Jonathan Turley: This was the 'haymaker' in SCOTUS arguments on Trump immunity case 

Great question

Well, they aren’t, but insider trading is narrowly defined. They need to make it more usefully defined. My sister only answers to the ceo of her company and sold lots of stock recently. …long story but I asked her if she should have published the move ahead of the trade and she said no because she isn’t on the finance team. …I was surprised, and I trade stocks.

Lobbying

And what about the corrupted BOUGHT Supreme Justices?

Because that’s their bread and butter

No. Reps and Sens have an exemption.

If you have proof bring it on boy !

No she has already used immunity as a defense.

​@cafl9844 Are you fkg kidding me boy!! You don't need proof, just go back to old videos and you have your proof DA!

Hahahahahaha. Whataboutism fail.

Looks like we couldn't, in the long run...

Right, and let's say that it "was the most honest election in history" ok? Why did the Democrats make it LOOK like a scam? Everyone went to bed with Trump winning by millions, and then all these boxes, 100% of which went to Biden, show up after hours and get counted in swing states in blue areas where they took away Voter ID and Signature Verification, and the voter rolls haven't been updated, and we know Democrats would push an old lady out of a wheelchair to "save Democracy" from Trump? Why would anyone believe in the validity of that election? I don't even think Democrats believe it, they're acting like fans of pro-wrestling heels... "No, Ric Flair didn't use brass knuckles too win! Prove it!"

I remember how everyone called Bush illegitimate in 2000… funny how things change. They’re all hypocrites

They need to charge me too....I think the whole f**king government is corrupt and tyrannical, they need to come and arrest me ASAP! FJB🖕

I'm curious if you believe the Al Gore and Hillary Clinton election result challenges used the same methods as Trump. Because if you can't see how Trump's "challenge" was different, you'll continue to be confused or point at a perceived injustice.

When trump did it. It was fine for gore Abram’s and Clinton. But Trump now we got a legal issue

THAT’S NOT ALL HE DID.

They're counted numerous times! Biden won. Teump lies stolen election evidence? Ever see any?

@@xhpy6760 THAT'S NOT ALL THE DEMOCRATS DID IN 2000 AND IN 2016.

Your right he has a right to contest any part of an election. this is manufactured out of a kangaroo court and DOJ ..that waited 4 years for this "opportunity"

@@xhpy6760 all in his right, Do you know how many presidents or running for president,have called for a certified result, especially when there has now been proven in court that many of the ballots were fraudulent. Why do you think Trump has more support now than ever before, the world sees he should be the real president and Bidens a hack, placed in by illegitimate votes and corrupted officials

Problem is the Left believes they are paid off if their decision disagrees with the democrat/progressive ideology.

@@fearlessfosdick160 No, they still do it. The problem is you lefties demand SCOTUS follow your ideology instead of the Constitution. You basically hate democracy even with all the BS whining about "saving democracy." Trying to jail your greatest political opponent because you know he's going to beat you in the election isn't American Democracy, but it IS Democrat party politics.

and 3 of them NEVER vote for the Constitution...well according to those 3, 2A does not exist, so it is political AF sadly. When the Right leaning judges go, 2A will be abolished immediately which could trigger a civil war as the are openly abolishing a right that says "shall not be infringed". the DNC today actually has me see that yes (by design) America will topple itself as it just splits.

No. That is the job of the president and congress. The US Supreme Court's job is to interpret it.

Too bad they sided with The Coup in Texas v. Pennsylvania. Treason.

God said No!

citizen trump is a conman. Wakey wakey

​@@manhandlerI heard a moron say this exact thing.

God hates trump.

lol

The SCOTUS has historically not batted 1000. The hope is that they get most of the major issues right most of the time. When one of it's members can't define what a woman is, I'd say we're pretty close to being lost.

Justice for Trump? Justice for Joe Biden? What kind of justice are you wanting?

@@subjectofgov Blind, impartial, equal. You know. Everything required by the Constitution but being denied to any opponent of this corrupt government.

@@subjectofgovdue process before a jury, not delay being enabled by SCOTUS, obstruction of justice.

@@subjectofgov Fair and impartial justice. Something that we are currently not seeing in some state run governments.

Calling Trump's team, 'court jesters', is objectively funny.

@@MachiavellisThePrince Oh ha ha. Gee your comment is hilarious.

​@@MachiavellisThePrince... give Hunter just crack pipe back, the parmesan cheese is "triggering your TDS"!! Go seek professional help immediately!!🤣🤣🤣

​​@@MachiavellisThePrince Calling YOUR DADDY Biden an actual "President" is what is TRULY funny.

SCOTUS doesn’t HAVE to hear this case, they can pick what cases to handle.

'Zackly! As if no other election, U.S. or elsewhere, has EVER been contested. 😃

It's not. Brandenburg v. Ohio, 395 U.S. 444 (1969)

Questioning is no problem. Plotting to overthrow the government is another thing, and is illegal, otherwise it would happen all the time.

@@chriskelly1890 Trump was still POTUS on 6th January. The fact the Far Left came up with the concept of 'election denier' shows you are wrong in any case. Enough shenanigans were already obvious at the time meant it was absolutely in order and in fact mandatory for the POTUS to question what had happened. He has of course been vindicated by subsequent events with more than half of Americans now agreeing the 2020 election which installed Biden was 'problematic'.

Read the indictment. He did a lot more than ask questions. There’s a reason Fox does not discuss the details. Ever.

Roberts is a joke and your lack of education is embarrassing.

​@@emilyalice1by your logic the could all be referred to as a joke.

@@emilyalice1 The fact that you think the "chief justice" is a joke speaks volumes for your education.

@@jeffreyloftus3617 The fact that you are incapable of analyzing Judicial precedent, reading the Constitution and conflict your politics with law proves you are a child.

@@jeffreyloftus3617 Because he is chief justice don't mean he is wise, he is as dumb as they come and a Trump cult member. All the prosecution against Trump was because of his own stupid action.

Right?? That has got to be the most absurd sentence ever muttered by a human in all of human history!

The President has a cabinet officer called “The Attorney General.”

Presidents don't have to, and 99.9% of the time do not.

​@@daviddadamo2290 so, what is the point? President likely hires person who will be loyal to him, plus some laws are not clear cut. Just like VP's role in 2020 election. Different lawyers had different interpretations.

@@zengjanezhu I disagree completely. Bill Barr advised Trump he lost a free and fair election. Mike Pence sought legal advice from Michael Luttig who told him he had no constitutional power to reject the electors. When your chosen partisan lawyer even tells you it’s illegal, it’s pretty clear you can’t do it!

@@daviddadamo2290here are the problems with your argument: you can ask 10 “legal experts” if the POTUS has authority AND responsibility to challenge a federal election and you will get 10 different answers. IF that POTUS was not a candidate in that election, the answers - with various caveats - would almost certainly favor “yes”. In 2020, though, the POTUS was a candidate, so the answers would probably be evenly scattered across the spectrum from yes, to probably, to maybe sometimes, to probably not, to no. And the ONLY reason for the differing answers is “the appearance of it” because of the POTUS being a candidate. But, it should not matter that the POTUS is a candidate. It should not matter because the issue affects not JUST the candidate. It affects the million citizens who VOTED for him!!! The POTUS has a duty to ALL citizens so, when million citizens are CONVINCED that their vote didn’t count because an election was not conducted according to the RULES, he MUST respond. He is OBLIGATED to either CORRECT the vote count OR be able to demonstrate to those people who feel disenfranchised that the vote count was accurate and fair. I can GUARANTEE you that, if Biden had been the losing candidate and Trump had done for Democrat voters EXACTLY what he did for Republican voters, ALL of you would think is was PERFECTLY PROPER for a POTUS to hold up certification and to prepare to have alternate electors ready to go in case Biden had been proven the winner and to call up the Georgia SOS to ask him to recount Fulton County, and to petition a few other states to have their elections nullified because of illegal rule changes having being implemented by people who had no authority to change those rules. ALL of you would be saying these were things that fall squarely into his JOB DESCRIPTION as the CHIEF law enforcement officer in the country.

Oh and it’s literally politicians job to compromise!!

Yes, that falls under free speech. You can say an election was rigged. But you can't send fake electors with forged certificates to reverse a legal election. That is not legal. Make sense?

As long as you don’t try to overturn the election with illegal activities then you can cry “unfair” all you want

They had a council years ago that looked into the ways you could game the system and Mail in Ballots was at the top of the list. Jimmy Carter was on this Council. Every thing Bad is what the Democrats want.

💯💯💯

He's an idiot

And guess what…He’s a democrat…I know it’s hard to believe..

Very calm and breaking down things to a manner we can understand

@@ThePrinceUva But 100% wrong on legal matters.

@@emilyalice1 🐑🐑🐑🐑🐑🐑🐑🐑🐑🐑🐑🐑🐑🐑🐑🐑🐑🐑🐑🐑🐑🐑🐑🐑🐑🐑🐑🐑🐑🐑🐑🐑🐑🐑🐑🐑🐑🐑🐑🐑🐑🐑🐑🐑🐑🐑🐑🐑🐑🐑🐑🐑🐑🐑🐑🐑🐑🐑🐑🐑🐑🐑🐑🐑🐑🐑🐑🐑🐑

That's from a Reagan speech. When was it said to he supreme court?

That was Ronald Reagan

When was this said in the supreme court, by whom & in what context? They keep written records, I hear. I'd be glad to look it up if you give proper info/citation. Thanks.

Well, there's social security, medicare, police, the military, roads, airports, the FDA, etc etc

Exactly, that is why I never trusted Trump when he was in office.

Im pretty sure they feared a president claiming immunity from everything he does, let alone the fact it came after he tried his hardest to overthrow the election 😂

Innoce t of what

A Grand Jury decided to indict, not Biden or anybody else.

user. Leave it to a demon-rat to question obvious answers to the political interference. Why ask a question when you won’t except anything that goes against your twisted agenda

dont break the law Karen, and youll be fine

You may have voted for him, but he wasn't re-elected. And the proof of that is....................BIDEN is in the White House. Go figure. Come back to reality. If you can.

he didn't get reelected, he lost

@@jamingoette9062 aww i bet mean old orange man hurt ur wittle feeling show us on ur l g b t dolly where it hurts

​@@jamingoette9062he was ROBBED, by many corrupt pieces of trash! And EVERYONE knows that! If you think this abomination got 81 million votes you're a complete mess and in need of serious help!

​@@jamingoette9062 typical freeloading welfare cheat

Yes, it is nonsense. And I for one definitely want to hear the opinion of these well-respected legal minds. They all seem to think it's nonsense also.

Absolutely 100 percent! Sickening.

I’m dying to see when Joe Biden loses in November what the Democrats will do ?!

@@christines8529. “Well respected legal minds”? To whom are you referring?

@jonboy9912 That sounds like the comment of a simpleton. In the words of Lavrently Beria, (Stalin's chief of secret police) "show me the man, I'll show you the crime". If you think using the police and courts to prosecute one's political opponents is productive, you're a fool because it will go against you anytime your opposition is in control of a court or police dept. - Having us continually at each other's throats. There is a widely covered politically motivated prosecution happening in NYC right now, and most outlets are starting to acknowledge that. Hillary and the DNC were fined a total $115K for running payment for the Steele "dossier" thru their law firm and masking it as "legal fees" in an attempt to hide the truth from voters. This is the same "crime" for which Trump is facing 34 felonies. The party that reads "Rules for Radicals" and promotes "projection" and "lawfare" should rethink it and be more egalitarian.

Clean up the DOJ from top to bottom. SCOTUS is fine.

Why did Fox news give Dominion voting Systems $787.5 million?

If you had a brain you might be dangerous

@@BuckNasty-du8wj 🐑🐑🐑🐑🐑🐑🐑🐑🐑🐑🐑🐑🐑🐑🐑🐑🐑🐑🐑🐑🐑🐑🐑🐑🐑🐑🐑🐑🐑🐑🐑🐑🐑🐑🐑🐑🐑🐑🐑🐑🐑🐑🐑🐑🐑🐑🐑🐑🐑🐑🐑🐑🐑🐑🐑🐑🐑🐑🐑🐑🐑🐑🐑🐑🐑🐑🐑🐑🐑

@@BuckNasty-du8wj He isn't lying....you can't disprove anything he said. You are the idiot...not him.

Porque no los dos?Sorry, I don’t know how to do the accent marks on my keyboard and I love response from the taco commercial. Why not both?

Both of theirs

tRump is a cocaine addict. Has been for years.

You people are stupid, did it ever occur to you that somebody could have brought it there in other to implicate Biden's presidency: given the facts that so many people have access to the White House.

Jill’s. 😉

Not according to bipartisan historians, in fact the very opposite. Of course facts are an inconvenience for cultist.

​@@manhandlerproblem is those historians will be replaced with others that will change rankings based on actual history not political scat. Always happens Carter was last until Biden those inflation numbers are always killers.

Get Medical Help

@@manhandler

Fewer people with jobs at the end of his term than at the start. He increased the national debt by twenty-five percent. To be fair Obama did the same but it took him eight years to do what Trump did in four.

If a POTUS has committed a crime then there should be no immunity for any of them. Why are you MAGA people so twisted and sick that you think a POTUS is a King? Have you not heard of 1776? utter block heads.

Who authorized crossfire hurricane?

you do understand that if a president cannot ever break the law that Biden can call off the upcoming elections and remain in power because he feels like and no prosecution?

There already is immunity for presidents. The question is how much.

So if a president orders a strike on the Supreme Court? They should be asked that question. People seem to only be concerned if something affects them personally, then their opinions completely change.

We dont know.. The corrupt AF american legal system keeps delaying the trail.

We don’t know that. And you certainly don’t have any special knowledge on the question. That is exactly what the allegations in the D.C. case are to designed to examine.

You won’t believe anything positive. That’s a fact

Why not??

As americans we tend to allow the courts to determine such things.

So walking around saying the election was stolen over and over is proof that a President has evidence that there was questions about the election? So he gets consolidations from people that say we can just switch electors and boom he wins.

Oh its worse than that... the trial in ny now while its ostensibly about the stormy daniels hush money the actual charges are election tampering. The state of NY is saying trump stole the 2016 election! While the DOJ is trying to put him on trial for saying Biden stole the election! You cant get more hypocritical than that!

Wow, you really haven't been following these cases or the facts regarding your argument right? Swapping the official electors for your electors is an illegal act. Its not just demanding someone to investigate if the election was fair, its several ACTS to actually rob whole states of their votes. Michael johnson actually carried out this plan, but in the end Pence rejected the fake electors at the moment in January 6th. This was orchestrated by Trump and his team. Furthermore, asking another government official to find 11,000 votes that don't exist so that he can win a state is also not legal. And finally, asking/telling, leading a group of people to violently attack the capitol while the election votes are being certified is akin to a military/violent coup. Many of those people were armed, used force, destroyed parts of the buildling attacked police officers defending the capitol injuring several and one who ended up dying from the injuries. and all of this was orchestrated by Trump and his team where in the channels used to communicate, violence was clearly advocated and sought out (they reached out to proud boys and other militant conservative groups).... Are you in love with him? Is that why you ignore all these facts that are so easily verifiable?

Trump sued 61 times lost every one over the election that's how they know.

Read the indictment. There’s a reason Fox doesn’t discuss the contents. Ever. He went way, way beyond.

I voted for Trump in 16 and 20. I will not be voting for him in 24. He isn't same person. Losing the election broke Trumps brain. He looks SO small, weak and pathetic now! He isn't the same man! Biden openly mocks him and projects FAR more strength and leadership. This case has just exposed Trump as a weak, small, pathetic and rudderless little man

True but this had nothing to do with votes but ballots

Cry harder

@@stevenhenry5267 Why are you a silly little fool?

I wonder wht Biden wil do when he hears he is immune and can do what he wants.

It doesn't look like scotus is going with the complete immunity argument. They are going to go with immunity for official acts of a president.

​@Magnetroman Same thing he is doing now. Walking all over the Constitution and defy the Supreme Court. And, he gets away with it because he is a Democrat with a weaponized DOJ.

Isn't that basically zero immunity? Lol

@@podunkest Even worse. They decide to prosecute or not.

“serious, heinous crimes” is WAY to ambiguous to mean anything. Nice try though.

Joe is too much of a cognitive mess to be arrested 😂

@@melaniedelaware7500 Law of Lenity

You are clearly without any sense

Depends WHAT PARTY THE president IS

JerKan Erken leave her alone she is mine.

Did gomer tell you that?

​@@mattguastella3018ONLY AFTER 10% IS TAKEN OFF THE TOP BY BIDEN.

Lol ah, another imaginary event you can be upset about, "10% from Ukraine." Just like the fantasy that 2020 was stolen.

Where is the evidence?

​@@hanshansen3885there's been tons of evidence. Joy Reid has been derelict by not telling you.

Because Republicans ignore it.

*Yep...and he's NOT even a politician. He is a businessman who deeply* *cares for America. He is a true Patriot! Trump 2024* 💖💫

@@Trumpstinks - do I have to remind you that US citizenship is defined by Constitutional Law?

If you read the "Federalist Papers", considered the Owner's Manual for the Constitution, you will see how much the founding fathers expected character and honor in politicians - if not the politician himself, at least those around them. This is a new situation we're in, where the politician has no limits to his behavior except those externally upon him.

Because he wants a free pass to and a get out of jail free card

No.

@@Edwarddiaz21 why not? The rest of us do not take an oath to ensure that the laws are upheld.

wow...are you gullible...every govt oath is a license to steal...look at the Bidens, Bush League, Clinton, and OBlama

Biden for Treason

Okay. President Obama said about predator drone strikes, they give me a list and I decide who lives and who dies. A sixteen year old American boy was killed in one of his ordered drone strikes. When is a local District Attorney going to empanel a grand jury to indict Barack Obama for the crime of killing that American boy? These TDS Democrats have opened up a can of worms.

Exactly! The political prosecutions by the Democrats is disgusting.

ummm we have...I have worked on a few Pres News Teams..you have NO idea what Clinton, George W, and Obama did...

It's not funny - it's a reflection of corrupt Democrat prosecutors weaponising the justice system. It's very dangerous.

We have always had this problem. The issue is this is the first administration who has felt the need to politically persecute their opponents.

@@eugeneharris6898 Trump isn't being persecuted. He's a criminal being held accountable. Why do you think he wants immunity?

Do you have a point besides the one on your head?

@@PauletteWinters Happy your loan was paid off. Next time, take courses that allow you to get a better paying position.

@@PauletteWinters Yes

So coups are allowed in our constitution then, even murdering a baby on 5th Ave with his foot. You really have a sound understanding of the law and what it says don't you.

Except that the Constitution disagrees with you

There was no coup , Trump questioned the outcome , nothing more or nothing less .

No it doesn't . Just the same as did in Nixon v Kennedy , when three Democrats officials declared Kennedy the winner in Hawaii 3 votes to nil despite there having been184705 votes cast , when the result at the time before the recount had Nixon winning the state by 140 votes. The result would not have overturned the overall result of the 1960 election , but the act was declared legal

Not none of them are immune from Impeachment which comes with consequences from the Senate. The Constitution is clear on that. So you have a Grand Jury of 435 and a Jury of 100. Immunity from Article 3 Judicial review which could be referred by the Senate. This was not refered by the Senate but by the politically party in charge.

Weird to be mad about fellow Americans being able to get a weight off of their shoulders... That arguement is basically saying "I'm a Hater". Just sayin..

@StoryModeAJ, Weird that how successful Bidenomics is, that you can’t get a job and take care of your own debts, huh?

@@StoryModeAJ ''fellow Americans'' should pay their Debts/Loans....your arguement is basically saying i'm a freeloader. Just sayin..

​@@StoryModeAJweird to not be mad about having a "fellow American's" weight shoved onto your shoulders. MORON

@@StoryModeAJ I'm saying it's unfair.😳

Yes indeed. Thanks to the supreme Court.

Should Biden lose he should declare himself dictator, if SCOTUS then rules a President can be prosecuted Trump can then be prosecuted, if SCOTUS rules a President cannot be prosecuted Biden can stay in office forever, if SCOTUS rules neither way in continuing delays to help Trump, then Biden can stay in power as long as he wants until SCOTUS rules.

Shhhh! Let this play out. I am sure Dark Brandon is paying attention.

He will never be prosecuted. No Democrat is ever prosecuted. That in itself proves they all have immunity. Only Republicans do not have immunity.

Why?

Please get an education

He didn't Fords advisors suggested he do that to avoid shyt like this brought about by an out of control democrat party. Nixon was not even impeached. He resigned under political pressure once again to spare the country from people like you.

Something called Impeachment.... presidential immunity applies until impeachment is completed. Nixon was successfully impeached. Thus, he could be charged. Since they never removed Nixon from office, he pardoned himself. And Trump was never successfully impeached, so his immunity should apply. That's the difference.

​@@Craigalicioususa BECAUSE NIXON WAS A SELF-LOATING COWARD.

Well isn't that a form of immunity? Dah

Nixon and watergate is a joke compared to what they have done to Trump: lying to FISA court, spying on him in the white house, raiding mar a lago for having documents there as if they hadnt forced him to move his administration there by compromising the white house, impeaching him for asking about Bidens corrupt threats against a ukranian prosecutor (and it turned out he was right about it), corrupting and wielding the courts and law like they are weapons with endless witch hunts and false charges. I could go on but when a long train of abuses and usurpations, pursuing invariably the same objext evinces a design to reduce them under absolute despotism...

Article 2,section 4 of the constitution debunks such a myth as presidential immunity!

Yes! It’s dangerous for a president to have absolute immunity

​@@robertlucas5090Impeachment and removal from Office are different from criminal and/or civil prosecution.

@@omarjacks9788 conviction of Treason, Bribery, or other high crimes and misdemeanors is self- explanatory my friend. Hint! Keyword Crimes!

@@robertlucas5090 I think the key word is actually 'venue'.

Demon-rats thrive on chaos. Known fact

What happened to needing evidence first

MConnel said "don't impeach let the courts handle this". Then McCarthy said "Donald Trump bares responsibility in this". Then they realized that killed their carreer, and went right back. 😂

@@lordbread2083 so this is where "needing evidence" comes in? What if Trump has been indicted four times because they have evidence, but the evidence can't come in because of DJT delaying everything? 🤔

@mdmoz1777 Radical Democrats is what happened.

@@williambrown4058 what makes someone radical?

Impeachment is a legislative proceeding, not a judicial one

exactly right.....impeachment AND conviction are the remedies ....this is Obama lead garbage.

It's more than dark. It is just an extension of a long-term ongoing coup by Democrats against our republic. Notice that Democrats are never prosecuted when they are known to have committed actual crimes.

If they give the president immunity that means Biden and DoJ has authority as well..He’s better off taking these lawsuits as a Citizen and not a president. For the sake of any future president. Check mate

Congress is biased. A jury must be impartial. Also anything can be brought before Congress, even without evidence. For an arrest, there must be enough evidence to convict, brought to the judge. A crime has to be proven.

Move to a blue state.

Now you have Sandy H Greene, Santos, treason Trump, and Beetlejuice Boebert. Blame yourself.

*Brilliant! Bravo!* 💫 *Trump 2024!* 💖

You need some new material

this is old and so are you., trumps going to jail

More importantly, given that no source will attest to it, did it actually happen?

Official ketchup stains. LOL

It's funny how every thing that dig at trump for nobody ever heard or saw happen.

Ok. What did CNN tell you now?

@@PauletteWinters official tomato ketchup wall decor🤔

@@ExtremeFear I’m not an economist, but I’ve been doing this a long time,” Biden said. “Here’s the way to look at it: If car prices are too high right now, there are two solutions: You increase the supply of cars by making more of them. Or we reduce demand for cars by making Americans POORER” Joe Biden in New York Post - January 7, 2022 |

If trump won twice, how can he be president again? Term limits.....

all these interpretations of whether they have the right to make Trump accountable for his crimes. But no one on the right is actually considering whether Trump actually did the things he is accused of. Its all about the judge, or the prosecutor, or Hillary, or Hunter's laptop

January 6th wasn't a protest it was an attack

BOT

Calling the Secretary of State in Georgia and pressuring him in a one hour long mafia like call to just make up 11780 votes for him out of the thin air, has hardly anything to do with defending the constitution! It has to do with violating it !

Which wich or witch or which are you bitchin' 'bout?

TRUMP NEVER Held HIS CONSTITUTIONAL Duty's

where is this written?

@@dwaynejordan5898 The MAGA/Trump Bible!!

Working !

His third wife really wanted to be by his side during his adultery trial, but she has better things to do.

@@Trumpstinks Melania, do you want to hit Stormy Daniel? Mélanie: No, why? I pity this woman for having to endure it for......... seconds!!!!

@@brega6286😂 Melania works?

They all know he is a liar, cheater, thief, scum bag and Master Grifter!!!

What Barr wrote sure was not to favor Trump.

@@Edward-eo5fv it rewrote the entire outcome including stating that there was no Russian collusion. And the MAGA cultists bought it.

If MAGA knew the truth they would not think Barr’s version was critical of him. Especially his identification as a co-conspirator who was not indicted only because he was president. Another reason (alongside the two impeachments +++++） why he was always going to be indicted post presidency.

It is Faux News! Where they spin like tops! And the audience isn't exactly the brightest bulbs in the box.

@@Edward-eo5fv lol....guess who endorsed Trump.....

Not a waste of time. If it's broke, you fix it! I'm not sure how you do it in the third world and I don't really care.

Speak English

The War in Ukraine WOULD have ended in 2022. Russia, Ukraine, France & Germany had ALL agreed to a Peace Solution. Then the Biden Inc State dept.... Convinced Ukraine to drop that deal.. In exchange for a LOT more Taxpayers $$$

No lack of weak minds at Fox.

Hope you don’t find out that trump put us in more debt than the last 4 presidents.

​@@charliebrown4697🤦🏻‍♀️

have you ever heard of checks and balances? Laws passed in congress still needs to be lawful..i.e abide by the constitution...if they so choose they can change the constitution.

@@dwaynejordan5898 My point exactly thank you

This is so frustrating because the Democrats always challenge elections. In fact, the entire Russian collusion hoax was a form of election challenge and the Democrats tried to tie up Trump's presidency with false accusations for years and were never prosecuted for it. Democrat criminality is legend. No prosecutions ever occur. Shame on Trump's attorneys for not pressing their case more aggressively before the court. Shame on the court for buying into these politicized prosecutions and obvious election interference.

WERE REDEFINING POLITCS.

Ummmmm….the executive branch consists of more than the President alone.

@@melaniedelaware7500 Yeah, they serve as the HANDS of the President at his pleasure. The President alone IS the executive branch. Without the President they wouldn't exist.

@@melaniedelaware7500 BTW, the courts have ruled this. “The Constitution itself places no limit on the President’s authority to act on matters which concern him or his own conduct. On the contrary, the Constitution’s grant of law enforcement power to the President is plenary. Constitutionally, it is wrong to conceive of the President as simply the highest officer within the Executive branch hierarchy. He alone is the Executive branch. As such, he is the sole repository of all Executive powers conferred by the Constitution. Thus, the full measure of law enforcement authority is placed in the President’s hands, and no limit is placed on the kinds of cases subject to his control and supervision. While the President has subordinates --the Attorney General and DOJ lawyers -- who exercise prosecutorial discretion on his behalf, they are merely “his hand,” Ponzi v. Fessenden, 258 U.S. 254, 262 (1922) - the discretion they exercise is the President’s discretion, and their decisions are legitimate precisely because they remain under his supervision, and he is still responsible and politically accountable for them.”

Wrong. The POTUS can and does act in a private capacity even while the VP is acting as a V.P. The VP does not need to be sworn in as POTUS for the POTUS to be acting in a private capacity. There is nothing in case law or the Constitution to support your argument. If there is, please state it.

@@emilyalice1 The VP is not acting as a VP. The VP is the VP. Article II vests ALL the executive powers in the President and the President alone. The President IS the Executive Branch. Everyone else within the Executive Branch serve at the pleasure of the President for his benefit alone. They are merely his hands. If the President who alone IS the Executive Branch was allowed to go off and act in a personal capacity that would literally mean the Executive Branch becomes abandoned because the President cannot be two things at once. Because the President alone IS the Executive Branch he is always in his official capacity 24/7 even while he sleeps, while he vacations and while he does anything that is even for his own personal benefit. It is in fact an official act by the President, not a personal act as a private citizen. Once the President takes the oath of office he is no longer a private citizen. He is the President who becomes a sovereign power as the Executive Branch of Government. The ONLY way the President can ever act outside of his official capacity as President is only if he steps down to take a leave of office which would in fact require the VP to be sworn in as the acting President until the President is able to return to office in his official capacity. This is why the VP was sworn in as acting President when President Reagan had to have a medical procedure that required him to be put under and the same when Bush had to and the same when Biden had to and Kamala Harris was sworn in as acting President until Biden was able to return to his official capacity. Otherwise there would not have been any need for them to be sworn in as acting President. If anything did happen where any of those Presidents did not recover they could have sworn the VP in at that time where they would have become President. Why do you think they were sworn in as acting President? Because if they weren't the Executive Branch would be completely abandoned without a President able to serve in an official capacity. That can never be allowed because the Executive Branch cannot be allowed to be abandoned where it would literally cease to exist for any period of time, even if for just a few minutes. The President is the only person that is in his official capacity every second of every day from the moment he takes the oath of office to the moment he leaves office. The only exception is if the President is unable to serve in an official capacity and the VP is sworn in as actine President until the President is able to return in his official capacity. See the 25th Amendment Section 3. Whenever the President transmits to the President pro tempore of the Senate and the Speaker of the House of Representatives his written declaration that he is unable to discharge the powers and duties of his office, and until he transmits to them a written declaration to the contrary, such powers and duties shall be discharged by the Vice President as Acting President. If a President acts in a personal capacity then he is in fact unable to discharge the powers and duties of his office since it is literally impossible to do both at the same moment in time. If the President is acting in a personal capacity then he is not in his official capacity. If he is in his official capacity then he cannot be in a personal capacity. Since President Trump never stepped aside by having the VP step in as acting President then everything he did was in his official capacity and a Presidential act, not a personal act.