Just the soliloquies: Hamlet's "To be, or not to be" (analysis) 

Your analysis was so accurate & it helped a lot studying for my next literature exam, thank you sm !! 💝

Thank's so much for your expertise and impeccable presentation!!

Some time ago I learned that in Q1, the "bad quarter" hated by many, there is a different and half shorter version of the monologue that begins "To Be or not to Be, Aye there's the point." Apparently, however, the views on whether it is an early version of the play or a version memorized by an actor for money differ, and because of this, Q1 has no value at all. Regardless, it is still a very interesting artifact and documentation of its time.

Hello dear teacher How i can contact with you please. My regards❤

Thank you!

‘Nobler in the mind’ doesn’t mean nobler. It means more rational. ‘Consummation’ should be ‘consumation’ (see Q2), which means annihilation (not to be). None of it is about him: that’s why it doesn’t contain ‘I’. It’s CONtumely not conTUMEly. A bodkin is a needle: only needle-like daggers are called bodkins. Lastly, it’s not a soliloquy. Thinking you’re alone doesn’t make something a soliloquy, and why would he think he’s alone? He’s in a semi-public place, he’s been sent for, and Ophelia is standing right there.