This is abuse of power weaponizing the government against a political opponent. Just like JAY6 was a political entrapment scam to weaponize government against a political opponent.
Damn that's twisted. You guys spent over a year trying to find dirt on biden and all you got was a car payment and lies from a kgb agent (see 1023 form). Meanwhile trump has gone through numerous grand juries (you know those are full of citizens) and you still say that. Hows the cult doing these days? And when will you bring the receipts on all that supposed fraud in 2020?
What the hell does that mean?? Are you confused?? Youd rather vote for someone that already has 34 felonies and is a convicted criminal as opposed to someone that may down the road possibly will be charged later?! Delusional
@@sunshinehoward9649 Due process; exactly like a jury trial founded on actual evidence. You simply loathe fact-based court proceedings because your narratives fall on their faces.
This is what the Sixth Amendment States. The Sixth Amendment guarantees the rights of criminal defendants, including the right to a public trial without unnecessary delay, the right to a lawyer, the right to an impartial jury, and the right to know who your accusers are and the nature of the charges and evidence against you. It has been most visibly tested in a series of cases involving terrorism, but much more often figures in cases that involve (for example) jury selection or the protection of witnesses, including victims of sex crimes as well as witnesses in need of protection from retaliation.
So good, in fact, that he does not grasp that the trial his committee is conducting a hearing on falls under New York state law and has nothing to do with the federal government. But given the shambles that his and his fellow Clouseau James Comer's failed year-long effort to get an impeachment of Joe Biden off the ground turned out to be, one shouldn't be surprised.
Here in the UK, it's hard for us to understand how state attorneys, that we know as public prosecutors, are funded by the biggest donor of a political party. Ours are publicly funded and would be instantly dismissed if found taking such funds. Surely, the actions of those S*r*s funded attorneys going after Trump could be correctly labelled as entirely politically motivated and therefore thrown out. How on earth can a country like the USA which we're constantly being told stands for 'freedom in everything', allow such a travesty in its judicial system?
Bragg is professional and would eviscerate Jordan. Let's ask Jim about his contemptuous avoidance of a subpoena, obstruction of justice on behalf of Trump, let's ask him about Ohio State, let's ask Jim Jackass Jordon about his participation in the criminal conspiracy to overthrow an election. Let's ask him if Donald is blackmailing him, let's question his integrity, let's get a wiretap for his phones and a special master to monitor his conversations.
In a court the judge is the expert on the law. The jury does not get to determine what the law is, they only decide facts. The charges were all under New York law. A State court can not decide Federal law.
@@alanmcentee9457 Merchan is not an expert on Elections nor accounting. Thus why he denied Defense to bring forth witnesses, which who would have destroyed the case even further. Merchan is still yet to name a crime. If it was for campaign violations then is becomes a Federal case, and if it was just to pay off Daniels then it remains a civil case where the Statues of Limitations has run out. The Judge has twisted the law unconstitutionally in order o continue the Lawfare against Trump! Back to arm chair law school, you failed!
@@alanmcentee9457You are not entirely accurate, I've been a jury Foreman in two murder trials and we debated what the law actually meant in the context of what facts we thought were pertinent and that was perfectly acceptable jury deliberation. However, you are directly on point with one of the most troubling aspects of this outrageous and illegal prosecution by democrats of their political opponents, a state court has no standing in deciding federal election laws or their so-called application to so-called business records.
@JimEllis-bq3ne Bro, just because that is the way you are, does not mean I am that way. You have no clue as to who I am,!! Your "opinion" is most like like you live life. wrong on almost everything. Your words just fortify my words, but with YOU included... .. GO EDUCATE YOURSELF! As now you simply appear as the fool.
If they really wanted to solve this problem the only thing that congress can do is not give the DOJ a penny until this lawfare stops. Until then nothing will change.
@@Rocco3x - yeah right, sure they didn't. I guess that's why they sent the number three guy in the DOJ - Michael Colangelo - as senior counsel on the Alvin Bragg case against Trump. But of course the DOJ had nothing to do with the case, right?...
For what? Exactly you Law genuises. Imvestiated and jailed ..For what? What Laws did he break? Feel free to name them 2) Cohen went to jsil fot these vety same crimes...and None of you had a problem with it. The Money he fronted? Was FOR Trump. To women Trump had sex with The non disclosure agreements, were For Trump Nobody... Nobody...Not Trump, noy his Lawyers? Nobody called David Pecker's testimony Untrue or a Lie Same for Hope Hicks? Yet all they did was corroborated Cohen. Lastly... Trump Should have been convicted in 2018 whrn Cohen was But Bill Barr enfed that Investigation Bill Barr fired , removed Prosecutors Saying that long-standing DOJ tradition is that you can't charge a sitting President. Not, that thr President wasnt GUILTY..but that as President...he couldn't be charged. So the State of NY, gathered Evidence Beyond a Reasonable Doubt. And Trump and his lawyers.. went through the Entire Legal process... agreed on the Jury pool and got a Fair Trial.... GUILTY,GUILTY, GUILTY, GUILTY 34 COUNTS OF GUILTY. Those Are the Facts!!!! Cry Louder!
@@teresataylor2741 Who said civil rights were violated? Trump? He had all the due process rights, and actually more, that anyone else charged with a serious crime in America gets. So what rights were he denied? You say "crimes were committed by the judge and prosecutor". OK there Sparkles, WHAT CRIMES were committed by the judge and prosecutor? Don't be shy, but do be factual.
@@paulfell6515 Yet the charges should not and could not actually have been brought by a state 🤣🤣. And no this is not wasting time lil bud, this is nothing what a pointless argument to make.
@@paulfell6515 Furthermore the appeal was denied, if you have a sense of what political persecution looks like, every investigation needs to be brought upon this judge. You have neither watched the video it seems and don't know anything about the trial.
..and for enriching his daughters war chest 'donations' to support The 'Democrat' Party politicians' re-election. Merchan's daughter is running a high dollar blitz campaign how Senator Tester is a great guy loved in the community (not) and fights for issues we care about like the border, jobs, inflation, our natural environment (not) and his opponent is all about lobbyist's money and destroying our public access to hunting and fishing (not). Sheehy got contracts, and has brought his family here for his dream ranch. He had been in Montana before and he and his wife had wanted to live here. Tester got enriched by lobbyists, graft, and corruption? Tester was bankrupt when he got elected, the farm a hobby farm, not is is a big landowner and multi-millionaire, maybe multi-billionaire. Tester expensive multiple campaign ads are repeated all over tv. I have one large postcard from Sheehy campaign. This is Merchan's daughter: big budget lies and slander multiple millions of dollars gathered during Judge Merchan's long drawn out made-for-tv show trial. The Merchan's have interferred in the elections both ways: get Trump, hold on to the U.S. Senate, and very likely supporting seats at risk in the House of Representatives to control U.S. Congress.
I'm waiting for the extortion charges against Stormy Daniels. Extortion is illegal the payments were not. A perfect example of trying to find a crime for their suspect
Well it doesn't really matter what you or Jordan or any of Trump's other ass kissers think. He was found guilty in a court of law. He didn't even take the stand to defend himself because he knew he couldn't. Why is congress wasting time on this when prices for groceries and gas keep going up?
@@kalfac8671watch the hearings in their entirety. The proof is here and ask yourself, if the charges weren’t just conjured up because if that’s so, why are we nailing all of the judges part of it. They already called it election interference. So as it keeps coming to light, you will see who has committed Treason.
Also let's not forget Leticia James that case was a sham. The property at Marlargo is worth billions but the judge on that case agreed the property was worth $18 million is an insult. Bragg and Fani in Georgia will not escape justice.
I find it hard to believe that Merchan is that stupid (he might be, though; after all, he is a Democrat). I think he made plenty of obvious reversible errors on purpose just to get this case tossed on appeal, but it would give him the opportunity to say that he was the judge that "got" Trump.
So explain to me how the trial is a sham. Was Trump lawfully indicted by a competent grand jury? Was Trump duly arraigned Was Trump allowed to make his pleas without pressure? Was Trump allowed a full legal team of his choice of lawyers? Were Trump's legal team denied the chance to cross examine the witnesses? Was Trump allowed to present witnesses in his defense? Was Trump afforded the opportunity to take the stand in his defense? Was the trial open to the public? Did the judge revoke his bail after Trump threatened witnesses? So then tell me Sparkles, what makes the trial a sham?
Weaponizing judicial system and government agencies, with instructing a jury, "you don't have to be unanimous", not saying the charges til the end of trial...WHAT THE HECK....THE judge, d a must be held accountable for all this UNCONSTITUTIONAL LAWFARE and judicial proceedings. Disbarred, indicated fined... and MORE
When we VOTE in NOVEMBER, we also NEED to VOTE to give Pres. Trump the Majority in the SENATE and KEEP or INCREASE the Majority in the HOUSE! THEN we can clean up this CRAP!
When Trump 47's new Attorney General cleans house at the Justice Department and starts a serious investigation into the wholesale violation of Trump's civil and constitutional rights by the New York "justice" system.
Trump's prosecution should be considered a campaign contribution for the Joe Biden campaign. That would put DA Bragg over the limits and subject to prosecution. If Biden doesn't claim it then he should be tried as well.
And think... there are tens of millions of voters who are absolutely convinced otherwise. I am amazed daily over how weak and close-minded the American voter has become.
@@MikeW165 right. Now, considering where the appeal was filed… do you really expect anyone to play fair against Trump? Any other appellate court would have thrown out that case immediately for Merchan’s judicial misconduct, among other constitutional violations. Why wasn’t it? Because it was in deep-blue New York, the country’s largest Democrat stronghold.
Nice to hear all of this laid out but what I really want to know is what are Republican lawmakers going to do about it! The Republican Party are impotent!!!!!
Why doesn't someone investgate how Merchan's daughter was involved and how much money she and the family made on Trump's trial? Seems like that should be illegal.
Not how it works. Congress can only investigate and make recommendations. The fact garland is under contempt charges and the doj won’t arrest is absurd.
@@montarakid1943no, that’s wrong! A defendant has the right to know what he has been charged with and to have his case heard in a fair trial. The judge disallowed BOTH of these things.
Alvin Bragg should serve the sentence that he hoped to make Trump serve. And then he should be prosecuted for all the crimes he didn’t pursue during his career
bring the judge and the D.A. to trial for violating's our constitution and abuse of their powers, and let them defend themselves with their own monies.
Nope, the whole world knew nothing real. The Prosecutor and Media parroted the "hush money!" line for a lawful NDA, and did emotional hand-waving to distract from the lack of criminality. *A non-crime of declaring NDA expenses on Corporate taxes was uniliterally declared by the DA to have been a falsely filed campaign expense. * An error in tax filings would have to be investigated by a transparent audit, which wasn't done, to determine if it was an error or malintent. *If it was an error, it would be a civil tax penalty *If it was malintent, it would be a misdemeanor -- and the Statute of Limitations for that charge had expired *The DA then unilaterally declared that the tax filing was fraudulently made to conceal a deeper Felony crime, which would have a different Statute of Limitations. *The DA then floated various theories into the media, based on "campaign interference" or "election fraud" but never brought specific charges against Trump. *The Defense wanted to bring expert testimony against this theory, but was blocked by the Judge from doing so. *The DA neither charged nor proved ANY underlaying Felony crime, but brought three "theories" to the closing argument for the Jury to consider without ever giving the Trump campaign any evidence or time to prepare a rebuttal. *The Judge allowed this, and told the Jury they didn't have to have a unanimous decision, any decision would result in one of the three non-charged Felonies being applied to the 34 Felony counts levied at Trump. *The 34 Felony counts represent every time the NDA was mentioned in a tax filing as a corporate expense, or in an email or phone call. Does line 12a say the NDA was a Corporate expense? FELONY! Does line 54c in the same tax form say the NDA was a Corporate expense? ANOTHER FELONY! *Trump was found guilty of more Felonies than the Zodiac Killer, El Chapo and Al Capone combined. The whole world knows now the US is a failing state with a justice system being used as a weapon by the Democrats against their foes.
Yeah, it would be hilarious to see Bragg simply read the fucking charges off the publicly available indictment and ask Jordan how the fuck it is possible to claim nobody knew what the charges were. This sort of dishonesty is absolutely sickening.
Ummm ... wrong case, buddy. You're referring to a civil trial which has nothing to do with the criminal trial which is the subject of this hearing. I know, it's hard to keep up with your hero's legal adventures.
@@kalfac8671 He does refer to the wrong case, but that case was a part of the pattern of cases against Trump which were not legally supportable. Never give your allies a power that you won't be comfortable with your enemies having. Let's switch up the example. Let's posit a deep red county in Southern Texas near the border. An illegal alien comes through the border and kills someone in their home. The family sues Joe Biden and Mayorkas under a Texas law that allows suit against federal officials who breach their oaths to faithfully uphold the laws of the United States. That deep red Texas jury is going to award that family more than that deep blue jury in Connecticut awarded against Alex Jones. Sure, the result of the case will likely be overturned on appeal at some level, in whole or in part, but people will go around saying Joe Biden and Mayorkas are adjudicated murderers and they will spend hundreds of thousands of dollars in defense of the claims all just to get back to the status quo ante. Do you want your elected Dem leaders to have to face that sort of BS?
@@kalfac8671 it really doesn't matter. they are all bogus. one could use the same reply for all of them. yes he is my hero. unlike your hero who doesn't even know what day it is. nevermind his age though. it is his policies that are killing america. was it his open border policy that brought you to us?
@@kalfac8671 TAKE A LISTEN AT 1:39 AND FORWARD. BRINGING A FRAUD CASE WHERE NO ONE WAS HARMED IS LAUGHABLE. BOTH CASES ARE ILLEGAL ADVENTURES AND BY THE WAY, HOW BOUT YOU TELL EVERYBODY WHAT TRUMP WAS CHARGED WITH IN YOUR SO CALLED CIVIL TRIAL THAT ROSE TO THE LEVEL OF A FELONY.?
Jim: I love you, man. But where, oh where, do all of your questions and 'bringing of the receipts' go. I never hear about anyone being arrested; I never hear about anyone going to jail. WHEN WILL THERE BE SOME REAL ACCOUNTABILITY FOR ALL OF THE BAD ACTORS CURRENTLY ON STAGE?
You can absolutely guarantee that Jordan will not subpoena anyone involved. The reason for this is simple: everything Jordan said about the case in this clip is total bullshit.
