Kemet, Egypt, Etymology, Linguistics & Islam | Maku, Beefie & Mohammed Hijab Speakers Corner 24/3/19 

Readers are leaders. Rastafari

Sahih.. Rename the venue to "dialogue corner". ;)

Hence why I was upset C.O.E moved elsewhere.

A liar

Nah he's just scared of people that are bigger and have status Expose that man

@@bashirissack21 Internet big boy! 🤦‍♂️

hijab is bullshitting he talking to guilable kemet negroes

I no surprisenly he was very honest even answeard the 'allet' question 😑 sleep on that!

@@warredytrillilltown3829 He was wrong in that though , The arabic word for Allah doesnt have a feminine form you cant just put 2 points above the letter it doesnt work that way , however you try to do it it wouldnt make sense , Allah in arabic is so unique if it was just a random word youd find ppl called with that name but there s actually none , not masculin nor feminine !

@@speedymicroman5893 I know an Egyptian girl called Alla no lie

@@thesilencevevo9839 lol the Arabic origin of that word isn’t Allah... it’s a whole different word

Everyone's thoughts are in black and white tho. Who the fuck thinks in colour?

@@josevanreyes I do ngl

He is Christ that saves. Not a religion. Where is Muhammad?

Hijab lies most of the time. Just watch his mistranslations of Islamic scriptures on soco films

Ballshippin Ballshippin soco films the anti-Muslim Christian channel that claims to know Arabic. Nah, you stick to your 1+1=3

@@nemesis2225 1 hafs Quran, 1 wash Quran, 1 duri Quran = 1 Quran? 🤔....

Tony King and your the shittest troll. When you stop crying then comment responsibly.

very good analogy

Don't mention intellect if you can't string a sentence together!

@@sj2672 🤣😂🤣

@@sj2672 to be fair, him not being well versed in English means very little for the intellect. This could've easily been his 4th language which would make his intellect surpass all of us here lol.

@@WeAreGhuraba English maybe his fourth language or it may not be. Your unfounded assertions hold no weight

@@sj2672 and your assumption of him earlier I'd say is of the same weight.

Arabic has nowhere near the number of words that English does. When of you count up Arabic cases and tenses and count them as bonafide words, it's still vastly smaller.

@@pictishblood5688 probably because the english language is the most used globally and keeps on growing with new words being added in the dictionary

98% of the most commonly spoken words in English are Saxonish, there tonnes of Greek and Norman French vocabulary though. The Celtic influence on the structure makes it sound unique too.

@@pictishblood5688 you are a liar with false information arabic has way more words more than 10x or 20x more

Islam and lies. The Quranic Arabic meaning has been change so many times over time. Till the extend that pray will mean blessing, Beat will mean beat lightly, Light will mean both light and reflected light, Also the scholars are trying to give meaning to correct the flaws in the Quran and not the true Arabic meaning, once the corrections of the meaning are accepted then the corrections will be forced on the Arabic language Because of these inbuilt deception in Islam, they will never be a clearly accepted translation of the Quran, so that once any fault that is found in future, the meaning of a word can be tweaked to accommodate a new narrative That is y there is no acceptable translation made by all the best Islamic scholars, not even one among 100 translations of the Quran is accepted.

Brandon you havent explained or rufuted anything the brother said about language listen properly again

@@87jamaine Okay let's go one by one. Is he correct to say that Arabic came from Hebrew which came from Yiddish which came from German?

@@wolfganghumboldt4830 arabic came from hebrew and aramaic you carnt deny that

@@87jamaine Yes I can. That is not how it works. These languages are related. That doesn't mean they come from one another. They are members of a family called West Semitic. Within the West branch is a North and South division. The Southern branch contains Arabic. The Northern branch contains Aramaic and Caananite. The Caananite becomes its own branch including Hebrew. Again, they do not come from one another. They have common ancestors, so they are related. No trained linguist, like myself, would ever claim they begot one another. And the claim about Yiddish is extremely absurd and makes no sense.

looooooooooooooooooool low him

ItsJustMaHmoud pussy

ItsJustMaHmoud words of a pussy 🤣🤣🤣 “insecure” alright mr hair transplant ❤️ stop projecting

Who wants to play NBA 2KHairline? 👀

@Yonis Ali to be honest u didn't answer my point Arabic is older than syriac and aramaic that is my point

@Yonis Ali ok appreciate it

L

Aksum came later on, Mesopotamia and Egypt are the oldest civilisations

Aksum is the oldest place on earth, older than Kemet and Sumer, Kemet knowledge was first Ethiopian knowledge, the Kemetians themselves champion this truth, it is not a secret but it is not well known

He was far from being black.. He was Macedonian

@@Abeuniversal why would moses be Macedonian when he is of Arab descent?

no pharoh was black ..pharohs ensla.ved black people

@@originsandcivilizations3983 No Afrikan Pharaoh was black? Hahaaa...So no Queen of England is white either

@@yesukristo8626black history lies in west Africa not Egypt

allah sent no prophets at all

I stopped listening when he said that.

Original.

leave that shit in 2018

No. Yiddish is a Germanic language that was spoken initially by Jews in Europe. The Jews of Roman Judea spoke Aramaic, and knew Hebrew as a holy language (they could probably read it and not speak it), and these Jews were eventually forced into Europe. Most of them ended up in the Rhine (today this is Western Germany). When they began speaking German, it became mixed with the languages the Jews brought with them (Aramaic and Hebrew). This mix made it distinct from German, but still the majority of the language is German. So much so that even German speakers today can understand quite a bit of Yiddish without studying the language at all. Today, most Yiddish speakers are in Brooklyn New York as a result of 19th century immigration. So basically, Yiddish is just a type of German with a touch of Aramaic and Hebrew.

Fool

@Mister BK why?

@@warredytrillilltown3829 why insult and what did I say is foolish

@@ghettofight where did Hebrew come from and where did Arabic come from?

Évolution gave the nessness. Look it up we knew it for centuries. Nessness was a hairy humanoid without the free will destroy by The Creator and he replaced it with Adam(as)

well apart from the wrong line number..and a slight exaggeration of that line..what did he get wrong?

@@djhsoul ALL of it, he got it ALL WRONG. That particular glyph or Medew Netcher does NOT say ISRAEL, he listening and reading from the wrong people who continues to push this WRONG information. errors were made by Flinders Petrie and also by Wilhelm Spiegelberg in his translation and transliteration of what they saw and was reading. Also another thing to think about, if Israel is supposedly been an old people and have been in and out of Ancient Egypt why is THIS the ONLY written stele from Ancient Egypt from a pharaoh to have mention ISRAEL?????? Very suspicious indeed, the two gentlemen (Kerrie & Spiegelberg) tried to place a people in a time and place where they were NOT there.

@@tentonymason Israel-ysry3l.....so what do you say the correct translation is?..many after flinders etc have come to the same translation and dated it at 12/13 bc.general consensus is that it means isreal...

@@djhsoul before i get to what it actually says. Do you understand how long Ancient Egypt has been around in its inception???? Do you know how many pharaohs there has been? Do you know when Canaan inception was and where the Canaanties came from and who was actually in control of that area???? Do you know when Israel inception was outside of the biblical narrative and where they came from??? And finally why is this the ONLY Ancient Egyptian stele by a Ancient Egyptian Pharaoh documenting a people called Israel????????????

@@tentonymason lol.....dont divert...this is not a history of semetic peoples as such ..just concentrate on what the translation is,,you dont know do you

landmark22 actually there not

theres over a 100,000 prophets and not all from the same part of the world

Lonely Boy youre Profilpic says it all .... youre god die on the kross and you Show it like it is an Award or somthing

Its like my Father die on a car accident and i have a profilpic of the broken car my Father die with ... the satan Play with you christians

Not as many holes as the ones your god died by. Jesus pbuh is free from you.

How's there too many holes you moron? That's all the answers covered from the guy.

1400 years, they been saying that.#nomantest

Say that again. Repeat than ten times. If you are not focused in a discussion, Hijab can drift you off to the wilderness with spinned lies and his cheeky laughter.

Your Uncle Ty got destroyed by Sheikh Danjuma. Check it out.

@@canyouimogen600 ur deranged m8

Stiĺl no constructive reply?

Watch the vid where your uncle got an intellectual beat down.

U really need a check up from the neck up family . L8r

Islam does not condone sexual relations with an immature person (both mentally and physically). Rather, Islam promotes an objective standard of morality where the following prohibition is etched in stone: "It is wrong to have sexual relations with an immature person" However, unbeknownst to many, what constitutes as 'mature' lies on a spectrum throughout human history; subject to change due to biological and psycho-social adaptations. What constitutes maturity in the contemporary period would have been objectively 'old' in the past, because people didn't live as long on average as we do today. For example, with regard to the Roman working class, most people didn't live past 30 (www.thelocal.it/…/groundbreaking-study-reveals-brut…) In other words, going by today's laws where 18 is the standard age for marriage, these people would have only had 12 years left to start a family and raise their children to adulthood before they themselves died. Thus, the average maximum age for their first offspring would have been 11-12 at the time of their parent's deaths; leaving them to take care of their younger offspring and become the breadwinners of the household. They wouldn't have much time to stay as children and literally had no other choice but to begin their adulthood phase as early as possible -- not only for their own survival, but the survival of their societies. The equivalent to this circumstance today would be like people getting married and bearing children at 50-60 years of age; only then to die a decade or so later. In summary, the very "progressive moral principles" that people claim to follow today would have been a major detriment to their ancestors; delaying their lives to the point where getting married and having children would have become unsustainable. Ironically, had our ancestors followed today's standards of maturity, the people complaining about it would probably not exists. However, what's more ironic about the outrage towards the Prophet (sallAllahu alayhi wasallam) and his marriage to Aisha (ra) is how faux and inconsistent it really is. You see, the vast majority of Muslims today would not only never marry their daughters off at such a young age, be we wouldn't even allow our minor children to have premarital sexual relations. In other words, we don't consider them mature enough to have these sort of relationships and we find it grossly immoral. However, in so-called civilized societies, sex between minors is considered perfectly acceptable to the point of normalcy. From popular culture to films, minors entering puberty and having sex is considered a societal standard. The only issue is when said minor has relations with someone arbitrarily considered an 'adult'. But you can't have your cake and eat it too -- either your children are mature and responsible enough to have sex (the most intimate interaction in the human species) or they aren't. You can't condemn the behaviors of your ancestors with your "progressive morals" when you yourself promote something that not even they would have found acceptable So are women that attend comic cons and get dressed up as fictional characters or play video games not ready to get married? Imagine being in a desert with no electronics, how would you entertain yourself? These people are really clutching at straws honestly. Narrated Aisha (ra): "I had seen my parents following Islam since I attained the age of reason [i.e., puberty]. Not a day passed, but the Prophet ﷺ visited us, both in the mornings and evenings." Sahih al-Bukhari, Book 8, #465. And by the way psychological development is a lifetime journey, a 90 year old person would tell you that they are a different person to when they were 40 or 50. What people fail to understand is that ultimately, the only direct information that someone's chronological age can give us is how long a person has been alive. This is not Islam's criteria for marriage and in fact it's a faulty one that fails to take into consideration important factors. Rather Islam's criteria for marriage is someone's ability to function as an adult within society both physically and mentally (i.e. is that person mature enough both physically and mentally to get married?). Whoever meets this criteria can get married. Now just because someone's ability to function as an adult within society coincides with different chronological ages in different societies and in different time periods is irrelevant. Here's a good article which explains this: yaqeeninstitute.org/en/asadullah/understanding-aishas-age-an-interdisciplinary-approach/ Here's another good three-part article: thedebateinitiative.com/2013/05/25/religion-vs-paedophilia-part-1/

Money Mitch The perfect example of islam was a pedophile Sahih Bukhari Volume 7, Book 62, Number 64 Narrated 'Aisha: that the Prophet married her when she was six years old and he consummated his marriage when she was nine years old, and then she remained with him for nine years (i.e., till his death 6 years old today or 100 years ago is still a 6 year old little child. The final prophet of islam was a pedophile because he was a grown man having sex with a child

@@YoungMrD29 seems you didnt read what i said read what my sources said and what my references said also Instead you dont address any of my points debunking your claim and make ad hominem attacks bereft of facts from sources/references like i have