John MacArthur | TMS Chapel | Q&A 

What a wonderful testimony you have! God led you in the right direction! Praise be to God!

GLORY BE TO JESUS OUR GOD FOR HE IS GOOD THANKS FOR YOUR TRUTH SHARING 😁😁😁🙏🏾🙏🏾

Amen

He is a holy life.

😂👊🔥🔥🔥🔥🙏✝️

Amen!

Why is Christianity so sad

@@PeterLangemanIt’s not sad, it’s happiness, joy, peace, comfort, and love. What’s sad is dying without Christ and spending an eternity separated from Him in a devil’s hell.

The more horror is when you look at yourself and then look at God and see that immense difference, you see how deep in darkness are, and how rich in Love, Holiness and Goodness but in Righteousness too God is😇

Louis Berkhof or Wayne Grudem are probably the most popular and best

So much would like to see the power of the sermon emphasizing the wrath against sin separated from the hatred of the sinner. As of now I see only one, perhaps two verses in God's Word referring to God's hatred of the sinner. Of thousands of verses! A doctrine so bold perhaps would have more references, when His love for Humanity is often stated. Also wrath and punishment is not a product of hating a person. A parent can be angry, can punish their child with no hatred. Remember in hell sinners will not long to be with God, only desire a couple drops of water on their tongues in hades.

Sermon 11 Unawakened Sinners Heap Up to Themselves Wrath Against the Day of Wrath as Men are Wont to Heap Up Treasures A Sermon on Romans 2:5 A post by Don Kistler on the Puritan board: I’m very pleased to announce the publication of another volume of previously unpublished sermons by the great Jonathan Edwards. There are 15 sermons in this collection, 13 of which have never been printed before. This 344 page book retails for $27, but is offered to you by way of pre-publication special for $14, plus $7 postage. This offer is good until June 1, 2017, the projected date for the book to be in stock. It will likely be done before that, but the offer is good until that date. After that the price goes up to $20.00, plus postage. Dr. Ken Minkema, executive editor of The Works of Jonathan Edwards and The Jonathan Edwards Center at Yale University, wrote this: “I am pleased to see another volume of sermons by Edwards edited by Don Kistler, who has devoted his life to making ‘America’s Augustine’ available to those thirsting for Christian knowledge. Don works assiduously and lovingly to present Edwards the preacher, and we are all indebted to him for it.”

Dunno, but it's on Romans 2:5. Any luck finding it?

@@badrasta5 see above comment for more details. It has been cited as Sermon 11 - Unawakened Sinners Heap Up to Themselves Wrath Against the Day of Wrath as Men are Wont to Heap Up Treasures

1 John 5:7

Three obvy

I have a question: Why are you are parroting foolish gossip and old news that took his words out of context! You are acting like the accuser of the brethren. REPENT!!!

@@gigiis526 the Bible is telling us to judge all things and warn people about evil and against wolves in sheep's clothing. you may be one of them since you dont want the truth to come out... but that will not stop me. i do not gossip. all you can do is watch ANY video with his teaching...and you can see how he CONTINUOUSLY makes masonic hand signs. also, he did say that even when you take the mark of the beast you can repent. which is false doctrine... which is very very dangerous. people with false love defedn evil doers and at the same time endanger simple believers so they fall prey into the hands of wolves...

No masonic hand gestures

@@HearGodsWord he makes them all the time...

@@aikozoe6598 as I said, no masonic ones here.

*Let's briefly run through the 'ten plagues':* First the rivers are turned to blood, all the fish die and the waters stink. No one has any water to drink. This lasted for seven days and would have resulted in mass deaths due to dehydration. Amongst the first to die would have been the children. *The author doesn't think to explain how the Hebrews were saved from this. No record of it was made anywhere in any Egyptian records.* Exodus 7:17-25. This is followed by a plague of frogs which had somehow survived the rivers of blood that had killed all the fish. A mere inconvenience, nothing more, and a big stink when they all died, *but no record anywhere.* Exodus 8:2-13. Next we have the plague of lice about which very little is said *and of course no record was made.* To a people who would have been accustomed to lice this would probably have been nothing remarkable. Exodus 8:16-18. Then the flies. Apart from the land being 'corrupted', whatever that means, there don't appear to have been any ill effects from this and they disappear as quickly as they came a few days later. *Nothing worth recording there, obviously.* Exodus 8:21-31. Now the author seems to begin to lose the plot and describes a 'grievous murrain' *which kills all the Egyptians' cattle, horses, camels and sheep.* ***They all died - hold that thought.*** *No Egyptian historian or keeper of official records deems it worthy of mention.* Exodus 9:3-6. Next come the boils which afflict everyone and everything, including all the livestock ***even though they had been killed by the 'grievous murrain' a few days earlier,*** *apparently, and yet no-one thought to write anything down anywhere.* Of course, anyone who understood anything about microorganisms and the aeteology of boils would have described this as an infestation with Staphylococcus - the signs of faecal contamination - but the author was obviously unaware of these. Maybe he was just in too much of a muddle by now to care. Exodus 9:8-11. Now it's hailstones so bad that every plant, every tree, every servant (for servant read slave) ***and even the livestock (that our story-teller has forgotten already that he killed off in the fifth plague before given them boils in the sixth) were harmed.*** It looks like our story-teller has learned from his earlier silly mistake with killing all the livestock too soon then having to resurrect them later. He mentions that some plants survive. Do I smell stinking fish again? *The greatest hail storm in all Egyptian history, apparently, but not worthy of being recorded.* Exodus 9:18-25. It's the turn of the locusts and it's suddenly obvious why some plants had to survive. *How could the locusts turn Egypt into a barren desert if the hail storm had done it earlier?* Good thinking there. Shame about the earlier boob! *Mysteriously, no Egyptian scribe appears to notice any of this or the inevitable famine and mass starvation which would have ensued.* Exodus 10:4-15. And for the penultimate trick, it's going to be dark for three days. *No one makes a record of this, obviously.* Exodus 10:21-23. The last 'plague' is not so much a plague as a ritual genocide. *Here our tale takes a nasty turn and the true character of the Hebrew god is revealed in all its glory - a petty, vindictive, homicidal psychopath who has not yet acquired the omniscience he will be granted later. He kills every firstborn Egyptian in a single night,* ***including the firstborn of all the cattle that died in the fifth plague.*** *For some reason he needs the Hebrews to leave a secret sign so he doesn't kill them too. Weirdly, he can't tell his own chosen people from ordinary Egyptians and doesn't even know where they live.* And he had been leading up to this, apparently, because after every plague he 'hardens the heart' of Pharaoh so that he wouldn't let the Hebrews go. He had actually been planning this genocide all along just to impress people with his powers. *And still no-one thought even this mass killing in a single night worth making a note of in any Egyptian records.* Exodus 12:1-30. And then, of course, Pharaoh could muster up 600 horses to pull the chariots ***from amongst all the dead livestock from the 5th plague*** (Exodus 14:7). Google *"Rosa Rubicondior: Origins Of The Exodus Myth"* ------------------------------------------------------------------ In addition, look up the below articles. *"Debunking Christianity: PATTERNS OF POOR RESEARCH- A Critique of Patterns of Evidence:Exodus"* *"For you were (not) slaves in Egypt: The ancient memories behind the Exodus myth - Archaeology - **Haaretz.com**"* *"Why the Exodus Story Has Value Despite Being Complete Myth - Psychology Today Australia"* *"Is the Exodus a Myth? - Worlds Beyond"* *"Historicity of Exodus and Moses - The Creatively Maladjusted"* *"Biblical Contradiction #81. When did the Exodus allegedly happen: during the reign of Rameses II (1279-1213 BC) OR in 1447 BC?"* - by Dr Steven DiMattei *"Biblical Contradiction #87. Does the god of the Hebrews reveal himself to Moses in Midian OR in Egypt?"* - by Dr Steven DiMattei *"Bible Contradiction **#134**. Which Ten Commandments?"* - by Dr Steven DiMattei *"Bible Contradiction **#147**. Who writes the laws and commandments on stone tablets: Moses OR Yahweh?"* - by Dr Steven DiMattei *"Ten Reasons Why the Bible’s Story of the Exodus is Not True - by Tim Zeak - ExCommunications - Medium"* *"Why Moses Did Not Write the Torah - Thomas Shoemaker"* *"Sargon the Great and Moses - The Word of Me… Wordpress"* *"The Documentary Hypothesis | Fewer Lacunae"* *"The Death of the Documentary Hypothesis | Rev. David Bokovoy"* *"The Neo-Documentary Hypothesis | Rev. David Bokovoy"* *"How do we know that the biblical writers were* ***not*** *writing history?"* -- by Dr Steven DiMattei *"Contradictions in the Bible | Identified verse by verse and explained using the most up-to-date scholarly information about the Bible, its texts, and the men who wrote them"* -- by Dr. Steven DiMattei

What makes you think the Yale scholars and people you referenced have evidence to support their theory? I would be sceptical about scholarships from our once theological seminaries now called IVY league schools. An atheist is the head of Harvard school of divinity. Please be careful with all of the people you referenced in your post and compilation of their theories. Molecular DNA is providing informational clarity about Adam and Eve. Scientific discoveries regarding origin and evolutions are very unreliable and continue to change. Please be careful and wear your sceptical lense when dealing with the scientific community. Science used to be in search of the truth but now, it's in search of private and government grants and comfortable life styles for the scientists.

Please read and comprehend, Job chapter 39.

So who was it then?

It’s just an understanding of the definition John is using in that day. Distinguishing 2 people groups amongst Israel. Covenant Faithful who believe in Jesus and apostate who deny Jesus and the covenant wrath is coming upon them. 1 John 2:22-23. Who is the liar but he who denies that Jesus is the Christ? This is antichrist, he who denies the Father and the Son. No one who denies the Son has the Father. Whoever confesses the Son has the Father also. Hebrews 5:5 So also Christ did not exalt himself to be high priest, but was appointed by Him who said to Him, You are my Son, today have I begotten you. So Jesus was appointed the true High Priest at His Baptism. From then on any high priest was apostate and Antichrist. Also the High priesthood had been corrupted when Jason stole the position from Onias 3rd and after Jason the lineage of Zadok never took up the position again which was against Gods command in Ezekiel 40. So the High Priest was the covenant apostate head of Israel which would make him an antichrist and anyone who followed him would be operating under the spirit of antichrist. To oppose or put in place of is antichrist definition.

There hasn’t been a High Priest since 70 AD. The destruction of Jerusalem and the Covenant Judgement on apostate Israel.

Romans 3:23 For all have sinned, and come short of the Glory of GOD.

Because sin is disobedience to God.

You cut the conditional part out of the verse by not completing it. God demonstrated His love at the cross and hates those that reject it. Psalms 5:5

Hi, good question. The rest of your Scripture reference should be helpful in answering your question, "...that He gave his only begotten Son, that whosoever believes in him should not perish but have everlasting life." This and the rest of John 3 that explains how sinners stand condemned already. Scripture is clear that all men will perish, in contrast to everlasting life. There is an exception: ..."whosoever believes." Furthermore, faith is not what saves. It is the object of that faith that saves: "his only Son." The chapter will make clear that God doesn't save universally. It's even closer to say he condemns universally, with the exception of believers in Jesus. Consider also Matt 7:13 saying, “Enter through the narrow gate; for the gate is wide and the way is broad that leads to destruction, and there are many who enter through it." Since many enter destruction, these are obviously those who did not receive God's love by the death of his Son. John 3:16's "world" is therefore not "all without exception," but "all without distinction." This is further supported on John 3's context: Jesus is talking to Nicodemus, who, like the rest of the Jews, could not imagine God saving from different nations without distinction (Samaritans, Romans, Americans 😉, etc..). Context is always the necessary to understand words, phrases, and especially those most quoted and loved verses. Again, a great question. Hope this continues to spur you on to prayerful and fruitful study in Scripture, to see Christ as more important than anything else.

That's beside the point. My point is God loves all sinners in general. Sinners need to hear John 3:16.

God loves the believer in a special way because he is His child. But this does not change the fact that God loves the sinner in general. John 3:16 teaches that no one is exempt from this love. Therefore it is not abominable and blasphemous to say God loves sinners unconditionally. In fact this is presupposed in the gospel message.

Are you questioning him?

@@ANGELSVEN I'm amazed

@@toddtaylor1602 I'm not. How can one be depressed when God has given you the gift of life?

@@ANGELSVEN sin, abuse, pain, etc

Negative!

He said hypothetically since there is only one unpardonable sin

@@matthewmangum6320 what do you mean? john macarthur is just one of the freemasons. he is on the conservative traditional side but he is one of them. he is simply playing a different role to deceive believers. thats why he is constantly making masoniv hand signs...

@@doctrinalwatchdogactive6454 what does that even mean what you are saying?? absurd to the max.... he said hypothetically that you can take the mark of the beast and still repent...?? so he said it or didnt?? he did say that.... and the fact that he is constantly making the masonic hand signs. he is a freemasons as the ones he exposes...he is simply playing a different role...

@@aikozoe6598 he said it and you can look it up on RU-vid. Thousands of people called him out, band him from stations etc. He never repented of it either.

The Bible.

​@@HearGodsWord this man is a monster ask Eileen Gray

@@michellepeoplelikeyoumurde8373 show me something from this video that makes him a monster.

Be careful what you wish for cuz you might just

Spending eternity with our LORD and Savior JESUS CHRIST is what I’m praying for.

RedSky, just shows his ignorance of the Word. It's all through the books from Isaiah to Revelations of animals in heaven.

@@paradiseheirdavid...854 Well I wish you could finish your sentence.

Can animals be born again? Are animals made in the image of God? Its clear to me that you are still a baby on milk and do not yet understand the deeper truths.

😳