Absolutely, Agar brihaspati ka putra shukracharya ki putra se prem ka natak nahi karta toh kya Shukracharya brihaspati ka putra ko Mrit sanjeevni Mantra sikhate , nahi naa ? Toh yeh kehna ki shukracharya ne kabhi bhed bhaw nahi kara , yeh galat hain . Agar shukracharya bhed bhaw naa karte toh kya Brihaspati ka putra ko shukracharya ka shishya bannae k liyae Shukracharya ki putri se prem ka natak karna padta ? Nahi naa ? Toh shukracharya ne apni putri k liyae hi Brihaspati ka putra ko apna shishya banaya tha ? Ghum phir k shukracharya ne bhi wohi kaam Kara . Toh yaha victim card khelna uchit nahi hoga .
@@AnantSing Shukracharya k hisab se Brihaspati ne pehle pakshpat Kara , Jo ki shukracharya k hisab se galat tha . I agree Toh shukracharya ki bhi zimmedari banti hain ki wae bhi ek behtar alternative de samaj ko , ek example set karke dikhay Jo ki brihaspati ka system se better ho . Lakin shukracharya ne apne aap ko sahi savit karne aur badla lene k liye, asuro ka sahara liya Adharmio ko support karna shuru kar diya . 😡 Ahenkari baan Gaya . At the end of the day wohi kaam usne khud bhi Kara jiske khilaf ek time pe baggi bankar ghum raha tha . Khud toh paap karke mara mara saath mae dusre logo ki bhi zindagi barbad kar di . Lesson - Isse yeh sikhne ko milta hain ki anytime problem problem ka Rona rone se nahi hota . Itna hi Problem agar hota hain toh solution bhi dena aana chahiye. Agar solution nahi hain toh chup baithna chahiye zyada uchal kud nahi karna chahiye.
Shukracharya raakshaso ka guru bn gaya gusse mei badla lene ko jaise kisi ko swimming pool mei nahaane ko naa mila ho to wo gusse mei naale mei kood gaya k yhaan maje se nahaaunga. Ya phir Animal movie ka gaana k tujhe ho gaya kuchh to duniya jala denge jaise duniya ki koi galti ho uske baap k marne mei ya duniya uske baap ki ho. Shukracharya wo h jiski performance to top ki nhi h lkin jise top spot chahiye by hook or by crook. Usko support krnewale keh rhe h k bechaare ki aankho mei mirchi daal di, bechaare ki tapasya bhang krne ki koshish ki. Arre us bechare ki tapasya ka kaaran to dekh lo, wo duniya he mita dena chahta h. Shukracharya is baseless, meaningless, and useless guy just roaming around like a loser venting his anger on innocent people. This is called terrorism. That's why his followers, Muslims, are indulged in terrorism and best at playing victim card just like him.
Nahi hain woh koi mahan . Kyonki Agar brihaspati ka putra shukracharya ki putra se prem ka natak nahi karta toh kya Shukracharya brihaspati ka putra ko Mrit sanjeevni Matra sikhate , nahi naa ? Toh yeh kehna ki shukracharya ne kabhi bhed bhaw nahi kara , yeh galat hain . Agar shukracharya bhed bhaw naa karte toh kya Brihaspati ka putra ko shukracharya ka shishya bannae k liyae Shukracharya ki putri se prem ka natak karna padta ? Nahi naa ? Toh shukracharya ne apni putri k liyae hi Brihaspati ka putra ko apna shishya banaya tha ? Ghum phir k shukracharya ne bhi wohi kaam Kara . Toh yaha victim card khelna uchit nahi hoga .
Agar brihaspati ka putra shukracharya ki putra se prem ka natak nahi karta toh kya Shukracharya brihaspati ka putra ko Mrit sanjeevni Matra sikhate , nahi naa ? Toh yeh kehna ki shukracharya ne kabhi bhed bhaw nahi kara , yeh galat hain . Agar shukracharya bhed bhaw naa karte toh kya Brihaspati ka putra ko shukracharya ka shishya bannae k liyae Shukracharya ki putri se prem ka natak karna padta ? Nahi naa ? Toh shukracharya ne apni putri k liyae hi Brihaspati ka putra ko apna shishya banaya tha ? Ghum phir k shukracharya ne bhi wohi kaam Kara . Toh yaha victim card khelna uchit nahi hoga .
Kintu Bheeshma ji ne to Parshuram ji se Weapons ki siksha liya tha...aur scripturs aur knowledge ki siksha unhone Devguru Brihaspati se liya tha ..... Shukracharya unke guru kabse ban gaye? Unhone Anushasan Parv me Yudhishthir ko jo gyaan diye the....wo sab Guru Brihaspati se liye hue gyaan tha....na ki Shukracharya se........Aur Devtao ne zarur chal kiye the asuro ko harane ke liye....kintu sirf asuro ko harane ke liye hi ta ki asur fir se 3 lok ko par atyachar anyaya aur adharm na faila sake.....Vishnu ji ne bhi Kavyamata ka vadh Pure brahmand ko 3 lok ko adharm se bachane ke liye hi kiya tha.....aur shukracharya ne bhi karn ki tarah hi sirf apne upar pakshpat ka adharm hota dekh kar apni shaktiyon ko adharm ki help karne me aur adharm ki raksha karne me lagaya....sirf apne upar hue anyay ki pratishodh lene ke liye 3 loko se anyay kar liya adharmi asuro ka sath de kar....jaise ki karn ne kiya tha.....😢😢...shame on this mentality.....
Agree with you, isiliye mai iss video ko like nahi kiyaa, kyuki iss particular video mai kuch chiz False hai. Aur ha, Shukracharya ke saath Karna ke tulna karna galat hai, kyuki karna ke saath discrimination huaa hi nahi thaa. Karna ke bare mai bahut false bola gaya hai Leftist ke propaganda and TV series ke dwara. Asal mai Karna ke Mata Brahmin and Pita Kshatriya thaa. Aur Karna ek Raja bhi thaa. Karna bahut hi dust charitra wala thaa. Duryodhan to thaa hi dust charitra wala, but uske saath ye bhi bahut dust charitra wala thaa.
Aapne ek vishay par apni drishti vyakt ki hai jo Hindu itihas aur dharm ke kuch prasangon se juda hai. Yeh vishay atyant gahan aur vividh hai, aur vibhinn granthon aur paramparagon mein iska alag-alag vistrit varnan milta hai. Aapne kuch ghatnayon ko uchit dhang se sambhavnaon ke saath vyakhya kiya hai. Parshuram ji aur Bheeshma ji ke beech ka sambandh keval ek hi prakar se vyakhya nahin kiya ja sakta, kyonki vibhinn granthon mein vibhinn varnan milta hai. Shukracharya ka bhi mahatva hai, aur unki bhumika ke sandarbh mein bhi alag-alag manyataen hain. Samay ke saath, dharmik aur sanskritik kathaon mein anyay aur adharm ka virodh sthapit kiya gaya hai. Parantu in sab baaton ko vyaktigat drishti se lena zaroori hai. Dhyan dein ki sabhi kathanon aur itihasic ghatnaon ko sach ka pratibimb na maan kar un par adhyayan karna avashyak hai. Aur is prakar ke prashnon par vichar karne se hamare samaj aur samajik sanskriti mein vichar dhara aur samajh ka vikas hota hai.
Absolutely true. Kindly stop giving wrong information or judgemental analysis. Half of these stories are half baked making it look like devas are villains and all. These kinds of videos are doing no good instead of creating false perceptions towards our culture. Kindly understand the implication of what you are publishing.
@@aninditaganguly5583Bhai devatas bhi janme hein unse bhi galti huin hogi par sanatan dharma ek time period ka baat ki jageh par kahi kalpo ka warnan karta hey isliye pura sanatan dharma ka kalpo ki kathon ka adhyan nahi kiya ja sakta,harek kalpa me kuch different things hoti unhi me se ek ye video ka kalpa he😊❤
Note :- Guru Shukracharya's mother was a Rakshas . And Indra , denied Shukracharya ,because of his ancestory and insulted him in front of entire assembly .
Bhai pagal hai kya tu? Shukracharya ki mata ek brahman thi jinka nam khyati tha aur pita brahma ke bete saptarshi bhrigu they jinhone brahmand me jyotish gyan diya
Mere liye shukracharya ji wo guru h jinke saath mere jaisa vedhbhaav hua lekin unhe sharan me jo koi v aaya unhone kabhi unke saath bhedbhaav nhi kiya or mai v jb ek teacher bn jaungi tb kabhi v bhedbhaav nhi krungi chahe koi v mera shishya ho ❤ Aaj ye video mere liye guidance k tour pe aaya jisne mera pain km kr diya ❤ Maine kl hi apne teacher ka biased behavior apne liye diya or mai itna jyada hurt 💔ho gyi thi ki mai so v nhi paa rhi thi Lekin ab mujhe samjh aa gya ki q log bolte h ki jo hota h wo achhe k liye hi hota h or aaj se mai v ek unbiased inshaan bnungi🙏🏻😇 Tq shukracharya ji 🥰😊😘
कोई भी महान्तम या महा गुरु हो लेकिन वो अन्याय के साथ है या संजिवनी भी उसके पास हो तब भी उसके कर्म ही उसका र्सव नाश कर देता है इसलिए अच्छे कर्म संस्कार मानवता की ही हमेशा जीत होगी ।
Osama bin Laden? Innocent buildings person and aeroplane people killed? Asurs/evils are born . One whose soul is pure , it's karma is pure too, despite partiality towards him.
He was literally an envious personality who envied Arjun to the extent that he asked for Brahmastra from Guru Dron in order to fight him. Upon being denied, he left the ashram and went to Parshuram and gained Brahmastra by lying that he was a Brahmin. He knew Parshuram hated Kshatriyas, so he lied to his own guru to gain Brahmastra. Karna was a villain and his morals were wrong from the very first, no denying that. He was a great warrior but never a good man.
Justification toh Arjun ke pass bhi tha, agar woh Virat yudh mai sab ko harane baad sab ki htya kardeta toh bhi kya app ukso inki tarahi hero banane ka try karta?
NARAYANA WILL NEVER CUT OFF SOME ONE'S THROAT LIKE THIS - This is a story from SHAIVA PURANA whose sole attempt is to replace NARAYANA of the Vedas, the Ramayana, the Mahabharatha & the Gita with Shiva as Paramathman. These people do not know the original concept of paramathman & thus, in their KAPT, they write these kinds of stories to make Vishnu look weak or characterless
@@PrateekMohanty-tv9xj o.o good. also they forget that Shiva becomes Narayana after he finishes his Tapas & gains control over his anger - the reason why he cannot wear Kaustabha mani like Narayana does. Then Shiva as new Narayana will manage a separate multiverse, where another Shiva will be born. This cycle will continue for eternity. Shiva is blue & Narayana is blue. Shiva has Vasuki, Narayana has Anantha. So many hints are there o.o Father & "Son"/Param Bhakta/Next Narayana. In Hinduism, there is no end. Only eternal journey.
This is not the correct story. Sukracharya is the son of Rishi Bhrigu and Rishi Angiras was his younger uncle. Once to kill a group of asurs Lird Vishnu had to kill Bhrigu's wife. Bhrigu filled with rage kicked on Lord Vishnu's chest which he bears as a reverance towards Bhrigu but Sukracharya went out of the hermitage and started teaching the Asurs. But at all times, he was a very great devotee of Lord Mahadev.
Yehi duniya achhe log ko aur imandar log ko koi puchta nahi aur inteligent ko nakara jata hai kabhi kabhi duniya ko badalne ke liye villain bana jaruri hai
प्रतिशोध के क्रोध मे जलने वाला स्वर्ण सहृदय व्यक्ति जो अपनी माँ के लिये इश्वर से भी लड़ लेता है,, परशुराम जी का अवतार शुक्र गृह के प्रभाव से ही हुआ था, और उसी कुल मे आगे चलकर
Please make a detailed video on Lord shree Krishna's life. I have seen and heard many stories about him but when I saw your broadcast on ramayan and mahabhat where Ami gantrara told that there she told that there are many fake stories so actually I want that you someday make a video on shree Krishna's life so that everyone will know who he was in real. Please 🙏🙏🙏🙏
Karna deserved better , he faced humiliation and discrimination at every stage of life from birth . Everyone cheated him even Krishna was main suspect. He was true hero of Mahabharata❤
THIS ENTIRE STORY IS FROM SHAIVA PURANA - NEW TEXT THAT GOES AGAINST THE VEDAS, THE RAMAYANA, THE MAHABHARATHA & THE GITA PROCLAIMING SHIVA AS PARAMATHAMAN - Shiva is not paramathman, the original concept is clear,. Narayana /Parabrahma / Paramathaman / Hari are same. Namaste also comes from Narayana.
अगर शास्त्रों को सही गुरु के मार्गदर्शन में न पढ़ा जाए तो वोह भ्रम पैदा कर देती हैं मेरा आपसे एक प्रश्न है की आप सनातन धर्म की कौनसी गुरु शिष्य परंपरा से है और किस संप्रदाय को मानते है (परंतु मुझे लगता है आप किसी भी संप्रदाय को नहीं मानते क्युकी कोई तिलक नही है आपके माथे पर) जो वैष्णव है उन्हे वैष्णव संप्रदाय के ग्रंथ पढ़ने चाहिए और जो शैव संप्रदाय से है उन्हे उसी के ग्रंथ पढ़ने चाहिए वरना वह भ्रमित हो जायेंगे राधे राधे🙏
karn koi bichara nhi tha .. usko hameisha hi arjun se jalan thi wo koi bhedvao ki wajeh se nhi . uski khudki insecurities ki wajeh se. mujhe apka content atcha lagta hai btw.
Villians are not born they are made is the 70% of the truth. Cause there are many peoples in this world who are manipulated by their own mind to do the wrong thing cause living life in the right path is more tough than living life in wrong path. But its about your decision what you choose to become a bloody heratless criminal who justifies his crimes by his past life stuggles, injustice and discriminations! Or a Hero who always helps people and becomes and idol for the society. Forgetting every past discrimination and injustice happend with him And you guys must accept that heroes in way are also made not born. Their life experience and choices make them Hero's and villians.....they are just an absolute weak shit! Who are just so nerd that they become what they dont like!...they become like their villians of past. Acting as an idiot victim But heroes...they fight against their enemies and prove them wrong and becomes a good and better person the their opponents Thats why villians are villians never right and never win...dies badly at the end of their life and Hero ALWAYS wins and die gloriously with respect from all and love❤.... Always Hate Villians and love and respect Heroes ⚡⚡💪🏼❣ Loving and glorifying villians and making villians better than heroes in their mind is one of the biggest problem of gen z generation Always Hate villains
Basically not all villains are made by society...Some are born to be villains ...I am not talking about Shukracharya ji... making general statement through observation
Karna made his choice and karma is there to deliver it. You cannot make him a hero when he made a choice not to be. He should be seen for the good and the bad he did
Lol asuro k liye sbse intelligent guru hi chahiye tha so indirectly accha hu hua nhi toh kya ye shukra khudse asuro ka guru banta kya jal gyi isiliye toh jake asuro ka guru ban baitha
How powerful was hiranyakashipu or hiranyakas or tarkasur or Shastra Ravan or banasur in hindi details How powerful was Narasimha avatar or varahn avatar in hindi
VISHNU COMES FROM NARAYANA - who is actually Shiva's Aradhya. Shiva is Adi Yogi, some one who does Tapas - so Shiva has a Aradhya he does Tapas on, which is Narayana. This is because Shiva still has not gotten control over his anger. Vishnu does not do tapas, he has no aradhya, because its a character from Narayana concept that is parabrahma whose ORIGINAL source is Vedas, Mahabharatha, Ramayana, Gita.
@@JioclAshy o.o May be according to your GRAND FATHER, but NOT according to Vedas, Ramayana, Mahabharatha & Gita - which are the foundation of the PARAMATHMAN / NARAYANA & ATHMAN concepts themselves. These 4 FAT texts are the ORIGINAL source for these 2 concepts. o.o And u should stop twisting things. Even Namaste comes from Narayana from where we get concept of Vishnu. Shiva is NOT paramathamna. He is just part of it,. like everything else. But Vishnu is special because they took it from Narayana / Paramathman / Parabrahma / Hari himself.
@@JioclAshy examine ur eyes o.o in vedas, clearly defined Narayana is Parabrahma, and from this we then move to Ramayana, Mahabharatha, Gita to explain what Parabrahma is. These are the ORIGINAL sources, NOT Bible, NOT SHAIVA PURANA or any of the other COPY CATS who twisted everythin, with out even understanding the concept
Bhai ye to suchme galat h suchme shuklacharya ji ke sath jo hua magar unki natrikta galat to thi ve yah kar sakte the ki deavta or asuron ko barabar hakk mile ❤ mai aapka new subscriber hoon or maine appki sari video aaj hi dekh li or aapke samjhane ka andaz mujhe antrix tv se bhi zada pasand aaya maine poori playlist ajj hi dekh li or mai appke channel se kaffi impress hua hoon or subscribe kr raha hoon aise ho content banate rahiye❤❤❤❤
Bhai aab arjun ka yatna ka bhi video kripya 👍👍👍👍Shukracharya ke baad sabse niyati saat nhi tha to vo arjun ka arjun decision se krishn ayee vo alag baat parantu arjun ek baar pado itna niyati unke sath nhi voh batav next video me 👍
