Karen Read Murder Trial Explained | Jessica Benson Show 

I think they planned to make it look like the plow hit him or something.

The bottom line They PLANNED it and they Killed him and threw him out as if he was trash and are cowards!!!

They planned it after they kilked him in that house! The dog too!

They might have caught ZERO on the ring camera. THose rings can be adjusted to only turn on if something is with in 20 feet. Saves on file size. I mean it could have been set to pick up all movements to the street. But we don't know that they never talked about it.

Static and a thin blue line?

We’ll never know bc he was a cop.

@@bornfree0507yeah I'm afraid the evidence was lost to the wind by a deliberately botched police investigation.

@@Physics072oh come on even if the neighbors had the videos inside of the town a large percent are witch hunters towards Karen and call her guilty and don’t explain any evidence for it or counter the scientific facts that show she couldn’t have hit him (and therefore couldn’t have killed him based on what the prosecution said must have happened). That’s not great odds that the owner would want to incriminate their neighbors with tons of power. Then we know the police wouldn’t force it and would honestly say “no we don’t need it right now” so it self deleted. So the neighbor definitely could have had a video of it and been willing to hand it over while it was still available. also they could have lied to police and didn’t have any. We know they should have got a warrant for it extremely fast. Like FIRST thing ever besides saving John. Also they can’t call this just “negligence” because they hid, manipulated, created, and destroyed evidence MANY times. Almost all of the witnesses were caught lying or “not knowing” or change of story a LOT and those are the ones called out and proven wrong. Yet every single time it was always anything that could have proven the case or exonerated Karen. Really? Key evidence that would convict Karen? ALL evidence that showed up randomly and could have easily been faked with extremely sketchy background? Every single piece of the “key” evidence that objectively shows Karen is guilty. Yet every single piece of evidence that would have exonerated her (or convicted as well), EVERY SINGLE ONE, was either purposefully ignored, destroyed, dissapesred, or had some weird chain of custody where it was handled by a cop linked to the families and was unaccounted for. All of the unbiased witnesses made Karen look more innocent. All the ones with at least sketchy connections or clear bias are the ones that testified against Karen. Almost every single one of the family majoirty destroyed, altered, hid, and many times called out on that for evidence or testimony. Yet every time they “forgot” or “butt dialed” it’s always something that would help us convict one of them and exonerate Karen. They had to have done it. Statistically, it’s is likely that over 90% of those “coincidences” were ON PURPOSE before the bias started kicking in. With the selective bias it’s almost all of it. If we saw one or two for one or two people then maybe that would be okay if it’s not too big, like someone getting a new phone the day before. We’d say there’s a 0.1% chance that just randomly happened (it’s really around 0.02 I did the math) and we’d just chalk that up to freak coincidence. But we’ve seen every single possible key evidence missed only when it would exonerate Karen. None of the experts on prosecution got into any REAL physical evidence or recreation of the scene. None of their evidence at all was able to prove Karen was innocent by even a decent standard. By this point it’s impossible that Karen is guilty because the prosecution would have prosecuted her with only 1/20 things they fucked up or ignored despite the fact that outside people directly mentioned it or told them they should do it or they spoke about it. It doesn’t look like they were trying to convict Karen for the crime they think she did. I believe that’s impossible to believe now even before the unbiased FBI experts proved that it is scientifically, medically, and physically according to basic LAWS of Physics impossible for Karen to have hit John at any point, impossible that he died in a car wreck, and insanely impossible she hit him into the yard. There is a 99.99% chance or more that he was bitten by a dog before he died but he was bitten 5 min-2 hours before his death. He died in the morning according to medical science. Karen could not have killed him it’s proven without a doubt actually. Unless someone can explain how she could have hit him to kill him and explain how that’s physically possible to do from the end result then you must admit there is no doubt, no single possible way, that Karen hit John with her car and considering the evidence presented by the prosecution she could not have killed him any other single way due to the timelines and movement. Which means someone else killed him. Oh also he didn’t get rid of his dog he REHOMED IT! I think he may have play fighter and the dog jumped in and bit and some unfortunate fall happened. Even though there was no evidence that could be taken from Chloe he got rid of her literally that night and hasn’t brought her back and wouldn’t tell the jury. So there is a STRONG chance that he is hiding Chloe and could have been motivated by Chloe biting John. See Chloe had already bitten one person and so she would have been confiscated and put down. Usually for big/dangerous labeled dots it gets put down the first bite it takes. The first thing did after killing John (hypothetically) was to take Chloe somewhere she couldn’t be found because they KNEW they may get arrested and charged. I also think they didn’t plan the car hit theory I think they had him alive but really bad and then once they saw Karen was stressed out they decided to go around and pretend like he died in the yard. Then they manipulated her to wondering if she hit him and had her saying things that they could twist. They probably asked the EMTs if they heard her say “I hit him” and kinda tricked them in forgetting the first part which is extremely doable. But really she said “Did I hit him?”. Naturally if someone is busy they’re way more likely to miss the “did” question mark where as “I” and “Hit” “Him” probably grabbed their attention right away or at least if they didn’t catch the first part of it. Anyways there is zero evidence or even potential explanation where Karen kills John nevertheless hits him with a car and it’s impossible she made him end up in the yard. The taillight plastic had to be planted which means none of the physical evidence after the first morning can be considered.

@omaha-republicanIt wasn't supposed to blow up in the media. I 100% agree with this. That's why the "investigation" was so slipshod. None of this was expected to ever see the light of day. I think where they really screwed up was underestimating Karen Read's intelligence and willingness to fight. That's maybe one silver lining: if they did realize that, they could have easily done a much better framing. It just strikes me as terrifying that Massachusetts police drive around drunk all the time and that in the MOST flattering interpretation of this situation they are merely incompetent keystone kops. I literally have no trust in them at all after this.

It's worse than that. Higgins admitted to using that FBI tool to extract "text strings" of the (in his mind) relevant text messages... yet what was put in evidence was screenshots of the texts. Lol, wut? That tool didn't create screenshots. It just occurred to me... I would bet money that the FBI kiosk Higgins used logs absolutely everything done with it. But also... Higgins literally testified on the stand to several federal crimes even WITH his lawyer present. You would expect the lawyer to tell him to take the fifth. This strongly suggests to me Higgins has some sort of immunity deal with the Feds.

I agree

and the fact that the jury pool/public, could be so adamant they believe karen killed him, when theres so much reasonable doubt. and evidence to the contrary, that he was not hit, don’t seem to matter. that’s what’s wrong with this country and justice system. according to jury instructions, and evidence presented, if the glove doesn’t fit, you must aquit. the fact that karen would go to prison when there’ssi much evidence of cover up, and injuries that experts say wasn’t caused bt a 3.5 ton suv, and there are people out there who’d be so unfair because they don’t like the cut of karen’s jib, is disturbing.

@@McQuizzicalWhy?

​@@kjnest Because there no evidence to support this.

@@kjnestBecause the prosecution's own medical examiner didn't believe he was hit by a vehicle and that opinion was shared by defense's expert witnesses as well, two of whom who were independently hired by the Feds and weren't connected to either party in the case. Not that that was really needed. You don't get hit by a 3 1/2 ton vehicle and just have some scratches and no bruising.

Bumpers stick out further than a taillight, the bumpers would have touched, not the tail light. It's impossible for the taillight to break from John's suv. You could absolutely see the light was broken when she pulled out.

@@iamlrrrruleroftheplanetomi1799 theyve already scientifically ruled out him getting hit by the taillight at 25mph though. like the FBI investigator said, the CW theory here really doesnt make sense. I just cant get past the fact he was found 30ft from the curb. it just doesnt make sense if he was knocked out with that head impact. 18 butt dials is far fetched too.

@goonerinit the toyota/lexus car data show a lot of info that's hard to ignore, I saw a recreation video of the sideswipe theory that shows it's possible, I'm in the camp that she did hit him but I think she was drunk and didn't realize it or she didn't realize until she sobered up a bit. 9 drinks in a couple hours with a bac of .2ish, I know a lot of these people are dumb but I don't believe they're also cover up masterminds. Sucks for John and his family, there's no winner here.

@@iamlrrrruleroftheplanetomi1799 Video shows the taillight intact when she got home, so no, she didn't hit him.

That’s a pretty ignorant comment. Some believe guilty some not. Wait and see and stop disparaging others opinions. Some of you know nothing about the legal system and the elements needed to prove a case. The jury will decide. What will you do if they find her guilty? Will they be the next target of the Read mob?

5 percent of people think the moon is made of cheese. Of those 50 percent think its flat.

Think of how dumb the avg person is. Half are dumber than that

I believe Karen could be guilty of a lesser charge that is what I think will happen in this case if she was not guilty they would have already come back with that

My daughter was at this court today and was appalled at the circus they have created out of this. These are her words:Yeah well we had court today so I already experienced that fucking circus and I'm so over it. Those people should be ashamed of themselves

Confession, DNA, motive.

The concrete floor in the basement was torn up and replaced. Only way to get rid of the blood.

FBI experts testified JO's injuries weren't from Karen's SUV, the Alberts aggressive dog "rehomed", cops never investigated the house, Higgins & Albert destroyed their phones, middle of the night "butt dials", more than JO's blood DNA found on his shirt but never tested....

@@williamp6800 first cover-up, they didn’t inspect or search the home on that property where John was found.

And did ‘renovations’ by removing some of the concrete floor in his basement and rehomed his phone the day before a court order to preserve said phone was to go into effect… and evidently had issues with ‘butt dialing’ one specific person.

Well isn’t that just a coincidence…. If you believe THAT then there is snow in H3LL !!!!

Ring footage camera was deleted that night from the Alberts’ house. Also, Karen Read’s tail light did not look SHATTERED when she went to get O’Keef early in the morning. According to the prosecution, at that time, she had already killed him and the tail light was shattered. Then you have Jen’s search. Then you have the dog that was re-homed. They sole the house after remodeling their basement. The alberts and all the other cops were calling each other all night long while O’keef had died, but they all pretended it was butt dialed. What are the odds they ALL butt dialed that night? Idk man. Whether she did it or not, she cannot be convicted due to those facts that causes reasonable doubt.

The defence knew where the dog was, why didn't they take dna from the dog, ..I will tell you, it was nothing to do with the dog!

@@eileengilbert1384you will tell us? Hmm…. You must be close to the dog or scene?

Personally I think it's that load of crap jury instructions that the judge first gave them but that is being corrected now

Ex cop on the jury. Thin blue line.

Lol

@@rad4579Medical actually but hey let’s not ruin a good story

Which Albert? If you're talking about Brian Albert, he didn't have a RIng cam. He testified that he'd gotten a Nest cam for Christmas but hadn't installed it yet.

They didn’t have a ring camera they had a google camera that wasn’t set up “allegedly”

Yeah, all police, firemen, and EMTs were willing to risk their careers for a man.. that they didn't know. How many individuals do you think were willing to lie to pull this off? Use your common sense.

Really?

They know, that's why they deleted all that evidence. And why would one randomly seach how long it takes to freeze to death in the snow at nearly 3 am.

​@debbiehall7016 Have you had your head in the sand and heard absolutely nothing about rings of dirty cops getting busted? Have you heard nothing about the goon squad trials? What about the sex scandal where various male officers slept with one female officer while they were on the clock? They're not risking their careers for a man they didn't know. They're covering up for their own people. This has happened over and over. Common sense says that this is what is happening here.

@@debbiehall7016there is no common sense in this case’s investigation. This is not a new issue they just picked the wrong person to frame and I don’t feel sorry for a single one of the McAlbert’s. They are definitely hoity toity entitled townies and it’s way past time they get taken down!

Yes, and when asked why he was at her house the next day when she was interviewed, he says, paraphrased: Jenn had just been through a traumatic experience, I was there to support her ... I've known her since she was six years old ..... " Brian Albert is a thug and he is covering for his nephew Colin who beat OKeefe up in the basement. I heard someone say that the individuals who tore up the cement floor in Alberts basement before it was sold, are being interviewed. They could testify to seeing blood damage.... A lot to be exposed yet. Karen's verdict is just the beginning.

All sounds so intertwined these two families and not in a good way.

Its all over internet Jen had affair with Brian too. Theyre all gross.

After he carefully curated the specific text messages he felt would be most helpful to investigators. Def shady.

@@JosephBroughton absolutely. Not saying she's completely innocent or guilty. But there's definitely enough reasonable doubt in the case.

He’s the 1 with motive and butt dials. Plus throwing away the phone. Who does that? 😂 there’s machines that give u cash for old devices. They were gaslighting us on the stand thinking we’re stupid.

hE ALWAYS USED THE MILITARY BASE, AS HE HAS NO RUBBISH SERVICE AT HIS HOUSE. He kept the messages on his new phone that he threw out , before he was asked to preserve it.

Maybe he wants his damn privacy. Doesn’t mean he’s in on a murder with a bunch of adults, their kids, paramedics and firemen.

😂😂😂😂😂...fairy tale

@@angelbaybi997 No need to think its a fairy tale its been exposed for the world to see. Its in the select meetings its in the bullying of voters in the town its in the videos of Albert Thugs assaulting people, its in the history with Chris Albert killing a person drunk driving then fleeing one to have This Judges (Cannone) brother get him off. Yes really a fairy tale of corruption, its been there so long its normal to them and maybe you too.

More like %1000 Speculation.

@@JoeBuck207 I will stick with the PHDs if he was not hit you must Acquit. No need to worry about the rest as all charge rely on her car hitting him. Just not possible to hit a arm and fly that far. That is the prosecutions fault.

@@Physics072 She's guilty, the question is if she is found not guilty what kinda life will she have ? Many people will think she got away with murder, will you take her in ?

Kerry roberts said whatever jen said to say so she is just as guilty

Yes, was about to type this. I believe that was the original plan. Granted, everyone was drunk. They dragged the body from the back gate to close to the road, but realize other homes have cameras. The next day Karen made a perfect Patsy, and if Karen hadn't hired great lawyers, they could have gotten away with it.

agree

Maybe they never meant to blame Karen. Did they get Proctor involved first and let Proctor conjure up the narrative as his ego took over and imagined he was a super-sleuth? Proctor kept ignoring who he should be investigating bc he wants to be praised and top dog amongst his peers. Then all they had to do is just listen to his theories and then customize their stories around Proctors theory? Just a thought, I'm still trying to piece it all together as well but I definitely believe this is a conspiracy and Karen is being framed. Canton Police should be investigated on this one let justice prevail.

@@joe19912 Karen made a perfect beeline to where she knew he was.

LMAO….Exactly! Prosecution sooooooo incompetent! Proctor and ALL the players, liars! I cant believe this ever made it to trial!

Brilliantly explained

replace "will" with "should" and you're spot on:)

That sounds so far fetched. Why would they have wanted to beat up their friend? The only one who hated him & wanted harm to come to him was his girlfriend as we heard her scream at him that very night as recorded on his phone.

And Karen too, she knew she had hit him.

@@CatholicHousewife2017 He was not their friend and one of them wanted his GF. None of that matters. He was not hit by a car at all. The damage to his body was not from a car hit. The physics make no sense at all. I agree with the FBI hired experts. So if no hit you must acquit. Don't even think about why or why not they would kill him. That is for another future case. He was not hit by a car.

@@ficalli4743 you clearly don't believe in science

@@CatholicHousewife2017 You must not understand the science

I agree from our vantage point its clear she is innocent of the charges. But the jury does not have TV, NEWS, Chats, You tube etc. I can't assume how they will view it. They just need to focus on 1. Did a car hit him YES or NO. Right now its a big NO. Once you know that the rest is just noise the charges fall apart. Should take 1 hour. But there will be at least 1 flat earth person in the jury. That will hold things up.

Thankfully the jury doesn’t have this misinformation.

@@mserin27 No all they needed is the Experts hired by the FBI PHDs that said he was not hit by a car. No car hit you must acquit. There is one flat earth type holding it up.

​@@mserin27Thankfully, you're not on the jury...

What I don't understand is the data is only right when it fits the prosecution brings it up but wrong when it disproves the their case odd that.

What about the others that heard it. She is guilty and unremorseful.

Quick. Call the FBI who is still investigating and let them know their experts have it wrong because Sharon Parker from youtube has cracked the case.

Seems that way that’s why others didn’t testify in the grand jury

Others said it too, not just Jen. Read made the false narrative and it hasnt been proven that anyone bashed John.

While others said they did not hear her saying so...do not forget that ;)

The judge should be fired

@@Neothefish yes, I agree

Yup, not only she not guilty, she is innocent.

Fired? I think maybe Jailed.

@@Neothefish She should be fired but she cant be fired so don't be upset when she is not.

Have you listened to anything in this video. Doesn’t sound so cut and dry to me. I’m glad they’re taking their time. I’d hope they’d do it for me if I found my self in this situation and you would too I assume. I’m glad you can determine who’s innocent or guilty for your phone/ computer. It’s quite impressive

I'm new to this case and was looking for a video exactly like this. Unbiased summary of the events that took place. Majority of other vids seem to be all over the place and cause confusion

​@@zoso8818 Brandi Churchwell has a series 'Conspiracy in Canton' worth listening to.

@@zoso8818this is completely biased with a lot of misinformation. You might want to keep looking.

@@williamthompson2941 the car hit. She did it and admitted it.

@@SA-tx2kl the neutral experts hired by the feds agree that he was not hit by a car

Exactly! I’m in the same boat and hope the jury thinks this way otherwise it wouldn’t be a fair trial at all!

Tammie you are not alone, just means you are a smart non biased person. I thought the same as you at the start.

My belief if I am free to say without being abused by the Read mob: Karen. She was pissed and backed up real fast. I don’t even believe she knew she hit him. She knew she hit something. She told her father that. Wasn’t til she realized he didn’t come home she put two and two together and realized he was what she hit.

@@SA-tx2kl On first read I would agree with you. But after seeing the wounds and where they found him it did not happen that way. Impossible to be hit on the arm tossed 30 feet and not have broken bones. If only the arm you will not fly 30 feet either and the arm could be broken and bruised. So that part is a No No. She could have still killed him but not the way the state is saying they BOTCHED that up because the guy that did the reconstruction is a buffoon. I felt sorry for him. So just using what the Jury saw she is 100 percent not guilty. Have to ignore you gut and use logic.

@@SA-tx2kl Did you happen to catch any of the scientific evidence, or are you a psychic?

​@@SA-tx2kl facts over feelings. The CW presented no evidence to back that up..

I'm new to the case and have been listening to the timeline and evidence the past few days. Based on all the info, I don't see a way the jury can find Karen guilty. CW didn't present anything at all to convince me she did infact kill him. Not saying she did/didn't do it but how it was presented screams Not Guilty

Maybe their dog attacked him he threatened to sue them and a fight ensued Maybe with their son and they're covering for him?

she is guilty of dating down