Judge Jails Young Thug's Lawyer After He Exposes ILLEGAL MEETING

Подписаться 3,2 млн

Просмотров 1,3 млн

50% 1

It's the lawyer that's the OG 💎Get 15% off a subscription to Spellbook with code LEGALEAGLE legaleagle.link/spellbook ⚖️⚖️⚖️ Do you need a great lawyer? I can help! legaleagle.link/eagleteam
Welcome back to LegalEagle. The most avian legal analysis on the internets.
🚀 Watch my next video early & ad-free on Nebula! legaleagle.link/watchnebula
👔 Suits by Indochino! legaleagle.link/indochino
GOT A VIDEO IDEA? TELL ME!
▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀
Send me an email: devin@legaleagle.show
MY COURSES
▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀
Interested in LAW SCHOOL? Get my guide to law school! legaleagle.link/lawguide
Need help with COPYRIGHT? I built a course just for you! legaleagle.link/copyrightcourse
SOCIAL MEDIA & DISCUSSIONS
▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀
Twitter: legaleagle.link/twitter
Facebook: legaleagle.link/facebook
Tik Tok: legaleagle.link/tiktok
Instagram: legaleagle.link/instagram
Reddit: legaleagle.link/reddit
Podcast: legaleagle.link/podcast
OnlyFans legaleagle.link/onlyfans
Patreon legaleagle.link/patreon
BUSINESS INQUIRIES
▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀
Please email my agent & manager at legaleagle@standard.tv
LEGAL-ISH DISCLAIMER
▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀
Sorry, occupational hazard: This is not legal advice, nor can I give you legal advice. I AM NOT YOUR LAWYER. Sorry! Everything here is for informational purposes only and not for the purpose of providing legal advice. You should contact your attorney to obtain advice with respect to any particular issue or problem. Nothing here should be construed to form an attorney-client relationship. Also, some of the links in this post may be affiliate links, meaning, at no cost to you, I will earn a small commission if you click through and make a purchase. But if you click, it really helps me make more of these videos! All non-licensed clips used for fair use commentary, criticism, and educational purposes. See Hosseinzadeh v. Klein, 276 F.Supp.3d 34 (S.D.N.Y. 2017); Equals Three, LLC v. Jukin Media, Inc., 139 F. Supp. 3d 1094 (C.D. Cal. 2015).
Special thanks:
Stock video and imagery provided by Getty Images and AP Archives
Music provided by Epidemic Sound
Short links by pixelme.me (pxle.me/eagle)
Maps provided by MapTiler/Geolayers

Опубликовано:

13 июн 2024

Ссылка:

Скачать:

Готовим ссылку...

Добавить в:

Мой плейлист

Посмотреть позже

Комментарии : 3,9 тыс.

@FSM_Soleran 11 дней назад

Judge: "My secret illegal meeting was secret, so how'd you find out about it?"

@midnighthaven 11 дней назад

I have my ways but I will not betray my source, so just put me in jail with my client please🤐 I imagine this lawyer is going to get all the clients after this.

@meekrab9027 11 дней назад

@@midnighthaven Also you know that lawyer is going to be a celebrity in jail, assuming he ever serves a minute of that sentence.

@chrisharley5781 11 дней назад

@@meekrab9027He bonded out, everybody in the jail can't afford his price because it just went WAY up lol

@JDO6715 11 дней назад

"There will be no tattling in my courtroom!"

@MultiClassGeek 11 дней назад

@@meekrab9027 I think he wound up spending a couple of days in jail. Presumably he came out of there with a shit-ton of future clients.

@arcedavida 11 дней назад

This judge needs to be investigated and review all his cases... this is obviously not his first time using corruption.

@nathanlonghair 11 дней назад

Oh yeah they need to dig DEEP

@nobodyimportant7804 11 дней назад

He seems very comfortable for someone caught breaking the law.

@glossywhite8634 11 дней назад

WHO?!? Seriously WHO would do the investigation? They are all on the same team.

@pugachevskobra5636 11 дней назад

It's insane. I thought Mr Steele was just exaggerating about the judge's kindly disposition towards the State but Jesus, it's blatantly obvious now.

@Epicurwat 11 дней назад

This isn't corrruption. This is stupidity. Or STAGGERING levels of arrogance. A Judge is not part of the prosecution.

@stephaniesimpson-white3293 8 дней назад

How generous of the judge to provide the basis for a fresh new lawyer contempt of court case! Now they won't have to refer to one all the way from 1994 anymore. 😂

@pilzner1118 4 дня назад

FOR REAL 😂😂😂

@MadGrubble 2 дня назад

lol yea. sooo generous ❤️ 🤣

@georgiafain3747 16 часов назад

2024 It was interesting to watch the Judge dismiss precedent after precedent against his own ruling.

@jugo1944 15 часов назад

You gotta think it's basis for a mistrial as well

@naverilllang 6 часов назад

The year is 2054. A lawyer being held in contempt is trying to use a case from 2024 to justify his position.

@ChrisVillagomez 7 дней назад

So if a judge ordered me to do something literally illegal in a courtroom, I'm legally obligated to follow that order, just because a judge said so? This judge can get stuffed

@blackenedsprite8542 4 дня назад

Ironically the 'but I was told to' defence is also literally not considered a valid defence 😅

@neilkurzman4907 3 дня назад

Hopefully the upper court will hold the judge and contempt, and set up to the exact same sentence.

@StarvingAutist 3 дня назад

Try defending yourself from an unlawful arrest. The law is for the rich.

@erikgilson1687 22 часа назад

@StarvingAutist I mean it's besides the point but Young Thug is rich and presumably so is his lawyer so they'll have a better chance than most

@repatch43 6 часов назад

Talk about catch-22, follow the order and be arrested for something illegal, not follow the order and be arrested for not following the order. All logic has left the chat.

@Vampyratus 11 дней назад

Honestly, that is going to be the best advertisement that lawyer will ever need; "I care that much about the rights of my clients and sources that I would literally go to jail rather than betray their confidentiality!"

@edwardallenthree 11 дней назад

If I ever am indicted for racketeering in Georgia, I know who I'm hiring.

@gabrote42 11 дней назад

Brian Steel always does this kinda stuff when he appears in cases

@Gildedmuse 11 дней назад

@@gabrote42In a bad "always has to make a scene way"? Or a "always goes above and beyond" way?

@olorin3815 11 дней назад

@@edwardallenthreewell i would hope you arent gonna need a racketeering lawyer in the 1st place LOL but yeah always sad when incompetence of the judge, prosecutor or some other state actor derails a trial like that. Instead of there being a proper proccess with evidence all everyone is remember is this stupid judge and feel simphatetiv towards the lawyer which might transfer to the defendant as well if its a mistrial and goes to the next trial, so regardless of young thug is guilty or not hes probably way better off just because of an incompetent judge

@gabrote42 11 дней назад

@@Gildedmuse The second one. Look up some of his cases, some are pretty funny. Not quite "Opposing counsel used ChatGPT" level funny but pretty good.

@unhaix707 11 дней назад

This judge needs to be removed from the bench. He clearly has no intention of presiding over fair trials.

@ion1984 11 дней назад

I work at a court in California - obviously none of my co workers are following this - and when I let them know what was at the center of it, they could not believe what the judge had done. Even what are typically referred to as "exparte" hearings, here, STILL have to notice other side by a certain time, to give them at least an opportunity to appear. to have done it with no notice, and with the expectation that somehow the other side wouldn't find out, is suuuuuper sus.

@TheCaniblcat 11 дней назад

Always fun when a judge disregards the law in favor of his own personal feelings.

@error00001 11 дней назад

If the law was just the judge would be imprisoned but I think we all know that's not going to happen

@TeganGibby0 11 дней назад

I've unfortunately seen enough of this from local judges where I used to live to know that it's not as much of an exceptional situation as it should be. Heck, I've seen an attorney openly admit to blackmailing witnesses in court with the judge's consent (the attorney suffered no penalties and the "evidence" was allowed, leading to a criminal conviction), and I've seen a judge actively conspire with a plaintiff due to a close personal relationship to the point that they admitted as such on the record (and they obviously ruled for the plaintiff). They're just really, really lucky that someone actually decided to challenge it in such a high profile case. In lower profile cases, no one cares enough to make sure there's justice as long as someone goes to jail.

@Otis151 11 дней назад

Was the judge maybe trying to protect the witness from being killed? Maybe we don’t have the full story yet. But, yeah, looks bad.

@georhodiumgeo9827 6 дней назад

As a professional criminal I can confirm this judge is encroaching on my profession and should leave criminal activity to more experienced persons.

@zill0678 5 дней назад

just engage in general opportunistic criminality or do you specialized in a particular field of illegal activity?

@rickitynick4463 4 дня назад

If he's admitting to being a professional criminal he's either a CEO or Lobbyist.

@kiriuxeosa8716 3 дня назад

@@rickitynick4463or a congressmen

@justwhythis5102 2 дня назад

@@rickitynick4463this is giving ceo vibes🗣️💥

@RyanBlackhawke 2 дня назад

😂😂😂

@bebebaybay1141 6 дней назад

If the young thug with all the money he has to pay the best lawyer is being wronged by justice, imagine those who go to jail without any defense and still disrespected

@YaIdcReportMe 3 дня назад

They get to waste less money with same outcomes

@kiriuxeosa8716 3 дня назад

Sadly that was my first thought All the backroom deals happening with these old rich fuqs buying their way out of court and leaving tje victims holding not just the injustice but the lawyer and court fees as well

@davewood406 2 дня назад

The money angle is one of the things annoying me. Several legal analysts have lead me to believe this is nearly certain to end in a mistrial, all for nothing but the Judge is putting off dealing with all this after the trial has run it's course knowing full well it is likely all for nothing. Lighting the defendant's and the taxpayer's money on fire...

@bebebaybay1141 2 дня назад

@@davewood406 That’s the point, despite the money he still suffers disrespect, but the one who has a mediocre defense can suffer even more. Remembering that this is the life of a person who can spend years unfairly inside a cell.

@davewood406 2 дня назад

@@bebebaybay1141 the guy that was on the stand all last week has the most to lose. If I’m not mistaken the prosecution was going to hold him until all the court cases were heard. Which could be years.

@Abu-huraira.0 11 дней назад

The irony is that the court, which usually hands out gold stars to snitches, throws a tantrum when someone tattles on them. 😂

@LeoPard-HQ 11 дней назад

🔔🔔🔔🔔 🤣

@wouldiwasshookspeared4087 11 дней назад

Exactly what I was thinking.

@Blasted2Oblivion 11 дней назад

I didn't even think of that. Kinda funny when you separate it from the situation.

@SerEthan 11 дней назад

Rules for thee not for me

@tacobowler 11 дней назад

Supreme Court is still whining about who leaked the anti-Roe decision.

@orangeaurora 11 дней назад

judge "can i see some case law" lawyer "heres some case law" judge "i dont like that case law"

@youmukonpaku3168 11 дней назад

"good news your honor, you're about to be the case law."

@TheEDFLegacy 10 дней назад

@@youmukonpaku3168 She should have said that in court 😅!

@zarkovitch42 9 дней назад

Yeah,like you got any thing Newer like 😂

@gmanley146 9 дней назад

@@youmukonpaku3168 "You're being found in contempt of court for murdering the judge"

@nonyabisness6306 9 дней назад

he is in fact not bound by case law.

@marinecorp179 6 дней назад

Fun fact. Case law never expires. So even if a case law is from 1960 it still stands as the guideline. Where did this judge go to law school?

@Lucifaar 4 дня назад

He got his law degree on the back of a cereal box.

@D-Vinko 3 дня назад

Idk apparently the supreme Court just doesn't care about that.

@jennymunday7913 3 дня назад

I've heard of cases where they successfully used case law from the 1800s. The shade that lawyer threw when she explained it doesn't happen often... whew. Spicy.

@danielwilke7574 День назад

I wonder if he is one of those "elected" judges who have no clue what the law actually is. But fascists are gonna fascist I suppose. They should make this a constitutional rights case.

@repatch43 6 часов назад

Heck, there are laws on the books from the 1800s and earlier that are still perfectly valid, and even still enforced.

@GaetanoMattioli-bi1vi 6 дней назад

7:04 I love how after the judge holds Copeland in contempt the camera pans over to the seal reading "Constitution" and "Justice". The cameraman knew what they were doing lol.

@ed765super 11 дней назад

And this is TELEVISED! It makes me terrified about the shady sh!t that happens in the untelivised cases.

@pablodelsegundo9502 11 дней назад

You SHOULD be terrified.

@deamonsoul1 11 дней назад

Not much. Honestly this will likely get the judge sanctioned if not disbarred.

@nobodyexceptme7794 11 дней назад

We already have documented cases of them being on the take for private prisons and intentionally sentencing kids to jail for kickbacks whenever they had the chance.

@madhippy3 11 дней назад

Thats the thing, this illegal meeting was off camera so who knows what was happening.

@rileyfaelan 11 дней назад

AFAIU, Georgia just routinely televises its open court proceedings.

@toast3 11 дней назад

Judge: "I demand to know who narc'd about my illegal meeting!" Defense: "It was pure speculation on our part, up until you admitted to it."

@Alblaka 10 дней назад

That would have been hilarious, but also perjury on part of the lawyer. The moment the judge would be able to prove that you *did* in fact know about it, you would get slammed for it.

@PCDelorian 9 дней назад

@@Alblaka A better response would be its pure suspicion on our part, and then you can explain away any evidence you have as being the grounds of the suspicion if discovered.

@galaxykode9243 9 дней назад

Great answer

@BongoBaggins 9 дней назад

What the hell Is going on over there? If you colonists don't behave we'll have to take the oody country back

@kyletucker3811 9 дней назад

@@PCDelorianThat's basically what Information and Belief is.

@kap4020 8 дней назад

what i've learned most from this channel is that I will _never_ get good counsel because I am neither rich, nor powerful, nor famous.

@RetirededKat 4 дня назад

You don't need to be any of those things, you just need to be literate, intelligent, and belligerent.

@DB-zp9un 4 дня назад

Better Call Saul!! You need a "criminal" lawyer to deal with stuff like this.

@kiriuxeosa8716 3 дня назад

You and us all buddy

@randy7928 2 дня назад

the lawyers for the stars got their start working for people that couldn't afford good lawyers. Plenty of good lawyers that are undiscovered

@CrabbyOldLady 5 дней назад

Also, Eric Clapton has been indicted for his musical confession that he shot the sheriff. Clapton still maintains that he did not shoot no deputy. Johnny Cash has been posthumously indicted for shooting a man in Reno just to watch him die. And Freddie Mercury has been posthumously indicted for his confession to his mama that he just killed a man. Put a gun against his head, pulled his trigger, now he's dead. Prosecutors claimed that the charge is corroborated by Mercury's "Killer Queen", which speaks of "Gunpowder, gelatine, dynamite with a laser beam", clearly boasting about his expertise with lethal explosives.

@leroyjenkinz9791 3 дня назад

😂🎉

@RyanBlackhawke 2 дня назад

🤣🤣🤣

@northstarjakobs День назад

Additionally, within "Killer Queen", Mr. Mercury says this is "guaranteed to blow your mind"; perhaps another reference to the lethal shooting of the man confessed to his mother?

@mal2ksc 9 часов назад

@@northstarjakobs Mercury also says "I'm gonna make a supersonic man out of you" (and even extends the same courtesy to women later). Just remember it's not the fall that kills you, it's the sudden stop at the end.

@electrified0 11 дней назад

Being found in contempt for refusing to follow a potentially illegally issued order regarding a judge's potentially illegal activity is...certainly one way to play that.

@PropheticShadeZ 11 дней назад

This judge really doesnt see a problem with his behaviour Hes probably threatened info out of other lawyers

@killjoy1887 11 дней назад

Don't worry I have faith in the BAR I am sure he will get a small fine and a strongly worded letter also lose his pizza party privileges for the year.

@dhermitmorse 11 дней назад

@@killjoy1887 Ain't that the truth

@maeburekaiser 11 дней назад

@@killjoy1887I doubt it. Because the BAR disciplines lawyers, not judges. No say over judicial pizza parties.

@dangeary2134 10 дней назад

@@maeburekaisermost judges are required to have a BAR card. Also, Georgia should have a Judicial Oversight Committee. A simple look through the Georgia Constitution should be enough to get the ball rolling.

@PpP-dr1od 11 дней назад

"1994 was 30 years ago. Do you have any more recent case law?" "No, this issue doesn't come up very often. It seems most judges aren't as incompetent as you are."

@blackoak4978 11 дней назад

Sry, there isn't much case law regarding judges blatantly breaking this particular law

@bendooley550 11 дней назад

Precedent is precedent regardless of time. Thats whats kicking me.

@sophiejones3554 11 дней назад

@@bendooley550also 1994 was only exactly 30 years ago. In comparison to the 300 year weight of precedence, that's practically the blink of an eye.

@jawstrock2215 11 дней назад

same excuse used by a certain some else....

@VonJay 11 дней назад

@@blackoak4978can you show me the law where it says an ex parte can’t be called without altering the other party in emergency circumstances? Or circumstances in which alerting the party would defeat the purpose of the ex parte? Not saying any of you guys are wrong, just can’t find that law anywhere.

@topscorer212 5 дней назад

Just hearing him go over who young thug is, with no judgement in his voice, was so refreshing. Like so many people on the news when they talk about him make light of him being a rapper and you can hear their disapproving tone. It’s great to hear the legal eagle just be factual and properly state who he is and what he has done.

@jennymunday7913 3 дня назад

I loved it, and at the same time, it was funnier because he was so deadpan.

@maxastro 11 часов назад

Speaks well of him as a lawyer since that's literally his job!

@PetProjects2011 8 дней назад

To quote an old saying, "When exposing a crime is considered committing a crime, you know you live in a country that's run by criminals." What was very telling to me, was how actually pretty calm everyone in the courtroom is. Not a single person with a "Huh? What?" reaction. Which kinda tells me this sort of thing happens more often than we probably know.

@TheGotoGeek 7 дней назад

I sometimes think that trial lawyers take beta blockers, or maybe a small amount of Xanax, before appearances.

@onlycambriaa 7 дней назад

I’ve watched 94 days of this trial, and something crazy happens everyday.

@waterierStone 6 дней назад

@@TheGotoGeek they definitely take something, but unless you actually went to law school and learned Latin, then most of the numbers and words are going over your head.

@badgercdlyons 6 дней назад

I rather believe that they have done a LOT of homework on this issue on both sides and have all their ducks in a row, which is why they are so calm. All they have to do is present the evidence because they know they're in the right and need all their arguments entered in the court record for the appeals and Georgia Supreme Court to review later. The judge is increasingly shown to be in the wrong, which is why he keeps grasping further and further at straws to try to justify himself.

@MrSaintVehementus 4 дня назад

stupid quote... so cops can violate ur rights to catch you now? dude...

@mikeb.2925 11 дней назад

You can't have the defense attorney arrested and removed from the court AND THEN continue the trial without the attorney present. WTF is this judge thinking????

@TheEDFLegacy 10 дней назад

Right?!

@thewhitefalcon8539 10 дней назад

"lol I win"

@GoErikTheRed 10 дней назад

I think that because Young thug had more than one lawyer present, it was presumed that they could continue. Still pretty sketch though

@mikeb.2925 10 дней назад

@GoErikTheRed incorrect. The defendant has the right to the counsel of his choice. The court has to respect and protect that right. Just because there are multiple attorneys doesn't allow the judge to remove one.

@AToneForOurSins 10 дней назад

@@mikeb.2925 If he did not clearly specify which lawyer was HIS CHOICE though, then the case still could go on with multiple lawyers present. He just needed to specify whether he was okay with that or not. How is the court supposed to know that the one of his three lawyers was the ONE he chose when he did not specify that after the fact?

@Kardia_of_Rhodes 10 дней назад

It's disturbing how many law scenarios recently have been a case of: Lawyer - "Your honor, it's the law. These are his constitutional rights." Judge - "Yeah, but it's my court." We have way too many judges that have no interest in serving justice and only wish to "make examples of people".

@Mainyehc 8 дней назад

@@bushman1492that’s the problem with the US vis-à-vis France: they think they’re so special and exceptional just because they’ve become independent and implemented a democracy at around the same time as the French Revolution; here’s the thing, France is already in its FIFTH Republic, and for pretty good reasons, wheres the US… got stuck with the same constitution for 235 years now, which, even with all the amendments and whatnot, is not normal by any standard. They just lucked out until now, and judging by the seriously stupid oversights on the part of the founding fathers and other politicians over the years, we may be witnessing the first true challenges to its fitness for purpose.

@charliewaters5289 7 дней назад

And that's just it. It's not their court, it belongs to WE, THE PEOPLE. We just allow them to sit in a chair at our discretion.

@bloodink9508 7 дней назад

That's what happens when judges seek election from the "bootstrap" "tough on crime" crowds. Real justice doesn't fit on a bumper sticker.

@doomsdayrabbit4398 7 дней назад

@@MainyehcBingo. Even the guys who were involved in writing it figured we'd have a new one by now. They figured we'd have a new one by 1810!

@youngrootv 7 дней назад

@@Mainyehcthis is a big issue in political theory actually, the living constitution vs the originalist. Living meaning the constitution should be changing and evolving vs the originalist meaning it should stay how it is. We unfortunately have too many old, stuck in their ways people that think that the constitution is some holy scripture or something that doesn’t need to be changed.

@CommissarMitch 5 дней назад

I saw the title and thought "That is a bit presumptions is it not?" before I learned his art name was Young Thug.

@jvacar 8 дней назад

This judge is dangerous. He's so brazenly ignorant of the law he's doing this on camera with national media attention. When i first heard about this i thought "that's like, really bad and not at all how that's supposed to work, right?" They might as well just call this a mistrial now

@angelitabecerra 11 дней назад

Young Thug has the *best* lawyer and the *worst* judge. And yeah, that's goddamn metal af

@drunkpaulocosta9301 11 дней назад

No it's not. It's nothing to do with "Metal" What the hell are you even talking about?

@Contevent 11 дней назад

@@drunkpaulocosta9301 Shut it gatekeeper

@RHCole 11 дней назад

@@drunkpaulocosta9301 Going to jail because you are upholding your principles is not only metal af, it's also punk af and based af.

@thejosie 11 дней назад

@@drunkpaulocosta9301u r not very metal

@dismurrart6648 11 дней назад

I'm genuinely surprised that lyrics are being used as evidence. We have people singing about summoning dragons and living in post apocalyptic Martian colonies or whatever. Guess we should jail John Mellencamp for admitting to being a gangster and a thug in hey soul sister.

@Kodiak42 11 дней назад

That judge is the picture of impropriety

@KenLieck 11 дней назад

He's a "Young Thudge"...

@oracleofdelphi4533 11 дней назад

He should get in line. The people above him include: Justice Clarence Thomas, Judge Eileen Cannon, Justice Samuel Alito, Judge John Murphy (Fl.), this judge, Justice Brett Kavenaugh. And many more.

@ashkebora7262 11 дней назад

well... less so than the SC... unfortunately.

@firefly4f4 11 дней назад

I'd argue he's in the conversation, but that two or three on SCOTUS and one in Florida have first claim to that title.

@Dommifax 11 дней назад

does it just seem like judicial corruption is on the rise and it has always been like this (we just didn't hear about it as often) or is this a new phenomenon? this is like straight out of a bad legal drama

@daniwalmsley611 6 дней назад

Genuinely how tf can we simultaneously rely on common law from another country, written before the founding of this country and simultaneously dismiss case law from 1994 as "too old"

@bennuter 5 дней назад

I plead the fifth, naaa the fifth is way to old I don't recognise it

@blackenedsprite8542 4 дня назад

@@bennutergotta plead the 8th now.

@chrispreston256 4 дня назад

You don't understand law. Common law is God's law or law of the land which does not include man made law. Case law which is nothing more than Common law being enforced by the court that is being violated by others. Regardless of year, until case law is overturned the original ruling still stands. Moreover Fulton County superior court is a company not a court. Quick business search on manta proves that so that means it's not a court of law but administrative hearing.

@chrispreston256 4 дня назад

@@bennuterneed an understanding of what you're talking about. Constitution only applies to government. The bill of rights or the first ten amendments are just a few rights that the people have that government has zero authority over and must comply. Anyone who reads the constitution should immediately see that the government established by the constitution is no longer in effect.

@D-Vinko 3 дня назад

@@chrispreston256 If you're confused by Chris's ramblings here, it's because he's using Sovereign Citizen logic. An easy way to identify that is by his redefining of subject terms. He calls a specific court a company, which it's not, it's a superior court with jurisdiction over Fulton county (it's in the name), with 20 ELECTED judges, whom are elected by the voters of Fulton County.

@PsychoMuffinSDM 9 дней назад

"He is entitled to due process... entitled to show of cause" ... judge starts grumbling...

@HiddenDarkHM 8 дней назад

"How dare you dare you bring the law into the sanctity of my courtroom!"

@danielhale1 10 дней назад

"Don't you have a more up-to-date precedent to cite?" "Sir, other judges have avoided breaking this law for 40 years. You get to be the new latest precedent."

@spvillano 5 дней назад

At this point, I really have to be up front and ask honestly, just how much money and real property was transferred during their ex parte "meeting"? Sounds like RICO was being violated by most of the officers of the court. Of course, corruption and Georgia courts... Well, I repeat myself.

@zwenkwiel816 5 дней назад

@@spvillanowait who would pay who in this case??

@zwenkwiel816 5 дней назад

@@spvillanowait who would pay who in this case??

@spvillano 5 дней назад

@@zwenkwiel816 good question, as RICO cases can get convoluted.

@WindGunner 4 дня назад

gotta correct you hear 30 years*, I am not forty yet

@carterdc3576 11 дней назад

Best legal ad ever. “I WILL go to jail for you!”

@AkariSarzul 11 дней назад

with*

@DemolitionManDemolishes 11 дней назад

@@AkariSarzul With "with" it's not so great anymore 😁

@Alblaka 11 дней назад

Second only to "I'll literally be shot to prove your innocence."

@JordonBishop-ug6ii 9 дней назад

@@Alblaka You dont prove innocence. Litterally 0 defendants have ever been found innocent.

@zwenkwiel816 5 дней назад

@@DemolitionManDemolishes why not? If you're a lawyer would you rather go in alone. Or go in with a rich and famous rapper/alleged gang leader? Like going in alone you might end up with people who aren't as friendly...

@donaldpero2 9 дней назад

All those judges cases need to go under review

@nocturnalwolf7559 5 дней назад

The lawyer's new slogan: I will go to jail for you. The amount of clients he will get after this 😂

@hockysa 10 дней назад

“When exposing a crime is treated as committing a crime, you are being ruled by criminals.” Edward Snowden

@PetProjects2011 8 дней назад

Ah thank you. I was wondering who said that quote.

@mcspaddin 6 дней назад

LOL, that's a terrible attributation. It's not the exposing that got him, it was the breaking the law to expose it that got him.

@OneBiasedOpinion 6 дней назад

He tried to warn us and we ignored it.

@NeoAstrisk 6 дней назад

@mcspaddin why are we more concerned about what he did vs. what the government did and continues to do?

@mcspaddin 6 дней назад

@@NeoAstrisk I'm not necessarily, but two wrongs don't make a right. That and the OP comment is so laughably not relevant to the situation because of what I pointed out. There's rule of law and evidenciary process for a reason. There's certainly situations where breaking those is necessecary for the greater good, but you'd still be breaking the law. Steel has clear ground over Snowden in that he hasn't actually broken any laws.

@jamierisk1216 10 дней назад

I'm a paralegal in Atlanta and have had the pleasure of working with Mr. Steel in an appeal. He is amazing! This dude is a boss and very well respected here. Also his contempt charge was overturned and he did not go to jail

@cjbprime 10 дней назад

I don't believe the contempt charge has been overturned. The emergency relief he received was allowing him to bond out, the underlying charge is still there.

@jamierisk1216 9 дней назад

Sorry I didn't mean overturned. He just didn't end up in jail this weekend.

@Rebecca-oh5yh 9 дней назад

Wow, that's pretty cool.

@ramonpena8491 6 дней назад

Its YSL Brian now

@jamierisk1216 6 дней назад

@@ramonpena8491 nah...YSL Silver Steel

@FearlesSLaughteR1 6 дней назад

What else has this judge gotten wrong when he doesn't even know how his own court is supposed to work?

@FunkyTwn 5 дней назад

Wasn't this on a Law & Order episode? It was basically a defendant who was legally allowed to lie on the stand because it involved the mafia, as him telling the truth would have been a death sentence, but behind closed doors he told the judge and prosecutor the truth, leaving his lawyer out of it, because his lawyer also worked for the mafia.

@oldschoolnewventure845 11 дней назад

the fact that a judge had an unscheduled and uninformed meeting with prosecuton counsel and witnesses, without defense counsel presence automatically calls for recusal at best.

@IanBourneMusic 10 дней назад

100%

@entrance554 10 дней назад

And on a RICO Murder Trial!😮

@a24396 10 дней назад

A judge can't recuse from the case they're already hearing after the jury has been seated without a mistrial. And that's what should be demanded: a mistrial with some kind of investigation into prosecutorial misconduct. That Copeland and his family has been threatened only means a deposition would be admissable if he were unavailable, as he would be if he were killed. But they need that deposition... Maybe some witness protection...

@kingace6186 10 дней назад

@@a24396 A mistrial is def needed. But more than that is needed? Is there a way for a higher court to sanction a judge or something?

@williamwchuang 10 дней назад

@@a24396steel demanded a mistrial, took off his suit jacket, and got taken into custody.

@inefffable 11 дней назад

We should hold corrupt officials to a much higher standard.

@snarkylive 11 дней назад

Yes.

@col.hertford9855 11 дней назад

It’s odd that they don’t in America. In the England and Wales it’s common for people in authority to be subject to greater sentences.

@zephyrzavala1695 11 дней назад

@@col.hertford9855 The Horizon IT scandal would like to differ.

@JollyGiant19 11 дней назад

We should hold them in jail until their day in court.

@E-d1d3 11 дней назад

Yeah, let the law abiding ones get away with stuff

@silentw1979 6 дней назад

I heard Kenneth Copeland and I was like “that rich church guy?” Boy was I wrong lol

@phatman9762 5 дней назад

Insane! I'm so glad you're covering this.

@cherch222 11 дней назад

Love how a judge get to decide to ignore a ruling just because it’s old. This corruption is insane.

@TheBrainSpecialist 10 дней назад

Idk if Young Thug is guilty or not, but even if he is, and is found guilty, this shit will make for the easiest appeal I've ever seen

@user-gl5dq2dg1j 10 дней назад

@@TheBrainSpecialist I think this is going to be eventually ruled a mistrial with the prosecution having to decide how to retry this case so they don't look more thuggish than the defendants. The bright side is that they would have a different judge.

@MonkeyJedi99 10 дней назад

Sovereign immunity covers a lot of vile activity.

@GalacticStarForge42 10 дней назад

Yeah, and maybe have a better case against him that doesn’t involve music lyrics and Witnesses that don’t actually want to testify. Maybe they need an entire new Judge and prosecution team.

@ztoob8898 10 дней назад

30 years old. That's not even that old! The judge asking for "something newer" was the weakest of weak sauce. Judge is working real hard sawing off that tree branch he's sitting on.

@robertlinke2666 11 дней назад

the moment, you as a defense council, have to cite direct case law, against a judges order, something has gone very wrong in that room that judge has created a circus

@mhxxd4 10 дней назад

Not necessarily

@retsaMinnavoiG 8 дней назад

That's not how that works. Do you know how many laws there are and how many court cases there have been? Generally, defending or prosecuting is not the judges job in a court, you bring arguments to him/court. Besides, I didn't think that was actually the defence but a group of lawyers discussing what happened with the judge.

@bac0nknight691 4 дня назад

This entire trial has been a circus thanks to the judge and prosecution

@MrMysteriousDm 5 дней назад

Corrupt judges will be corrupt judges period. With no accountability for these kinds of massive corruption scandals. It will just continue to happen until the people finally have enough and take matters into their own hands

@hunt2334entertainment 5 дней назад

I haven't watched your content in a while but I really love your color grading now. This grading is really good!

@jurgnobs1308 11 дней назад

the judge literally said "that was ex parte. all of that was ex parte. how did you find out about that?" bruh. that's a bruh moment.

@smalltime0 9 дней назад

Is the judge aware that the 5th amendment applies to him?

@nasis18 9 дней назад

@@smalltime0 Probably. His arrogance in believing he is untouchable is likely what led to him making such an incriminating statement.

@tima6044 9 дней назад

The judge said "That's ex parte. If all that was an ex parte conversation, how did you find out about any of that?" The judge wasn't admitting to it. He was clarifying the allegstion and then stating that IF it was ex parte, how could he have found out.

@jurgnobs1308 9 дней назад

@@tima6044 that's not how the english language works. he said it in the indicative, not the subjunctive. the way he worded it, it's an admission.

@tima6044 9 дней назад

@@jurgnobs1308 I'm a native English speaker, thank you very much. He was succinctly stating exactly what the lawyer was implying, but didn't admit to doing it.

@Sky-bx9mn 11 дней назад

Holy wow that is flagrant violation of the law, wtf. Also, never in my life have I heard of a *trial* court being able to claim "this caselaw is too old to count" when the case law hasn't been overturned.

@tatkkyo9911 11 дней назад

Considering most maritime case law is older and still valid, it's some crazy bs.

@gvigary1 10 дней назад

Maybe the Supreme Court used similar thinking on Roe v Wade? 😉

@ZiggyGrok 10 дней назад

@@gvigary1 they did the opposite -- they cited case law from before our country was founded to throw out case law more recent

@mallk238 10 дней назад

what's scary is that the 90's isn't exactly a long time ago. So many millennials must be rapidly growing grey hairs as they hear this argument

@Sky-bx9mn 10 дней назад

@@gvigary1 Thing is, the Supreme Court is an appeals court that /actually has authority/ to overturn precedent. A trial court does not.

@ChrisBear1989 9 дней назад

Corrupt judges in this specific instance like this should be investigated and charged.

@KartiacKID 5 дней назад

Yesss, love that you covered this

@caffedinator5584 11 дней назад

That judge needs to be held accountable. This is laughably transparent of how he is engineering this trial to have a specific outcome.

@jinzokan3499 11 дней назад

At the very least it should be the easiest appeal case ever which if young thug is actually guilty is a travesty of justice

@danang5 11 дней назад

@@jinzokan3499regardless of result its a traversty of justice because the judge is doing the case improperly

@ta2034 10 дней назад

@@danang5 That should make it easy to appeal the ruling then, if the ruling is not to the liking of the defense. They need to just grant a mistrial, there's no way this dog and pony show will hold up.

@southerncyan4098 10 дней назад

Makes us wonder what kind of "kickback" the judge is getting, a new car perhaps 💀?

@logansmall5148 11 дней назад

Judge: "How dare you not tell me who informed you I was violating your client's constitutional rights!"

@adrianflipflop9054 9 дней назад

He's also throwing everyone from the ex parte meeting in jail for criminal contempt cause one of them snitched

@Hurricayne92 5 дней назад

@@adrianflipflop9054 Thats actually hilarious, like who is he trying to protect right now 🤔

@yebzy 3 дня назад

What a badass lawyer Steel apparently refers to his balls and not just his name

@The_Knight_of_Helles 8 дней назад

Me: You did a super illegal definitely immoral ex parte. Judge: if it was soooooo ex parte, how’d ya find out about it????? AHA! I got you!

@Pickle_Candy 11 дней назад

That judge should be in jail, not the lawyer, what an absolute joke of a trial.

@LordBillington42 11 дней назад

It's not just that the judge crooked, it's that he's so confident while being crooked, it's terrifying.

@adamb89 10 дней назад

Must've gone to the same law school as Eileen Cannon.

@SadisticSenpai61 10 дней назад

And he knows his court is being recorded too. Like, he has to know that there's no way this is going to stay quiet. And it's also an excellent reason for anyone found guilty in his courtroom to call for a mistrial. Or an investigation into the judge at the very least!

@PositiveOnly-dm3rx 10 дней назад

Most judges are corrupt af. They think they are above the law.

@adamb89 10 дней назад

@@PositiveOnly-dm3rx No, they aren't. Most judges are what they are supposed to be--fair, impartial, and honest. That's why it's such a problem when people like Alieen Cannon, Clarence Thomas, and of course this guy go off the rails like that. The right-wing stooges are actively TRYING to sell the idea that "all judges are corrupt" or "you can't trust the justice department" because they're all finally being held to account for their crimes. Getting an army of goons to overthrow the justice system is their only hope at avoiding prison now. So please stop playing into Trump's hand.

@TheEDFLegacy 10 дней назад

@@SadisticSenpai61 It would be hilarious if the lawyer tries to press charges on the judge for false imprisonment. 😅

@theoriginaltoast420 9 дней назад

Sounds like we need to start having the AG attending every court hearing.

@chrisgipson6042 4 дня назад

thanks for covering this

@Cheesehead_Caleb 11 дней назад

Ladies and gentlemen, THIS is what a corrupt judge looks like.

@EinsteinsHair 11 дней назад

How can you tell without knowing the purpose of the meeting? It sounds as if Copeland would rather face legal consequences, than face retaliation from the RICO conspirators. If that was the purpose of the meeting, then it might seem reasonable to the judge to meet with Copeland, the Sherrif's office, and the prosecution, without the attorney who is duty-bound to report back to his client. The judge is wrong, not corrupt, in that case.

@redbasher636 11 дней назад

@@EinsteinsHair Finding someone in contempt of court over it is.

@Danonymous5000 11 дней назад

@EinsteinsHair it doesn't sound like that is a legal reason to have an ex parte meeting with the judge. Protecting a witness from the accused is a matter for the prosecution, not the court. I don't understand the situation Copeland is in. If it is true that he is required to testify, it makes sense for the judge to explain that to him; but there is no reason for the defense to not be there to hear that explanation.

@ryanclemons1 11 дней назад

What do you mean by "looks like"? you can't know if someone is corrupt based off How they look.

@daemonsw77 11 дней назад

or a defense team that are a part of the criminal syndicate

@cadillacmonte 10 дней назад

This feels ridiculously illegal, and the judge is coming off as a thug in a robe with the way he’s disregarding the law he pretends to uphold.

@ssighs2304 9 дней назад

Why did my dog just jump up?

@sylvrwolflol 8 дней назад

@@ssighs2304some of the bulls**t must've wafted over from the courtroom

@jamesstark4136 8 дней назад

Unfortunately if the judge was in the pocket of a rival gang or even the actual YSL this is how he would run a courtroom. Intimidate a witness jail anyone who questions the witness intimidation.

@cobolbass 6 дней назад

Old Thug v. Young Thug

@robertruschak7083 5 дней назад

The judge should be fine for millions , fired and arrested

@briangallacher6475 5 дней назад

Thanks for the video, keep seeing videos of this judge. Wanted to know what it was about etc, all descriptions i found dragged on

@azarisLP 8 дней назад

The Fulton County justice system is totally whacked out.

@connorgibes709 11 дней назад

"All that was an ex parte conversation, how did you find out about any of that" is like saying "I hid the body, so how did you find it?"

@youmukonpaku3168 11 дней назад

the good old "nobody drove by while we were doing that"

@LeoPard-HQ 11 дней назад

He's the worst judge I've ever witnessed.

@FurieMan 11 дней назад

Judge Cannon.

@jerichaux9219 11 дней назад

But you have witnessed him!

@Abu-huraira.0 11 дней назад

Judge Alito

@_NoDrinkTheBleach 11 дней назад

Judge Aaron Persky

@bertrambolsingbruel3829 11 дней назад

Y'all forgetting Julius Hoffman?

@InvertedAim 9 дней назад

Thank you for referencing the key amd peele sketch lol

@fineoutside 9 дней назад

that key&peele clip at 3:40 😂😭😂😭

@92Looneytune 11 дней назад

"1994 was 30 years ago, do you have any more recent case law?" "No, but the case law is about to be updated."

@youmukonpaku3168 11 дней назад

"can we circle back in about two weeks, and cite ourselves?"

@nobody8328 11 дней назад

"No, judge, no one else has been corrupt enough to challenge it in the last 30 years"

@chrono1182 7 дней назад

⁠@@youmukonpaku3168ngl citing themselves would be legendary 😂

@Madhattersinjeans 7 дней назад

@@chrono1182 Do not cite the ancient case law to me witch, I was there when it was written last tuesday.

@Clevelandlantis 11 дней назад

Dude about to have the most street cred of any lawyer since fuckin Johnny cochrane

@MultiClassGeek 11 дней назад

>mfw Chewbacca asks to be jailed alongside Han and Lando so they can prep their case

@zdelrod829 11 дней назад

@@MultiClassGeek The real Chewbacca defense.

@NoriMori1992 11 дней назад

*Johnnie Cochran

@Tofuey 4 дня назад

Can't wait for an update on this

@chombie33 2 дня назад

I love your videos. I just wish they were about half as long. In the 10-15 minute range. ✌🏼

@JPR3D 11 дней назад

I know nothing about law. I am concerned that the Judge's attention was entirely on getting the name of the person who 'snitched' rather than looking into what they may have missed in the right process of arranging the meeting at all.

@Accuratetranslationservices 10 дней назад

Lawyer here and I am concerned about the same exact thing. Ex parte meetings with a sworn state witness are unheard of. This implicates so many of the defendant’s rights - right to a fair trial, right to confront witnesses against him, right to be present, to a public trial, to effective assistance of counsel, to exculpatory evidence, to due process (which requires a neutral judge). All of these rights are potentially violated when the judge is taking the state’s key witness, who is already sworn in, out back for a meeting without the defense. Even worse is that the judge purportedly encouraged the witness to take the fifth and thus prevented the witness from testifying in a way that could have been favorable to the defense. It gives the appearance of a tainted trial. One would think that the judge would be able to provide a damn good reason for this meeting on the spot, but no, he’s more concerned about who tattled.

@rmglover3191 11 дней назад

Steel's co-counsel was like "If Steel goes, you'll need to arrest me too." Whole squad is boss.

@TheTragicClown6001 11 дней назад

They were making the record, literally the defense couldn’t have done anything smarter than to capitalize on this massive error to its full possible extent.

@IvyAelin 11 дней назад

Yeah and judge back peddled reallll quick when he realized the defense attorneys were doing that. Lol “well I asked Mr. Steel, I’m not asking YOU.”

@PoniesNSunshine 10 дней назад

The defense called his bluff, if protecting the source was a jailable offense then lets just take this to its logical conclusion and jail the entire defense... Which would be further grounds for recusal... Which the judge admitted to start, he said if the case goes to appeal then they can review the record, it's almost as if he wants off the case 🤦‍♂️

@johnburnside7828 7 дней назад

The entire judicial system MUST be investigated and ALL the corrupt judges MUST be removed!

@fsu4031 9 дней назад

My problem is that if the defendant is a criminal then the justice system should be able to prove that without breaking any laws!

@SpikeRosered 11 дней назад

That judge is SOOO ANGRY that someone snitched on him.

@dawnshimmer7341 11 дней назад

Hearing this without basically no legal knowledge it is still clearly absurd

@nonyabisness6306 9 дней назад

judges can to ex parte decisions, but are limited in the scope of them. lots of people here alleging misconduct without any evidence. also consider the dude i very clearly guilty and this is likely the one and only thing that may get him off.

@ethandubois7536 8 дней назад

Pretty stupid of the judge to hold a *secret* ex parte meeting then, if that was the only thing that would get the defendant off.

@nonyabisness6306 8 дней назад

@@ethandubois7536 ex parte is by definition secret.

@Lyth 8 дней назад

@@nonyabisness6306 No, it is not. The other party has to be informed of the meeting prior and given the opportunity to respond. They are also to be informed of the substance of the meeting.

@nonyabisness6306 8 дней назад

@@Lyth I suggest you look it up again. That's not what an ex parte meeting is.

@AFN2750 6 дней назад

The man will never have to buy a beer again

@DivineForcesBro 9 дней назад

Corruption is always present. I'm glad we at least can see this one.

@benjaminmatheny6683 11 дней назад

Love that a judge can just ignore a law or precedent simply because they think it's too old. Especially considering how many laws and precedents are older than 1994.

@LesserAndrew 8 дней назад

No kidding. Some of our common law predates 1776. The entire point of "Text, history, and tradition" is that you ought to respect precedent and interpretation from a long time ago.

@tomwallen7271 8 дней назад

There are options. The defense's job is to make sure it's all on the records and his objections are recorded and any conviction should have fertile ground to be thrown in the trash on appeal. That, and the judge can be brought in front of an ethics committee for sanction.

@gustavbw 11 дней назад

7:10 The cameraman zooming into the word "constitution" is hillarious

@MMuraseofSandvich 11 дней назад

_Oh yes, "constitutional" judge right here folks..._

@davidtruelove5022 День назад

Best one yet!

@Bliefking 7 дней назад

Please do a follow up video!

@StepperBox 11 дней назад

I'm tickled by the 20-25 lawyers showing up to tell that they are here to defend their breathern.

@Jordan-rb28 6 дней назад

Are you hating on those people? What's your problem dude? There's nothing to even defend from, calling out a heinous and corrupt judge is not itself a wrongdoing.

@marc68521 6 дней назад

@@Jordan-rb28I do t think he is saying anything negative about them

@Prez16 6 дней назад

Your reading comprehension is way off @@Jordan-rb28

@Dan016 5 дней назад

@@Jordan-rb28think you need to reread their comment. They’re saying other lawyers are coming out to defend Brian Steel/YT from this.

@Torbox1 11 дней назад

1. How many times has the judge done this and gotten away with it? 2. The fact that no matter what happens he wont be held criminally liable for anything is rediculous. The most he can get is disbarment and losing his job is insane. 3. How many times has the prosecutor done this with other judges? Again no criminal liability is rediculous.

@momom6197 10 дней назад

2. Being disbarred is a serious matter. If it happens, his current life is basically over; he'll have a lot of trouble finding a job in law with that kind of history.

@BrianHolmes 10 дней назад

@@momom6197he wrongfully incarcerated this lawyer,...took his freedom away. Our Judiciary is in great need of oversight.

@Night_Hawk_475 10 дней назад

@@momom6197 corruption should be always be criminal, he /should/ be prosecuted criminally in a court fairer than his. There should be no judicial immunity in a case as blatant as this. Losing your career is something that can happen due to severe incompetence, losing your career is not enough for someone who has been corruptly working to falsely incarcerate defendants and then works corruption to cover it up by falsely incarcerating their lawyers too.

@TrabberShir 10 дней назад

99% chance he does not get charged with anything. But from the moment he knew that the meeting was illegal, anything he did in furtherance of the conspiracy is outside his official duties and a DA could charge him for it. Considering the political nature of the DA's office, that 1% chance has more to do with politics than morality or law, but it is actually possible for that judge to face criminal liability for this.

@Torbox1 10 дней назад

@@TrabberShir I highly doubt the DA will do anything since one of the DAs own prosecutors what in that meeting and apparently saw nothing wrong with it.

@Xander_DeWitt 8 дней назад

I was waiting for this

@RayvenTheNight 4 дня назад

This is insane, so many people are on a power trip and don't care about the law. This is terrible when you realize this is affecting people's entire lives.

@patrickchase5614 11 дней назад

The 'Serious Trouble' podcast (Ken White of 'popehat' fame) had a really good take on this IMO. The funniest part was the _prosecutor_ recognizing the danger to their case and trying to get the judge to walk it back a little by allowing Young Thug's lawyer to stay and represent his client. The lawyer asking to be jailed with his client so they can prepare is also priceless. That's just a beautiful "f*** you" to the judge. I think that Young Thug caught a very lucky break here. The judge's conduct is textbook reversable error IMO.

@displayer6023 11 дней назад

Also gave the shady judge an opportunity to appear "generous" by allowing him to be jailed with his client, which he immediately capitalized on

@kingofhearts3185 11 дней назад

When the prosecutor said to back down, you know the judge is out of line.

@FIRING_BLIND 11 дней назад

Yeah it's like this judge has never heard of trying to PREVENT successful appeals. Ya know, by doing things by the book

@patrickchase5614 11 дней назад

@@displayer6023 I don't think the judge is shady per se, I just think he's temperamentally unsuited to the job. This guy is a US Army Brigadier General. I think he's used to having people salute and obey his orders, and he failed to keep that separate from his "day job" as a judge in an open and adversarial legal process.

@mikaeljensen4399 11 дней назад

@@patrickchase5614 There is a word for that: Corruption.

@retr0robbin 10 дней назад

Steel has asked for a mistrial MULTIPLE times through out the trial for multiple issues. And the judge obviously denies it every time.

@MaxJey2 6 дней назад

Steel certainly has a golden opportunity with this one.

@XxEntaroAdunxX 5 дней назад

The appeal can definitely declare a mistrial.

@Uebagi 2 часа назад

I was told that the justice system is perfect and that judges will never be corrupt or influenced by outside forces. This is totally a 1 off thing and not the norm.

@IncredibleMoose- День назад

I literally paused the video to check the comments for reference of the Key and Peele skit. Didn't see it, then resumed the video and he played the Key and Peele skit. Lmao

@thelittleredhairedgirlfrom6527 11 дней назад

The lawyer is hereby granted an open invitation to the cookout effective immediately.

@Brandon-im9wj 11 дней назад

about to be Levy in the Wire

@mrfancygoat 11 дней назад

Judge should have his rescinded.

@treesaretough 11 дней назад

A judge can just say a ruling is too old? where the hell is that rule when it matters

@mallninja9805 11 дней назад

Judge: Show me the case law Attorney: _receipts_ Judge: I wasn't expectin you to call my bluff, so imma just do what I want anyway

@captainkirk79269 11 дней назад

Arizona sure didn’t. They used a law before they were even a state. It’s only “too old” if it doesn’t fit their agenda.

@hm9892 11 дней назад

they cant funnily enough , only if there is more recent case law that contradicts the previously established rulings. this judge is dubious at best

@XXMatt0040XX 11 дней назад

@@hm9892 Yeah it only takes a second to remember all the human rights taken away by the Supreme Court and their reasoning for it to go "What?...No!"

@hm9892 11 дней назад

@@XXMatt0040XX yeaaa , unfortunately many of the current justice systems around the world are just as corrupt/non-nonsensical. not much is likely to change unless about half a dozen countries all decide to get their act together

@georhodiumgeo9827 6 дней назад

I've been waiting for this video

@waffleman2211 9 часов назад

That's absolutely wild

@bodaciouschad 11 дней назад

If that judge keeps his job that is a travesty of justice. He should never be allowed anywhere near the practice of law again.

@XXMatt0040XX 11 дней назад

It's Georgia. What do you think is gonna happen?

@memeitymeme4137 11 дней назад

its america. don't hold your breath for any consequences for the judge.

@Demmrir 11 дней назад

If? He will. Worst case, he'll have this trial taken from him. That's it. He'll continue serving, being allowed to issue whatever rulings and contempt charges he want, and collect his salary until he dies. This is AMERICA. We don't hold our authorities to our standards here.

@imnotmike 10 дней назад

Oh, are we talking about Clarence Thomas?

@kylezo 10 дней назад

Lmao you think this a travesty? This is business as usual. This is status quo, this system was built by property owners for the protection of property owners. Not for the rabble. You know, like the ICJ.

@erichrathkamp8498 10 дней назад

The blatant corruption is insane. The judge should be disbarred for this, not just recused from the case.

@gianni_schicchi 10 дней назад

Who knows how many people he’s railroaded.

@kylezo 10 дней назад

Why would they do that when we can't even get rid of qualified immunity

@charliewaters5289 7 дней назад

Jailed.

@charliewaters5289 7 дней назад

@@kylezo It's time we ensure that judge's understand there is no such thing as qualified immunity. The only question is which Amendment we use to hold them accountable. The 7th Amendment, or one with a lower number.

@stevenshea990 6 дней назад

defense should move for a Bad Court Thingy

@tomwarzysz День назад

Legal, you would make a great comic book character!

@michellem4287 8 дней назад

If they confess or there's evidence, then why would a song, poem or manifesto be any different than filming your crimes in regards to evidence.

@Sam_on_YouTube 11 дней назад

I was in misdemeanor court with a young ADA once and the judge asked the lawyer if he knew when the defense lawyer would be there. The ADA started talking about the case and the judge has to stop him and say she wasn't trying to have an ex parte conversation and then when the defense lawyer got there, the judge disclosed the event