@@hgjghg3435Romania had a big impact on the war, the Romanian Army reached Odessa and Stalingrad and Romania was giving oil to the German Reich. Plus other things.
I appreciate that this video tries to lay out the facts instead of injecting constant opinion and bias. If the facts reveal bad things there is no need to inject additional opinion anyway. Well done!
Whoever is reading this, I pray that whatever you’re growing through gets better and whatever you’re battling with makes your situation better as you’re continuing to be a better person each day. I have faith that you’ll turn out great as your circumstances will change. Have a fantastic day! You got this! 🤗💪🏼❤
Stalin never "defeated all his rivals to become leader" his position as general secretary basically made him the man who had to know everything for everyone and was constantly hounded by the other members for either information or help with issues but his position he was given as general secretary is the one he held until his death but that position isn't like president or prime minister at the time it was actually made up by Lenin to get him out of military control after his spat with Trotsky. ironically Stalin basically fell into the role of leader. It wasn't until the purges in the 30's that he started actually using his power to defend against counter revolutionaries in the party while also causing possibly a few innocent members to parish caused by anxiety due to the fear of war with either Germany or the West.
This is just another hogwash on Stalin's history. You cleverly skipped the part in 1917, when 14 Capitalist countries invaded USSR and made deals with white army to divide the lands of USSR, which made the Soviets to handle the traitors within the party with iron hands. What Stalin did through rapid industrialization, made USSR to withstand Germany's brutal attack, when the western capitalist countries folded within days and weeks. France, Belgium and Netherlands lost the statehood to German invasion in a matter of weeks. UK only survived because of the English Channel separating Britain from West Europe. It was USSR that faced the brutal invasion and beat back the Nazis. If it wasn't for Stalin, USSR would have folded within 2 months at max.
what are u talking about it took 6 months for ussr to even come close to moscow. Also he was very arrogant, ignored all warning signals from The allies about potential Nazi invasion and only started to win when he gave his generals more freedom and when allies started to invade from the west
@@Henry_john78 allies landed in italy 1943 and they cleared up africa way before that. They also gave an insane amount of weapons and supplies to the soviets. Soviets also didnt perform that well, germans were the ones who made a lot of mistakes in later years. Im not neglecting soviet achievements, but they were definitely not the outcome of Stalin. Probably many leaders would do better than him actually
Stalin fue un GIGANTE de su tiempo. Iósif Stalin vivió en una época histórica, en donde el mundo requería de liderazgos fuertes. Así que tuvo que ser un dirigente enérgico. Severo. ¡Imponente! O, de otro modo, la “Madre Rusia” hubiera desaparecido del mapa. Stalin fue lo que tenía qué ser: Un Gran Líder. Un Gran Estadista. Stalin heredó un país yermo, rural, preterido, analfabeta, hambriento, supersticioso, deprimido, insalubre, carente de todo y, para colmo, delirantemente desamparado. Rusia era entonces, un país de “Siervos” (Esclavos), y Stalin lo convirtió en una súper potencia industrializada y poderosa, que puso a temblar al mundo. Rusia estaba atrasada en 100 años con respecto a Occidente y, superadas las precariedades y todas las devastaciones que causó la Guerra, él, Stalin, el “Fundador de la URSS”, puso en marcha el primer Programa Aero-Espacial del mundo. Seis años después en 1957, lanzaron el Sputnik I. Eisenhower, al saber de semejante hazaña, creó la NASA en 1958. Kennedy inauguró el primer vuelo tripulado hasta 1961. ¡Jáh! Stalin recibió una Rusia que estuvo en guerra casi 30 años. (Empezando con la humillante derrota frente al Imperio de Japón, 1904-1905. Revolución Rusa, 1905. WWI, 1914-1918. Revolución Bolchevique 1917-1922. Guerra Civil contra los “Rusos Blancos”, 1922-1927. De nuevo, Guerra contra Japón, en 1939. WWII 1940-1945… Más la Pandemia de la mal llamada “Fiebre Española”, en 1918-1920. Después les llegó el brote de la “Peste Bubónica” en 1926. ―En 1932-33, Stalin implementó una campaña general de vacunación contra la viruela, la cual, en 1936, propuso que fuese una campaña a nivel mundial. Iniciada por Stalin y secundada por todas las naciones del planeta, la viruela se erradicó en 1980―. Y, además el “Crack Financiero de Wall Street”, de 1929-1937). O sea que, Stalin, asumió el poder de un país golpeado por las guerras, enfermo por la Pandemia y, económicamente quebrado por la crisis mundial. Estas calamidades dejaron una Rusia desposeída y miserable. Stalin la rescató imponiendo disciplina y trabajo. Un ejemplo de rendimiento y nuevas tierras productivas: Al final del Segundo Plan Quinquenal, se logró la siembra de 14 Millones de hectáreas de tierras antes yermas. Ya terminada la WWII, en 1947, se alcanzó el doble de Millones de hectáreas sembradas. Ni antes ni hoy, nadie en el mundo puso en duda su ENORME LIDERAZGO. Stalin fue genial; magnífico, cultísimo y astuto. Fue un Titán con mano de hierro. Amado por su pueblo y temido por sus enemigos. Hace más de 70 años que Stalin murió y, la Propaganda Occidental, no afloja en denostarlo. ¿Con qué propósito? ¿Ya como para qué? ¿Cuál sería su utilidad ahora? ¿Stalin se convirtió en un “Fantasma Ideológico” que causa temor? [*Y, acá, aparte, va un dato que dimensiona la grandeza de Stalin. Joseph Stalin, fue nominado DOS veces al Premio Nobel de la Paz (en 1945 y 1948), con el apoyo de múltiples instituciones universitarias de Reino Unido, Irlanda, Francia, Italia, Suiza, Bélgica, y Grecia. Esas nominaciones fueron tomadas en serio por el Comité en Oslo. A él se le acabó su tiempo a los 75 años. Stalin murió en 1953, sin recibir nada de nadie, pero sí, todo el reconocimiento de su propio pueblo amoroso y agradecido.].
the rsfsr included all of central asia. the central asia was divided into ssr's later. moscow is really far from where it actually is. Stalin becamse dictator in 1924, not 1929. Romania wasnt annexed as a part of the molotov ribbentrop pact, but bessarabia (moldavia/modova). the capture of berlin didnt lead to hitler suiciding, he suicided 2 days earlier. yugoslavia existed at the time, u showed modern day borders which took a lot more violence to create. the soviet army's name is the red army. its not kim 2 in roman sung, its il, the letters i and L.
Ты сравни что было с пост-советскими странами во времена Сталина (исключая вторую мировую, тут все и так понятно), и что за последние 30 лет. Особенно на страны Кавказа и средней Азии обрати внимание.
God is great!! From nobody to a very man. But when become great plase let us not for get The God who made us great..I know that that's will be a great man with God above!!!!!
To industrialize, there is always a consequence, especially when the Western "democratic" (Britain, US, France) and the Nazis want to destroy you. I'm not saying that he can't have done even better, but he did do a lot for Russia today. If he didn't industrialize the USSR and lead the country through the great patriotic war, it would have been destroyed by the Nazis.
Obviously, Stalin was a dictator and was responsible for the deaths of millions of people. Additionally, he eliminated most of his rivals, but on the other hand, he was a hero who deserves all appreciation for the survival of Russia and USSR. It was he who, with his strong determination of throwing Germans out of the USSR by defeating Nazi Germany. Had he not been that cruel, the USSR would have been part of Hitler's Nazi Germany. You had covered one part by showing cruelty and atrocities carried out by Stalin. Would be highly appreciated if someone could show up the courage and determination of Stalin that had led USSR in defeating the Nazi Germany. Whatever he did did it for the existence of Russia and USSR more than his personal gains. He did his best for making his country strong enough to face the challenges of today's colonizers and American imperialism.
Nah stalin had great generals is reason they won look at how many disaster especially early in war he's responsible for hell he lost good general because he refused to retreat from Kiev Rather than be encircled witch happened plus a made another good one turn against Ussr because he was refused to Espace from an encirclement
If he eliminated his rivals, explain to me how an anti-stalinist guy took over after his death? Does not make sense. And he did not kill millions like you're saying.
So many people done nothing wrong was jailed and killed, how can he be hero? evil hero may be, as Mafia gang like mess killing bully may be, dangerous bully.
Cope harder butthurt. Stalin was and is still the leader of the world proletariat, meanwhile the leaders of your countries were exploiting the third world by making them colonies.
The greatest leader of the 21st century, I know most westerners would disagree, but no country developed as quick as the Soviet Union under comrade Stalin, under severe pressure from inside and outside the Soviet Union he conquered, without him, Russia would be standing as it is today
Stalin. Was a hero for taking out hitler and defeating the nazis. Stalin was evil. But. Not as evil as Hitler. Stalin. Was lesser of the 2 evils. Hitler should of just stayed paiting. Then those 6 million Jews would of survived.
@@Josef_Stalin1878- agreed. He was more of a hero. And many people get the gulags incorrect. Not everyone was sent to gulags. Only people who where traitors. Working for nazis we’re sent there. Gulags we’re prisons. For people who were deemed As a traitor. Stalin made a strong economiy and strong industrialization. He did more good than bad. Hitler was insane. Hitler killed millions of inccceent people. Stalin. Only took out who was a traitor.
@@Hardcoredawg420Stalin actually soft on the traitors, that is why some of the Trotskyists escaped and I filtrates the party. Even Krushchev was a Trotskyist.
Good video. I've always believed that people like him can be considered great, but just because they did things at a great scale when opportunities came. It is a simple greatness in the idea of social archetype organisation. It comes down to first impressions that can be used to tune decisions a bit and for nothing else. Just like encouraging patriotism or the question of "when does culture matter in politics?", this all is in the territory of natural conditions, not drastic dynamics like an actual movement. And these kinds of dictators are true believers in the system but corrupt within the path and solutions for beliefs. They just keep doing what they were doing in life before because there's no clear limitation to change things around. But where I'm from, that's the default opinion even kids seem to be born with, and this still is an enlightened centrist general summary comment that anyone can find worth in for any reason because there are no real opinions
