Another very informative video from you, Thomas. Really great photos and explanations on exposing for the shadows or the highlights, depending on what you want. To me, as someone who has only been shooting film for a little over a year, your videos always seem to answer these kinds of abstract questions I have about how best to measure exposure in different situations. A lot of You Tube photography channels talk a lot but say very little. Your calm demeanor and willingness to take the time to explain things a bit more in detail is greatly appreciated. Plus, when I see your photos it reflects exactly what you have been talking about. Simply the best photography channel on You Tube, in my opinion. Thank you!
Hey, many thanks for your nice feedback. I really appreciate it a lot! It's nice to hear that you also picked up film photography so I hope you have a lot of fun with it!
This is Agfa ASP 400S (aka Aviphot), a traffic surveillance film. Effective ISO is 120 - 160, surely not 400. That's why the grain is so moderate "for a 400". In winter I use it at ISO 200 and sometimes even a bit more to work up the contrast. Remember, 200 and certainly 400 is pushing it! The film develops well in HC-110; Rodinal only up to ISO 120, otherwise too grainy. It reacts quite strongly to yellow and orange filtering, interesting effect. In any case, nice film with character. It used to sell cheaply in bulk rolls and I still have some in the freezer. The JHC price is pure phantasy. You may want to look at Rollei Retro 400 which probably is the same stock but sells for considerably less. -- BTW highlights: If you work hybridly, the concept of blowing them out is practically (almost) meaningless. Wet positive processing is an entirely different matter. Still, try to develop your film for making darkroom prints. Then they will also scan well.
Thanks a lot for your detailed input! Yes I am basically scanning only, the one time when some of my photos are enlarged from the negatives is for large size wall prints. I also am totally NOT an expert in the darkroom or even in film development so I always rely on a professional lab here in Cologne for film development or when creating these analog prints. So your insight is most welcome! Having said all that I shot most photos in this review with the camera (Olympus OM-1, metering re calibrated for modern batteries) set on ISO 400 and it seemed to have worked out well. But yes even slight under exposure created those deep black shadows with no detail at all so if the film’s effective speed is around 120-160 that would explain it perfectly! Thanks also for your information on the different branding and lower price!
Well done Tom - some great street B&W captures! And thank you for introducing us to another B&W film. These alternatives to the big names are thriving, offering something different for the analogue world. I've checked and found I can get it in Australia and at a reasonable (for 2024!) price.
Many thanks for your feedback! And great to hear you can get the film down under. I‘ve shot some more rolls in winter and really enjoy the film. It’s not for everyone and there is a learning curve, but (for me) it’s really worth it! And I agree, these alternatives from smaller businesses are very valuable for the analog community! Cheers to Australia!
@@JantaSaree-gl1uq I see. I am sure there are also great possibilities for street photography in India. I notice that I find photography in my own home town sometimes boring because I see everything there every day. But it could still be something unique and interesting for a stranger!
Many thanks for your feedback! For what it’s worth, after I used up all these rolls of Streetpan 400 during my trip, I purchased a roll of Lomography Berlin 400 at the „Analogue Films“ store in London. What a drastic difference! I see why harsh contrasts are not everything but also have to admit that the amount of grain of the Berlin 400 in 35mm format is too much for my taste. But I am going to try out that film in my Rolleicord hopefully soon! I love creating analog content so I am very happy that videos like this have some friends as well! Normally they get much less views than my reviews of digital gear, but I also notice that videos about analog stuff get more likes per view, so the „fan base“ is definitely there. Many thanks again!
Thanks for your feedback! What I find more interesting than the price alone is that, if I understand it correctly, they sell the same film as ISO 200 instead of 400?
The results look really good. I also like this punchy and contrasts with the dark blacks. The Tipp with the new shop in cologne is also interesting. Maybe I can arrange it to visit the store next time I come to cologne. Cheers! 😊
I think that shop is really focused on providing local service, they don’t seem to be focusing on selling online. So if you’re in Cologne and can make it, definitely worth a visit!
Excellent news, Tom ! Would love to buy a roll or 2 into germany, but haven't spotted it on Fotoimpex yet. Update: being sold out, and it does cost ~14 EUR each 135-36 roll..kinda expensive. @@tomscameras
Great stuff-very nice/gorgeous images and film, really loved it and your explanations❣ (...scrolled back and forward and again...🤩) The london bridge looks amazing, the man looking at the smartphone is really something🤍
I think no. At least here is a source where they state it’s a different film: randomphoto.blogspot.com/2018/05/one-roll-review-jch-street-pan-400.html?m=1
Yes. Actually I totally missed to say anything about it in the video, sorry! I use a K2 yellow filter as default when shooting black & white film during daylight…