Voters in Florida will have the opportunity to vote “yes” or “no” to legalize adult-use marijuana in November. If at least 60% of voters approve the measure, it would open the recreational marijuana market to consumers.
Cannabis should be absolutely just as legal and easy to obtain anywhere as alcohol currently is. In every single state. No exceptions. It's so easy: As legal and easy to obtain/use as alcohol currently is. Why hold relatively benign, often healing cannabis to any sort of irrational, stricter double standard than perfectly legal alcohol?
Legalize Federally Nationwide Right Now & Treat Relatively Benign Cannabis Exactly Like We Treat Far More Dangerous Alcohol. Perfectly Legal In All States!
@BillyCrystal-hc5jp Try selling your lame reefer madness bs and stereotypes to Bill Gates, Carl Sagan, Oprah Winfrey, several presidents of the U.S.A. amongst countless other very successful people who have admitted to enjoying cannabis. A long list of successful people have admitted to partaking in cannabis in their lives, including: BILL GATES “As for drugs - well, Gates was certainly not unusual there. cannabis was the pharmaceutical of choice…” (Source: Gates: How Microsoft's Mogul Reinvented an Industry--and Made Himself the Richest Man in America) PRESIDENT GEORGE W. BUSH "I wouldn't answer the cannabis questions. You know why? Because I don't want some little kid doing what I tried." (Source: New York Times) OPRAH WINFREY "To kick things off, [television show host Andy Cohen] asked the last time Winfrey had smoked cannabis. 'Uh … 1982,' Winfrey replied. 'Let's hang out after the show,' Cohen joked. 'Okay,' Winfrey laughed. 'I hear it's gotten better.'" (Source: Bravo) PRESIDENT BILL CLINTON "I experimented with cannabis a time or two." (Source: RU-vid) ASSOCIATE SUPREME COURT JUSTICE CLARENCE "The White House said today that Judge Clarence Thomas, President Bush's Supreme Court nominee, had smoked cannabis while in college." (Source: New York Times) STEPHEN COLBERT "First, [in high school], I smoked a lot of pot...and that’s how I got to know the people ‘half in’ the society of my high school and we waved at each other over the bong. Then I got to know people by making jokes.” (Source: San Francisco Chronicle Interview (January 2006)) JON STEWART “Do you know how many movies I wrote when I was high?” JOHN KERRY "Yes." [In response to the question: "Which of you are ready to admit to having used cannabis in the past?"] (Source: On The Issues) GEORGE SOROS "He said he had tried cannabis, enjoyed it, 'but it did not become a habit and I have not tasted it in many years.'" (Source: Reuters, 2/6/97) BILL MAHER "Look, I have never made a secret of the fact that I have tried cannabis... About 50,000 times." (Source: RU-vid) GOV. ANDREW CUOMO "I did experiment with cannabis when I was a youth." (Source: New York Daily News) SEN. RAND PAUL (Source: GQ Magazine) SANJAY GUPTA "I have tried it." (Source: CNN) GEORGE CLOONEY “The owner of a local cannabis café told reporters George Clooney was no stranger there.” (Source: The Weed Blog) MAYOR MICHAEL BLOOMBERG ''You bet I did. And I enjoyed it.'' (Source: New York Times) The list goes on and on.
@BillyCrystal-hc5jp Name calling and as in this case here, stereotyping. It's all that prohibitionists have left to offer society since virtually every piece of cannabis propaganda out there has been thoroughly debunked, and completely dismissed by a smarter than prohibitionists thought public. Nobody can provide a real reason to continue the "War on Cannabis" because there isn't one. You know, a little live and let live goes a real long way towards ensuring a very long, stress and anger free life. If somebody doesn't approve of cannabis, then by all means, that person shouldn't consume cannabis. Nobody is ever going to force anybody to consume cannabis that doesn't desire to. Plain and simple. Problem solved. Let's allow other hard-working, tax paying adults to make their own choices about cannabis. The government has no business attempting to legislate morality by creating victim-less cannabis "crimes" because it simply doesn't work and has already cost the taxpayers a fortune.
@BillyCrystal-hc5jp Believing in and pushing ridiculously dumb anti-cannabis Reefer Madness Rhetoric are low "I.Q. activities". "Cannabis is 114 times safer than drinking alcohol" "Cannabis may be even safer than previously thought, researchers say" "Cannabis may be even safer than previously thought, researchers say New study: We should stop fighting Cannabis legalization and focus on alcohol and tobacco instead By Christopher Ingraham February 23 Compared with other recreational drugs - including alcohol - Cannabis may be even safer than previously thought. And researchers may be systematically underestimating risks associated with alcohol use. Those are the top-line findings of recent research published in the journal Scientific Reports, a subsidiary of Nature. Researchers sought to quantify the risk of death associated with the use of a variety of commonly used substances. They found that at the level of individual use, alcohol was the deadliest substance, followed by heroin and cocaine." -Washington Post "The report discovered that Cannabis is 114 times less deadly than alcohol. Researchers were able to determine this by comparing the lethal doses with the amount of typical use. Through this approach, Cannabis had the lowest mortality risk to users out of all the drugs they studied. In fact-because the numbers were crossed with typical daily use-Cannabis is the only drug that tested as "low risk." -Complex
The issues with the legal Cannabis market are overtaxation and overregulation. If Florida does pass it find a tax rate that is fair for business owners and on regulation find a way to keep quality but not putting the boot on the industry. The only reason why the black market thrives is prices. Overtaxation is what brought the black market to the spotlight.
It takes a special kind of evil to want to inprison people for possessing plants. I wish Desantis was a Christian man who respected our inalienable God given right to use any plant.
My family friends and community vote yes for amendment 3. This will really better all of us. It seems like it's mainly the police judges and prosecutors that oppose for thier own monetary gain. We the people must take this stand in florida.
Not it ain't at all, i've personally captured insect holes on it, which means more « $anitory produ¢t$ » on top of greed justifying the sell of such mari-¢a¢a...
I wonder why Trulive wasn’t available? Pretty sure they’re lobbying it the most. I mean they’re the Florida Walmart of cannabis y’all dropped the ball lowkey
It's actually no surprise that most sane, rational reasonable intelligent Floridians fully support the legalization of relatively benign cannabis and treating cannabis just like far more dangerous and deadly yet completely legal everywhere, alcohol. Regardless of the lobbying by Trulive of any other entity, there is no rational denying the fact that the vast majority of all Americans, including all Floridians very strongly support full cannabis legalization nationwide. The prohibitionist view on cannabis legalization is the viewpoint of an ever-so-rapidly shrinking lunatic-fringe-minority of the American people.
@@hammyhamhamster5993 Right. People against cannabis because they bought all the malicious propaganda against cannabis, will twist every bit of information they can to demonize cannabis and they will also just outright lie. I do not trust any politician who is against cannabis, it is an obvious trait that proves they are liars.
Ending the criminalization, arrest, incarceration, life long permanent criminal records, prosecution and persecution of American citizens for choosing to enjoy and possess cannabis always has been and always will be the main reasons for cannabis legalization. End of discussion for most cannabis users and also for most Americans who don't even use cannabis, period. We all have loved ones (sons, daughters, brothers, sisters, mothers, etc...) and friends whom have been criminalized over relatively benign cannabis and it needs to end now!
maybe if you paid attention to what he actually said you'd see he's against a market monopoly. Which is something I've been trying to get through to all you weed heads but seems your only concern is weed.
@@jeffhucle6436 Name calling and stereotyping. It's all that prohibitionists have left to offer society since virtually every piece of cannabis propaganda out there has been thoroughly debunked, and completely dismissed by a smarter than prohibitionists thought public. Nobody can provide a real reason to continue the "War on Cannabis" because there isn't one. You know, a little live and let live goes a real long way towards ensuring a very long, stress and anger free life. If somebody doesn't approve of cannabis, then by all means, that person shouldn't consume cannabis. Nobody is ever going to force anybody to consume cannabis that doesn't desire to. Plain and simple. Problem solved. Let's allow other hard-working, tax paying adults to make their own choices about cannabis. The government has no business attempting to legislate morality by creating victim-less cannabis "crimes" because it simply doesn't work and has already cost the taxpayers a fortune. What we certainly don't need are anymore people who feel justified in appointing themselves to be self-deputized morality police. We are very capable of choosing for ourselves if we want to consume cannabis, a far less dangerous choice over alcohol, and we definitely don't need anyone dictating how we should live our own lives. We can't just lock up everyone who does things prohibitionists don't personally approve of. Fear of Cannabis Legalization Nationwide is unfounded. Not based on any science or fact whatsoever. So please prohibitionists, we beg you to give your scare tactics, "Conspiracy Theories" and "Doomsday Scenarios" over the inevitable Legalization of Cannabis Nationwide a rest. Nobody is buying them anymore these days. Okay? Furthermore, if all prohibitionists get when they look into that nice, big and shiny crystal ball of theirs, while wondering about the future of cannabis legalization, is horror, doom, and despair, well then I suggest they return that thing as quickly as possible and reclaim the money they shelled out for it, since it's obviously defective. The prohibition of cannabis has not decreased the supply nor the demand for cannabis at all. Not one single iota, and it never will. Just a huge and complete waste of our tax dollars to continue criminalizing citizens for choosing a natural, non-toxic, relatively benign plant proven to be much safer than alcohol. If prohibitionists are going to take it upon themselves to worry about "saving us all" from ourselves, then they need to start with the drug that causes more death and destruction than every other drug in the world COMBINED, which is alcohol! Why do prohibitionists feel the continued need to vilify and demonize cannabis when they could more wisely focus their efforts on a real, proven killer, alcohol, which again causes more destruction, violence, and death than all other drugs, COMBINED? Prohibitionists really should get their priorities straight and/or practice a little live and let live. They'll live longer, happier, and healthier, with a lot less stress if they refrain from being bent on trying to control others through Draconian Cannabis Laws.
@@jeffhucle6436 The same exact thing can be said about anything. Most definitely including federal legal everywhere: Alcohol, caffeine, sugar, nicotine and many narcotic prescription medications. So why must he hold relatedly benign cannabis to any sort of stricter double standard than alcohol and every other perfectly legal thing that can far greater make people lose control of their perceptions if irresponsibly used? "Cannabis is 114 times safer than drinking alcohol" "Cannabis may be even safer than previously thought, researchers say" "Cannabis may be even safer than previously thought, researchers say New study: We should stop fighting Cannabis legalization and focus on alcohol and tobacco instead By Christopher Ingraham February 23 Compared with other recreational drugs - including alcohol - Cannabis may be even safer than previously thought. And researchers may be systematically underestimating risks associated with alcohol use. Those are the top-line findings of recent research published in the journal Scientific Reports, a subsidiary of Nature. Researchers sought to quantify the risk of death associated with the use of a variety of commonly used substances. They found that at the level of individual use, alcohol was the deadliest substance, followed by heroin and cocaine." -Washington Post "The report discovered that Cannabis is 114 times less deadly than alcohol. Researchers were able to determine this by comparing the lethal doses with the amount of typical use. Through this approach, Cannabis had the lowest mortality risk to users out of all the drugs they studied. In fact-because the numbers were crossed with typical daily use-Cannabis is the only drug that tested as "low risk." -Complex
Okay, this is exactly how it went down: Desantis held a little reefer madness laced "prayer meeting". Holding hands and closing their eyes with all his irrational GOP buddies, DeSantis frantically pleaded to help him defeat "The Devils Lettuce" initiative. He then threw in a few desperately urgent and whiny-sounding "What About the Children?" crying-pleas. Then he passed around the donation jar. Afterwards, they all headed out on their very expensive private yachts to their favorite bars on the waterfront in Miami. Where they ogled young women in bikinis and then proceeded to get smashed drunk AF. Then they got really emotional and complained some more in unison like little crybabies and little spoiled rotten brats about "The Devil's Lettuce", pesky women and their abortion rights and voters in general having way too much freedom to choose for themselves. Then they all got even drunker and more obnoxious feeling morally superior. Then they all started to slap those women's butts in those bikinis and then complained even more about whatever other freedoms pisses them off, since so many other freedoms do these days....
PLEASE DO YOUR REASEARCH AND CRITACL THINKING THIS WILL MAKE CANNABIS EXSPENSIVE !!!! We are a tourist state if tourist can buy cannabis the demand will skyrocket higher than Florida can keep up with thus driving up the price plus you will be paying TAX - Theres no HOME GROW mean VOTE NO -
Again: Ending the criminalization, arrest, incarceration, life long permanent criminal records, prosecution and persecution of American citizens for choosing to enjoy and possess cannabis always has been and always will be the main reasons for cannabis legalization. End of discussion for most cannabis users and also for most Americans who don't even use cannabis, period. We all have loved ones (sons, daughters, brothers, sisters, mothers, etc...) and friends whom have been criminalized over relatively benign cannabis and it needs to end now!
O course because he is an irrational GOP prohibitionist who doesn't have the brain power nor balls to ever think for himself. That's the reasons why, it's obviously, "O course". The rest of us sane, intelligent, reasonable, rational Americans without an obvious irrational anti-cannabis agenda realized long ago that there never was a real, valid reason for criminalization of cannabis users and that historical facts prove that the entire reasoning behind cannabis being illegal was racism and so that Henry Anslinger could create new scapegoat to demonize after alcohol prohibition was repealed. So Richard Nixon could criminilze blacks, Mexicans and hippies, and anyone else he saw as a threat, and that's historical fact. Cannabis prohibition and the schedule one status was never based upon public saftey nor any real danger posed by consuming relatively benign cannabis. This is in most all history books. Why do Desantis and other prohibitionists think we are not going to notice and just completely ignore the true facts of our real American history over their pathetic lies and obvious Reefer Madness Rhetoric?
@@princessaly9507 gateway to what? The fridge? Please stop talking karen. And no it doesn’t ruin people’s lives. Nobody’s listening to people like you anymore.
Stop encouraging the use of dumb Reefer Madness Rhetoric, silly fear mongering over the inevitable legalization of relatively benign cannabis and also please stop encouraging the use of such obvious scare tactics such as intentionally throwing relatively benign cannabis under the umbrella term "drugs" in hopes of fear mongering the public further. By deliberately trying to conflate cannabis with many other far more deadly drugs that typically the public tends to fear and rightfully so, far more than relatively benign cannabis. Sound fair and reasonable? Stop encouraging these deceitful and desperate scare tactics/aka Reefer Madness Rhetoric. All just because you personally have an irrational moral dilemma with allowing other adult Americans the choice to legally enjoy relatively benign cannabis without constant threat of lifelong incrimination, prosecution and persecution over it. You don't personally morally approve of cannabis use? Then simply: Don't use cannabis. Your entire little problem with cannabis has been completely solved and resolved you for Lil-Nimby, your welcome!
"Nah," Legalize federally now. What's legal to possess and consume in over half of the populated areas of The United States should not make you a criminal in states still being governed by woefully ignorant prohibitionist politicians. Cannabis consumers in all states deserve and demand equal rights and protections under our laws that are currently afforded to the drinkers of far more dangerous and deadly, yet perfectly legal, widely accepted, endlessly advertised and even glorified as an All-American pastime, alcohol. Plain and simple! Legalize Nationwide Federally Now!
For those of you not familiar with how medical cannabis is authorized and dispensed in Florida, it's basically recreational cannabis with extra steps. Officially legalizing recreational use is unlikely to make a big difference in the number of people using it now. It will however, take away an excuse for giving minorities a felony record, thus preventing them from voting against the GOP.
@BillyCrystal-hc5jp Did you look that up yourself, Doctor Google? Go on and tell that happy horse sh1t to cancer patients and people suffering with depression, PTSD or anxiety.
It's a known fact a drunk driver is more dangerous than a stoned driver. The drunk driver has had liquid courage and pushed us that pedal down to the floor and goes way over the speed limit like that black guy in that exotic car that was doing 120 miles an hour and killed that woman and her little dog. Where is a stone driver where the passenger says oh my god dude there's a cop speed up you're going too slow. Now remember speed kills and car crashes would you rather have a dent in your bumper or the whole car torn in half. The drunk driver kills the stoned driver bumps your fender., I'm 60 years old I've witnessed enough of both to compile a truthful observation.
Many people are afraid to say that on the record, especially as a politician, law-maker or anyone in a court setting. Some people, especially a first timer, could consume cannabis is a massive dose and drive unsafe because they intentionally choose to block out focusing on driving while they drive. Because of this possibility, people do not want to admit that driving on cannabis is perfectly safe for people who use it on a daily basis. People who consume cannabis all the time in a responsible dosage, can drive 100% safe and possibly even safer than if they were sober from cannabis, since they can put themselves on more alert of their surroundings. You have to know yourself and know when it is and isn't safe to drive. Someone heavily drunk, is NEVER safe to drive and it is proven that they are far more dangerous drivers than sober people. One statistic that the evil people like to do, is claim that car accidents from stoned drivers goes up in states where it is legal. This is equivalent to saying the number of people in car accidents with coffee have skyrocketed since Star Bucks came around. You could also say that wearing a certain color shirt is a specific location, during a specific timeframe, shows an increase in car accidents. You could also say that "since we have had a governor of a specific political party, we have had a skyrocket of car accidents". Let's say there are 100 car accidents a month and 5 of those people are high on cannabis. Now let's say 20 people a month are in a car accident since they made it legal. Then you can claim that 4 times as many car accidents since weed was legal. However, what if the intentionally missing data was, that the monthly car accidents have also gone from 100 a month down to 75 a month. Well, now you can say that stoned drivers are reducing the number of monthly car accidents by 25%. Dishonest people give dishonest information to people to manipulate them, like Ron DeSantis does.
Legalizing Cannabis will not create a massive influx of marijuana impaired drivers on our roads. It will not create an influx of professionals (doctors, pilots, bus drivers, etc..) under the influence on the job either. This is a prohibitionist propaganda scare tactic. Truth: Responsible drivers don't drive while impaired on any substance period! Irresponsible drivers are already on our roads, and they will drive while impaired regardless of their drug of choice's legality. Therefore, legalizing cannabis will have little impact on the amount of marijuana impaired drivers on our roads. The same thing applies to people being under the influence of cannabis on the job. Responsible people do not go to work impaired, period. Regardless of their drug of choice's legality.
@@FusionDeveloper Correct and in reality: What has actually occurred in states that have legalized cannabis is that law enforcement agencies statewide immediately and vigorously began a new policy of testing more drivers than they ever did before legalization occurred for residual trace amounts of THC. Which remain detectable in a driver's system for up to months after consuming cannabis. This obviously in no way proves actual impairment at the time a driver is pulled over. So for instance, the police get to the scene of a roadside accident with a fatality. The driver at fault, is let's say for example three times over the legal alcohol BAC limit, but the police also insist on a test for cannabis. Although bear in mind, with a BAC three times over the legal limit for booze and with all the obvious tell-tale signs of impairment, it's plain for all to immediately see, and know, that alcohol was the drug responsible for this tragedy.... Residual trace amounts of THC are detected in the driver's system after the police conclude their very specific and intentional policy driven test for those residual trace amounts of THC. A month prior to being pulled over, the driver consumed a little cannabis socially with friends... Obviously, the joint or two from a month ago had nothing to do with this fatal and tragic accident, but the booze the driver drank at the bar before he got into his car that very same night most certainly did. Law enforcement now marks off this accident as another cannabis "INVOLVED" fatality in order to bolster their bogus statistics. Prohibitionists always use terms like "INVOLVED" , "RELATED" or "LINKED" when they tout these horrific sounding statistics and claims. Because they can't ever prove cannabis impairment alone to be the actual "CAUSE". In states that have now legalized cannabis, when you get into an accident whether at fault or not at fault even, pulled over for speeding or for anything at all, law enforcement policy will automatically also require that the police administer that very same test for residual trace amounts of THC from up to months prior to being pulled over. Which again, in no way proves impairment whatsoever and then the results are added on as just another one of their bogus cannabis "INVOLVED/RELATED"/LINKED" statistics. This is nothing more than merely another prohibitionist scare tactic. The goal being to frighten and alarm the public back into the strict prohibition of cannabis. Well guess what? The public isn't buying it and everyone sees the deceit by ever more desperate prohibitionist zealots. Hell-bent on keeping cannabis illegal. So, the public is already well aware that when such claims are made about cannabis "INVOLVED/RELATED/LINKED" deaths, they are flat out lies! Nobody is so gullible as to believe these utterly nonsense prohibitionist claims of massive amounts of new cannabis impaired drivers. Now, I challenge all anti-cannabis prohibitionist types publicly yet again: Please provide us proof of just one single roadway fatality proven one hundred percent to have been "CAUSED" (Not "INVOLVED/ Not "RELATED"/Not "LINKED") by cannabis impairment and only cannabis impairment, alone. The public is waiting for prohibitionists to provide indisputable proof of just one such death "CAUSED" directly and solely by cannabis impairment, alone. Just one. (Not even the massive influx prohibitionists claim. Just one.) We'll wait....and wait...and wait....While we all know they simply can't. Because it's all just propaganda, lies, and scare-tactics. *yawns* Next?
Ehhhhh......pothead can be dangerous when they travel new roads. But in reality crap drivers in a rush are the reason for 95% of all fatalities. No litigation for impatience nor stupidity.
Legalizing Cannabis will not create a massive influx of marijuana impaired drivers on our roads. It will not create an influx of professionals (doctors, pilots, bus drivers, etc..) under the influence on the job either. This is a prohibitionist propaganda scare tactic. Truth: Responsible drivers don't drive while impaired on any substance period! Irresponsible drivers are already on our roads, and they will drive while impaired regardless of their drug of choice's legality. Therefore, legalizing cannabis will have little impact on the amount of marijuana impaired drivers on our roads. The same thing applies to people being under the influence of cannabis on the job. Responsible people do not go to work impaired, period. Regardless of their drug of choice's legality. Irresponsible employees already share our workplaces and they will come to work impaired regardless of their drug of choice's legality. Contrary to what prohibitionists are so desperately trying to get the public to believe wholeheartedly and without question, legalizing cannabis IS NOT adding anything new into our society that wasn't always there and widely available already. Therefore cannabis legalization does not lead to some massive influx of new cannabis consumers. The very same people who have been consuming cannabis during it's prohibition are for the most part the very same ones who will be consuming cannabis when it's legal. The prohibition of cannabis has never prevented cannabis's widespread availability nor anyone from consuming cannabis that truly desires to do so. Cannabis has been ingrained within our society since the days of our founding fathers and part of human culture since biblical times, for thousands of years. So, since cannabis has always been with us and humans already have thousands upon thousands of years worth of experience with cannabis, what great calamities and "Doomsday Scenarios" do prohibitionists really think will happen now due to current legalization efforts that have never ever happened before in all human history? Legalize Nationwide Federally Now!
@@BlackRiggerEBTWelfare Cannabis consumers in all states deserve and demand equal rights and protections under our laws that are currently afforded to the drinkers of far more dangerous and deadly, yet perfectly legal, widely accepted, endlessly advertised and even glorified as an All-American pastime, alcohol. Plain and simple! What's legal to possess and consume in over half of the populated areas of The United States should not make you a criminal in states still being governed by woefully ignorant prohibitionist politicians. Legalize Nationwide Federally Now! What we certainly don't need are anymore people who feel justified in appointing themselves to be self-deputized morality police. We are very capable of choosing for ourselves if we want to consume cannabis, a far less dangerous choice over alcohol, and we definitely don't need anyone dictating how we should live our own lives. We can't just lock up everyone who does things prohibitionists don't personally approve of. Btw and FYI: Name calling and stereotyping. It's all that prohibitionists have left to offer society since virtually every piece of cannabis propaganda out there has been thoroughly debunked, and completely dismissed by a smarter than prohibitionists thought public. Nobody can provide a real reason to continue the "War on Cannabis" because there isn't one. You know, a little live and let live goes a real long way towards ensuring a very long, stress and anger free life. If somebody doesn't approve of cannabis, then by all means, that person shouldn't consume cannabis. Nobody is ever going to force anybody to consume cannabis that doesn't desire to. Plain and simple. Problem solved. Let's allow other hard-working, tax paying adults to make their own choices about cannabis. The government has no business attempting to legislate morality by creating victim-less cannabis "crimes" because it simply doesn't work and has already cost the taxpayers a fortune. "Cannabis is 114 times safer than drinking alcohol" "Cannabis may be even safer than previously thought, researchers say" "Cannabis may be even safer than previously thought, researchers say New study: We should stop fighting Cannabis legalization and focus on alcohol and tobacco instead By Christopher Ingraham February 23 Compared with other recreational drugs - including alcohol - Cannabis may be even safer than previously thought. And researchers may be systematically underestimating risks associated with alcohol use. Those are the top-line findings of recent research published in the journal Scientific Reports, a subsidiary of Nature. Researchers sought to quantify the risk of death associated with the use of a variety of commonly used substances. They found that at the level of individual use, alcohol was the deadliest substance, followed by heroin and cocaine." -Washington Post "The report discovered that Cannabis is 114 times less deadly than alcohol. Researchers were able to determine this by comparing the lethal doses with the amount of typical use. Through this approach, Cannabis had the lowest mortality risk to users out of all the drugs they studied. In fact-because the numbers were crossed with typical daily use-Cannabis is the only drug that tested as "low risk." -Complex
