Ken Jennings on Winning Over $3 Million on “Jeopardy” 

I thought that Mike Richards seemed good UNTIL he went on this exhaustive search to find the perfect host... then hired himself

I would have thought his lisp would disqualify him. It's not a minor lisp either.

Ken's doing really well. i really liked Buzzy Cohen, but Ken's great. Mayim... she can stay on Celebrity/Primetime whatever, as far as I'm concerned.

@@billtruttschel I didn't notice any lisps.... the only downside from Ken is that his voice would be better if its deeper

Why did you think that Alex Trebbek was the only person that could host Jeopardy. Don't get me wrong I liked Alex hosting the show but its not really that demanding of a job. Probably one of the easier gigs in entertainment.

he liked going to class

Seems pretty grounded.

✊️

Haha I was thinking the same thing. Stern's worth many, many multiples of that.

@@Crushenator500 Haha I was just thinking that too

An excellent host.

ken already curb stomped both of them sadly

Ken Jennings, best syndicated version host ever! Mayim Bialik, best primetime version host ever.

Don't feel bad I lost on Match Game

@@mauriceortiz8817 when? I don’t watch that show

😂

Ken Jennings, best ever syndicated version host! Mayim Bialik, best ever primetime version host.

12/5/12

This must have been several years ago because they are talking as if Alex is still alive.

🇺🇸💭

Dave Foley

2012

Are you deaf?

Intelligence: The ability to acquire and apply knowledge and skills.

🏅

not true . ability to recall is key to intelligence. Otherwise you’re just a pontificator. That’s why exams are critical. I don’t buy all this new-age crap rationalizing,… well he’s really smart deep inside but just not quick on his feet.

@@BenSussmanpro It is true, and you're wrong. Being able to think critically is what makes someone intelligent. Just because otherwise intelligent people go on Jeopardy and do well does not correlate to intellect. These people do well because they're well-read and are able to pull up that information when called upon. But do you honestly think that Einstein was well versed in world geography or literary works? What about Newton? Or DaVinci? Their brilliance was not defined by their memories, but rather their ability to think in ways that others had not, and then to use the scientific method to bring those ideas to fruition. Exams mean nothing in the context of modern education. Children cram facts into their brains, are tested on it, and then a week later they have no recall because they didn't actual learn anything, they merely memorized things. Stop being naive and learn what truly defines intellect.

Recall is an aspect of intelligence.