I ‘m the guy that John reads, He was more accurate than I knew. The month of January and the number one was my friend that died in the accident, he was the driver. The gun going off I think was when a bunch of us was messing with a pistol and didn’t know it was loaded and it went off. The bullet went into the door jamb chest high just as one of us was coming through the door. The woman with congestive heart failure and the month of April was my grandmother. When I got home that day I called a couple of my buddies that were there and they reminded me of all the crazy stuff we did. The question of paternity was a conversation my dad and I had about an uncle and we were the only ones who knew about that conversation. As you can tell by the look on my face I was in shock trying to put it all together as he was telling me about myself.
One of the funniest things I ever saw was John reading a dog. He had no idea what was going on. He thought he was reading a person only it was really confusing him because what he was “seeing” made no sense to him or to the person he was reading for. He kept asking if the “person” that this woman helped was physically challenged because it was like the person had to crawl everywhere. The woman kept saying no no no and John kept insisting. FINALLY he said confusedly and hesitantly, “Did you used to feed this person over a fence? I know that sounds crazy but it’s what I’m seeing.” The woman said, again, “No” shaking her head. Then she said, probably feeling pretty stupid, half joking, “I used to feed the neighbor’s DOG over the fence.” John got this stunned look on his face and said, “OMG, I just read a dog!!” Everyone, including John, burst out laughing. It was hysterical. When everything settled down, John says, “He wants me to thank you.” You can’t make this stuff up. I think John sees things but he doesn’t always know right off how to interpret what he sees. He has a vocabulary of symbols and he has to find a way of interpreting his vocabulary in such a way that strangers non native speakers can understand.
In 87, I was talking to a lady as we were working for the first time together at the Anaheim Convention Center...we were just talking out of boredom...she mentioned she and her husband were thinking about buying a large motor home....One of "those thoughts" quickly came in......I said "Don't.."......I couldn't tell her......I had the thought her husband would die soon and she would end up with that motor home and alone in it......so I quickly ended our chat and found a month later he just died. ....so many of us get "those thoughts" but that doesn't make us a fraud.
Wow that's amazing. My granddaughters daughter is 32 and visited the Dionne Warwick psychic network and they told her that at one point my daughter had been on a Dionne Warwick concert and reporters said her voice is improving since turning 85.
I guess I will always be an agnostic but unexplainable things have happened to me in my life. My mother came to me after she died. I was out of the country when she died from injuries from a car accident. It was not the typical by your bedside vision but one of total experience. As I woke up she came into my room and her presence filled every inch of it. Then she focused on my body and surrounded it like a warm cocoon and then went through me and away. It was a feeling of intense presence and I realized she had no dimension to her spirit and communication did not need words. Something that cannot be explained to others. Some years afterwards I went to a spiritual medium before the years of the internet. She only had my first name and phone number. She told me things I did not know or had forgotten. I saw her three times and she was phenomenal and she retired. I have never met one yet that compared to her.
I don´t what to know you, nor any so called medium out there to know how they operate, what tricks they use to defraud gullible people like yourself. It´s nice that you feel the presence of your mother. You don´t need any of these charlatans to tell you that she is still with you
I can’t do what John does but I’ve had several encounters with loved ones... It wasn’t spooky or scary or weird. I wasn’t “wishing” for it or even always thinking about the person. It was quite unexpected and peaceful. One was a dream; the other two were not. John always says, “You don’t need me,” and I have no particular desire to be read for. I’ve never seen him in person and probably never will although it would be fun. But I don’t need him. If the people I love have anything to “say” to me, they will say it and I don’t care to hear from anyone I don’t love. :)
How can anyone, aka Katie Couric, doubt anything at all after hearing what she just heard. It blows my mind how people continue denying even when things are put right in front of their face. (shaking my head)
Because we notice all the misses as well as the hits while people who believe this stuff only notice the hits and/or revise history and turn misses into hits. The car accident story-John said one lived, one died. Turns out two people died and one survived. John said the guy’s mom died but she hasn’t. He said older woman with congestive heart failure and then invited the wife into the reading and even widening the net like that, neither one knew who he was talking about. He said there was an accident with a gun going off but nobody was killed and the guy said a bunch of generations ago someone killed someone by accident. He said there was an adoption in the family and when the guy couldn’t connect that, he changed it to there being an issue of paternity in the family. Do you have an adoption in your family? I do. Do you have anyone in your family where paternity was in question? I do. Do you have a younger male who died in a car accident where one lived and one died? I do. Did you lose an older lady to congestive heart failure? Yep, you guessed it, I have. Do you have someone in spirit with a J or G name? Do you understand the January connection or the 1st of a month? Those are all questions John asked that guy and the guy connected the dots he could for John and we’ll just ignore all the ones the guy couldn’t make work for John.
@@trickortrump3292It’s all probabilities … look at the age of your audience or target, then you know that their aunt/uncles/ parents/grands are of a certain age. From there - pick a thing, like missing a leg or firing a gun or a car accident or heart disease or cancer; then pick 2-3 letters or 1-2 months …. You know how many people have diabetes at our older ages? Or cancer or heart disease? Yeah, high probability. Then the letters? 1-2 out of 26, but most first or last names have 1 of 5 letters, so that is another low probability; same with months - there’s stats in the most birthed months, etc. Like the lesbian woman? I could have done her entire reading - recent breakup? She had emotional problems or mental illness or was bipolar? That’s all probable. I hope I’m wrong and these folks can meet with our deceased loved ones, but ………………..
dense? I never have called myself a psychic but...........I have a lot of those feelings about others without telling them.......but their real and you can't make them go away......we get those "flashes" about others and it just comes our way...oh well.
he's been scientifically tested and the scientist that tested him is a master of scientific method and he put John Edwards and a group of psychics through the wringer ! John Edwards got the highest score and it was amazing because the scientist kept making the tests harder and harder because he was having a hard time with how good they were doing & it got so ridiculous that the scientist actually would blind fold john edwards next to a phone, the phone would ring, john would answer but the person calling wasn't allowed to speak and John would read the caller and then he'd hang up and the scientist would score the reading by accuracy , and he scored very accurate. the same scientist would also perform the test on a fake cold reader and it's no comparison there is a huge difference between a real psychic and a talented cold reader
I'm Catholic and feel don't judge a religion but honor the individuals priests, nuns, ministers, rabbi's, and lay people who have good intentions and do good work, even if you don't always agree with every facet of the religion.
there are many versions of the Bible. As a Catholic or member of any religion, you decide what you believe is right or what is not right, we all can decide what we believe and what we do not resonate with.
John Edward is SO much more impressive than Ms. Margolis... he actually seems to get real messages, he's so specific; it's like she's just throwing darts, to see what'll stick. Although it was wild that the two women sitting next to each other but not together had grandfathers named "Max" and each Max had a granddaughter named "Jessica". It's like spirit was 'piggybacking'... but I believe they would've received more meaningful messages had John been reading them.
I’ve had numerous psychic things happen to me, throughout my life, since 1963. People usually ignore what I shared with them, about their lives, even after it actually happens, except for one cop.
i always think its amazing john can blew your mind with some things when he is reading an audience. The person themselves can sometimes have a high awareness which helps john validate what he is seeing feeling. At other times the audience member is very confused or has no memory of what the spirit is trying to convey. What impresses me is john doesnt care about 'looking like an idiot in front of the audience' when he isnt being validated as he tells them just to remember it and later down the track they work out what was being conveyed by spirit.
Edwards is only specific by forcing the person to somehow reach back in there memory to make something he dreams up fit. Char just works off common names but somehow the "Spirits" only give her the 1st letter of the name?? Why don't the "Spirits" give Edwards more letters of 1st names?? Ha they're both very good at making people believe they can make contact with the dead. But of course they can't. It's a practiced art they have refined over years.
He starts off with: 'I have a feeling of a contemporary who passed, husband, brother, cousin, friend, I don't know if it's male'. So it may be a man but it could be a man or woman, husband or wife, cousin or friend? Wow. I would love to believe in this but that's a pretty broad guess. A 'contemporary' is someone who's alive at the same time as you, so in other words, anyone you've ever known. I also don't understand what he means when he says: 'They're telling me that you had a very unique accident with a gun.' 'Telling' me? I thought he couldn't hear them speak? Each video I see with John, he always brings up 'something with a leg', 'a father figure' or a 'mother figure' and 'something with the chest or heart'. Again, that's so broad. Also, every video I've seen with Char Margolis, she always starts with 'I'm getting M or MA', and someone affected by cancer. I think that is SO general that everyone can find an M somewhere in their family and cancer has touched every family, especially if you allow that to include ANY relative, living or dead, including friends, cousins etc. Like I say, I would love to believe this was real but it just seems like a guessing game. ru-vid.com/video/%D0%B2%D0%B8%D0%B4%D0%B5%D0%BE-cK7j3tB9A6k.html
I've seen more than a hundred videos of his readings / interviews. He's not using the word contemporary like the dictionary definition. He means someone that would be to the side of you in a family tree. Friend, sibling, cousin, spouse. When he says "above you", it almost always means someone older who is above you in a family tree. "Below you", same thing. It's always gonna be someone the person has a personal connection with. Their dead barista isn't gonna come through, unless they had a deep relationship. He doesn't hear a voice, really. He once described it as like being shouted at from a fast-moving car. You might hear a bit of it, but the car's moving so fast that it's already gone by the time you're trying to make it out. He always connects with dead family, so of course it makes sense that "father figure" and "mother figure" would show up often. People who go to him are more likely to be older, since the tickets are expensive, and they're more likely to have dead parents than dead children. Heart disease is the most common cause of death in the US, so of course something in the chest would show up very often. If you're open-minded, keep watching his readings, and esp some interviews. Or read his books. Either he's a complete liar, or you will be struck by how authentic and no-nonsense he is. Down-to-earth. Doesn't try to seem special or better than you. Those are the things I like about him.
Because it's fascinating to see how easily some people can be fooled, it's interesting to see these folks who are willing to exploit grief, and it's easier to spot the authentic ones , ie John Edward.
do you believe that all politicians have your best interests at heart? yet people still listen to the speeches.. Even people that dont believe still 'listen to them'. Just because you dont agree with a subject doesnt mean you shouldnt listen. Everything.. yes.. EVERYTHING in life life is something that is learned. you learn by.. listening, experiencing etc... Do i believe in the content of this video? hmm.. Im not convinced either way. Do i believe everything i watch on youtube? LOL!!! NO :p so.. IN answer to your question, Why do so many skeptics watch the show? the answer is to gather information to form an opinion one way or the other. Maybe your question should have been, who do so many people that disbelieve try to ridicule the content.
I have always enjoyed watching John’s readings and I think he comes across well and likeable. I attended a reading of his many years ago now and can’t say I was anything but impressed but having watched a few of these videos in here in a row now, he always starts with a J or G name, in every video i have watched...it’s the same thing. I can’t explain how he can explain other situations, or provide the information he does to some people but can’t help but feel it’s weird he literally always starts with J or G.
not trying to imply anything but I also associate January and April to the number "1," January being the first month of the calendar, and April being the month of Aries and Aries is the first sign of the Zodiac.
He said there was a connection, could be to BOTH dates. It may hit the guy later what it was after he thinks about it. In all honesty the guy didn't seem all that with it, like he was trying to put things together in his mind to figure out what matched. Plus in many of these type videos a lot of information comes through during one persons reading that actually relates to someone else in the audience. Believe it or don't...it won't matter to some of us until its all over.
John Edwards at 12:28 said that there's a connection with the month of Jan...someones anniversary or birthday, then I guess 2 min later he forgot what month he said and at 14:28 said there was something about the month of April, rather then January.
Bi-Polar is not comical, dysfunctional or a definite reason why someone should break up with you. I'm sorry but having lost a loved one to Bi-Polar depression, I have very strong feelings against stereotyping mental disorders. Char- With all due respect and I am a true believer but please be careful how you deliver messages regarding anyone who suffers from this or similar mental health problems!! To all listeners or readers, Bi-Polar Disorder is not a joke. It is so often used to describe people in a negative way when in reality, it is simply a treatable disorder which is caused by a chemical imbalance in the brain. Okay...rant over!
The one thing I do not like in these kind of videos is the interviewer. Journalistic integrity is always thrown out the window when people conducting the interviews cannot stay in the middle and either not be bias or saying they are sceptical. Char Margolis, damn. I'm not entirely appreciative of how you conduct the read with the interruptions and talking over them and even yelling over them. When you're with John, the comparison is huge. John seems so much more calmer and quieter when he does his reads. Sure he speaks fast, but it seems he has learned to bring that down.
alot of people had feelings before and on 911 I myself . and it's on tape. I believe GOD gives us gifts some know how to use it better. we all have that sixth sense.
K priph. People will do anything to try to make something fit, and if it doesn’t the excuses start, it’s all BS, they are quick cold readers and work with peoples body language and they are all fraud I have proof PROOF: THRTE IS NO WAY EVER THAT IF SOMEONE CAN COMMUNICATE WITH THE DEAD, THAT THE ONLY THING THEY WOULD DO IS SPEND ALL DAY 24/7 WITHOUT GETTING RICH SPENDING ALL DAY TRYING TO HELP FIND MISSING OR MURDERED OR LOST CHILDREN, ANYBODY THAT HAS A POWER TO SEE SPIRIT OR SOULS OR PAST, PRESENT, OR FUTURE. OR CAN TALK WITH THE DEAD AND DOES NOT SPEND ANYTIME DOING SO TRYING TO FIND CHILDREN BUT DONT ARE WITHOUT A DOUBT THE MOST HORRIFIC SCUM WORTHLESS PIECE OF GARBAGE IN THE WORLD AND THAT EQUALS ALL MEDIUMS AND PSYCHICS OR WHATEVER THEY WANT TO BE CALLED, PHONY FUCKING SCUM INCLUDING AND ESPECIALLY THESE TWO HEARTLESS PIGS WITHOUT ANY CARE FOR ANYBODY EXCEPT WHAT CAN MAKE THEM MONEY PREYING ON THE SORROW OF PEOPLE THEY ARE SCUM
Time is one of the most difficult to predict because time doesn't exist across the veil. On the other side of the veil only exists dimensions. Time is a man made concept. It can be the greatest challenge to predict WHEN something will occur. I am psychic and gift of mediumship. No, I don't do it for a living or ever charge. I can tell you I have dreamt of things that happened and felt things that came true; however, I have always gotten the 'when' off every time. If you are open and interested in understanding, then don't base timing as a reason to believe.
I wonder why the messages from the "other side", are always positive. I wonder why you never hear about some medium somewhere, working a low paying job, but help people for FREE, because they would never take advantage of their "god given" gift. Grief is a powerful and tortuous emotion. I wish people were smarter.
interesting how people WITHOUT THOSE SPECIAL THOUGHTS ridicule those who get them......I get them and you can't stop it....its frustrating ....I never tell anyone I get "those thoughts" about others.........but its true.
When someone walks into a TV shop showroom every TV is showing the same picture, no matter if the TV is £1000 or Dollars or £300 or Dollars we all see and view the same image rather the TV is big or small, the same goes for a medium/ psychic etc no matter if the medium or psychic charges £1000 or Dollars or £300 or Dollars he or she will still see the same psychic image...
Except that never happens. They’ve tested it out many times and had two or more mediums read the same person and no two mediums have ever claimed to see the same spirits with the same validations. Literally never.
@@trickortrump3292 There is a Scottish medium called Gordon Smith which has been tested time and time again and has proven when tested to be extremely accurate and even those who had tested Gordon Smith still can't understand why he is accurate and Gordon does private readings for free he was even asked to read for an extremely wealthy Arab and he refused as he said he was asked to carry out an unethical reading he was offered a large sum of money but still refused....no matter what you may think of mediums we our not all fakes yes is there mediums out there that are 100% fake 100%...
People who are skeptics and feel a need to say something negative, judgmental and ignorant...... Need I say more? They are sending messages of love and do so with gods help and blessing.
I'm so happy to here char margolis say she visually saw spirits. Like gosts because i saw a gost before my wife passed. We both did. Me and brittany both saw him visually but he spoke into our heads. He was completely clear. A clear dead man. Obviosly he was dead or he wouldn't be in spirit. He wore jeans and was an old grubby white man.
@6:05 between the last comment from John saying "If I help someone, awesome, but if it's not right for them, I respect that." and Katie's next phrase, "Do you feel that people close down?" ... there is an interference. Someone's voice. No one catch that?
I am a medium myself in no way would I ever charge anyone ridiculous amounts of money for a sitting I charge £ 30 for a reading which is more than enough to ask anyone to pay, and I charge £10 per- person for my show demonstrations
(1) I don't take orders from anyone (2) I don't have to prove myself to anyone (3) No matter if I did decide to prove my gift to you I would still be called a fraud or fake why do I say this, it's very simple: (1) You will say I went out of my way to look on facebook for info (2) I went onto Google to seek info: about you (3) I found were you lived and hunted down your family details (4) SO WHATS THE POINT OFF ME TRYING TO PROVE TO YOU THAT I AM A PSYCHIC MEDIUM, & YOUR REPLY TO THAT WOULD BE, AND I DON'T HAVE TO BE PSYCHIC TO KNOW YOUR ANSWER...….YOUR ANSWER WOULD BE: you don't want to prove it because you can't, but when you go back to the reasons why I don't have to prove myself to you then you will know the reasons why I refuse to read for you..
john says to the guy your mom has passed yes? he says no then he immediately moves on with someone having problems with their lungs and its forgotten watch carefully...
If it doesn't ring for the guy, there isn't a necessary reason to dwell on it unless the loved one is being persistent with passing on that information, which Edwards often does (he doesn't drop the information until someone acknowledges where it belongs because it is important). Furthermore the information he receives is mostly for validation. He admits when he gets it wrong and will often start with a disclaimer before reading. No need to watch carefully. Mediums can be just as susceptible to mistakes as any human in the field they work. Doesn't make em phonies.
Char looks related to Lindsay Lohan . it is so evident people just want to be seen, to be assured, to he forgiven for their perceived errors, even the error of too much sorrow, you might say, ..and in that sense, I see this mediumship as a gift to them.
many people think their fakes however.....its hard to prove otherwise. I should know...I have had many years of this and you can't stop "those feelings" from coming.....but i'll never cash in on it........and its OK.......I've had this since I was 10........I'm now 68 PS. I didn't say I communicated with the dead by the way...but its with the living I get "those feelings about"
"A level of fast passing" just that statement. is enough to tell you he is not a Medium. Because if he was talking direct to a Spirit individual then it would be a precise peice of information.
Why do you say that? If someone had not long passed, and it was a quick unexpected passing, the spirit can come through very mixed up, as they themselves find it hard to believe they are on the other side themselves, so it's not always accurate
John Edward definitely picked the wrong couple to speak with in the audience halfway through this video. That couple was not good at responding and kind of clueless. They should’ve been more attentive.
I don't live in the states but have always heard so much about Katie Couric. I don't know what I was expecting. this is the first time I have heard her speak. I must say...am very disappointed. A woman in her position, I would have thought would be more sophisticated.
see her nanny saw a full bodied spirit of her late husband. or the gost of her husband...it's exactly true because I've seen the same once as well. they don't come to shoot the shit as they say.
How about this....why are so many people wearing the color red? Why is it, everyone picked in the audience was not wearing red but were with someone wearing red? Coincidence? I think not.
Deuteronomy 18:10-12 There shall not be found among you anyone who makes his son or his daughter pass through the fire, one who uses divination, one who practices witchcraft, or one who interprets omens, or a sorcerer, or one who casts a spell, or a medium, or a spiritist, or one who calls up the dead. For whoever does these things is detestable to the Lord; and because of these detestable things the Lord your God will drive them out before you.
Asking a question in a statement is NOT or NEVER will be spirit communication. I only saw a section America started modern spiritualism but how far has it falls when we see northerners like these. I only say that because I watched his show ,yt videos for quite a while if he is A psychic believe me there is a difference the former reads the auric and gains info from the auric field Charlene is as bad
Went to an oversold John Edward event. Have never come across a shamelessly greedy medium like him. H'e s the rotten apple in the bunch. Takes advantage of the elderly by selling false expectations at $150 a pop times a thousand maybe for a short "show."
john gets much more specific, like "how could he have known.." about the accident for example, seems much more realistic about it, (him twitching his foot while char is reading, lol) Char kind of annoying me, stammery, fishing....
I thought John was and is legit. Char....not so much. Listening to her in this made my hackles go up. Don't believe Char is that good. Would like to hear from people for whom she has read.
False comfort is given by all mediums, psychics, tarot card twirlers and too many misinformed paranormal groups. The Scriptures say in Leviticus Ch 19. v 31. "Do not turn to mediums or *necromancers; do not seek them out...".(*Those who seek to talk to the dead, the Lord calls an abomination.) Mediums - whither using traditional methods, an *EVP or “ghost box” - believe they are communicating with or taking messages from a loved one. However, even if the information you are given by the medium is accurate, it won't be coming from your deceased mother or that friend who died in a car crash. It can only be a demonic entity whose agenda is our spiritual destruction. The demonic excel at deception. They can shape-shift, use every day objects to amaze or terrify and have the power to fabricate ANY type of "reality.” Those negative dark entities will also only be too pleased to act as your personal “spirit guide”. So why can't it be a deceased human speaking to the medium?Because In Ecclesiastes Ch.9 v 5 it informs us, "For the living know that they will die, but the dead know nothing." And again in Psalm 146:4. "When his breath departs, he returns to the earth; on that very day his plans perish". The Bible calls death "sleep", and 99.9% of humans who have died, "sleep" and are oblivious to anything past or present. In John Ch 5. vers 28-29 it explains, "Do not marvel at this, for the hour is coming when all who are in the tombs will hear His voice (Jesus Christ) and come out; those who are believers and have done good, to the resurrection of life". Unbelievers are called to the Judgment much later. In Revelation Ch. 21 vers 7-8 it says, "but as for the cowardly, the faithless, the detestable, as for murders, the sexually immoral, sorcerers, idolaters and all liars; their portion will be the lake that burns with fire, which is the second death.” If you put your trust in deceivers, are you prepared to accept the consequences? The choice is yours to make.
Religion is manmade nonsense. We don't need a Religion to talk to God because he is all around us and we just have to talk. Because John Edwards is religious, I doubt his psychic ability because religion would be the first thing he'd cast off