I have the Klipsch (The Three). Although it isn't without flaws, it has a nice sound. The bass is a little boomy sometimes, but for me it isn't as deep as I would like. I think that is due to the frequency range of 45 - 20,000kHz and depending on the music, the mids are not that bright and the highs are not that crisp. I was contemplating replacing it with the B&O Beolit 20. There are a few reasons I am considering this. The main reason is the fact that The Klipsch is a little delicate. It is actually very delicate. It is not made or designed for mobility even though it is compact enough to bring along and jam. That being said, it is still very delicate. The wood will get dinged, scratched and chipped. The cloth may fray, get snagged and be at risk of getting punctured. My Klipsch has the dings but has no snags on the cloth, however, I just received a brand new Klipsch (The Three II) due to the toggle switch breaking off. It is now out of warranty. I was willing to pay for the cost to repair but Klipsch and their only US partner do not and cannot obtain replacement parts. The part is all of $50 to $100 dollars max and a bit over an inch high and they could not fix it. To their credit I was sent a new The Three II. And was hoping to sell it and get the Bang & Olufsen Beolit 20, but I think I want to hear it in person as the computer is not the best scenario to make judgement. As for the Beolit 20, it is built and designed for mobility. On paper, the specs such as the low end freq range of 37 - 20,000 Hz are pretty impressive. The cabinet is a very durable Polymer material and Aluminum. It can take a punch. There are no knobs to be broken. The top holds loose change, knick-knacks and also charges a phone. I think I can get more out of the Beolit 20 than the Klipsch The Three. I'm always protecting The Three as opposed to enjoying it.
เสียงออกแทบจะไม่ต่างกันเลยครับ คือฟัง the three ก่อน พอเปลี่ยน 17 เสียงเหมือนไม่ใสเลย แต่พอฟัง 17 ไปสักพัก เปลี่ยนเป็น the three the three กับไม่ใสซะงั้น พอสลับใหม่ อีกตัวก็ไม่ใสอีก
It's the other way around, the only thing Klipsch actually have going them are the midrange (Sweet sounding in fact), bass and highs leave me wanting more however. Overall it cannot compete with the superior low bass (retained even at higher volumes), not to mention the sweet highs (never harsh) and decent mid bass (passable?) of the B$O. IMO If you're into blues or rock mostly than go for the Klipsch, it does a fantastic job bringing out the roots, realism and weight of guitars for example (specially electrics) and has a good solid rock tone overall (tight and fast). Again this is mostly due to that sweet midrange. The B$O does a much better job with vocals and mid (so-so) to low bass (great) from what I can hear. mostly all other genres of music go to the B$O I think. But its another 2 for the price of one situation. Its up to you where you want to park your money ;) Personally I was raised on Hi-Fi and the Klipsch appeals to me more as it sounds more "organic". The B$O sounds like there's fairy dust sprinkled all over the tone. Not that it sounds artificial (no) just less realism in my opinion with the B$O. The average listener will likely enjoy the B$O as its easy listening and will appeal to more folks for sure IMO. It really does have a wow factor to it.
