Karna was like the most capable yet the most rejected or least appreciated employee of an office. But what stood out for this employee was its unimaginable potential. Karna's story is relatable with most of us. Maybe, If a person knows the true difference between winning or losing, the person still attains excellence and god's abode💪
All characters of Mahabharat represent some attribute of our mind. Arjun represents focus, Bheem represents strength and will power, Nakul represents humility, Sahdev represents wisdom. Yudhishthir represents ideals, Draupadi represents dignity. Dhritarashtra represents blind-faith. Gandhari represents common-sense who has knowingly chosen not to see anything. With their union you get 100 types of defects or issues in your mind that are represented by 100 Kauravas. Under a bad influence- Shakuni, they get to grow powerful. Bheeshma represents our defensiveness of our mind, Drona represents the old ideologies that we use to justify them. So what does Karna represent? He represents our need for validation. People who want to feel validated go to extreme lengths to make others happy. This is why Karna is shown to be generous, but at the same time agreeing to the bad influences. This extreme need for validation is as strong as our focus, and can be stronger too. But if it wins, the person will be destroyed. And Lord Krishna represents our Conscience. We need the guidance of our inner calling to strive through and destroy the bad influences from our life. We shouldn't be overconfident though, which is represented by Abhimanyu. To win thewar against our own issues, we need to finally win against our desire for validation...
@@руслансварогов Killed Abhimanyu in helpless situation, broke rules of engagement of war. Insulted Draupadi. Also the factor of invincibility and being sided with adharma is present.
सम्मान कैसे मिलता इसे, इसने सिर्फ अपने बारे मे ही सोचा,अगर उसने समाज का कोई भला किया होता तो जरूर इसे सम्मान मिलता,लेकिन इसने सिर्फ दूसरो से मुकाबला करना ही चाहा
@@amanrathihr4835 abe m Mahabharata ke time ki baat kar raha hu...jab karna Mahabharata m tha tab use koi samman nahi milta tha...haa ab jarur milta h...m bhi karta hu iska samman
@@DeepakSingh-lw1yu yes ye baat to sahi hai ki woh sirf apne liye Lada naa ki samaaj ke liye....warna woh chahta to woh bahot hi bada badlav laa sakta tha esa uska prabhaav tha par usne Kiya nahi.... instead baba saheb ne woh kar dikhaya jo karna ki puri generations nahi kar paati,woh dusro ke liye lade aur mare naa ki khud ke liye 🤷🏻♂️....Amara rahe woh mahapurush 🙏
1.नास्य शस्त्रं व्यर्थं याति पूर्वेषां च महारथः। नास्य हि विक्रमे तुल्यः पृथिव्यां विद्यते जनः॥ अर्थ: कर्ण के द्वारा छोड़ा गया कोई भी शस्त्र कभी व्यर्थ नहीं जाता। वह महारथी है और युद्ध के मैदान में उसकी वीरता और शक्ति के समान कोई नहीं है। विश्लेषण: इस श्लोक में कर्ण की शक्ति और कौशल की सराहना की गई है। यह बताता है कि कर्ण युद्ध में अपार शक्ति और दक्षता रखते थे, और उनका हर शस्त्र अपने लक्ष्य को अवश्य भेदता था। उन्हें पृथ्वी पर युद्ध में अजेय योद्धा के रूप में देखा जाता था। 2.दानवीरः कृतवीरः सत्यवाक्यः प्रतापवान्। ऐश्वर्ये व समं कर्णं न पश्यामि पृथा कुले॥ अर्थ: कर्ण दानवीर, कृतवीर (कार्य करने वाला वीर), सत्यव्रती, और प्रतापवान था। पृथ्वी पर ऐश्वर्य में उनके समान कोई दूसरा नहीं था। विश्लेषण: यह श्लोक कर्ण की उदारता, सच्चाई, और पराक्रम का वर्णन करता है। कर्ण को दानवीर के रूप में जाना जाता था, जो अपने शत्रुओं को भी दान देने से नहीं हिचकिचाते थे। उनकी वीरता और ऐश्वर्य का कोई सानी नहीं था। 3.कर्णो विक्रमसंयुक्तो नास्य तुल्यः पृथा कुले। अस्ति यो योद्धृत्यां हि शत्रुवशं नयेत् ॥ अर्थ: कर्ण विक्रम से संपन्न था और पृथा (पृथ्वी) पर उसके समान कोई दूसरा योद्धा नहीं था, जो अपने शत्रुओं को पराजित कर सके। विश्लेषण: इस श्लोक में कर्ण की अद्वितीयता और शक्ति का वर्णन है। यह बताता है कि युद्ध के क्षेत्र में कर्ण के बराबर का कोई योद्धा नहीं था। उनका साहस और युद्ध कौशल उन्हें अत्यंत शक्तिशाली योद्धा बनाता था। 4.कर्मण्यकौशलमिदं कर्णस्येति मया श्रुतम्। व्रणेऽपि च न विप्राणि रणोऽप्यस्य न दुस्तरः॥ अर्थ: मैंने सुना है कि कर्ण की युद्ध में अद्वितीय दक्षता है। वह घाव से भी विचलित नहीं होता और रणभूमि में कोई भी उसे आसानी से पराजित नहीं कर सकता। विश्लेषण: इस श्लोक में कर्ण की अद्वितीय युद्ध क्षमता की प्रशंसा की गई है। यह बताता है कि कर्ण युद्ध में घायल होने पर भी नहीं झुकते थे, और उनका सामना करना किसी के लिए भी आसान नहीं था। 5.निहत्यानि हतं सर्वं राजानं कर्णनायकम्। न शक्यं केनचिन्मर्त्ये कर्तुं यद्धि कृतं त्वया॥ अर्थ: जिस प्रकार कर्ण ने युद्ध में विजय प्राप्त की और शत्रुओं को पराजित किया, वैसा किसी और मानव के लिए करना संभव नहीं है। 6.अद्यापि च मया ज्ञातं कर्णं योद्धारमुत्तमम्। यस्य वीर्येण बलिना नित्यं सर्वे नश्च यस्यति॥ अर्थ: आज भी मुझे यह ज्ञात हुआ है कि कर्ण एक सर्वोत्तम योद्धा है, जिसकी वीरता और शक्ति के कारण सभी उसके सामने झुकते हैं। 7.कर्णस्य बलवृत्तं च सदा सत्ववतः प्रिये। नान्यः कर्णसमः पुमान् विद्यते रणमूर्धनि॥ अर्थ: कर्ण के बल और साहस की कोई सीमा नहीं है। रणभूमि में कर्ण के समान कोई पुरुष नहीं है।❤❤❤❤
You can respect Karan for his different qualities But never respect to the fact that .....any power (samarthya) which supports adharam could not be justified in any way 🙏🏻 If he fought like Baba Saheb Bhim Rao Ambedkar 🙏🏻until his death then it would be appropriate rather then supporting adharam
Bro don't compare different personalities as same....B.R Ambedkar was legend who fought for whole lower caste community while karna fought for his rights, equality, respect 🤷🏻♂️....they both are legend in their own way ✌️
@@psh19821 Even shree krishna respected him for his good deeds and what happened to him in Mahabharat war was for his bad deeds. And we humans do more wrong things in our life so atleast we are nobody to raise a finger on him. And we should appreciate people for their good deeds bcuz if we start looking for faults then you can find many faults in me and i can find many in you. And thier are many people who found faults in shree krishna as well they calls him thief and ladki baaj. sick mentality
Actually bhishma had lot of respect for him and he also knew out of all kaurav and pandav he had the potential to be the strongest that's why he was harsh with him cos pampering will not let u achieve what you truly are
Don't trust these serials. Read the original Mahabharat. Bhagwad Geeta. Karna wasn't treated like this in fact he was trained by a brahmin. And Karna wasn't as innocent as shown here. These serials are a propaganda to divide Hindus and show casteism
He is the second best archer In the world . Arjuna always remains first . I am massive karna fan but reality is different from t.v serials . Only if you read Bhagwat bori kgm sanskrit mahabharat dhanurved you will arjuna was really a beast he was not in a competition only he was nar himself
@@SS-cv4cs see Mahabharat is such a beautifully structured epic that you cannot say who is best l, who is good, who is worst...everyone have their dual characters..Forget Arjun, forget karna, just feel proud of the greatest epic of all time..the one which is more interesting and thrilling than fantasy and superhero movies
Don't trust serials. Read the original bhagwad Geeta. Karna wasn't treated like this in real. These serials are made to divide Hindus. Don't believe everythjng you see on tv. Read yourseld. Do research from authentic sources not leftist propaganda
As serials have portrayed him as hero. He was the one who proboked for chirharan of draupadi. Think of the mentality. That person can be a great warrior but not a hero
@subhankardeb4119 see I am not supporting anyone's fault but when pandavs na draupadi ko daav pr lagaya wasn't that wrong at some point everyone have some huge fault so instead of criticizing one we need to see positive side of everyone
@@subhankardeb4119and you are talking about character of a warriors if we talk about a lie that he said to his guru please honestly speak didn't you ever spoke any lie to your teach and on the side are you capable of giving the most important of you body and life as daan to someone like he did in his most important phase of his life
Very emotional and important exchange of words between 2 Kuru Atirathis grandfather and (long lost) grandson. But the question that puzzles me is why didnt Bhishma accept Karna as a kshatriya then when he knew the truth about Karna's birth. Why didnt ge intoduce Karna to the Pandavas as their elder brother. Also to Duryodhan as his elder brother too. The rightful heir to the throne and also who possess ALL the qualities of a great and beloved king. Much better than Yudisthir and Duryodhan combined.
@@bijayshah1240 no you are incorrect about 1 thing. According to the rules of those days, even if Karna was born to Kunti before marriage, he would still be eligible to be the rightful heir to the throne. Krishna himself told Karna that, when he tried to convince Karna to come to the side of dharm so that the war could be avoided. So if Krishna says that, then by all means that is not illegal or immoral during those times. Besides, if you are thinking that Karna is illegitimate, then my argument is that all the Pandavas were born illegitimate as they were not born of Pandu. Truth is the Pandavas were not born as a product of sexual intercourse but by divine gift given to Kunti by sage Durvasa.
@@suvadeeppoddar5826 even I have the same question why bhishma didn't introduce him as the elder brother of Pandavas?and Krishna why he revealed it only before the war why he didn't reveal the truth earlier?
Because duryodhan will become emperor if karna was the eldest pandu as duryodhana was his friend he will gift his kingdom to duryodhana that's what karna says to krishna and he intends yudisthara to be the emperor as karna wants the dharmastapana same as bhisma that's why bishma may never mentioned this secret to anyone as duryodhana becoming the emperor to hastinapur is a bad sign for prosperity of hastinapur
@@sabbellasrinivasareddy8916 that was after Duryodhan stepped in to save Karna from embarrassment. what i am asking is what if Bhishma knew who Karna was all along and recognised Karna as a kuru even before he fell into the predicament where Duryodhan had to step in.
3:40 Even Bhishma also said ki Lower caste (ha pata hai varna vyavstha par dono me antar koi ni hai dono ke dono bas dusro ko nicha dikhana sikhati hai)ki haalat us time bhi buri thi because unhe samaan adhikar nahi diya jaata tha.....par irony ye hai ki unhone kabhi use hatane ki baat nahi ki 😞
Don't trust serials. In reality Karna was not treated like this. He was trained by a brahmin. And Karna wasn't as innocent as shown here. He was a rebel too.
@@applepie5921 Well, we don't have Ved Vyas ji ki Mahabharat manuscripts with us intact rather it's the BORI CE Mahabharat that is the most trusted and oldest Mahabharat we have, it cannot be relied on fully of course. We never know who was exactly what until we meet or witness stuff. At last it was just a saga of jealousy, rights, deception, Injustice and Anguish. No one was 'Doodh ka dhula' yet everyone was a grey character! That is what makes it relatable and intriguing also something worth learning from.
हर युग में दलित समाज से एक महा नायक महा योद्धा जन्मा है जैसे कर्ण, बाबा साहब और उनको दबाया कुचने का प्रयास किया गया डॉ बाबा साहब 2000 हजार पहले आते तो उन्हें भी क्षत्रिय बता दिया जाता
The Bhagavatha Puranam/భాగవత పురాణం, Vishnu Puranam/విష్ణు పురాణం and Mahabharatham/మహాభారతం - The Bhishma knew the Caste System/కుల వ్యవస్థ/వర్ణ వేవస్తా started at the time of Vedas Period, in King's and Queen's Period. All Our Indian King's and Queen's are responsible for the System/కుల వ్యవస్థ/వర్ణ వేవస్తా. He did not try to stop the Caste System/కుల వ్యవస్థ/వర్ణ వేవస్తా until his death. He told about how the Caste System/కుల వ్యవస్థ/వర్ణ వేవస్తా started in the Vedas Period/వేదాల కాలం to Karna at the time of his death. The Bhishma had done Mistake, Unrighteousness/అధర్మం and పాపం. The Bhishma accepted himself like him all Kings and Queens are responsible for Caste System/కుల వ్యవస్థ/వర్ణ వేవస్తా. All Dhalith People reject the all Kings and Queens. Don't give preference to all Kings and Queens. 💐🙏🏻
then he could have gathered karna under him and raised to be brother to pandav then he would have been the protector of pandav but this is fate is all lela
Inspite of all the negatives Karna went through, Bhishma still always attacked Karna with insults and humiliation. Bhishma never tried to get the Pandavas to be better individuals. No wonder the Pandavas shared a common wife among themselves. No wonder Yuddhistir gambled away his brothers and their common wife.
