Jiddu Krishnamurti on yoga 

He doesn’t tell you things directly because you need to come to things on your own or you won’t understand what he’s saying regardless. You are not separate from anything in the universe not only that but your internal world is externalized and the act of doing yoga is for you to keep your super computer VR body that you’ve been blessed to have keep it strong and the mind flexible. Understand things slowly and ask yourself questions.

@@E______ I understand this sort of view. The view that there are things that must be realized experientally and concepts can only point to what must be seen through experience. The problem I find with him, is the same I find with Zen buddhism, is that it is too vague and not defined, so can be very easily misunderstood. Theravada buddhism on the other hand, is very precise and exact in what the instruction is, and can explain what is to be realized. But still points that language can only take us so far and is only pointing the direction. Only because we have limitations due to language on teaching something to realize in experience, does not give permission to nonsensical teachings, this will lead many astray... Its a meaningless word salad that sounds profound but with proper analysis is seen to be vacuous and pretentious. He has taken parts of buddhism and made it to be something of his own. He hasn't the decency to respect the source of his knowledge, the Buddha. This leads to cults and guru devotion. Go to the source, abandon the charlatan.

@@rohlay00 I’ve listened to probably over a thousand hours of krishnamurti and David bohm dialogues in the past 5 years and I’m sorry but I have to disagree with you. I once thought in the beginning of my journey that the things he would say was a big word salad but I couldn’t help but come back to him then when I found the dialogues with him and David Bohm, everything fit so nicely and from there I moved to studying the CTMU by Chris Langan and his approach is using logical syntax to explain it all, as he calls is a super-tautology that cannot be broken. Go back and listen to Him and David Bohm speak. The issue is words and thought and it does take for one to realize how much we rely on thought, instead of trusting that our whole being has grasped the quintessence of life as we live as so thought could be put aside.

Deepak Chopra is the same way. He just talks in circles .quantum consciousness blah blah

@@matthewrousseau2982 You also have to realize the man always answered questions from the public. He never gave lectures, he never prepared. So if anything was going in circles its the questions. To project everything you said on the man you're listening to is quite turning things the other way ( no offense :))...