Jeff Daniels Says "To Kill A Mockingbird" Is A "Right Hook" To White Liberals 

‘Cause, he’s an actor, a good one!

You need an actor this good to do dumb and dumber. Believe me.

It's not just that he was in there. It's that this was an example of one of his scenes: ru-vid.com/video/%D0%B2%D0%B8%D0%B4%D0%B5%D0%BE-b7l6jg4Hlog.html That....or To Kill a Mockingbird. Range =)

wow how can an actor change his moods lets see think of happy , think sad think hot think cold think portray OOOO dat is soooo hard you gotta be kidding me everybody in the world that has been a kid knows how to act

its called lying

FCC has decided that Americans are too sensitive to hear swear words or see partially covered nipples.

Feb 19 babies are passionate people.

They would have bleeped him if it was taped. But last night was live because of the debates and cutting away was their chosen option. Silence and staying on Daniels would have better - we could have read his lips.

@@ZarkowsWorld but mutilated people or mass murder/violence? all a-ok to them! we humans are so screwed up.

He's an actor.

Same. It's like the dad uniform.

Lmfao!

Scott Flaherty it was exposing the media circus. that’s why it ended

It was a fantastic show.

I felt a similar (yet, obviously, not the same) experience with the quite disturbing because real The Loudest Voice with Crowe. Something raw, perhaps, an evil Will McAvoy to some extent. But the fact that it is based and most likely watered down version of true human scums makes it even more memorable, in my opinion.

+Andrew Nibbi ~ My exact thoughts as well, he's been an eye-opening discovery, since finding The Newsroom on Amazon streaming. He interviews really well, too, so it's not that he need's Sorkin's words in his mouth, though it sure can't hurt.

Sorkin found an embodiment for his voice in Daniels. Just as he did in the entire cast of the West Wing headed by Martin Sheen. They aren't just reciting lines, but incarnating them. The previous generation had Gregory Peck as their "conscience". (Taking on racism in "TKAM", anti-Semitism in "Genteman's Agreement", ethics in "The Man in the Grey Flannel Suit", etc.) If you haven't seen it, check out Daniels in the miniseries "The Looming Tower". Not Sorkin, but equally powerful.

He was cast for a reason

Max Max Even more so than Sheen I think. Martin is amazing, but you watch interviews with him, and he’s truly an actor’s actor. Amazing but he is able to hold a distance between himself and his roles and then able to just instantly sink into these legendary parts. Even though Sorkin loves to write for and to actors, Sheen is perfectly comfortable in the fact he shares some values with, but is NOT the kinda guy Bartlet is. Jeff on the other hand, is BUILT for Sorkin. Truly. And he’s so invested in politics and getting fired up about them, he really seems embody Aaron more writing TO someone than them acting to a character he wrote.

lol he was a kept man

YEAH - YEAH

"Mockin' bird now everybody have you heard! He's gonna buy me a mockinbird"

@@MultiKalmer But what if that mocking bird don't sing? -- Can you subpoena a friggin' mocking bird?! -- Does it have immunity?

Yeah! 😂😂😂

Kallermo “Has everybody heard about the bird? Ma-ma-mow, ma-ma, mow, pa-pa Ma-ma-mow, ma-ma, mow, pa-pa.....” 😆😆😆

@Pacino Heat Where are you getting this from? Alex Jones?

Pacino Heat Epstein’s criminality was known for decades. Accusations have been leveled at him, as with Drumpf, for decades. The appetite to prosecute was never there, until Drumpf was elected. It doesn’t take a genius, Alex Jones is no genius.

Pacino Heat 😁 I was trying to say that it doesn’t take a genius to suspect that the number of accusations of pedophilia and/ or sexual abuse, etc. directed at guys like Epstein, Drumpf etc., is likely true. Alex Jones is no genius (nor did he have to be) to put two and two together, so to speak. I guess I tried to summarise this because I knew what I meant, but of course no-one else can read my mind. I just need to be more explanatory.

And sex appeal!

Respectable only when he shares the same view. He interrupts Chris Wallace continually.

Steven Brock 90% of Jeff’s talking points were emotional-based, so your argument doesn’t hold

He's amazingly well-spoken too, and he just got done doing Sorkin, so he still has that flow going through him that's effortless to listen to. ...Plus this was a live show, and when the red light shows, you gotta cut it. So maybe Colbert just thought he'd let him go until the light.

I'm tired of the FCC censoring internet comments like this

oh he did 😈

He gave a flock he was flipping out pinching his seat cushion with his dimpled white ass.

@@arsonfly They didn't, the censored the live broadcast and CBS didn't bother re-editing it. The FCC has no control of RU-vid content.

Compensate to Automate! Yang2020

I'm from Michigan as well but I can't speak for the whole state, only myself. To me, empty promises are still empty. No president can bring manufacturing jobs back. It makes no sense to corporate america at all. Things need to be made well for as little money as possible because we are a consumer driven economy and society. And our country is a part of the world and the world economy. It makes no sense to buy a product at twice the price. Think of it as organic food that costs twice the price or more. Who buys it? A large segment of the population? No. Organic food is a niche market still because of the cost. And Americans are already in debt up to their eyeballs. Things which cost more won't make their lives better. Cars which cost more they can't buy. It just adds to their pile of debt. We aren't in a sustainable economy. It's going to fall apart. So what we need in politicians aren't conmen. We need real human beings who will try and help us the best they can. Who will try and make government responsive to the needs of the 90% and not the 10%. The 10% own all the stocks. They control Wall Street. The 90% own a small portion of the total stocks. They get by, month to month, year to year. And the only thing they can do is turn out and vote to remove the current occupant of the White House. Because any of the democratic candidates are better than him. Those 87,000 that voted for democrats and left the presidential ballot blank gave us Trump. Clinton on her worst day in office would have been far better for the country and the state of Michigan than Trump. She would have created a professional working cabinet. She wouldn't have spent 60% of her day watching Fox News and tweeting. She wouldn't have turned the CBP and ICE into the gestapo. She wouldn't have tried to destroy the ACA to create millions of uninsured. She wouldn't have insulted our allies and embraced Putin. She wouldn't have started needless trade wars with our largest trading partners and threatening others. This is a zero sum game. If you reelect Trump then you will have zero sums in your bank account eventually because he is bankrupting the country. We've coasted off of the efforts of the democrats in 2009 which started a long lasting recovery. Only 3 republicans voted for ARRA. That was at a time when we had a minus 9 GDP and were losing 800,000 jobs a month. Now our unemployment rate is less than 4% and thanks to Trump and republicans in congress our deficit this year will be more than double what it was only 4 years ago. Obama and the democrats inherited a messed up economy and did something to help the American people. TARP reestablished banking stability. ARRA started the recovery. ACA brought insurance to millions who didn't have it and needed it. They spent their political capital on these things to benefit the average person. Trump and the GOP spent their political capital on a huge tax cut for billionaires and millionaires which increased our deficit by at least 150 billion a year. They called it a jobs bill when job growth per month under Trump since then has been less than it was per month under Obama in 2015. And the increase in our GDP was less than half of a percentage point. That's 1.5 trillion in cost for less job growth and a GDP boost less than a half percent. So I plead with all Americans. Please remove Trump from office. Vote for the democratic nominee. They may not be great but they will be better for our country than Trump. He is the American Caligula and he is as much a traitor to this country as Benedict Arnold was.

So the WHOLE country has to suffer because a few people felt this way...sounds fair. She WON by 2 million votes.

yew 2oob I’m not saying it’s fair that she lost -- I’m saying that if you want to win Michigan this is how most people feel. Hillary barely campaigned here and didn’t make the Midwest a serious part of her platform

Hate Spreader who cares

Skiimn77 so because you agree with him politically he’s a great actor? Dumb and dumber sucks lmaooo stop

@@nvm7438 I never saw the movie. But you can stop being Dumb & even Dumber.

Skiimn77 how is it clearly obvious? Because he has an opinion on a tv show nobody watches? Trump will destroy you dumb libs again in 2020!!!

I didn't hear him say a word about Congress.

bedfordnhdonkey preach brother!!! Trump 2020!!! Currently watching to kill a mockingbird on broadway. Atticus definitely leans right yet Jeff Daniels is a looney lefty.

Wow

Well, it's still CBS. Grandpa tv...

@@nivekian More to do with the FCC. You know that government agency that regulates free speech.

What does the FCC have to do with RU-vid.

What did he say when the audio cut out?

Anyone planning a film about Ed Schultz, here's your male lead. Let's get to work!

No, you did not understand him. He really does not know enough - he said he knows what he wants and does not want, he knows why, he can argument that, he is decent - but that is not nearly as enough. If one is to run for a political position the MAIN think that he/she needs to know is how the system works so that they could get SOME things that they want, done. It is NOT a world where nice ideas win you what you want - it is a double crossing hell of political end economic interests, shifting loyalties and shameless lying. If you want to get even the simplest thing done, you need to know by heart how the system works. And that is the fear I have (even though I am not an American) - Lizz and Bernie have very good ideas, and given the fact that they are in various offices for quite some time, I guess they know the system well enough to MAYBE get 10% of their ideas come into life. Because, that is the best they can hope for - political system is inert and it would take generations to come to the point where ideas like theirs could be done to the full. I am not afraid because they will, maybe, manage to get 10% done - that is a HUGE thing for US right now. I am afraid that ideologically blinded and optimistic will see that 10% as a defeat instead of victory. Why? Because that is the exact same thing that happened to Obama. He came with nice talks of change, but once faced with political system, he could barely get anything done. He started pushing in the right direction but people saw it as not enough, a defeat, they wanted it all right there and now, within those 8 years. The moment they saw it ain't comin', they voted for a different type of person. Politics, especially in USA, is an incremental thing, moves very slowly. And the ideological blindness is what will keep US down - people wanting things done right now and if not, it is a defeat, then switching up in the next terms, always going one step forward one step back - while the rest of the world, especially dictatorial countries that are the main enemy (China and Russia) are driving an obstacle free highway behind a single idea. That whole current US mentality that comes with the newer generations, "I want it NOW!" is what will keep the country down. You can't get it now, radical changes take generations to build but years to destroy.

agreed, I think a willingness to learn, integrity, admitting You Don't Know something, are qualities that make anyone a formidable leader

It's not hard to know more than half the politicians in government. It's also not hard to have WAY more common sense than the ones who are smart. I am not slow by any means, but I know a guy who could make me look like an infant with crayons by comparison on tests. If you knew him in real life though, you'd wonder how the hell he doesn't require a legal guardian with him at all times for how stupid and gullible he is.

Robert Cartier Under no circumstances is it enough to be a decent human being. you HAVE to have intellectual capabilities, knowledge and understanding of the world and to know the basics about politics to get things done.

@pammens miss Would you mind telling me (or us) what you comment has to do with either what OP said or what I said?

@Pacino Heat ?

Alex Corll He is a completely out of touch, elitist schmuck. He blamed the entire Midwest for the results of an election, criticizing people that did not vote in 2016 or voted for Donald Trump strictly in protest of career criminal politician Hillary Clinton, he blamed people who lost their fucking jobs in manufacturing for choosing a candidate who wanted to create more manufacturing jobs over one who wanted to cut them. I wish I was as morally superior as Jeff Daniels, I wish I had supported a woman who profited at the expense of poor Haitians, laughed when the child rapist she defended beat a polygraph and was cleared of a rape charge, whose failed foreign policy in Libya led to Americans being murdered which she in then lied about, who terrorized her husbands sexual assault victims, takes six figure speeches on Wall Street where she stresses the importance of having public and private stances on the same issue, intentionally mishandled classified information, and exchanged political favors for cash under the front of a phony foundation. Jeff Daniels hasn’t lost touch?? Are you fucking serious? Holy shit........

But he doesn't live in the bubble lol. He's lived in Michigan for the last several decades. That's why he hasn't lost touch.

I live in Pennsylvania it's the same here. I expect that it is the same in Ohio, Indiana and Wisconsin, too.

@@saintmichael1779 Shout outs from Dayton, Ohio. Ya, we know those feels. All too well.

If you get laid off from a corporation that you’ve worked at for several years, do you not get unemployment benefits, which include a dislocated worker program?

@@saintmichael1779 Yes, Wisco here..

@@21972012145525 It's not having your job!!!

What was the dumb part for you?

Check out Newsroom and you'll be even more amazed.

@@Mediaright ~ Another Sorkin master work. It's a shame it ended too soon, but it was great while it lasted. I'd been aware of Daniels, but didn't really have an opinion of him, but seeing him in The Newsroom (and subsequent interviews), I've become a huge fan. He's the real deal, even w/o Sorkin's words in his mouth.

I’ll never understand why people liked that movie. Ugh it was awful.

Why? he's amazing at comedy and had done several before that.

You mean turn you into a mindless liberal idiot? Guess so...

@@ksteiger if by mindless liberal idiot you mean advocate for appealing to the voters who decided the last election and will decide the next then I think you're wrong. Liberal idiots rage on about Russia and racism and mysoginistic tendencies of as the reasons why they lost instead of blaming their own failed policies such as NAFTA. Daniels said that essentially.

Its the mark of a truly intelligent person when they say they don't know enough.

Damn straight. I like to see books like "To Kill A Mockingbird" banned from schools, which is why I only vote straight Democrat ticket now.

@@rexpimplemyer3839 amen.

but what did he say that got edited out?

@@justincastillogayray It's either a screwup or he cursed. The live shows are on an 8 second delay...I think, maybe logner, but there's no time to do a clean cut like they do usually.

right lol how do I vote for Jeff

@@1famekouby Exactly what is it that you think the Dems can do with the GOP controlling Congress for a decade now, and with Trump promising to veto anything they send him? The House has passed numerous bills since the Dems took it back. The Senate refuses to even vote on them. They don't win because they don't want to. Lol! What sort of bullshit is that? They aren't spending millions of dollars running because they want to lose.

@@1famekouby that's...so incredibly stupid. we're talking about reality, not stupid theories to make yourselves feel better. anyone, on any side, who runs for president has a ego-boosting desire. Anyone who tries to be in charge of anything, politics business even just a household does so due to an ego drive. Sometimes you get a capable person, sometimes you don't but there's always ego. You think they spent all that money and pandered to every group because they want to lose? Come on, you're better than that. "any legitimate pundit" more like any pundit who needs to fill talking time on the air by pulling nonsense out of their ass. They lose because they fail to capture the emotional fervor that the right has. That's just common sense, when one side has the most religious voters and their pastors are telling them to vote for a candidate because he's sent by god then *of course* he's going to win compared to the side that can only say "hey, this is what we think will work, what do you think about it?".

Bernie" I will let terrorist and rapist to vote" Sanders

@@okirrama3587 Blah. Even if that was his stance, which it isn't, it wouldn't match many republican figures. "lets let the people who only have interest in lining their own pockets pay me to make decisions!" I know that this problem is present in both parties, but it's clearly more prevalent in the republican party. So whats the difference? Letting rapists vote so they can vote how THEY want things? Or letting the people who are raping the american people as a whole, pay to make policies how THEY want them? Even based on your incorrect claim, it only brings him down to where the other politicians are playing.

Lol, Bernie wants Americans to have rights! Your argument is a fallacy! But I love seeing how simple trump supporters are.

okir rama You don’t get it. You may never get it. When you eat away the fundamental right to vote and leave it in the hands of those who are try everything in the book to take that right away from you, (guilty or innocent) to protect their base, you have already lost.

"Food lines are a good thing" Bernie Sanders

Your comment reminded me of that line from Dumb and Dumber "You Go And Do Something Like This… And TOOTAAAALLY Redeem Yourself!"

@@GG-kc6ie yes. That is why he fashioned his comment as such.

@@adamyoung7999 how can you be sure it wasn't a coincidence?

@@GG-kc6ie because I recognize patterns and I’m not retarded

@@adamyoung7999 Yeah I'm not sure

One more reason to vote for Bernie. We need a WH that's ...fighting for government by the people ...fighting corporate ownership of government ...AND giving us 4 more years of Colbert's best impressions.

@@dontaylor7315 True.

But can I interest you in The West Wing? ;)

Everything but the last line. Taking a pot shot at millennials when every policy that he was railing about was enacted/voted with baby boomers

@Abigail Slaughter Naw it still is. Remember that its socialists who make these estimations and it's obvious which countries they favor. More pertinently, the socialists that make these estimations aren't the ones who are hard done by the system, and haven't a clue the harm that large governments impose on people.

Better one in Network (1976)

I sorked off twice while watching this clip

Lol.

I wish that sorry Bastard throw a punch at me.

It's good to know he's out there, being strong and in the criminals faces!

@@michaelquarry6433 Of course. You're showing your trash level.

he didnt let it all out something weird was itching him

@@michaelquarry6433 Threw*

I think he would've if not for the fact that this is a live episode.

Oriolez This needs to be sent to all the democratic candidates

he sux as an actor

I completely agree. I could definitely watch a full episode of just Jeff Daniels and Colbert.

Loved him in The Newsroom

Don't go backwards, go forward. Many countries and many areas have been through losing manufacturing. You need to find new areas to make money because competitors will move, produce cheaper and take over market share, so you'll be out of a job either way.

Manufacturing of almost any stripe has to go through environmental permitting with the general understanding, dependent on the type of manufacturing, that they will have emissions of some nature. I understand you desiring a clean environment and most importantly jobs - but you need an understandable medium. If it's too expensive over environmental expectations, the manufacturing, and the jobs, go somewhere else.

Manufacturers were screwed. 100%. But if you look at the data, most of those jobs are lost forever. Automation is here to stay. The reason why I support Andrew Yang is because not only does he recognize the problem, but he has proposed solutions to them. Real, 21st century solutions. That go way beyond just his UBI proposal.

manufacturing jobs arent coming back, A.I cant be stopped

Absolutely brilliant intro music, I to was wondering also how to purchase it, I loved the sound.

It reminds me of an instrumental called Third Wind, by Pat Metheny. The section of the piece that I’m thinking of is near the end of the piece.

Retraining programs have a success rate of less than 15%. With so many jobs being replaced by machines and computers, we need to implement a universal minimum income. Andrew Yang knows this.

@@Neoquaker1 a minimum income isn't bad but retraining programs utilizing new technology is necessary or we lose the entire old workforce.

@@randomness8819 I guess a mix of both would be ideal.

@@randomness8819 If the guy above is correct and retraining has a 15% success rate then its just pissing in the wind.

@Abigail Slaughter Asking why will open a pandoras box that no politician will touch.

Create numerous fake accounts

You could always clarify what you called so much, so that others who agree can also register their likes.

I think most of these candidates are just fighting for a VP nomination. They don't have a chance at POTUS and they know it.

@@riverraisin1 The protracted dog & pony show was okay in the fifties but, with modern mass media and instant communication being the norm, this is going on too long. The opposition needs to start being more sharply focused and defined instead of squandering the limited public attention span on infighting.

@@puirYorick Well said! I cringe at the infighting.

I. K. R.

David Read 🙄

David, READ!

You don’t need to apply for citizenship. Just walk across the border. If you’re a poc Democrats will even give you a bunch of free shit.

whos will mca avoy?

Genevieve then don’t swear and get sued by the fcc on live tv. It’s that simple. If you want that to change, get out there and make it happen. But right now, that would have been a huge problem for Daniels, Colbert and the network.

catalinacurio We have in our English Literature classes in middle school as a reading assignment!

No

yeah, me too!

Agree 100%

Hallelujah!

Ignorant statement because if you actually looked and left your echo chamber you'll see America is going great. Now back into your echo chamber because your TDS gets worse.

@@TheJester39 I couldn't have put that better.

He's an actor. He's voicing the same opinion 99% of actors have. Get a f'n life.

@@jaimesaenz221 - Yes, that's called the truth. Get a f'n education.

Those are just part of the lyrics from a song and an album that talks about how corporate America has been FUCKING over the working man for years.

That song, The Consumer's Song, was released in 1999. The song was talking about outsourcing. In 1999. Think about that. Thats FOUR Presidents ago. Clinton. Bush. Obama. Trump. And the issue remains. And people vote Trump. DEMOCRATS - this MUST be addressed or we WILL lose the next election. And we cannot afford to lose. Another 4 years of Trump will be the end of the USA as we know it. Supreme Court ? Alt-right. For the next 50 years. Federal judges ? The same. Wrongful convictions are going to go to "hanging judges", who have probably put many to death themselves. Executions will increase. Corporate control of the government will be complete. Ivanka Trump will prepare her campaign. And she'll have billions in corporate donations from SuperPACS. Elections will become about corporate control. Your views and opinions as a citizen will mean nothing anymore. The suffering will get worse and worse. The decline of Middle America. The horror of the deportations will increase. Richard Spencer will probably be working in the White House. We are - believe it or not, it's the truth - ALREADY at war with Russia. A cyberwar. This is a new type of war. A new theatre. If you've ever voted, the dictator Putin's GRU and FSB military intelligence will have that information. Putin's network of intelligence is vastly superior to the NSA. Because the NSA is undergoing a serious brain drain. So your name and address and political affiliation (based on voter record) will be in the hands of Russian military intelligence if it's not already. Why ? Because the Republicans will own the nation forever. No Democrat candidate can withstand an opponent with a battle chest of 5 billion dollars (thanks to Johnson and Johnson and all their friends). I can't go on. Its too depressing to think about. And the people who vote Trump are tying the noose around their necks and smiling in blissful ignorance as they walk up to the hangman's dock.

Look into Andrew Yang

Yep. What Jeff Daniels was saying is 100% correct. Andrew Yang deserves the Dem nomination because as Jeff said “Talk to the people of Michigan who lost manufacturing jobs” Yang does, and went two steps further. He’s correctly identified automation as the source, and has solutions tailored to it. The progressive movement has a lot of energy in America socially, but not so much when they’re talking about market realities. The reality is automation is going to end manual labour in advanced countries inside of this next generation. Period. If progressives can’t keep their eyes on that ball, it doesn’t matter if you’re the most morally righteous person in the world. The US and the rest of the developed world are going through a technological revolution that will make the upheaval of the industrial revolution seem like a cakewalk.

The US won't survive automation if they don't provide better access to higher education.

I agree that automation is a big problem, but if our only solution is UBI, then we’re back to feudalism. We cannot give up that easily.

Higher education is great but a lot of those white collar jobs that a college education provides are also subject to automation. We need to get more people into trade schools and certificate programs. The younger generation has been sold a lie that college is the only path to success which is why we have people with degrees and a pile of debt working part time at Starbucks. It's not just the art history majors either.

Yang wants to get rid of the entire welfare system that alot of these people are reliant on. Yang is for the shareholders as much as Trump is my dude.

@@christopherstewart3998 Here's the thing: the current welfare systems that are in place have too much bureaucratic red tape that you need to go through just to receive the benefits. Couple that with the fact that if you get a job again and the gov't finds out that you can financially support yourself or your family again, the benefits will be cut for most of those programs. The pre-conditions are not attractive and does not give the individual a sense of optimism for the future. On the other hand, the Freedom Dividend is given to you NO MATTER YOUR ECONOMIC SITUATION. Sick, healthy, poor, rich, jobless, job... You will (in theory) always receive the $1,000 just for being a citizen of the US; a RIGHT. PLUS: you still come out ahead if you decide to opt-in to the FD, AND it will stack with SSDI; essentially an add on for social security. It's a win-win for the economy and the individual, able to take off the existential and economic stress of those that are just struggling to get by. As to your second question, Yang is not funded by any corporation or Super PACS. He is simply getting by (and I would argue) rising simply on the donations of individuals who see that he is not a charlatan like Trump. The only reason why he is running for president is because of the problems that we are dealing with now, as well as what he foresees if we do not alter our trajectory. The Freedom Dividend is a response to the coming wave of automation and AI that will eradicate the jobs that most people take for granted. What good is a $15 minimum wage or tax cuts to the rich when the every day American can not find a job? He is not concerned with shareholders like Trump: He is concerned about the future of t(his) country, and unlike the other Democrats that are running, he has ideas and solutions that can bring America to a new future in the 21st century. I would hope you can learn a little bit more about him if you haven't already and really dig deep into his broader vision for the country, and I hope my comment was a sufficient response. :) #Yang2020 #YangGang

Why do you say he wants to take aways what these people rely on when he wants to introduce an alternative opt in program?

@@christopherstewart3998 phasing out those broken systems slowly and in the long run is better for progress. Welfare stigma is worse than the concept of a dividend which is empowering.

I’m not American, but Yang 2020!

What kind of job is that?

I think that's what he was implying. You don't necessarily have to lie and say you will/can bring back the old jobs (as he says Trump did). However you do need to talk to them. Give them alternatives (like what you describe above). At least let them know they're not forgotten and just looked down on as a statistic that doesn't matter because 'it's business'. That there is some sort of future for them or their kids.

We could create whole NEW industries by reducing our carbon emissions. They have the technology out there and they need people to work to incorporate saving the planet into our economy. If we do our part in OUR country those jobs would never be taken away, because we are saving ourselves.

@@--enyo-- Exactly. Go to them. Pay attention. Be honest. Don't just talk about compassion and patriotism, talk about policies that show it. They've been told too many easy, comfortable lies and hollow, empty promises.

@@alalalala57 Well, for instance, we need a HELL of a lot more bodies in the recycling centers (and more of them) to separate the different items and properly recycle them into new products. If the government is going to be on a green kick when we boot tramp, there will likely be more funding for things like that.

He’s not blaming the shareholders. He’s blaming the company for putting the shareholders first.

Who tf is HRC? 😂

Darwin award right there.

Cristian Villanueva it was tragic. can u explain how it has anything to do with who is president, tho? Jeff Daniels sure connected those dots