Just so YOU know, THIS constitutes 'Live' in 2024 

I've sent over a message via Instagram 🙂

Seal?! As if!! I am 71 now, and you are still one of my all-time favourite artists. Thank you so much for the joy you have given me and many others.

@@bobfrankish8883 Aww 🥰 thank you Brother. It’s feedback like the one you give that in turn gives me the reason to continue making and performing music. ✌🏾&💜

Sir?! thank you for not only for the art you create and created...but also the courage to defend that "art".. I love your work! ❤

The only reason i questioned if it was you was your channel is empty, I was assuming there would be something of you there, which would be nice.

we could all see that and all credit to you , i personally enjoyed the set nontheless

@weedywet and all power to you and the band for working through that. Seems to have been an issue for quite a few at Glasto this year. That said, I’d still rather get an imperfect live performance than a ‘playback’ with barely anything live happening. That’s how we learnt and got better! I feel sorry for anyone that hasn’t experienced a proper ‘live’ concert.

Are you going to play with her on the final tour? Can't wait to see it live.

It is so obviously live and all the better for it.

I saw her at RAH and I loved it! It was one big party and I really really love her.

Wait, it's you? I remember Kiss from a Rose. Great song. I also agree with everything you've said.

Perfectly stated, thank you.

Absolutely correct, wonderfully said, by the way I love your music!!!

I think its because image and followers first , then fix the rest later.

@@MG53v8Honestly I just don’t know what it is and I really don’t wanna sound like one of those ‘oh back in my day’ types but recently some well known rappers came up to my home in LA where I have a studio. They wanted me to do a a-hmm ‘top line’ on something they were making. Now I’m always flattered whenever someone wants me to work with them as collaboration has always been my favourite aspect of music. So I came up with something that I actually thought was okay but not great, anyway I digress. They were happy with it so then I decided to do what I do when approaching my own music which was to; 1. Sing the line until I got one pass right. That means in tune, in time, correct phrasing and most importantly right emotion and feel. 2. Start adding the first of a three part harmony to the main line. Once I got the first harmony right which involved matching the main line and singing it in tune, I then muted the main line and started singing three more passes to the new harmony line, each time muting the previous attempt so that they don’t all stack up while I’m doing them. This way you avoid getting sloppy and you’re best able to maintain critical accuracy. 3. I then repeated the process for the other two harmonies. When I’d completed, I looked over and they were completely gobsmacked and couldn’t if their lives depended on it, figure out why I just didn’t get the computer, ie melodime or whatever it’s called to just automatically spit out the harmonies based off of the original lead line I sang!! To me it was another day at the office because that’s the way I was taught. That’s the way you make ‘RECORDS’ that hopefully withstand the test of time so that when the listener listens to said record for the 100th time, they hear something on the recording that they never heard before. That artform seems all but lost and my heart sinks 😢. I’m not saying this because I’m trying to boast about my work ethic, I’m a very good singer, not great in my opinion. I’m saying this because that’s how ‘WE ALL MADE RECORDS’ when I started out! The recording studio was hallowed ground and you had to earn the respect of your piers to be in it!! Now people make ‘beats’ in a fkn laptop and call themselves producers when most of them couldn’t produce a blow-**b in a brothel!! Gimme a break 🤬 That same laziness and instant gratification is inherent in the live performance. Why sing it in tune when you can use autotune live? Sorry for the rant. 😅

Legendary quote from an absolute legend in every way

Same!

❤

Forgot throat cancer in cyndi's case.

Totally agree. Those bands that just played it exactly like the record were criticised. We, the audience wanted it real and a new take.

ABSOLUTELY!!! When I was a kid I used to think live albums were awful because they didn't sound exactly like what I was used to (the studio versions) but thankfully I very quickly came to appreciate the differences in sound, both subtle and profound and now prefer live recordings for the most part! And that was the exact reason to go to a concert, to see how the artists were presenting material they'd now been exercising on the road. For sure!

That's because you were listening to rock bands and not trashy pop music. You're not going to find this from most of the acts playing at, say, Wacken Open Air, because in the worlds of rock and metal, the skill of the instrumentalists is every bit as important as the vocals.

@@mikedtw Oh, I did love live albums because well back then without a "safety net" you got to hear maybe a missing word or usually the beat was almost always so much faster than the original it lent itself to me just feeling as if i was there - which from 10years old or so I was there & I've the albums though no turntable which with what's out today is much needed in my home. 75 years old, am a singer (not active) I'll pick up my hairbrush mic. Wait, I have real mics now. lol

And penny's they were. I once saw ZZ TOP, Blue Oyster Cult, Savoy Brown, Billy Preston, and Deep Purple for $6.00 advanced $6.50 day of the show. I recently found the ticket, it's why I remembered .

Imperfect is human. Perfect is silly.

I watched Taylor's concert film to see what the fuss was about so perfect such good visuals such on and off lip synching why have people wasted hundreds to see her live as a dot in the distance or projected on a screen watch the film and have better visuals of her combo live and lip synching show, turning point for me was the Stones in 96 came out asking friends if I had seen the stones or just lots of special effects so different to when I saw them in 82. best recent concerts Suzi Quattro and Bonnie Raitt they sing live, and they use no gimmicky effects. The drive to big arena concerts has been a big factor in the rise of lip synched shows

​@@nellie371I think you might be making a good point but it's barely readable

If I wanted a perfect performance, I could stay in the comfort of my easy chair and listen to a recording.

Hear, hear. And when you catch a live act that truly manages to echo, if not duplicate, their recorded sound you know you're experiencing something special. Those types of shows have long been my favorite.

I was at Tracey’s concert in Australia in 88 it was just her and her guitar I was in 6th grade , it was incredible ❤

I saw Laura Marling do the same in Edinburgh. Her band all had the flu so rather than cancel the gig, it was just Laura with a guitar and a mic. It was wonderful.

Tracy could sing a phone directory and it would fantastic. She's so great.

@@nailedbyrosiel2007 Gah! I'm so jealous! I've loved Tracey since I was a kid ❤

@@TheKevinGHutton I don't know who she is, but that is epic! Much respect to Laura and the band 🤗

I loved that performance! Even the security guards were getting into it.

and he plays drums

Also, classics by The Smiths

More proof Glastonbury is never to be taken seriously (as if we didn't know) when a S/A/W teaboy's soppy 1987 factory-made signature 'tune' is happily welcomed on. And to think he was likely the best thing there, which says it ALL about where we are today in the long dead music scene!

@@kyachdistent1301 Aaahh, I take it you are the font of all musical authority, on what passes as "worthy"? Sure, I don't like the stuff Glasto has on these days. I'm not keen on Rick Astley, but dude is a musician. He's kept performing and playing, even when he wasn't a household name. Sure. His hit was designed as a by the numbers hit. Guess what. That's been happening for as long as the recording industry has existed. Glasto is a buisness. It's always going to pick artists that bring in the money. That's ALWAYS been Glasto. That money doesn't come from ticket sales. Unfortunately, younger audiences are used to pitch perfect recordings, & karioke "live" sets, and I guess modern singers either don't have the confidence to perform live, or they/the record label don't want out of key footage around "damaging" the song. After all, you are never going to leave a Dua Lipa set thinking "gosh, she performed really badly today. Her voice was so off!" Fans are always going to get the "performance" they expect.

She's good enough for me.

Why does it?

She’s starting he final tour this year. ❤😊 1:22

She wasn't a kid when she broke out.

​@@michael3728you goonie!

This! There’s something so unique about a live performance that I love. Like a fingerprint, not a one exactly like the other. I listen for the moment the artist takes a chance, does something a little different than the studio version. That’s the whole reason I love live. That, and the emotional infusion into the song at any particular moment. What would be the point of paying for a “live” concert for anything other than that? I’d rather just watch that at home on a big screen to go along with the “perfect” studio version on Spotify.

Maybe to some people. But I don't see any reason to bother with a live performance that is just like the original recording. I call it a recital and I'd rather just stay home.

People always said Steve Perry of Journey sounded better live than in studio. That's a compliment not sounding the same.

@@MsJimmysgirl I always hated the way Steve Perry sounded on those Journey records. If he sounded different live, then good for him.

​@@paulperkins1615the way I interpret "they sound the same as they do on record" is not that they're mimicking the original version exactly, but that the band is as tight and proficient as in the record and the engineering of the audio is on par with the studio sound, but of course the performances differ, maybe the stuff is played faster, the guitar solo is a bit different, the vocals are less perfect. The band recorded material in a studio and is good enough they can play that same material on a live setting

@@CoTeCiOtmIt’s great when the band is tight and has practiced versions of songs that are a little different from the record. It makes you feel lucky to be there.

Well that's an opinion. Backing vocals have always been a thing

@@DistantCousin Sung live by backing vocalists, not from a recording.

it's not even that. At least in a karaoke bar the person singing is actually singing.

@@patwilson2546 The is Ru Pauls Drag Race lip-sync for your life. LOL!

@@patwilson2546 there were 4 people singing backing vocals on that stage

Saw the same thing with Debbie Harry (blondie) last year. She clearly had a problem with her in ear audio and was singing flat, she literally said ‘up up up’ multiple times during the gig. But everyone saying, poor old birds lost her voice. Plus she was 78 years old at the time ffs. Still rocking hard

I hope I sound as good singing at 71!

At least when you do karaoke you are actually physically singing into a microphone. Still counts as a live performance... it's just a live 'vocal' performance. Even if you suck at singing... you are still actually physically doing the singing, with your lungs physically pushing air through your vocal folds and mouth and into the microphone... and then said microphone converts that into an electrical signal... which is then amplified and sent to the loudspeakers so the audience can hear it! :)) Lip syncing is entirely different obviously... not even close to karaoke.

Let's also take a moment to say Dua Lipa's songs are crap and totally unmemorable unlike Cyndi Laupa's.

Ozzy's last tour he had another guy off stage singing his parts, what would you call that other that Sharron is a Shekel Grubber?

The British press is usually terrible about anything good.

Does anyone even know what's going on in the buisness. Gotta be honest if not for Fil I wouldn't know how prevalent it's become. And being a product of the 70s and a tad stupid, thinking how cool it was to stand in front of those huge Marshals, my hearing isn't what it used to be.

​@@davidwhitfield6432- I'm a product of the 90s and maybe the last generation silly enough to stand in front of massive Marshals 😅

They build up who they want…untalented women who just shake their bodies…It’s singing and the music I want. Not your butt or boobs!

And that is why so many artists are leaning on autotune and backing tracks now. The expectation now for both fans and the press is that your live performances will sound exactly like your studio versions

Good for you.👍

I appreciate an artist that really performs and cares.

With ya! I gig without correctors and a fully live band. Yes we make mistakes, who doesn't. I do feel though either we are forgiven or they are so slight the audience doesn't hear them.

RESPECT

@@tonywardle4764 Making the occasional mistake tells the audience you are real and live, and putting in the work.

I totally agree! When I first my favorite band do an album on stage it was SO thrilling! Hear the vocals live and how they recreated the album sound so it sounded better live!!

highly underrated vocalist

No, there was huge amount of processing on his live vocals.

Don't talk stupid​@@EmsXGuitar

Are the great genuine 80's-90's sound of Milli Vanilli and mimed tv performances.

Me too!

@sergiovogel2449 I love her too - and it comes through her creativity. I want to be her friend. : )

Modern pop is totally boring now

As someone who survived the 80s and 90s I remember how much unbelievably boring mush was played on the radio back then. Please throw away your rose tinted earphones.

but eh, try it,. you will get attacked, they dont wanna hear that.

I think there can be a middle ground. For example, for most of Twenty One Pilots catalog, Tyler Joseph records every vocal, the main, harmonies, different lyrics overlapping etc. When they play live, there are occasionally backing track vocals heard. But the main vocals are all him. They just prefer not to bring an outside touring band, one tour being an exception. He also quite often records all the instruments except percussion, so sometimes some instrumentals are also tracks, so that he can focus on singing and playing one of the instruments, and dancing around the stage.

It's not false. I'll do some apology for pop shows such as our much loved TS or Dua, where most people have a cell phone nowadays and are recording their own version of the show. In fact, you get such show live on RU-vid if you look far enough, all thanks to people with what boils down to portable 4K/60 cameras. People, in pop, expect perfection, expect a dynamic show, people running around, pyros, costume changes, name it, all while being perfect for everyone's cameras as a small bit of baby fat or imperfect mascara will get slammed down. Is it entertaining? OF COURSE it's entertaining, and I recommend these shows all the time. This is not what is expected from old show foggies, or 1st parts, or newcomers. 3 hours worth of Rush (R40 was awesome), Rammstein, Pink Floyd, it's different, it's instrumental at times, it's expected to be less Physical (pun on Dua) for the artists. Cindy, she has the grand luxury of not caring anymore. She's a legend. But she's also not running around the stage doing acrobatics like a P!nk, Halsey, Queen B. Metallica can take smoke breaks and play instruments while posing, it's not their name in the middle of the place (it's their brand, though). Depeche Mode can have Gore play some songs as he's a talented vocalist. No one can play TS, she's the front and only person anyone wants to see in hundreds of shows per year, YET she still plays some live. And Again, Cindy, she earned her live act. -- TL;DR: you are exactly right. Performing rather than Presenting. And IMHO it's sad reality but all right.

Doh. of course Dua is performing too. You're talking rubbish. She performed her arse off

Good observation

@@DistantCousin Her backing track is performing, idk what Dua was doing the no talent slag

@@shootinputin6332woah! Strong feelings for dus lips there! lol

Part of Cyndi's style was to always sing off the beat,today's music scene can't handle that

@@whenimeetgod She was so far behind the beat the next band had already started playing.

@@MGrayl-ib5fo 🤣🤣🤣

@@whenimeetgod she's one that lives to her own beat.

IIRC she said that her in ear monitors were lagging

Don't understand how anyone can like Dua Lipa she's awful, I'd rather they had the Spice Girls 😂😂

😂

Dua you think so?

And Cyndi did sing " The drum beats out of time ! " many years ago .

😂

She isn't lip synching though.

Wow. McKee has one of the finest voices ever, and while I’ve never liked Lauper she certainly is a great singer. That was something very special. I’m very jealous!

Do you remember the year?

​@@europatelemakos2819 It might have been Duke of York Theatre which would put it in 1989. Hope that helps.

WOW that would be epic! They are both incredibly talented! ❤❤

McKee is highly underrated, damn near forgotten these days. I loved Lone Justice (yeah, the revolving line-up may have hurt their becoming more popular), but Maria truly came into her own with those first three solo rekkids in addition to being a session musician and song writer. No backing/accompanying tracks in her live catalogue, that's for damn sure.

You got what you payed for back then, that is to actually see them perform live and all the variance that a live performance brings. If only people would start walking out and demanding their money back when an artist starts lip syncing, things might go back to those days.

Bands did that through the 90s and early 2000s as well!

Oh yes, she really is. She’s a doll *and* a sweetheart

So was Dua Lipa. It's live. Most of it at least. it's very clear when you watch other songs from the same performance.

Cyndi is great but she's just walking around.

Live over a prerecorded track does not equal live. You mention the drum balance is different in another post but that would be due to the "live" recording being recorded through the stage equipment.

@@jorellhshe is 71 do expect wild antics now. She was great.

@@Fadingfool No, it's not due to it being recorded differently. I've lined the tracks up in my DAW and compared them. The drum hits are different. Sometimes the kick (loudest drum part) is a bit later in the live version, other times it's a bit later in the studio versions. These are 100% different drum recordings. Also, you can compare these drum sounds to the drum sounds from other songs from the same performance and you clearly hear that these are live drums.

Great comment! I wasn't a fan but that makes me wish I'd seen them.

Yes! That’s the experience of live music. You feel part of the moment and it’s memorable and fleeting and unrepeatable. Who cares if they f**k up - it’s all part of the fun and it’s evidence that they are human beings.

Like when you have a 30 minute set list, but the drummer is so efficient the band powers through it in 25.

❤your a lucky man Ross....

And that's rock'n'roll!! Exactly how it should be 🖤

Tell me you've been spoiled by Floor and Nightwish without actually saying it. I saw them a couple of years ago in LA; absolutely brilliant. Then again they are old school too.

I saw Rush many times and got the tingles every time!

This is important: there isn't one way to make music live. But I think it's useful to know what you're hearing.

Have said this for years now. Milli Vanilli were simply pioneers of what people wanted (or were satisfied with) from popular music... ;o)

Well said.

I don't know but this was common on TV shows back in the day.

@@vaderladyl I agree in principle. However, nobody showed up at the Ed Sullivan show thinking they were getting a "live concert" experience, nor did they pay exorbitant fees to do so.

It's TOTALLY different! Milli Vanilli DID NOT do the actual singing on their recordings. All the vocals were done by session musicians, not the duo.

That's exactly what I thought.

Then they should just be dancers only. Otherwise they're just charlatans.

It's done all the time in live theater. We dance hard and are expected to sing as well as if we were standing still. Just saying that's why singers run on treadmills and sing

I'd like to see an analysis of Janet Jackson in the Rhythm Nation days. She danced and sang and YES she was often out of breath.

Madonna did it on her "Blonde Ambition" tour back in the 80's. The dancing was just as strenuous as anything today. Wireless headset mics became fashionable because of her.

Dancing is a valid art form. Trends come and go.

Call it a dance festival then, certainly wasn’t a music one.

It is ironic when the kpop performances at Glastonbury, which are as much dance performance as they are music, are actually sang live more than some of the other artists.

It was never a "rock" festival. It was always a festival of contemporary music. That has changed a lot in 50 years. It was never a genre festival

To be fair they had had many many ‘oldies’ playing there Cat Stevens last year, Elton John, Paul McCartney and many others. There are less of the Dua Lipa’s than the older artists. But Dua Lipa is - in my mind - a recording artist not a live performer? I’d go for the oldies!

Great comment. Agree 💯

Agree. And not just in terms of performance, but also about the risks they take with the material and where they take it, how free they are with it. I can listen to different recordings of Dire Straits songs because the mixes and the guitar solos are so different each time, such a pleasure.

Precisely! ❤

Live after death is an excellent live album from the greatest band of all time

True, but in the 80s there was always a distinction between the groups that could pull it off live and those that couldn't, at least for people who went to shows and cared about the music, not just the "spectacle." Today it seems like a lot of concert-goers fall into the latter category.

I doubt there will ever be live concerts like those two again. At least not in my lifetime!! Maybe one day, but I doubt it!

@@Lilah1754 .... The huge venues will certainly be gone, but I think out of the ashes, will arise smaller bands that will form as touring buddies and travel around to play medium sized venues and play authentic music, just like heard at those monster events. Music is changing and there will always be those garage bands, they just wont reach Rolling Stones, Beatles or The Who levels any longer. . Music will survive 🤘can The Kitty get a Bonk for Tunz?🐈😸

There was outrage when Brittney Spears got caught doing the same thing, semi-miming through concerts. People weren’t as willing to accept the excuse back then that the dancing and showmanship mattered more than live singing.

You could go to the opera, you know. No autotune, no pitch correct, not even a mic. Just a single voice, often singing over a full orchestra, filling a hall of a thousand people or so. Real musicianship too.

@@Wyl7 ... Yup. We have seen some big issues made of failed lip syncing and Milli Vanilli comes to mind. Of course, they didn't even sing their own songs in the studio, but authenticity of the artist, rightfully carried more weight than if they had good dance moves. I have little doubt that people like Michael Jackson would lip sync parts at least, but we go back to the mega R&B groups, for great singing and modest dancing. . Many music "artists" today are sold specifically on appearance, charisma and ability to dance in unison with others. If people know that is what they pay for... no problem at all.

Now there's someone who needed auto tuning.

There are videos from Gorillaz as well. Shaun Ryder sang on one of the songs, Dare, and was incredibly drunk a few times on live performances.

Usually because the guys on the records weren't the guys on stage!!

@@jonchilds1637so true man

@@michaelwills1926 Is it, what a fanny.

@@jonchilds1637 Well, Milli Vanilli for one. There weren't many others.

@@RebeccaTurner-ny1xx don’t recall seeing much of Milli Vanilli in the 70’s!!

Sinatra, Crosby and others were crooners who relied on close mic technique, not by having strong voices like opera singers. They relied on technology a lot. And karaoke singers are all live, however terrible.

well, ever hear profession oparasingers and soloartists? and what about pinkfloyd, they sound better live than on the albums.

The give away here is that no one can dance and singe so CLEAN at the same time. It’s just impossible

You are correct. I tried to listen to Dua Lipa's Glasto bit and I instantly switched off coz I could tell she was NOT singing live. She simply wasn't.

@@wout123100 Those professional singers may do a really good job, but do they sound absolutely identical at every performance? In the case of Pink Floyd I've definitely heard several live recordings where they sounded substantially worse than on their albums. Which is quite surprising because when the recordings are that bad they can actually cheat and fix them up afterwards.

Yes! She was singing live. And she is trying to be ironic and cool while she is singing for dome reason. Well I have seen worse. However so dod she have pre-recorded backning track of her voice on the chorus.

Beth ditto of gossip didn't have a problem singing live. She was fantastic

So in essence what Dua Lipa is doing on stage is actually Karaoke (singing to a pre-recorded backing track) rather than a ‘live’ performance.

​Dua uses studio recorded and manipulated "live" vocals with an active mic. I worked a gig a couple of years back and she was one of the headline acts, and her vocal mix, (with pitch correction), failed. Hearing her ACTUALLY signing live was the longest and most painful 30 minutes of my life; and I've had kidney stones AND viral meningitis.

Maybe I'm just too optimistic but I think most artists actually do most things live, and Dua Lipa is more of an outlier than a rule. At least from the artists I am familiar with, although I do admit I don't pay attention to most popular acts.

I just did that. She was amazing. And yet the critics tore into her.

Yes, but she has signed on to do an avatar like ABBA Voyage (she made a video about it a few months ago) and that disappoints me on some level.

@@jimandlizhudson2501it sounded awful to the crowd. There may have been reasons, but nonetheless it didn’t sound good,

nicely said.

Despite him not even being the best drummer in The Beatles.

@@DaveMcIroy I assume you were being ironic there - you do know that it was a comedian that said that, and that no one with any musical knowledge has ever said that?

@@annamariaisland1960, a couple of musicians said that. 🤷🏻‍♂️

@@DaveMcIroy Imagine how John felt. He wasn't the best drummer, lead guitarist, bassist or singer.

@@darthminogue, guess why he killed Paul and replaced him with Billy!

I am a thereminist and it is literally impossible for me to play without adequate monitoring (hearing the pitch coming out is the only reference on my instrument as there is no physical reference and the field of the instrument is never exactly the same, so you can’t rely on physical memory if you can’t hear yourself). I have had so many bad experiences with live monitoring I have started to take my own headphones to gigs as a backup, which is not ideal but has just about saved me a bunch of times. I wish people understood this about performers

i was there, it didnt sound great, it sounded awful, but not because of any of the musicians performance onstage, we could barely hear Cyndi. there was something wrong in the mixing for sure. i saw other bands on the same stage and the sound was great. she kept fiddling with her mic/talking backstage to the crew etc. it was clear everyone knew there was a sound problem but they had to soldier on.

It happens often in festivals that only allow a quick line check with the lessor bands. They can usually get things "reasonably" figured out sometime into the first song but sometimes never. You'd think Cyndi would have gotten more of a sound check, but by the comments it doesn't look that way.

@@gertietheduck I wonder what Clara Rockmore did before monitors playing the theremin. That would interesting to find out. Maybe the had monitors then don't know but people definitely trained differently before the 60s when performing. You had to be able to project to the back of the theater as a singer for example. Now people had head mics and stuff.

@@popoff7808 she did what most modern-day therminists still do when they aren’t going through a PA, which is have a dedicated amp behind you. Even with a monitor/PA, it’s still best to have an amp behind you too (but I am limited in what I can carry to gigs as I don’t drive, and my little amp is not loud enough if I am playing on larger stages with a lot of other musicians). especially because you need to hear the dry sound without any effects , loops, etc and with no other instruments. You would place it at head height and use it as your main monitoring system. The idea is that you’d be able to hear yourself louder and before the audience could hear you as the sound would reach your ears first, so you can correct/adjust your playing as you go, especially when you have to come in after a break, because there will always be a tiny, split second adjustment needed to the pitch, if you are coming in cold. If you play quietly enough that you can hear but others can’t you can adjust almost instantaneously before others’ ears pick it up. But yeah, you cannot play accurately on a theremin without hearing yourself. Not even Clara.

Agreed. Today it's more about a cult of personality than anything to do with music/art.

@@cindys2617 I'd say it has always been a cult of personality for many people.

The credibility of Glastonbury hasn't existed for at least 2 decades. I would rather pay for a completely unnecessary dental extraction.

Credibility of Glastonbury is long gone.

At what she does. And what she does is dance on a stage wiggling her yahoo and pretending to sing but, you know, not really. And when you do her her actual voice, well, let's be honest. That's barely MID on her best day...which is obviously in the studio and not live.

Being fine at picking your nose is nothing to be admired. She's an auto tuned fraud who created forgettable dreck.

@@jungatheart6359 What, you mean Glastonbury isn't a bunch of stoned hippies lost in some field any more? Noooooooooo!

I went to a Janet Jackson concert recently. I AM SURE she was lip syncing. I didn’t enjoy the concert at all. My sister dragged me to the concert.

you probably already have !