How it feels to play KSP1 with Kcalbeloh, OPM, Minor Planets Extension, Near Future Tech, Far Future Tech, Cryo Engines, Kerbal Atomics, and Stockalike Station Parts Redux
For stock ksp with opm and galaxies unbound I stick with Interstellar Extended for the variety of tech and propulsion/complexity. For RSS with Real Exoplanets, I stick to Atomics/Near/Far Future for being more grounded in real theoretical tech. Volumetric clouds and tufx is a must for either.
@@gravitygames4495 True, although there's also Anneheg and Onrefni from Kcalbeloh which are two different styles of molten world (Anneheg in particular looking like the planet in the video)
Pretty sure this trailer was released back before Take Two decided they had to be overly controlling over development and ruined the initial developer.
It isnt even that bad, the science upd actually made the game incredibly fun, much so better than the base KSP1, and the performance is so much better, trust me, KSP2 is going places.
@@Kerbist Judging by your name and your pfp you might be a bit biased, but I want to believe! I really don't like rewarding them for delivering half a game for this price after all this time, but I am tempted when you say such things...
@@Greippi10 I can see why'd you think that. Yeah, but even if you dont like it, you could always just refund it. I made the mistake of playing for more than 4 hours when it released (when it was super laggy) so i couldnt refund it. I do think it'll be good, in my opinion (as stated before) KSP2 base is much better than KSP1 in base, mostly because of the visuals but its also nice to have the hydrogen engines and stuff. However, just play KSP1 with many mods, much better experience most of the time (Though, ksp2 exploration mode has a storyline unlike ksp1)
@@Kerbist I know it is going places. I do play it. But I am beyond disappointed they advertised all these promises for an early release when this should have been a kickstarter instead. The multiplayer is a huge game changer. Honestly the most disappointing part is they have not added that yet.
Unfortunately that is closer to the truth than is comfortable! It is more or less just the edited KSP2 ad, to which the actual game version will never come close. Don't understand how people believe that this will be the game itself
the devs smelled their farts during all the years of pandemic and now are wondering why they got fired. Only chance of survival of this game is if it somehow goes back to the original ksp creator. rip
had they spent less time with all these theatrics and those pretentious ass devlogs instead spent their time developing we might actually have a damn game
@@emersonsnyder369 it is just the ksp2 trailers edited, but it's edited in a certain way. If you look at the title it says "with no failures" or something like that, why is that? Even the ksp2 trailers have some failures, what type of failures? The explosive type. So yeah it's basically the ksp2 trailers edited without failures Hope that helps
@@emersonsnyder369the humour of the developer makes them incorporate and embrace failure as a main part of the game. catastrophic explosion is fun afterall! which is why there are plenty of catastrophic failures in their trailer
I’m going to assume you just watched that Hbomb video? Seeing as this video is heavily edited and includes different music it should fall under fair use, no matter what certain hacks say.
me when someone uses 0.2 seconds of footage of something that was created by someone else (if i play ANY game that wasnt made by me i will INSTANTLY DIE!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!)
