would be impressive to see it on the battlefield. I would not be surprised, if this super-weapon would bring huge benefits on the battlefield. Not at all would not be! Not at all! The most important thing is said!

@expandedhistory 2 года назад

Both the Javelin and NLAW are equally just as good for home defense 11/10 would buy again.

@KennyNGA 2 года назад

We should give them to americans gangs to stop drive by shootings

@10thmountainvet 2 года назад

Best comment on RU-vid

@matthewspry4217 2 года назад

Home pest control, same as the Ukrainians are using them for

@BigEd2006 2 года назад

NLAW for home defense, won't kill everyone inside with backblast :)

@PETE4955 2 года назад

So your expecting big trouble at home then.

@AbstractPragmatism 2 года назад

Unit for unit, the Javelin is better, but you can have significantly more NLAWs on a given budget. They both fill an important role and, for the record, I would be quite excited to have an example of either in my safe!

@KennyNGA 2 года назад

Im the prince of nigeria i have both i can give you them if you pay for the shipping costs

@amacca2085 2 года назад

@@AKguru762 no

@dgurevich1 2 года назад

@@AKguru762 the javelin can work as surface to air missile too, as seen by footage you no doubt have seen.

@Conan-ny1um 2 года назад

Just have the Javelin and Nlaws and throw in a Gustav and you’ve covered all your bases! And now that Ukraine was sent Polaris side by side 4 wheelers that can do 80mph and have a bed to carry a crew of 4 and 500lbs of arms and ammo you can hit and run at speeds not many can touch. That’s the ultimate Tank Destroyer

@Kevin-bl6lg 2 года назад

The actually best anti tank weapon is Tinder.

@70snostalgia 2 года назад

The most comprehensive military briefing I ever had from a sock.

@looinrims 2 года назад

This sock leads the military of Uberslavia against all

@johnnycrinkle 2 года назад

They are both amazingly well suited to perform their different rolls; Javelin for ranged scenarios, where being able to destroy MBT's from kilometres away is required. Nlaw for tight urban scenarios. where being able to fire from the concealment of a building is required. I'm sure the fighters in Ukraine are grateful for both systems.

@oldsalt524 2 года назад

Yes, I'm sure they will be used for their intended purpose and not for profit on the black market 😉. Hand someone who makes 1k a year a 150k weapon. What could go wrong?

@cerbuscankerous3714 2 года назад

I'd probably go with Javelin at company level and nlaw at platoon level, as you say they are distinct.

@johnnycrinkle 2 года назад

@@oldsalt524 i would expect anyone, in the imediate position of being faced with a hostile armed vehicle, would use the best suited weapon available to defend themselves. regardless of prior job status and usuall income figures. My guess is, the number of Ukrainian fighters wandering around their besieged homeland, looking at making a quick buck off selling the very weapons that are currently keeping themselves alive will be practically zero. That's my best guess.

@oldsalt524 2 года назад

@@johnnycrinkle your info is low. Get moar info before posting. Thanks.

@johnnycrinkle 2 года назад

@@oldsalt524 as I said pal, thats my best guess!! If you happen to come about the location of your suspected "black market" and the vendors within,.. try keep it on the hush-hush... wouldn't want word getting out and an ensuing "black friday" style stampede at the checkout. 😂👍

@etubrutus3501 2 года назад

I’m a 26 year military vet. When the war started, a news crew was following around some Ukrainian forces. I noticed immediately the Ukrainians were packing Javelins. I knew the Russian armor would not be rolling over Ukrain like the whole world thought.

@inteallsviktigt 2 года назад

Well what do you say now in middle of may? Did the Russian tank role over as we thought

@imjashingyou3461 2 года назад

@@inteallsviktigt they did not.

@inteallsviktigt 2 года назад

@@imjashingyou3461 so Russia isn’t on the retreat? They aren’t getting their tanks obliterated? They aren’t suffering heavy casualties? Theta haven’t lost an explosive amount of generals? Javelins are obliterating Russian tanks and warships. NLAWS are obliterating Russian tanks

@imjashingyou3461 2 года назад

@@inteallsviktigt well considering that's what I said and they didn't role over Ukraine like evrryone thought. Hence the they didn't. You and I are in agreement.

@inteallsviktigt 2 года назад

@@imjashingyou3461 oh I read your statement as meaning the opposite. My bad😅

@babalonkie 2 года назад

Javelin for open/large terrain. NLAW for cities/confined. That is why UK uses both.

@benrodir2 2 года назад

I didnt give the nlaw enough credit honestly. for how cheap it is it is quite effective. my bad

@MasterChiefSamus 2 года назад

Or NLAWs for most troops, Javelins for strike teams who already have intel on their targets and are setting up ambushes or major offensives.

@thomasnowell 2 года назад

That's exactly what the video said?

@MrJdsenior 2 года назад

@@thomasnowell Yes, I think, you meant to use a period. :-)

@babalonkie 2 года назад

@@thomasnowell Only it did not take 20 minutes to explain... ;)

@Neion8 2 года назад

TLDR: Javelin is the king of handheld anti-tank missiles, however they're costly, time consuming to deploy and less effective in cities. NLAW covers these weaknesses with it's strengths of being in exchange for being marginally less effective and less capable in rural environments - but both still too costly to completely replace the AT-4 with regards to destroying defensive structures or support vehicles. They're the holy trinity of forcing your enemy to walk.

@farzana6676 2 года назад

AT4 will struggle big time against a tank. I would say RPG7 is better than AT4

@Neion8 2 года назад

@@farzana6676 'AT-4 with regards to destroying defensive structures or support vehicles' Where in that line did I imply using it against tanks? Also, RPG-7 will struggle against tanks too; back in the Iraq war a Challenger 2 took 70 of the fuckers and still returned to service later with it's crew alive and well. However, a Javelin or NLAW would've taken it out in a single shot, because that's what happens when you use the right tool for the job.

@steveclarke6257 2 года назад

Javelin is an excellent system.....but it's not the "king of missiles", that goes to missiles like the Israeli "Spike" and the British "Brimstone's". Both these have a huge range and better autonomous targeting than Javelin and the Brits have sent Gen 1 Brimstone's to Ukraine

@farzana6676 2 года назад

@@steveclarke6257 Lol, brimstone? That's such a heavy weapons system. Why not just compare a Tomahawk now.

@MrJdsenior 2 года назад

TL:DR :-)

@IMAN7THRYLOS 2 года назад

Javelin is meant to be used by specialists. The NLAW can be issued to civilians who just joined a resistance force. It is like the RPG-7. Just made in the 21st century.

@ROFLobster4884 2 года назад

My boss and I discussed this in length when the war started. We came to the conclusion that if you’re heading out to specifically set up an ambush on armored vehicles, the Javelin is the better choice. But if you’re looking to arm a squad of infantry in field that /might/ encounter armor, the NLAW is the better choice.

@scottjohnson9912 2 года назад

Gotta love the Ukrainians sense of humor when they use the term " God save the Queen " when they fire the NLAW

@valerianocuomo996 Год назад

Engineering is of sweden ,the progect is Engineering of industry of sweden. UK THEY HAVE not a national industry, BAE SISTEM :20% IS OF LEONARDO COMPANY, 15% THALES, 30%ONLY IS UK...BUT ALL THE SISTEM UK IS NO MOST BRITISH FROM 1980 WITH THE THACHER, AND NOW, WITH BREXIT, UK IS ONLY LONDON ( FINANCE) 50% GDP ,RICHEST IN LONDON AREA,REST OF COUNTRY IS IN DIFFICULT, FAILED?

@valerianocuomo996 Год назад

Is a shit death,

@scammicus7110 2 года назад

Javelin is meant to give dismounted infantry an ability to stave off tanks from well sited positions, NLAW is meant to keep infantry fighting vehicles, and accompanying tanks, from close assault. If you can force the mech assault to dismount beyond the last 100 metres, you can kill them with defensive arty / mortar fires and MGs while they struggle to close with the defenders. Different tools for different roles, and meant to be used together. In urban fighting, you use Javelin on the perimeter, NLAW in the interior. Its a great pairing, but always a pairing unless you are tank hunting, in which case, take the right tool for the ambush site. Another great job Blinkov. o7

@doozledorf7036 2 года назад

Javelin for sure. All that added range is amazing

@oldsalt524 2 года назад

2.5 mile range is really impressive for a shoulder fired weapon.

@TheNotSoFakeNews 2 года назад

The fact that the british army (and swedish) developed the In-law to work alongside the javelin system, suggests they both fulfil different niches on the battlefield.

@SuperDougal22 2 года назад

In-laws are deadly, I can vouch for that.

@TheNotSoFakeNews 2 года назад

@@SuperDougal22 lol hahahaha, I'm not correcting it

@siadwarsame2045 2 года назад

The British didn’t develop the NLAW. it’s developed and designed in Sweden, the UK makes this weapon under License from Sweden.

@siadwarsame2045 2 года назад

Question: is Kermit the frog a Russian spy?

@MikeLitoris66 4 месяца назад

Comparing Javelin to NLAW is like comparing assault rifle to sniper rifle and trying to determine which one is better. NLAW is much better and maneuverable at close range, while Javelin excels at long range. Both are great and compliments each other nicely.

@BrokenCurtain 2 года назад

The anti-tank king are those upcycled soviet-era RKG-3 grenades that are being dropped from those commercial drones. They used to be totally obsolete, but some Ukrainian ingenuity and 3D printing technology turned them into quite effective tank killers.

@garychandler7632 2 года назад

Insurgents in Iraq were getting getting them ftom Iran and using them pretty effectively. We countered their use by changing our formations sector of fires as we patrolled. They were pretty hit or miss abd worked better thrown in volleys

@MrJdsenior 2 года назад

Commercial drones should be dead easy to defend against, just spoof their GPS and knock them out of the air before they get close, but it's pretty obvious that standard tanks, guns, etc don't have that capability, YET. I can guarantee they will have soon, though, at least the more expensive stuff, but in any case soldiers are not really expendable either, not if you want to stay strong, and for the even more obvious reasons. It's out there, and just jamming, as I understand it, and other methods. They are just not in large scale general use yet. Another really simple mode I saw for this function is a very fast and agile drone that just disables incoming drones by dropping a graphite net over the target. blades stop, or are damaged, no more drone. That way the cost bang/buck is more commensurate. Using a very expensive missile is NOT. And the ones you mentioned are so cheap and readily producible that I have seen them used as anti personnel, etc. Sometimes simple stupid, cheap, and readily available is just the ticket. :-)

@endutubecensorship 2 года назад

All wrong. The John Deere 8330 is the most effective platform for removing enemy tanks from the battlefield.

@MikeGraceJediDad Год назад

ROFLLMAO

@geodkyt 2 года назад

Kind of like asking, "Which is better, AK-74M or PKM?" Different systems, for different roles, even if both use the same kill mechanism.

@gallendugall8913 2 года назад

The anti-tank king is not supporting your tanks with infantry.

@BofaDee33 2 года назад

I was a Javelin system operator in the U.S. Army it's a pretty simple 2 week course. Not a huge amount of training really required to use it well, the army likes to repeat information repeatedly day after day but probably after a full day of doing the training to understand the CLU and you could use the javelin well. They are heavy AF. Now this is the U.S. army so the prices they gave us were much lower and it was in 2010. The CLU was expensive like 175k but the missles themselves were only 70k a peice. If we are selling them for 218k a pop to allies what a mark up even after adjusting for inflation.

@shingnosis 2 года назад

Courses like that are a license to print money. Yeah, it could be a 1-3 day course. But why pass of 2 weeks of tuition cost? And maybe some halfwit won't blow himself up too, who knows.

@BofaDee33 2 года назад

@@shingnosis ya but only 1 person who scores the highest score during training actually gets to fire 1 live missle the rest of us just simulate it on the CLU during training and watched the high speed guy get to shoot the missle in an actual live fire.

@Truthbomb918 2 года назад

The javelin we used came with a stand for the clu, don't think American forces ever used it

@josephthomason447 2 года назад

I'm sorry... did binkov just show me a simulation of a cope cage WORKING?

@Lusa_Iceheart 2 года назад

Yeah I was surprised by that too, I guess that's what their supposed to be for. Whether the cope cages work is an entirely separate question of course. Was nice to have someone have an explanation for what the hell the they're for. I haven't seen anyone give an explanation for em anywhere else.

@defective6811 2 года назад

Complementary systems, not competing systems. Its like asking what is more important for a car, the engine or the tires.

@michaeldenesyk3195 2 года назад

You miss the point, The javelin has a purpose, and the NLAW has a purpose, they compliment each other

@Twirlyhead 2 года назад

Yes. UK, manufacturer of NLAW, uses both NLAW and Javelin. Big clue there.

@extragoogleaccount6061 2 года назад

I think he stated that well. The title is obviously clickbait comparing the two directly. The average person may not know what you do, so they wonder which is better. Even though the direct comparison is a moot point, it makes for a pretty decent video topic and those average people hopefully know more after watching.

@lancerd4934 2 года назад

The best AT weapon is the one you have. If both are available, the javelin is more capable, but if you're in a line infantry platoon getting charged down by an armoured spearhead, you're more likely to have an NLAW on-hand. We've seen both are quite able to cause a Significant Emotional Event for a tank crew.

@afatcatfromsweden 2 года назад

Finally someone who doesn’t credit the NLAW exclusively to the UK! If I weren’t subscribed already I would absolutely have hit that bell button!

@matsfagerberg4286 2 года назад

👍🇸🇪🇬🇧

@sopissedoff Год назад

You say that ,funny the road was cordened of in Belfast while they were loading two containers of Belfast built Nlaws ,British built and about ten police cars around them when heading to the docks🇬🇧🇺🇦♥️

@afatcatfromsweden Год назад

@@sopissedoff That’s like crediting the AK-47 to Pakistan.

@sopissedoff Год назад

@@afatcatfromsweden not at all ,it was shorts missiles ,then ratheon defence ,now thurel ,but we all still call it shorts ,born and bred in east Belfast, so British it is ,sorry about that ,but hey don't let the truth get in the way of a good story,who's this sabb crowd anyway

@TheSandersh 2 года назад

Horses for courses. If I had to choose what to arm my professional army’s anti tank platoons the Javelin is the clear winner, if I have to bolster standard infantry sections or get a quickly trained force into the field then the NLAWs ease of use and cost benefits are a winner. Both have their niches and work well together

@occiderisaethiopissa3702 2 года назад

I would recommend you read after action reports that have been filtering back from Ukraine. It makes a damming picture on Javelin's effectiveness, specifically relating to the batteries and the thermal sight, the cool down time, the batteries constantly being depleted when needed. It paints a picture that Javelin is indeed effective when it is used, the problem is in getting it armed when it is needed and fired when the operators only have a few seconds of opportunity outside cover before being shot, which has happened a lot.

@Joker-yw9hl 2 года назад

Depends on the military expenditure. For the vast majority of countries in the world the NLAW is the obvious choice

@TheSandersh 2 года назад

@@occiderisaethiopissa3702 I haven’t read the reports but that sounds like a logistical and operating/maintenance issue rather than with the weapon itself? Admittedly the Ukrainian logistical train faces several issues and the NLAW & other simpler weapon systems may function better in this specific conflict. Though if you have any links to these reports send them my way I’d happily have a look.

@TheSandersh 2 года назад

@@Joker-yw9hl yeah definitely, I was speaking from a U.K. standpoint where we can have both but that price difference is huge for smaller armed forces

@MaximGhost 2 года назад

I choose .... the RPG-7 Why? Because that's what Jamsheed uses. Duh!

@whwhwhhwhhhwhdldkjdsnsjsks6544 2 года назад

RPG-7s are gonna be blocked most of the time against modern tanks tho

@Gentleman...Driver 2 года назад

Jamsheed is a fucking legend.

@paradox7358 2 года назад

I know why Queen Elizabeth has not made any public appearances lately. She's in Ukraine hunting Russian tanks.

@glenspargo3376 2 года назад

She is resilient and quite tough when she needs to be. I bet every time she captures a Rooskie she pulls him to the rear by the ear!

@misfortunemate8261 2 года назад

"Mmm, should I use Javelin? Or NLAW?" must be the most wealthy Infantryman on this planet who thinks.

@idleishde6124 2 года назад

Why spend millions on a tank when Antietam costs just a few thousand? Equip a large part of your force with NLAWS and Javalins and you can cut your armored costs down and deploy more Infantry, giving more flexibility and greater numbers fielded. It's how Ukraine went from a smaller force than Russian to approaching parity. They don't have the tanks but they don't need them to be defensive.

@duitk 2 года назад

@@idleishde6124 you still need tanks to conduct large scale offensive maneuvers. The reason the Ukranians have been so successful is because the Russians don't use infantry to properly screen and support their tanks. We have videos of Ukranian infantry and militia literally walking up to armored vehicles with RPGs, blasting them and then running away. That tells you those vehicles had not infantry cover.

@smokeypuppy417 2 года назад

The US army just has so many anti tank weapons. Each divsion has 2 squadrons of 24x apache helicopters, with each apache being able to carry 16 Hellfire missiles, thats theoretically 768 potential targets to be killed before reloading.

@TheMoen22 2 года назад

Not even including the main gun which can also shred tanks from piercing the top armor.

@spaceisalie5451 2 года назад

This is a good point. When twitter was making a big deal about the US "giving away all of their javelins", my first thought (besides that being false) was how little of an impact that makes on our ability to destroy armor. In a war with russia or china, it won't be our javelins destroying their tanks, but our airpower and our tanks doing 90+% of the work.

@BAMozzy69 2 года назад

As well as the A10 Warthog and the AC130 - both VERY effective at dealing with Armoured Vehicles and Tanks. Javelins and NLAWS are more for ground troops without air-support. Its also for Troops to take out Tanks when you don't want to give away your position by having Air Support or heavy armour nearby (Ambush - NLAW or Snipe - Javelin). Both of which are reasons that Ukraine received these because they needed to stop Russian Heavy Armour as they didn't have the Air Support of Apaches, AC10's or AC130's over head, didn't have the 'heavy' armour to tackle a fleet of Battle Tanks. It stopped them Reaching Kiev and has been a very useful weapon to aid Ukraine in Defence of their Land and Right to exist as Ukranians - not Russians!

@danielmocsny5066 2 года назад

@@spaceisalie5451 - and don't forget the US Army's own artillery that can fire a variety of guided and unguided shells, with spotter drones to call in corrections. It's obvious that the US Army views the Javelin as a backup weapon to the primary tank-killing platforms, just in case an enemy tank sneaks through.

@spaceisalie5451 2 года назад

@@danielmocsny5066 The javelin is a very handy weapon when armor and airpower (and artillery) are either doing other things, or (for aircraft) it's not logistically cost effective to send them out. The Javelin is really great but it's not the end of the world if we didn't have them.

@williamED15 Год назад

It's not "really" ten days to train for a Javelin. It's really only takes a afternoon to learn to use it and be efficient, it's just to run all the programs might take some time as it's set up like a videogame with ever increasing levels of difficulty and skills

@ted331 2 года назад

If it stops a tank then why argue The important thing is they both do the job

@ex0duzz 2 года назад

No ones arguing, they use both even. U.K. And USA both share weapons

@hennessyblues4576 Год назад

Shouldn't Russia be the judge

@kennlw5 Год назад

Best comment award 🎉

@gooldii1 Год назад

85.000 dead Orcs! Great!

@thepaintingbanjo8894 2 года назад

Saint Javelin and her Father-NLAW.

@Perkelenaattori 2 года назад

And Uncle Spike the Jewish cousin from Israel added to the mix. It's also top tier gear.

@nondogoyal1176 2 года назад

My god. Is that the queen with a NLAW

@cyrilli1546 2 года назад

💀

@PNWAffliction 2 года назад

launch some tea and crumpets pew pew!

@celebrim1 2 года назад

By all accounts the Queen was a very good soldier back in the day. I have no doubt that were she younger, she could have operated an NLAW with proficiency.

@moritamikamikara3879 2 года назад

When this war started I saw a propaganda video released by the Ukrainians about them using NLAWs and they shout "God save the queen" My sides were in orbit. Someone tell me how I can help fund the production of more

@grvc44 2 года назад

How about NLAW VS MOTHER IN LAW?

@rodgermurphy5721 2 года назад

Good one

@Gentleman...Driver 2 года назад

Mother in law wins always. Very destructive and accurate weapon system.

@Ronaldopopkings 2 года назад

Even if AT4 cant take out MBTs. It will probably work wonders against the Russian BMPs and logisticall vehicles like trucks. Saving more expensive weapons to the bigger tanks.

@alexanderkha27 2 года назад

would it be fair to say a javelin is conceptually a modern day Anti tank gun, where NLAW comes from linage of Panzer Faust, RPG, AT4.

@larikauranen2159 2 года назад

Its not really fair to compare the nlaw and javelin. Its like comparing an assault rifle against a big caliber sniper rifle. Both are necessary in an infantry role and cant be replicated or combined to try and make an all rounder

@malcolmanon4762 2 года назад

Horses for courses - Javelin - picking off stuff in open field combat from long range NLAW - picking off stuff up close and personal, with the F&F allowing personnel to displace rapidly, suitable for urban combat and other danger close situations / ambushes It is almost like they were designed to cope with different use cases

@bertieschoice216 2 года назад

It would be very interesting to see statistics on how many of the Russian tanks and vehicles destroyed in the war were taken out by each weapon, NLAW, Javelin, Stugna, Panzerfaust and others. Of course, no such statistics exist, but perhaps some day there will be reasonable accurate estimates based on Ukranian accounts. There is a lot of attention in the press and online for NLAW and Javelin, but I have the feeling that more basic weapons like RPGs have actually destroyed the most armour.

@jrd33 2 года назад

You would also need to know how many of each system were in use and how many rounds of each type were fired before you could really do any analysis. Also, RPGs are more likely to be chosen against lightly armoured targets.

@mdaaaa1211 2 года назад

I think artillery has the most kill

@MrZlocktar 2 года назад

@@mdaaaa1211 And it's true.

@josephahner3031 2 года назад

@@jrd33 if it's what you have handy you don't really have the luxury of being picky with what you use against what.

@josephahner3031 2 года назад

The more basic stuff will likely have killed more simply because the Ukrainians have more of them as opposed to the newer ones and they are more likely to have been what Ukrainian units that first made contact were issued with and familiar with.

@nowayman1406 2 года назад

Carl gustaf recoilles rifle.

@jacobhuff3748 2 года назад

The Nlaw sounds like a terror in urban combat or deployed at high traffic areas. An antitank team dispersed in a city with these would give any convoy a headache and at a lower cost too. The javelin is scarier for targets out in the open. Damn, there's no way to win here.

@Perkelenaattori 2 года назад

The classic street ambush video from early in the war showed what you can do with an NLAW. Remember the one where a Russian column was heading down a street and a Ukrainian group ambushed them from the left.

@solomonofakkad1927 2 года назад

The US actually operates five anti-tank weapons, AT4, Carl Gustav, M72 LAW, TOW, and Javelin (although only TOW and Javelin have sufficient penetration against modern MBTs). It's good to have a mixture of both short and long-ranged systems to cover as many types of environments as possible. Ukraine has a mix of plains and urban area, so both NLAW and Javelin can leverage its strength. And the obvious fact that any relatively modern anti-tank weapons are better than none, lighter systems like AT4 or LAW can still penetrate rear and top armor, and in the urban warfare, you'll get a lot of opportunity to attack weak spots.

@moritamikamikara3879 2 года назад

Wait US is still using the LAW? I hope they've upgraded the warhead...

@imjashingyou3461 2 года назад

Besides the fact that almost all of those more portable options are fine for light armored vehicles, and IFVs. No need to waste valuable heavy hitters on lightly armored vehicles if you have them availibe and they can hit.

@imjashingyou3461 2 года назад

@@moritamikamikara3879 we use the law in a limited capacity against buildings and fortified positions in Afghanistan as a cheaper and lighter weight option for the mountains. I doubt they would be taken outside of like theaters.

@MrJdsenior 2 года назад

Yeah, I think you left out the A10s, Apaches, and company, which can make short work of an entire column, that would be far and away my first weapons class of choice. When you have zero air cover, as the Ukrainians do in virtually every area, ground weapons become a lot more necessary, meaning more widely used. From what I've seen you always want to 'soften' the enemy from the air first, and by soften I mean destroy.

@aguynamedscott11 2 года назад

Stalin once said that quantity is a quality of its own. He wasn’t a great philosopher but he was right about that. If I were in Ukraine, I’d rather have 50,000 NLAW’s than 5,000 Javelins

@gustavmeyrink_2.0 2 года назад

For the price of 50 000 NLAWs you could have 150 000 Panzerfaust 3 aiming/trigger units and 900 000 rockets to go with them. Range is pretty much the same as NLAW and the hit rate 90% at maximum range. I know what I'd rather have.

@accountreality1988 2 года назад

@@gustavmeyrink_2.0 panzerfaust are only good at extreme close quarter like city/Forrest fighting (best weapon on the market for it actually). but nlaws is meant to be an mid to long range anti-tank weapon. better in fields or more open areas in general.

@aitorbleda8267 2 года назад

@@gustavmeyrink_2.0 I would have a mix, including instalaza c90 and c90er.

@gustavmeyrink_2.0 2 года назад

@@accountreality1988 Panzerfaust 3 IT-600 with Dynarange trigger (the prices I used were for this) has a max range of 600m for moving targets and a 90% success rate at that distance. I would not call 600m 'extreme close range' being only marginally less than the NLAW.

@sciencetube4574 2 года назад

This is the most comprehensive explanation of the advantages and disadvantages of both systems I have seen yet, thank you. I still don't understand how the NLAW can attack things in direct attack mode with a shaped warhead directed downward, though. Can it adjust the alignment of the warhead?

@AnErrantPhoton 2 года назад

Direct hit just slams the warhead into the target and explodes on impact. I'm pretty sure the explosion will still do some serious damage even if it doesn't use the shaped charge feature.

@josephahner3031 2 года назад

Programmable detonation. The warhead is designed so it can be used to full effect either forward or downward or more likely have a more powerful forward detonation and a less powerful top attack detonation due to there being less armor to punch through

@lutuvarka2649 2 года назад

Would be interesting to talk about other AT weapons such as Stugna, Gustav, maybe some RPG variant that is effective, etc

@Sammysnows 2 года назад

Both are strong in their own perspective Javelin is like a Sniper for long-range engagement, the aiming system can be used to recon too, and is effective on any MBTs and low flying helicopters but they're more expensive and heavy, and despite the direct impact configuration it still needs to fly quite a bit upward. NLAW: is like a front liner, they have less range than Javelin but are cheaper, Lighter, easy to use, can be used in confined spaces, and Effective in urban Areas, but you can't use the aiming system as a recon tool, and sometimes can miss the target if fired in the wrong Angle on direct impact configuration or too close where the warhead is not active yet. the right comparison should be German :Panzerfaust 3 US : SMAW Sweden:AT 4 Russian : RPG 23 & RPG 7 Singapore : MATADOR Edit I just realized AT 4 is Sweden made

@leokajanus94 2 года назад

AT-4 is Swedish tho

@bobbatons1720 2 года назад

Which is the anti-tank king in Ukraine war? John Deere tractor

@KingTFD 2 года назад

What about Lamborghini

@kebertxela941 2 года назад

Screw or Nail,which really builds a house?

@kabar0124 Год назад

Been looking for a NeoSoviet tank crew to settle the NLAW vs Javelin question once and for all. Unfortunately, none can be located. All are either dead or deserted.

@SDZ675 2 года назад

Javelin for long range NLaw for short-med range RPG for short range Ukrainians using all 3 which is why they're kicking ass.

@user-qb9ec2is9n 2 года назад

Which is the anti-tank king? Answer is 152/155mm artillery shell. The only thing war in ukraine showing for both sides is exactly how major is role of artillery is in modern combat, and how overvalued things such as small arms and shoulder launch AT grenades are

@gj1234567899999 2 года назад

You build a trench or a bunker deep enough and you can withstand huge artillery attacks. After the artillery strike you send in infantry and then they get shot by the guy in the trench and their APC gets blown up by a handheld AT. Just saw a video of A T90 being blown up by a Carl gust off recoilless rifle.

@nagantm441 2 года назад

@@gj1234567899999 their fortifications usually are basic trenches and earthworks.

@user-qb9ec2is9n 2 года назад

@@gj1234567899999 Proof yourself, post link to video

@leemacdonald6533 2 года назад

1 Javelin or 10 NLAW

@captainbuggernut9565 2 года назад

Javelin is 4x the price and more importantly is harder to manufacture. Its a classic high tech weapons system with a big price tag. It works brilliantly but even better with NLAW in tandem. Dealing with short and long range targets. If either of them hit the target the occupants aren't going anywhere and they know it. Imagine the effect, well you don't need to because the Russian army was halted literally in its tracks by them.

@steadmanuhlich6734 2 года назад

TO BINKOV: This was another of your excellent videos. Very clear graphics and narration (writing and voice) make this topic easy to follow and shares very good information about the weapons. Well done! The animated graphics and distances for effectiveness were helpful too. Also: the thumbnail has a bit of humor, as it shows Queen Elizabeth and Biden using the weapons supplied by their countries. :D

@jamesdowell5268 2 года назад

Legendary thumbnail lmao

@mattwarner8273 2 года назад

At start of the war NLAW was superior. Mainly in close contacts, urban environment and used by milita army i.e low training. Now on the Eastern front where the main Ukraine army is, you will see more Javelins used as I believe this is where most of them went due to the training they have and also the nature of the battle. Dombass region is flat, hardly any cover. Perfect for Javelin to engage at long range.

@FloofyMinari 2 года назад

You're likely right. I haven't see any footage of NLAW's since The Battle for Kyiv. All I see is footage of Javelines in the east

@pmagrin 2 года назад

The fighting in the Donbas isn't a war of manoeuvre but more about attacks on fixed defensive positions. A soldier hiding in a trench or bunker can quickly and easily aim at an approaching tank or armoured vehicle with the much more portable nlaw rather than wait 5 mins for the javelin clu to warm up before being able to fire.

@nyw100 2 года назад

@@FloofyMinari It`s because Javs are really good. A bit heavy to move and operate, but reliable and good. Russians are actively using them once they capture Ukrainian supplies. NLAWs are plagued by the reliability issues. Once NLAW battery runs out of juice to a certain level, launcher stops working, therefore you either have to swap battery every time you are going into combat and plan to use your NLAW, or you will have to gamble and prey to that it will work. Now pretend your are acting in an open terrain far from your supply bases with no predicted resupply. Will you bug your brain with checking battery or will you just take an RPG or Panzerfaust 3. Therefore both sides tend to drop NLAWs in favor to any other launcher. Same goes for MANPADs. Stingers are really good and valued by Russians, Starstreaks are heavily marketed meh.

@Archer89201 2 года назад

Meanwhile Chad Stugna-P which has blown up MBTs, IFVs and even Helicopters😁 and the main boss which has caused most of the casualties : artillery. Accurate artillery from howitzers,SPGs, mortar and MLRS has been the main killer of tanks, ifvs, infantry and enemy artillery as well

@Raz0rking 2 года назад

Yeah, those two surface to air kills were impressive

@Unhinged_rant_starts_here 2 года назад

Stugna is king

@zopEnglandzip 2 года назад

Anti tank mine taking a less glamorous silver medal

@mikedrop4421 2 года назад

Is it just me or has binkov sounded bummed out since the war broke out?

@Jarod-te2bi 2 года назад

Probably cause he knows millions are suffering fear confusion and anger, and thousands are dead and being murdered my Russian soldiers

@localdrugseller6431 2 года назад

Spike NLOS Brimstone and L-UMTAS are anti tank kings. Though it is true those systems and NLAW are not comparable. NLAW has short range. While systems i mentioned can be fired up to 20 kilometers.

@alphawolfgang173 2 года назад

yeah the Spike ER is an amazing piece of equipment

@jack1428 2 года назад

These weren't meant to compete with eachother, the UK has both Javelins and NLAWs, a few Javelins to pick of specific and highly important targets from further distance, and NLAWs to do the heavy work and take out the rest.

@Ukraineaissance2014 2 года назад

Exactly. Reflected by the huge difference in price as well.

@robskalas 2 года назад

Very good job of explaining the differences between the 2 systems.. both pro and con!

@josecarlosamador 2 года назад

NATO: "So, Ukraine, which should we send you? Javelin or NLAW?" Ukraine: "YES!"

@ALovelyBunchOfDragonballz 2 года назад

I felt that comment in my wallet.

@ALovelyBunchOfDragonballz 2 года назад

@Alenas Kvasninas I'll believe it when it happens. Our govt is good at wasting our money. Theyre damn near professionals at it.

@Daveydoodoo 2 года назад

@@ALovelyBunchOfDragonballz UK was repaying USA for WW2 lend lease right up until the final payment in 2006

@ALovelyBunchOfDragonballz 2 года назад

@@Daveydoodoo and? US tax payers had to foot the bill for a foreign country for 60 years? Sounds worse than I thought.

@Daveydoodoo 2 года назад

@@ALovelyBunchOfDragonballz It was a loan. With interest. Do you understand how loans with interest work. The US made a profit. Maybe they should spend more money on education.

@frenstcht 2 года назад

I recently saw a video taken inside an Abrams and was shocked at how thin the top armor is. It looked like glorified sheet metal, if you'll forgive the hyperbole. I finally viscerally understand how those tiny little grenades being drone dropped can be so effective. Man. I get that in a tank you're safe in all that armor, but I'd feel trapped in the world's biggest target. I would freak out if somebody ordered me into a tank.

@MrJdsenior 2 года назад

Me too. It wouldn't be that difficult to arm and thicken those top covers, as well, and have assisted opening, but just one more thing to go bad or not function after a survivable hit, if you want/need to get out quickly. I know earlier weapons like Copperhead targeted the base of the turret, and dumb weapons are less likely to hit from the top, except maybe in high rise city locations. If you heavily arm the entire tank they become much heavier, requiring larger motors, heavier stronger track systems and turret driving and support systems, all of it cascades, and obviously their fuel range becomes greatly diminished. Design is always trade offs and compromises off one requirement against another, functionality, or for practicality, producibility, logistical considerations, etc. It is virtually 'we'd like to do everything we want' and you get it. Taking it to the absurd, it is hard (well nigh impossible) to make one vehicle to accomplish the functions of a helicopter and a submarine. Impossible at any real scale, actually.

@leibniz4455 2 года назад

When it comes to war, I would choose my In-law's as spotters to help me operate the Javelin.

@davidroosa4561 2 года назад

careful, they might call in an airstrike on your head

@robertwhyte5078 2 года назад

I think the answer is you want lots of both in your arsenal.

@GalaxyFur Год назад

The Ukrainians using them both say they are excellent. The Javelin has also proven effective at taking down Russian aircraft and helicopters. The NLAW has been used big time in the inner cities of Ukraine to great effect. Both have proven themselves equally potent. But they really are designed for specific types of warfare. The Javelin is ultimately a more powerful weapon. But due to its size and design, it's not suited for close combat.

@Nialletto 2 года назад

Very informative - thank you.

@cccowboy2576 2 года назад

It’s not a problem to use Javelin if someone else is picking up the tab... 😂

@jacobshahan6912 2 года назад

"especially when someone else is picking up the tab" 😂😂

@maximusultra1847 2 года назад

The thumbnail with queeny with NLAW is epic .

@rikulappi9664 2 года назад

Terrain! The forests and hills in Finland make it difficult to find ranges in excess of 800m. Typical distances are 50-500m. We use NLAW. (and Spike.)

@gustavmeyrink_2.0 2 года назад

Why waste money on NLAWs when you can get the Panzerfaust 3 for a lot less? One single use NLAW costs $30 000. The reuseable aiming/trigger unit of the PzF 3 costs $11 000 and each subsequent rocket only $300. So for the price of one NLAW you can get one PzF3 trigger unit and 63 rockets. The range is quite comparable: For the PzF 3 IT-600 it is 600m for moving targets with a 90% hit rate.

@arandomzergling928 Год назад

Well In my opinion it still doesn't matter anyways because russian armor is still being destroyed. They fought the NLAW and the NLAW won.

@DB-zk1tw Год назад

I'll pay that.

@alifr4088 Год назад

@Talorc MacAllan lmao

@Ianmundo Год назад

both are a bargain if you can take out an armoured vehicle, but I wouldn’t want to get too close to a MBT, Javelin’s standoff range is a brilliant feature

@danielc2701 Год назад

Yeah but in reverse, LAWs are given out 2 per squad. Javelin is a dedicated AT weapon, the NLAW is the weapon you give out en-mass.

@waynesworldofsci-tech 2 года назад

Add the Stugna to your comparison. It’s a neat system.

@michaelhowell2326 2 года назад

The At4 has gone down hugely in cost. They were $18Kish around 2007.

@GreenBlueWalkthrough 2 года назад

Same with the Javlin around 2009 they were 1 million each.

@arwing20 2 года назад

On the whole, I'll take the NLAW over the Javelin. My reason being that, not only can the NLAW one shot any armoured vehicle its likely to meet, with the added benefit of it being able to be fired indoors. And of course the price makes it a no brainer. I'd rather be able to equip my entire army with NLAWs vs only being able to equip a handful of units with the Javelin. Economics trump most things when it comes to fighting wars

@Aphichat. 2 года назад

Having a javelin has many benefit. You can take out heli and tank at long range. With a fire system, give benefit to fire at night, with thermal. That is, why most western use both.

@justinmccarthy2195 2 года назад

The N-LAW range is well within the effective range of all enemy small arms and heavy machine guns mounted on tanks, supporting vehicles or carried by accompanying infantry. It has its role. But, the Javelin provides an offensive tank killer well out of range of everything but a tank's main gun. Survivability of anti-tank team is much higher with Javelin. It would be interesting to compare Javelin with Ukraine's indigenous STUGNA-P guided anti-tank missile. I believe it has greater range and comparable warhead. But, needs to be guided onto target.

@Adohleas 2 года назад

NLAW for urban and close targets, Javelin open terrain and moving targets. Right now the Donbas region has large stretches of open terrain so in those areas you will want the Javelin.

@ianworley8169 2 года назад

Given the price, maybe the question should be, Javelin or 3 NLAWS (or 10 Panzerfaust 3s)

@captainamerica9028 2 года назад

It just depends on how much a country values its soldiers. If they value the safety of their soldiers, they'll pay more and get a Javelin where they can fire it from a safe distance of 4.5 kilometers. Firing a NLAW or one of the other missiles at 600 meters is playing with fire. Do it enough times and you'll be burned. Being that close to a column of tanks is suicide.

@looinrims 2 года назад

Javelin NLAW I don’t even think has a shot:pen ratio of 3:1 but I could be wrong

@ianworley8169 2 года назад

@@looinrims No, you're quite right. After a search on Google the Javelin is $176,000. An NLAW is $30-40,000. Obviously the cost ratio is between 6:1 and 4.5:1. No doubt the Javelin's re-usable, although personally I'd rather shoot and scoot, rather than lug the Javelin. And no doubt a longer range, more powerful bit of kit, but not six times as good. The rate those Orcs are piling over the border, I think the Javelin is probably best left for more high value targets and use more NLAWS, bang for bucks. Those PF3's are a lovely piece of kit too. Especially in urban settings. Interesting chat bro.

@looinrims 2 года назад

@@ianworley8169 the difference to me is how confident are you in that tank column heading towards your ambush point is going to be sufficiently thwarted by weapons with less than half pen rates, especially at that range, at least javelin is a Km+ class weapon so even if somehow javelin didn’t kill what it found, you’ll be long gone before the gunners get into retribution mode. Besides, javelin makes a bigger visual boom than the others, this is nigh pointless for actual combat, but could prove even more effective psychologically than a smaller explosion, but that’s a bit subjective Of course I wouldn’t want to be the poor sod lugging the thing but under American doctrine you should have 3 people lugging it anyway so it isn’t as awful and frankly if you’re in a situation where you *need* a javelin, lugging it is the least of your worries I’d assume Then again I’m not fighting the Russians, so perhaps I’m wrong

@DrBockNstein 2 года назад

This is one of the best videos I've ever seen on the subject of either of these systems.

@MrRusty-fm4gb 2 года назад

Bro, Is that the queen of England with a javelin in the thumb?! 😂😂😂

@ryananggoro493 2 года назад

And Biden 😂

@mileschang796 2 года назад

Former Navy SEAL Andy Stumpf would go on patrols in Afghanistan with two javalins on his back and used them as precision mortars on unsuspecting insurgents who were out of small arms reach.

@LASSEFITTA 2 года назад

Sure he did, for 200000$ a shot. I call bs!

@mileschang796 2 года назад

@@LASSEFITTA Well, no body was using them and they were just sitting there collecting dust while he was trained on the CLU so why not.

@BlacksmithBets 2 года назад

@@LASSEFITTA the uk uses it in the same way, it’s a small price to safely kill an enemy. Especially when you have hundreds lying around

@arthurmoore9488 2 года назад

@@LASSEFITTA DOD procurement is it's own world. Sometimes something relatively inexpensive, but needed by all is impossible to get. On the other hand, PCARS and associated systems are a nightmare. So, it's significantly easier for everyone to just use consumables, like ammo, than it is to try to return it unused.

@greygray6230 2 года назад

@@LASSEFITTA lol you suffer from Dunning Kruger effect

@Shinzon23 2 года назад

I don't know.... one has the Queen of England holding it whilst wearing her finery, and the other one doesn't

@TheMrPeteChannel 2 года назад

Long live the Queen!

@joeblowe8140 2 года назад

@@TheMrPeteChannel Blech...

@thepetrologist 2 года назад

This was a perfectly balanced video and the abstraction level was even throughout. This topic can easily become a rabbit hole where I would start reading about Spike ATGM, AT4, Panzerfaust etc. And also start reading about infantry support tactics, countermeasure systems and main battle tank development over time.

@robspecht9550 2 года назад

Only one way to find out, a 17th Century style duel at 10 paces.

@TheChodax 2 года назад

NLAW wins due to premature ejaculation of the ordinance! Javelin can go longer but also takes longer to get a round off! #splat!

@AndrewPreston2 2 года назад

I've never seen this channel before, but as soon as I saw this sock puppet I Died laughing. So awesome. Will be coming back to watch!!

@theimmortal4718 Год назад

An advantage that the Javelin has is the thermal + magnification of the CLU. We use it as a scouting observation device all the time without the missile. Its a great tool for scouting ahead for our heavy armored vehicles. A fire team with a CLU is more difficult to spot than a vehicle

@oldworldpatriot8920 2 года назад

I love how the British weapon has the queen instead of BJ

@StevenSmith-mk5fg 2 года назад

It's because BJ isn't head of state. Head of state and it's Biden vs the Queen. The US doesn't have a PM ofc. Some countries have both

@rbstevns1534 2 года назад

Can you imagine being a Russian soldier thinking they are invincible then having this happen. 60 Russians killed crossing a bridge, military planning ,tactics and logistics are not part of the Russians game plan

@fromfareast3070 2 года назад

Javeline is best in terms of damage. But it's 6-8 times more expensive($240,000 PER MISSILE) than NLAW (30,000-40,000$ per unit) In comparison: Ferrari 812 Superfast with its full exterior and interior bodywork and engine tuning, costs €150,000.

@24YOA 2 года назад

That cost may not be a factor. It's probable USA is selling Ukraine Javelins for extreme discounts, or for free.

@Thor_Odinson 2 года назад

Please do a video on NATO vs Russian artillery.......especially since this will become critical in the fighting for Donbas.

@Sterben026 2 года назад

Both are great at what they do! NLAW is more cost effective but Javlin keeps infantry at range negating counter infantry from protecting tanks.

@danielpearson482 2 года назад

Tanks in a open field are just waiting for javelin missles. However tanks trying to take a city are just swarmed by nlaws. Best way to really pictures this is on a assault on a city. Javelin misses will hit the tanks on the way to the city. But once the tanks have entered the city, then the nlaw is the one to use.

@dekardkain5469 2 года назад

Exactly - just visualize a British soldier and a US soldier fistbumping while simultaneously saying "I got you, bro."

@sopissedoff Год назад

If a friendly country gives you 5500 NLAWS,or anything else for that matter , don't ask questions ,demand that the eu and NATO reimburse that country for having the balls to help while them 2 organisation proved incompetent,🇬🇧♥️🇺🇦