Тёмный

Jean-Paul Sartre and Simone de Beauvoir Screener 

Contemporary Arts Media
Подписаться 10 тыс.
Просмотров 164 тыс.
50% 1

Jean-Paul Sartre (1905-1980) and Simone de Beauvoir (1908-1986), two of the most influential and controversial thinkers of our time, are presented in this unique documentary originally broadcast in 1967 and photographed by Michel Brault, one of Canadas most distinguished documentary cameramen and filmmakers. Jean-Paul Sartre addresses a variety of topics: his opposition to the Vietnam War, the purpose and mandate of the Bertrand Russell war crime tribunal he chaired, his reaction to extensive criticism, and his refusal of the Nobel Prize for literature.
Simone de Beauvoir responds straightforwardly to questions. She talks about her ongoing commitment to womens liberation and about the decline of the movement, particularly in France. Her vision of life is optimistic, but her realism in the face of despair is disarmingly lucid.
For the first time, the two allow a candid glimpse into their private lives. They show us the places theyve lived, reveal their thoughts and work habits, and discuss, albeit discreetly, the nature of their relationship. Simone de Beauvoir modestly confides that they agreed to be filmed for all those who have enjoyed their works and all those who will one day read them.
1961, B/W, 60 mins. Transcript available by request.

Опубликовано:

 

9 сен 2024

Поделиться:

Ссылка:

Скачать:

Готовим ссылку...

Добавить в:

Мой плейлист
Посмотреть позже
Комментарии : 43   
@ajsparks87
@ajsparks87 14 лет назад
Interesting to see how he holds his pen. A literary existence for sure.
@cosminpopa5287
@cosminpopa5287 6 лет назад
funny
@TheLisergicQueen
@TheLisergicQueen 9 лет назад
as de Beauvoir said, “The comradeship that welded our lives together made a superfluous mockery of any other bond we might have forged for ourselves.” They were a powerful couple,with independent lives, who met in cafés, where they wrote their books and saw their friends at separate tables… but who maintained a kind of soul marriage.” Whatever your personal views, you need to consider this: The relationship worked for Sartre and de Beauvoir for 50 years.
@aman_insaan
@aman_insaan 2 года назад
That's poetic! That's ideal!
@ramalekshmans
@ramalekshmans 14 лет назад
Only Sartre had the talented eyes to see right and left at a time.
@Dogtles
@Dogtles 2 года назад
Har har
@ethanbenson
@ethanbenson Год назад
It’s so cool hearing him talk about the cemetery he’s buried at in a fond way like that at 1:40
@qualityfruits
@qualityfruits 14 лет назад
this is brilliant! thank you so much for uploading this
@fahedch6785
@fahedch6785 6 лет назад
Merci pour la vidéo , même si cette dernière est courte mais au moin nous informe de ce que nous savons pas sur Sartre et beauvoir.
@jess_chase
@jess_chase 4 года назад
Can someone translate this? (Better than the subtitles added in 1967)
@victoriaschindler1737
@victoriaschindler1737 7 лет назад
adoro esse casal
@TheBraveryGirl
@TheBraveryGirl 15 лет назад
Thank you for posting
@fourclaws
@fourclaws 14 лет назад
i love youtube brilliant, thank you for uploading, goes on my to-buy list straight away
@RuudvdMe
@RuudvdMe 14 лет назад
@RuudvdMe Which means that you should never conceive yourself like an essence (i.e.: 'I'm a depressed person'). You should always remember that you're - in a way - free to alter yourself from this facticity, although you might never do so. Without considering myself an existentialist, it's quite another thing to call it casuistry. As Gilles Deleuze said: (..) Fortunately there was Sartre. Sartre was our Outside, he was really the breath of fresh air from the backyard.
@RuudvdMe
@RuudvdMe 14 лет назад
My last reply out of a 2009 book on B&N by Sartre-scholar 'Sebastian Gardner': Facticity is our fysical, spatio-temporal being in the world and all social, cultural, institutional, political and historical bonds in which we find ourselves. Facticity is everywhere. Sartre was the philosopher of authenticity, not of freedom.
@maxbheath
@maxbheath 13 лет назад
"I think therefore i am. . . a moustache!"
@Eliajayoub
@Eliajayoub 12 лет назад
The translation is really just an approximation of what's being said. Nothing literal
@RuudvdMe
@RuudvdMe 14 лет назад
@infrasleep A comprehensive reading of EN [Being & Nothingness] shows that the fact that you are responsible [sic] for your world doesn't necessarily mean that you are free to do whatever you like. Like you write 'The idea that each individuals will creates existence ignores too many other factors to be a sound idea.' Sartre dinstinguishes both facticity and transcendence in EN for man's possible authenticity. His framework is the idea of man transcending himself towards a possible future.
@chachokeva
@chachokeva 14 лет назад
Not sure I agree with you're POV. Neither will I dismiss it. Im a 50 year old male. As of late, Ive arrived at that point of life where one begins to analyze and scrutinize one's life's work, failures and accomplishments. Without a doubt I can state that the essence of my being is directly proportional to the total sum of choices I've made throughout my life. Were I to couple this with the conscious choice of doing what is responsible, there is no denying the premise of Existentialism.
@infrasleep
@infrasleep 14 лет назад
@scotty123123 Sartre was a pseud, 'Existentialism' is a hopelessly flawed 'philosophy' all the debates on it lead down meaningless cul de sacs. The idea that each individuals will creates existence ignores too many other factors to be a sound idea. The fact that nothing today is discussed from 'The existential viewpoint' shows how naff it was. His 'Roads to Freedom' trilogy are superb, however.
@BlackSabotage100
@BlackSabotage100 11 лет назад
*I do not think ...
@Viperplayer187
@Viperplayer187 14 лет назад
was J P S really under 5'0 tall?
@Tommybgoode
@Tommybgoode 14 лет назад
the translation is balls
@shady4life1991
@shady4life1991 14 лет назад
@Supernovae04 Oh and how aren't we? We're completely free to think and act until these rights are impinged upon by others who don't realise that their own freedom is subject to the freedom of all others. With complete freedom comes complete responsiblity for your actions and that is what you fear. Sartre was more intelligent than you could ever dream of being.
@infrasleep
@infrasleep 14 лет назад
@RuudvdMe Just out of interedt; Gide in 'The Immoralist' outlines that freedom-man's eternal goal-is an impossibility. In order for me (or you or anyone else) to achieve freedom we have to impinge or deny other peoples freedom.(I may want to make love with a girl and demand the freedom to do it;but what of her rights and freedom?)Gide summed this up in a short novel;Sartre just seems to annex this and spend a million more words to arrive at the same house. Is this just cricicism of Sartre?
@anatolyyurkin6635
@anatolyyurkin6635 5 месяцев назад
01:40 "я люблю кладбища" Сартр
@giorgoskallergis6439
@giorgoskallergis6439 9 лет назад
wolves, love JPS. respect.
@mfue92
@mfue92 5 лет назад
Monty Python was slightly right about this couple.
@RuudvdMe
@RuudvdMe 14 лет назад
@infrasleep IF Sartre was all about transcendence, yes, but again: he is not. Sartre [read: part 1, chapter 2 B&N] is about facticity as well, which he knows full well that you sometimes cannot transcend. It has nothing to do with 'buddhist monks', he formulates freedom in a 'negative sense' like Kant. We cannot conceive ourselves as mere 'cogs in a machine' which is why we have the (illusory) feeling of being free.
@Verociel
@Verociel 7 лет назад
I came here from Nier Automata
@infrasleep
@infrasleep 14 лет назад
@RuudvdMe It seems he tries to cover too many bases and ends-as all intellectual philosophers do-in a paradox. Theres something in what he says but Sartre falls into the trap of trying to create a philosophy for everything. He has just produced a theory for something. I loved Sartre's 'Roads to Freedom' trilogy;thats him at his zenith. For me-of modernists-Gide.Yukio Mishima (Sea of Fertility) and Patrick White are far more satisfying than Sartre on the topic of being/nature.
@fietsvriend
@fietsvriend 13 лет назад
Were S d B. and J P S. twin flames?
@infrasleep
@infrasleep 14 лет назад
@RuudvdMe But transcendence means going beyond the normal range of human experience- usually achieved by drugs or religious manias and serve only to give us the illusion of being more than human. Eastern philosophers pre date Sartre by 3000 years exploring the role of free will in mans actions way above Sartres level and with relevence to the human condition. Man has deluded himself -eg with monks/shamen etc that we have some extra gift-take away the luxuries of technology & we're animal again
@infrasleep
@infrasleep 14 лет назад
@chachokeva Again I would say right only up to a point. How many choices aren't decided by our free will ? An existentialist would have to maintain that the 9/11 victims died because of their concious choice to go to work that day;or that African famine victims died as they chose to stay where there was no food, This is where existentialism falls apart-one of many areas, and i agree with critics that Sartres great theory is pure casuistry and only casuists debate it now
@S2Cents
@S2Cents 14 лет назад
@scotty123123 That's hot.
@mangerlentement
@mangerlentement 14 лет назад
poorly translated.
@P0ulpie
@P0ulpie 12 лет назад
@claudiobenassi85 Underage prositution ? You got to be kinding me! :o
Далее
Greatest Philosophers In History | Jean Paul Sartre
20:26
Bacon на громкость
00:47
Просмотров 58 тыс.
Beauvoir: ambiguity and existential ethics
12:00
Просмотров 43 тыс.
Sartre & Beauvoir on Feminism & Relationships
2:45
Просмотров 262 тыс.
Simone de Beauvoir Her Life and Philosophy
56:46
Просмотров 138 тыс.
PHILOSOPHY - Sartre
6:37
Просмотров 3,6 млн
Philosophy Feuds: Sartre vs Camus
3:27
Просмотров 193 тыс.