Russia has made some significant gains in Kursk, but at a great cost. According to one source, Russia has lost 20,000 troops, dead and wounded, in Kursk. substack.com/@... • KURSK: Speed, Aggressi...
@@SkruffyTalez_TheWarzone Obi-wan has taught you well then haha. Reporting from Ukraine and Ukraine Matters are also verygood. No real competition by the way, all their own style. You're more of the close-combat and specific military anticipation things. Nice for people with the tactical raw deal things and speculations. Anyway, your own niche.They tend a more hindsight or overall approach - those second pair I mentioned.
I would say that is probobly true. Ukraine have been planing this quite a bit in advance, and they know where to strike the Russians when moving in to position. They striking 15-20 trucks in the highway had to been casualties in the several hundreds. And they done that a fairly large number of times. Of cause, worth saying, this will not go on forever. Russia will become vice to it and start modifying the deployment to cut down on those losses. But the basic statement of war 70% of losses is due to artillery, Ukraine have simply optimized there position to have the most amount of successful artillery strikes.
Wtf 1000 losses per day are you talking about? 6 divisions according to what source? Again, Russia has artillery & air superiority, but again you're forcing false claims about huge Russian and zero Ukrainian casualties. Scruffy says that there would be 30% or 50% casualties of Russian forces there. How come the Russian front didn't collapse in Kursk, and how come didn't Ukraine already reach Kurst NPP in that case? So according to Scruffy, Russian front should very soon collapse in Kursk, and we will see a deep push from the Ukrainian side.
@@shtBlock No it would be like 480 per day. No 20k casulties is not 6 divisions, its more like 1-2. "Again, Russia has artillery & air superiority" No they don´t. " Russian and zero Ukrainian casualties." Nobody claimed that. But with mostly artillery kills, one would think that the casualties on the Ukrainian side would be significantly lower. "How come the Russian front didn't collapse in Kursk" Becasue most of the casualties is a result of Ukraine mostly defensive stance. "Russian front should very soon collapse in Kursk" No that is not how war works. " and we will see a deep push from the Ukrainian side." No, there is no reason to think that. Ukraine have taken up a optimal defensive position, One would imagine that they would keep defending that position to punish russian troops. Do you even understand the concept of strategy?
@@matsv201480 losses daily is fake. Especially when Russia is on defense & has fire power advantage, artillery & literally everything else. It’s just not possible, it would mean half of their losses would’ve happen in the place where they are defending… seriously? This number makes sense for pokrosvk. Not kursk stop.
@@shtBlockno you don't GET it. Our overpriced western artillery pieces are like 400000x better than an old Soviet piece and a FPV Drone to correct for fire Lmao, these people are deliberately being disingenuous
The russian losses of 20,000 seem plausible as their losses hover around 1000 per day....they have relocated at least 6 divisions from the south.ukranian command state that attacks in the south had decreased so to maintain the loss numbers that means they had to be losing those troops elsewhere i.e. kursk
@@shandogg1313 that's bollox.ukraine bases it's figures on verified photos or videos from drones or they don't get put on the loss list ,so if anything russian losses are probably more than what is reported as not all attacks are verified
Its been 42 days so that is about 480 losses per day, that i would say is probobly pretty plausible. They have made 1000 losses some days, but not most. I would also suggest that most of the losses, really more than is usual, have been done by artillery. They have basically optimized there position to have solid artillery strikes. If you have so good artillery control you could have multiple strikes on a caravan of trucks on a highway some 15-20km away. It would not be hard to rack up casualties. Some generals that was probobly pretty smart was doing all the fire missions a head of time and planing them up to have optimal effect when they where in position.
This is probably the best play by play of the Kursk offensive out there. Supported by maps and real experience. Everything you're saying seems pretty legit to me. Thank you for this!
as for Russian artillery, I have a strong suspicion that the Russians probably have an ammo shortage here, also Russian air support seems to be missing. Where are the Russian attack helicopters to support the offensive? Recently 3 days ago Shoigu visited North Korea to probably ask for more weapons. esp. artillery ammo. Embarasing. and yep while Russia has a lot of towed artillery, they have a shortage in SPGs. and I suspect the Russians are buying SPGs from North Korea hahah embarassing but the Russians are desperate.
I'm watched till min 11 so far. Want to stress : in game of mobile warfare, superior intelligence and coordination matters. So far, it still proves Ukraine is OP here. Russian make initial pushes, yet fail to decisive results. I guess their artillery fails due to fog of war, bad operational oversight and louzy communication with the vanguard.
It could be true. Remember some of these troops have been killed while there being transported in the trucks as the drones spot them and humans take action.
В том то и дело, что это безумие. В Курской области не было масштабных боев. В основном засады, обстрелы и налеты авиации и дронов... Даже всу там не потеряли 20к... А они на много чаще чем русские попадали в засады и под обстрелы, во время своих необдуманных, неподготовленных и безрезультатных попыток прорыва. Ну вот серьезно... Вы реально думаете, что всу наступая на легкой броне, без поддержки артиллерии и авиации, нанесла русским больше потерь, чем понесли сами?
War is madness.you don't have to believe the figures.bu it's a known fact that russian tactics are to throw men and equipment At a problem which is why their losses are horrendous.
@@harold22774any evidence of such “throwing men” meat waves/human waves has been a topic of talk by western media for years, yet 0 videos of such have been presented. Even the smallest things are recorded daily, & yet after 3 years not a single video of supposed meat waves have been presented, what’s more likely is you’ve just forgetten your pills today. Take them it isn’t healthy to skip
he is wrong.Russia lost 200000000 soldiers,15000 tanks,266474748 planes,several deathstars and a dozen stardestroyers alone yesterday in Kursk so keep up you fake propaganda man.
You have 0 clue on how any of this works. In the east Russia send 2-4 men to sabotage the Ukrainians behind the lines & cause them to pull back due to panic. In kursk it’s just extreme firepower & men advantage as they waited for the Ukrainians to rotate out. They waited for a sweet spot & are now harvesting the gains
@@SkruffyTalez_TheWarzone Yea and Ukraine is winning :D Why people just don't think by itself? If russians have "deat"(casualities) why they "don't" have problem to conscript mens to figt(not by force mobilization) instead Ukraine have problem with force mobilizatin (ukrainians "don't" wana go to fight) just a little problem :D But is just for those who can think :D
I think too few people realize how much trouble Russia is having because the FSB is commanding the MOD. Those branches absolutely hate each other. It’s not like they are going to be a cohesive force. Everybody involved at higher command levels will be terribly concerned with getting credit and avoiding blame, not achieving a common valued objective.
@@blazunlimited Yep that is quite true, The Patrushev/FSB/Rosgvadria hates Shoigu/GRU/Russian army and yes they will not be a cohesive force in fact both sides are trying to sabotage the other. Im not surprised if these days the Russian army is giving intel to the Ukrainians on the current Kursk Russian offensive to embarass the FSB,
Путин издал указ об увеличении численности войск, для легализации уже набранных добровольцев. Потому что они уже не влезают в рамки численности ограниченной законом. Так же как и прошлое увеличение, было для того, чтобы вписать вооруженные силы ДНР и ЛНР. Если бы русские понесли большие потери, то зачем увеличивать штат? Все добровольцы пошли бы на замещение потерь... Как у Вас в голове складывается большие потери и рост армии?
@@justsilas37 Ну давайте по другому... У Вас есть сейф... в котором Вы храните 1,3кк евро.... Вы очень активно тратите деньги, разбазаривая направо и налево... Зачем Вы увеличиваете объем сейфа до 1,5кк евро? От увеличения объема сейфа денег не прибавится. Так может быть Вы все же не такой транжира и зарабатываете больше чем тратите? Причем тут Z и другие буквы? Чтобы анализировать боевые действия, нужно смотреть на происходящее как на матч двух команд третьего дивизиона, до которых Вам нет дела.
Here's an example: you want 1000 soldiers but currently only have 900. So you recruit 100 more and train them. By the time they reach the front, your total number of soldiers is 850. The answer to this riddle is that you lost 150 soldiers during the time you recruited and trained 100 new soldiers. This is what happens to putin, he can't recruit and train as many soldiers as he needs to. If you want solid numbers on that, perun made an excellent analysis of this phenomenon a few months back.
@@T.efpunkt Так зачем тогда увеличивать штатную численность, если реальное количество солдат снижается? Сложите уже 2+2... Увеличение списочного состава нужно, чтобы легализовать уже набранных добровольцев и заложить их зарплаты в бюджет на следующий год. Простым указом об увеличении численности армии, количество добровольцев не увеличить. Для этого нужно мобилизацию проводить. Так что передайте Вашему "Пердуну" большой привет... Потому что он аналитик от слова анал.)))
and lets not forget the Russian navy which is now one of the worst performing navies in the world where the Ukrainians who have no navy sank 20+ Russians ships including the Russian Black sea fleet former Flag ship Moskva, the Russian navy has practically abandoned Crimea and has more or less lost control of the Black sea to a nation Ukraine who has no navy. HOW EMBARASSING RUSSIA.
if you want to see what the worst navy is than just look at the scam US navy vs the flip flop camelriding Houthies.The Houthies alone without the help of 40 gay countries defeated "the mighty US we are only strong with an alliance" navy.hahah you freaks are pathetic at this weak propaganda😂😂
Inflated figures for sure. Even if Russia reposition troops from different sectors of the battle areas, I doubt that, that would automatically allow Ukrainians to go on the offensive. Best case scenario, Ukraine would have breathing space
The Russian can fire their artillery 3 to 5 times before the Ukrainians have a location fix. For this attack the Russian guns likely fired 20 plus time over a 30 minute period. Ukraine likely hit the Russian positions with all they had. The guns were likely near the road from Ryisk to Koranevo. The Lgov road to Koranevo is under Ukraine fire control. A few days ago, Ukraine general staff claimed over 70 artillery hits. maybe when the Russian guns were told to redirect fire it was easier to claim the radio was broke or they had no shells. There is even talk that ATACMS were used to hit the area utilizing weapons away from the Kursk theatre!
According fresh reports, Russia already moved serious numbers to Kursk from other front area's. And intensity of engagement dropped a bit. Not that much - but notable. ISW suggests such in reports as well
Ну ты же видишь что русские не обстреливают высоты... А почему? т. е. Любимовку и деревни за рекой и Ольговку обстреливают, а высоты нет... Сам догадаешься почему? или подсказать? Ага... всу как соберут все имеющиеся дроны... как атакуют... а сейчас то почему этого не делают?
@@SkruffyTalez_TheWarzoneMhm, the Russian ministry of defense claims ukraine looses 2K men a day. Do you believe that? Ofc you won’t, & you would never make a video about it
@SkruffyTalez_TheWarzone lol do these cucks actually send you money to read (poorly) these fairytale? Admire your hustle. Anyone so ignorant deserves to be played.
@@mikhailv67tv I trust the side with higher manpower, airpower, and artillery to have 1:1 casualties on the offensive at most at worst 3:1 that's still no where close to Ukraines claim
@blazunlimited Oh come on !!! the magical number has always been 6million LOL 20k losses in deserted region?? that might make the Ruskies mad and more will join up to fight NeoNazis LOL
Чувак, рисунок на который ты ссылаешься, полный бред. Русские зашли на высоты, еще когда брали Снагость. Веселое всу не взяли... А синие точки, да... это техника всу... уничтоженная техника всу. у всу нет сил для нормальной атаки на Глушково.... А с контролем Снагости, у русских нет проблем с переброской любого количества подкреплений. Да и в принципе... у русских больше понтонных мостов, чем Хаймарсов у всу. Тем более, что после почти каждого выстрела, Хаймарсы отправляются на металлолом... Давай так... Если всу не продержатся в Курской области до конца года, ты закроешь свой канал и никогда не будешь позориться, занимаясь анализом военных действий. Согласен?
Ukrainians are not in the habit of targeting civilians like the russians are. much evidence of Ukrainians aiding russian civilians in Kursk. So, this has to be military casualty numbers.... crazy though.
You're making the mistake of judging the Ukrainian army by the standards of russian. Your notice villages and towns taken in kursk are still standing unlike the rubble putin claims as gains.
@@SkruffyTalez_TheWarzone lol the russians were told to stand down in kurst, to give the neonazi some moral victory of prisoners ! which were limited border guards and police heh
@@Dimension37 Who has denied Ukraine has taken losses? I don’t expect the 20,000 Russian losses number is accurate. What matters to me is that a rabid vatnik is so seriously demoralized by the huge Russian losses that he is openly doom posting, knowing that there can be serious consequences for him to do so.
@@Dimension37 I don’t know who you thought was denying any Ukrainian losses. I don’t take the 20,000 Russian losses number seriously. The important thing to me is that an insanely vatnik milblogger is so demoralized over the huge losses that he is openly doom posting about it, knowing that there can be serious consequences for doing it.
@@blazunlimited Oh come on !!! the magical number has always been 6million LOL 20k losses in deserted region?? that might make the Ruskies mad and more will join up to fight NeoNazis LOL
Of which are mostly conscripts Under russian law they cannot be deployed outside of russia. Putin even almost apologised to russian people but acknowledged there were conscripts at the start of the invasion. Vowing they wouldn't be sent there again.
@@chasx7062what a bs, you must also calculate the exploration cost. Do you know how many billions the war has cost already? The mines in Donbas made a lot of deficit before the war.
