@@khamjaninja. That is fascinating! Thank you so much for sharing that. I've never understood why Fahrenheit is the way it is, but that makes perfect sense!
@@khamjaninja. That's brilliant! I'd always felt that 96 was quite a nice round number (probably because I am a computer programmer), and this now entirely explains that it indeed is!
Problem with that is absolute ZERO , temperature that is determined by extrapolating the ideal gas law ; by international agreement its −273.15 degrees on the Celsius scale ... we dont actually know if thats the real absolute ZERO .
Best and most apt video I've seen in ages - laughed until the tears ran down my leg! Whoops! Circulated far and wide and all give it the Thumbs up big time! May your food forever be plate presented from now on!
@@Matstoen did you exit quick? Or where you too exCited? ( Just joshing, I don't usually like correcting ppl on replies as it's not an exam lol. Grammar police eh? ) Have good day m8.
@@UKKC80s hahah ironically im actually the one to point that out sometimes, although english is not my native language. Your comment made me laugh :) Edit: and thanks! Although it was a typo and i knew about what you said from before, it could very well be the opposite. Have a good day! :))
I might be the only non-American who likes Farenheit better than Celcius. See, in everyday contexts, we normally use temperature for weather measurements. The 0-100 portion of F is much more convenient and relevant than the 0-100 portion of C. Hardly ever a need to go into negatives (and miss the minus sign, and mess up difference measurements, etc.), and the granularity is better - "high 70s (F)" is a sensible thing to say whereas "high 20s (C)" is kind of pointless (25 and 30 feel pretty different).
I have a counter point. Many people look at weather forecasts when making travel decisions. Celcius having 0 being freezing mean you can skim through the numbers overnight and if none are below 0 then there won't be ice on the roads. The fact that 0 and 100 are values which people experience very often (ice, steam) it makes it very easy for people to scale. if an oven is 300 (C) without having to think about it everyone knows its 3 time hotter than a kettle gets and so easier to grasp.
Legit the best argument I've heard for farenheit is that you can use the degree number to approximate how warm it will be. 100 degrees will be 100% warm. 70 will be 70% warm, fairly, but not too much. 120 is 120% warm, now you are too warm.
@@dogwalker666 For scientific purposes, Celsius is better, I agree (just like the metric system is far superior to feet and miles). But for practical everyday reasons, I prefer Fahrenheit. It allows you to express temperature more precisely without decimals. Just looks cleaner and more convenient. But it's just me.
@@aliaksandrhn1 I don't see how using decimals is a problem, They are never used on weather charts, Visualising temperature is far easier when you use C, F is just random, Gallons are even worse because American gallons are smaller than imperial gallons. But a litre is the same size everywhere.
@@dogwalker666 The reason decimals are never used in Celsius is because they'd look pretty ugly if they were used. Fahrenheit allows you to express a temperature more precisely without resorting to decimals. 24.5C is not as clean as 76F. Also, I am not arguing in favor of American gallons or any other measurement system used in the US (except temperature scale) - as I mentioned earlier, I like European systems much better.
@@aliaksandrhn1 at work the low temperature controllers are two dp ie. 70.65C, the 1400C ones don't, my car computer shows temperature to 1dp 3.6C today I understand that you are used to F so prefer it but The DP issue I don't get as I said the met office doesn't use fractions.
@@xCPTxNEMO Interesting. If they're seeing the performers do funny stuff that we can't see, that would explain why they are constantly rofling at one-liners.