Labour's Manifesto Quickly Summarised (2019 Election) - TLDR News 

I think other than cutting taxes and gutting public services the whole manifesto could just be read in it's entirety as a way to say what they failed to do

That's pretty easy, they failed to deliver any promises and tanked the economy with Brexshit.

I would like it if they made this video but then tory supporters would throw a fit saying TLDR are biased, like what happened last time on the video about the tories lies.

Toby Ginger that’s a good idea actually

@@banicans5299 that's the problem, the rich need to decieve the poor to get their vote so their supporters will go mad as they are almost always IDPOL segregationists (billionaires have better things to do than comment on RU-vid) and want to be secretive about their motives.

what, even more good stuff? nice

Matthew Bentley There’s loads of good, progressive stuff in the manifesto. Too good to go through it line by line. We’d be here until Exmas.

JE Hoyes my main point of contention with the manifesto is that it hinges on Labour being able to keep their plans in check by 2030. Of course none of the things they’re promising in the manifesto can happen in a day but it seems somewhat naive of them to assume that they’ll stay as the majority for a long enough time to ensure all of these points are brought to action. Then again, that statement can be made about all party manifestos.

@@joshuaclare4860 There are at least a few things that are planned within a year, or thier first term at least like the new minimum wage, increased support for care workers, properly funding the NHS and schools, but certain big changes do need time unfortunately.

@@joshuaclare4860 why is it their fault if they stay not long enough to do all? it would be the voters fault and the systems. if they think to vote tories after just one period again, we are a failed people.

Matthew Lord excellent

Go do it. It's not about who wins but how much they win by that sets the political agenda.

there's no such thing as a wasted vote always vote

@@bugsiins3407 it's not so much about it being a wasted vote, it's more that no one was inspiring me to go out and vote and I'm only gonna vote for someone if I really feel it's right. If I was in a contested seat I'd 100% vote labour (or lib dem/green/whoever had the best shot at winning that seat over the tories) but since they don't need my vote here I was just gonna not bother. But foreign policy is my main issue after the NHS so I feel like I really need to vote on this, even if my vote is pretty much just symbolic.

big suus Exactly!

bro shut up hat are you actually here for if all youre going to do is complain you obviously cant be bothered reading either

Strofi Kornego BANTER!

@@sk-so9dx Nice to hear your intelligent, thoughtful, engaging input.

People like to send their money to big organizations which means they have less control of how its spent.

@@gregoryfenn1462 Glad the British public rejected the far-left Labour party!

Bingo

@Finn LOL.

I'm a tad simple please explain to me what is so bad about the last 5 years of Tory rule domestically. I don't mean any offence I just need to understand what's been so bad and how and why labour would improve the country in the next 5 years.

@Finn I understand the concern here, but statistically the Conservatives borrow more money per year in power then Labour, therefore increasing the countries debt. All the debt accrued just so they can offer tax breaks whilst gutting the services. Of course Labour's plan seems like it'll spend more, they plan to charge the rich's tax havens and oil companies to help cover the costs. Also an economy is based on how much people spend, now I don't know about you, but I buy less these days. Our economy is failing under the Conservatives already. At least with Labour we may see positives as well, instead of watching the NHS fall apart and the cost of bread slowly crawl up to the minimum per hour wage.

@Finn considering it's still less than France even with all of it. And France is no Venezuela, I'll take my chances.

100% sometimes (as I am today) I go back and look at what we could have got with a Corbyn Gov in 2019. We were so close to having a much more equal society in my opinion.

@@hello150 Friday 13 December, 2019 was tough. It was hard to accept just how wrong the voting public were.

There is little democracy. The media decides elections, usually against what is good for people

There are always downvoters. They're called bots, trolls, and Tories.

I think it's people that have assumed what side of an argument the video is on, instead of viewing it as the neutral summery of a document that it is

I downvoted because in the energy section, it didn’t mention labour’s plan to build nuclear power stations. They included nuclear plans when talking about other parties energy plans and it was very divisive but why not include it here? A simple oversight, maybe. Summarising a 100 page document in 10 minuets will inevitably leave information out, maybe. TLDR News showing their bias by avoiding controversial topics in their preferred political party’s plan, maybe. Edit: they also didn’t mention anything about labour’s plan to introduce full term abortions. Seems like something people should know about and that might be seen as controversial.

iFkNxLegend can you tell me what page they talk about full term abortions. I read it. I didn’t see anything about full term abortions. All I found was a very small talking point by breitbart, which is known to make things up.

Er....not communists,anti-semites,terrorist supporters that’s who

They say never argue with idiots

Scandinavia has produced enormous wealth before implementing these policies. Also, labor unions, the government and employer leagues managed to cooperate.

@German Pie that's only Norway, and Norway was still rich before we found oil.

@German Pie Sweden, Norway and Denmark have historically obeyed to the Janteloven (laws of Jante) that prioritise the interest of the community rather than the interest of the few. And may I add that while Norway has oil and Sweden has minerals, Denmark is quite poor in natural ressources. But what do you know, they top the world in HDI, GDP per capita, happiness index, you name it.

Yeah, no. Sweden is a hell hole, and Norway gets its money from oil.

Let it be, it lost enough power as it is, why make it elected

@@Sebastian-dc2qg because then it can be held accountable to the people and not just a handful of church officials, noble families, and whoever the Primeminister appoints

@@Sebastian-dc2qg Because it runs on public money and having them there doing nothing at all is a waste. They should find a job and not sit idle all day long.

Its supposed to be check on the commons. If they're the same as the commons, playing the inner party game how will they be different to them. There's certainly an argument in saying that someone who's appointment by merit but who cannot be removed if they upset the party orthodoxy can be a great benefit to the country.

@@Sebastian-dc2qg They get an allowance of £300 a day, not to mention various benefits. Coming straight out of mine and every other UK tax payers pocket. enough is enough.

TheYopogo and the SNP have already accomplished half of it in Scotland

@@matthewh8520 but it's only Scotland...

The joker moves was epic. Wasn't real though

@@matthewh8520 And labour have accomplished half of it in Wales, your point?

KPSS has a very similar plan 😒

Plus murder of over 140,000 people that wouldnt have otherwise happened

@@purpleturtle8841 I thought it was both, but either way the point stands. They promised to "fix the economy through austerity". And it's only worse. 9 years of austerity and it's worse

800 billion has been added to the deficit since 2010.

@@genesis1765 That's wild. I knew people more acquainted with the facts would come and polish off my claim. £800billion. It's hard to imagine

@@ILikedGooglePlus tories spending yearly on the NHS has been 3.3% Labour's was 3.6-4%. And when people media say about tax rises for £80k wagers that's what Blair's government did and gave us 1 month waiting for op's on the NHS Police Schools. And 3 GE victories

@Finn we currently have fewer houses than we need.... and hold off on the obvious racism, if you have kids, they'll be for them.

@@matthewbentley1236 agreed, @Finn taking it a bit too serious

@Finndog whistle much?

@@matthewbentley1236 if you bring racism you lose your point ... we all know that the gov have special treatment for a certain demographic

@@tedy5796 yeh you're right Finn lost to point the moment he made racist comments referring to us and them, though you've kinda done the same at the end of your comment ?!?!?!

Unique? He's just another private school-educated intellectual masquerading as a "labour" leader. This manifesto is tyrannical. Parliament and the people discuss matters and decide what to do on the go, not Mister Posh Jeremy Corbyn.

the casuist You sound tyrannical

@@KrazyKatPosse I sound down to earth and plurality-driven.

the casuist X for doubt

@@KrazyKatPosse Y for knowledge

How about, just don't commit crimes? Maybe if we give them money they won't commit crimes.

Drug prohibition is the number one root cause of most crime, and the reason organised crime and gangs even exist.

​@@omi691 Explain to me how all drugs other than caffeine, alcohol and cigarettes being illegal helps those crack babies or their crack addicted mothers.

Temüjin Khan legalised, sold and taxed. The money from the tax goes back into drug ridden communities and to helping addicts. People will also not be afraid to seek help if it’s legal, so serious addictions will be rarer, treatment better and there will no longer be a black market causing crime violence, and giving people low grade or fake drugs that kill them.

this is tackled through capitalism not socialism

great critism, it really helped to understand. Hope they see this!

Kris Eriksen what do you expect from 3 lads barely out of uni ?

@@bangtidybird8284 the ability to proofread and thoroughly check your work before submitting it. Should have that down to a fine art by the time you start third year at the latest.

Shut up ....like you read every line in the 100 page manifesto..And you still criticising.

Kris Eriksen Shut up like you’ve read every line in the hundred page manifesto ..And you still criticising couple of minor mistakes.

Bernie is.....let's hope they don't rig it this time

@Adrian WRONG Bernie was out-polling Trump in basically all the states that Clinton lost to him in. People do actually want change despite what the mainstream media will tell you, that's exactly why they voted for Trump - something different than the same old broken politics that only really serves the wealthy and corporations, which Trump promised but has failed to deliver on. If Bernie gets the nomination he will win mark my words

@Adrian BULLSHIT you put Bernie and Trump in a debate and Bernie's victory is assured

Funny how labour literally say they want to implement a socialist society.

@@harambae7014 What I mean is that socialism is some how a bad word...

Raising taxes for the rich is all well and good if you assume the UK is an economic bubble. The problem is, it’s not; big businesses will just leave, meaning we’ll end up getting less tax money, and there’ll be less jobs from all the companies leaving. There’s a bigger picture than just “more taxes, more money”

How are the wealthy making you poor? Most are wealthy as they create jobs and drive innovation and without them we’ll have far less. Secondly the top 1% will just leave or make it impossible to tax them, so that all tax burden will again fall on the middle class. Do you know you need to earn over £42k to pay more in taxes than what you receive in services, only 20% of workers provide a net gain in taxes.

@@orangebanana845 let them leave, they lose immunity from taxation

Orange Banana it’s more complicated than that, it’s not actually that detrimental to their businesses to be taxed that little bit more, just a struggle for their own personal wealth. also the reason they are setting up companies in britain is because they are taking advantages of the tax breaks given to them. so it’s not just as easy as leaving the country

@@oliverlane9716 Amazon and Google pay zero tax What job did you get from them?

@shizzleminizzle why does it matter if I pay £100 in taxes to retrofit my home if I save £400 a year? Similarly, when the NHS was established, people might've lost money in taxes, but not having to pay for healthcare privately ultimately saves them money. Sidenote: the last Labour manifesto was fully costed. And yet the Tories still talked about how they were shaking a magic money tree, how they weren't able to pay for it, how it would cost massive amounts in taxes to the poorest people in the economy. The Tories are not the party of economic good sense and caution, they're the party of the aesthetic of economic good sense.

@shizzleminizzle good for you. If we have more disposable income and better public services as a result of higher taxation, I don't see why we should care if it's the Government getting the money as opposed to six different businesses, so long as we're getting that housing, food, and access to education. You're entire point boils down to "before I spend a penny of my salary, I want to have a big number," which is really short sighted economics, but go off I guess.

@shizzleminizzle If you'd earn £12000 without tax, that only really means you earn ~£10000 with the current system. I've been arguing the principle, but it looks like you actually think it'll go up to 50%, which it won't. So say the Government moves its rate from 15% to say 20%. It won't, most of the rise will be on people who decidedly don't work at Tescos, but let's pretend. You lose ~£600. If they can save you £400 with retrofitting homes to be more energy efficient, and reduce your travel costs by half (the average commuter in England spends thousands on train fares a year), and provide you with cheap, affordable housing (private renting will need to become more competitive to survive against council housing, lowering everybody's costs), and empower unions to allow workers to make the money they deserve, and recognise a living wage as essential, then you've gone from effectively getting ~£2000 of actually disposable income a year to a much, much higher amount. Again: if your only economic measure is how much money you physically have in your bank account *only after the Government taxes it,* then yeah, go ahead, Labour's not for you. If you actually care about your standard of life, and even if you only care about the cash you can actually decide how to spend (deciding not to pay rent is, for most people, not a choice they can even consider), then this manifesto is for you. This isn't 1970s Labour. This is 1945 Labour- the Welfare state, and rolling back the disastrous mistakes of Thatcher, and then Austerity. You'd probably agree that the NHS is good. This is the extension of that principle. If people need healthcare to survive, and the Government provides it, why should they not do that for other things they need? Like housing, and food, and education? If you think that's Marxism, then I urge you to consider becoming one.

@shizzleminizzle aye, because explaining yourself fully has always been a great tell that you've no clue what you're talking about. Whereas quoting something in the wrong context instead of absorbing anything they've said is the true mark of intelligence.

Population of Sweden is less than population of greater London. Just think about the that first before comparing.

I worry that social media is just a bubble of mainly labour voters though and that come Election Day I’m gonna be really disappointed

Borris is a clown and UK parliament are corrupted by city of London

@@harveyholmes9533 it is a bubble of leftists, but this bubble is orders of magnitude larger than the right's, just like in real life. That is fine, because it is the only sensible position to have.

Sultan King really depends on who you follow but since I tend to follow more people my age and who are labour voters it seems like it’s an overwhelming majority of lefties, then I go to work in a pub in Hull and some old guys say they think Corbyn should be lynched

Harvey Holmes sane that’s always my worry, but he’s been doing really well on tv debates and interviews, so there is still some hope 😬

because nobody knows how they're going to pay for it!

@@kerrimiddleton7327 How will Tories pay for their manifesto whilst also lowering taxes?

@@RevitaliseTV *and* not increase borrowing. Yes, I was thinking the same thing too

@A Human Ok Snowflake!

@@octowuss1888 ok boomer

Most of this is controversial

@@Jemz35everything is controversial people think the earth is flat

Prob cos like the 12mnth ago me, most r v anti nuclear n dont know about recent developments n why thorium nuclear is our best chance to avoid climate catastrophy or a return to the dark ages

@@kimwarburton8490 Well said, thorium is the future and answer to a lot of climate control but, the far left radicals can't see that.

@@roadrash90 but.. Labour's manifesto DOES include plans for a new nuclear plant. That was the point.

@@sonicwingnut The Labour party is is far left but, then you got the people who don't want any government you know that type of person who goes around breaking window's, burning cars, blocking the underground and chaining themselves to buildings and who say the GMO rice that can save millions of people life's a year is bad, that's what a a far left radical is too me, at least with Labour you have some law and order. Damn you made me give Labour a compliment lol (by the way before you say it, no I'm not a far right nut job) 😂😂

I'm far left but I study physics so I know that nuclear energy is the most efficient sources of energy and is incredibly efficient and powerful. If we need to switch from fossil fuels we need to use nuclear energy during the transition to meet our energy demands.

Thankyou! Someone else who sees what i see Mother natures bill is due, time for us to pay to save our future. The worst imaginings on brexit are nothing compared to the almost guaranteed predictions of extreme climate n weather changes we will experience

Did you guys enjoy your walk/cycle to work this morning?

@@FILTHY-YOGURT I personally took the bus (diesel, indeed, but better than going in a car). What's your point?

@@qutaibaabumatar6015 the point is climate change is nonsense - but enjoy your tax hikes, no holidays and living in a hemp flat inside an overpopulated country with open borders encouraging massive 'carbon footprints' - go figure.

@@qutaibaabumatar6015 Alright, you obviously aren't very bright, which is given away by the ad homs. So your head was rammed full of crap in school - you believe everything you're taught by moronic SJW teachers? Perhaps you should listen to the cleverer of the two Corbyns (Piers) to learn a thing or two about politicised science and climate change. I'll give you a tip - turn off the BBC. Go listen to ex-Greenpeace founder Patrick Moore for the truth and read up on agenda 2030 for a glimpse of the dystopian future that's planned for you - taxy, taxy, crampy, crampy. And lastly - if you can't work out that a constantly moving globalist plebian workforce won't create an enormous carbon footprint, then there's no hope. Open borders with weaponised migration is utterly moronic and used to be the thing the real left fought against before it deserted the very people who set the labour party up. you only have to look at wage suppression graphs to figure that one out. But carry on being 'radical'. George Soros and all his banker friends say 'Hi'.

@TheBaconHunter this is about a lot more than you paying a little bit more tax - assuming you are a high earner. How can we stand by and let the Tory government continue to leave people in poverty and forget about the NHS for another 9 years because we are so selfish that all we care about is how much tax we are paying?

@TheBaconHunter I'm alright, Jack.

I know why do so many people care about Mr Monopoly having his feelings hurt.

I think people think of Corbyn being a communist or terrorist sympathiser. That is what is putting people off. I don't think people can look beyond the superficiality.

@@EdenM911 because Mr Monopoly can go and live somewhere else and then you get less money from him instead of more

@@olivermorrison7127 if said Mr monopoly is making his money from UK residents then he should be contributing to their fair share of tax, if he wants to move somewhere else and make their money someone else will move into the space vacant in the UK and take their market share and contribute taxes fairly

Coud but who is to say that rich people who want to pay a fairer amount of money will come here

I know the Green Party now have a similar policy too.

They are paying more now anyway

If you tax the rich, the rich will run

olga kov not really, they might pay more as an overall figure but not so much a percent and it’s not much of a dent in there income compared to people on the lower end. Some one who earns 2k a month and only see 1500 after tax and NI compared to someone earning earning 9k and seeing 7.5k after tax there’s a pretty big income gap there and a little more wouldn’t hurt. But I’m talking really about these CIO’s and CEO’s on half a million and up a year. It’s them that should be getting heavily taxed they are literally earning so much money they could never spend it all if they were to spend 2k every day of the year.

@@benhopkins4587 but they spent time and money to get good education, worked hard. I doubt they can get high salaries just for no reason. Yes they need to pay a bit more but not dramatically more. It is person problem he earns 9k...something wrong with him why who earns more must pay more taxes? I thought everyone should be equal

And even if they did, they still pay more tax in one year than the poor will in a life time

Misterlikeseverythin money makes money. Why should people get spanked because they worked hard. France tried this and then scrapped it because their economy nearly collapsed

@TheBaconHunter every other western european and scandinavian country: *has better standard of living and quality of life than the UK* TheBaconHunter: bUt tHaTs nOt a gOoD tHiNg

When will don't voters realise less tax paid to the government means less money is available for all public services including the NHS? Countries like Scandinavian countries have higher taxation to properly fund public services. It's not rocket science. I have no problem with high earners paying more tax. Some of the hardest workers in the UK are low paid and many do jobs others would hate. So many people in work get tax credits because of their low incomes. Surely their employers should pay them a decent wage so the government can collect more tax instead of paying tax credits? Let's raise standards for everyone instead of the race to the bottom approach of the Tories.

@@wilmaknickersfit I can't hear you over the wails of my minimum wage workforce and caviar on toast

The conservative party have not produced a manifesto yet. It is expected approximately 2-4th Dec.

😂😂😂😂

Exile 1 😂😂😂

@@matthewmcneany So that we have less time to realise how bad it will be.

Exile 1 this comment deserves to be on top. Lol

True true, but we as a nation need to also have a change of heart on our use of petroleum products or other fossil fuels. I personally think the ban on car sales (combustion engines) is too far away and needs to be more like 2025 with heavy subsidisation for electric vehicles + hydrogen fuel cells

Completely agree mate

There is no such thing as cheep of free. You will pay for it.

People control business through their spending better than they control the state through voting and maximizing "profit" is almost always away less harmful than the maximization of state violence...

The green deal would have destroyed the economy.

@@anshumanjaiswal5787 The coronavirus DID destroy the economy - but the government can still find money for their mates and doing up their flats.

Peter Egan the manifesto is a bit hypocritical

Country destroying undeliverable promises.

@glyn hodges Because its surely the same party as almost 40 years ago.

@@888jaymer This manifesto is far left marxist and would not be voted in because England votes against this. This would reverse Thatcherism but southern England and London would be hit with higher taxation the British people have choice I am voting snp the Tory candidate hates the the poor he is Nigerian age 28 he lucky Britain took him in he has not right to attack native Scottish or British people he stands for the Conservatives but he will not win Glasgow North West seat. The Conservatives only care about power and they will not deliver Brexit every British citizens already no' s this to be true.

How can being "Ambitious" be seen as a negative lol. People sometimes amaze me :D

@@jamesfagan69 There's a such thing as being overly ambitious. Bankrupting your country and killing your ability to attract outside investment is a result of this 'ambition.'

It’s nothing unprecedented. The state will still be smaller than many European countries. Attlee’s Labour government built social housing for the entire country and created the NHS. FDR raised top income tax bracket to over 70%, eventually reaching about 90%. Nothing in this manifesto is impossible or unaffordable. It’s a plan for a fairer, more equitable, greener, cleaner, kinder future for Britain.

@@JohnHuxleySavage Are you kidding? FDR is responsible for some of the biggest frauds in US history. He created the Federal Reserve, which is nothing but a cartel of banks. The New Deal was a huge boondoggle, which suppressed competition and gave huge favors to large corporations. The UK signed up for globalism (they kinda created it). You are on a world stage now. If you push through these kinds of taxes, you will ruin your economy. China has done it, but they aren't snowflakes like the Western Left. They don't have mandatory health care. If you don't work, you don't eat. If you step out of line, they kill you. Unless you're willing to go to those extremes, you will do nothing but create a nanny state that will bankrupt your economy.

@@jiminagym4569 Lol china is a disgraceful country. The government has completely brainwashed the majority Han population with authoritarianism, and destroy anything that isn't "Chinese" and post-Mao. I can see the US heading in the same direction.

It looks beautiful... *but it's only on paper.*

@@commercio3564 You aren't even making a point. All manifestos are paper until their parties' get into power. So what are you trying to actually say?

@@Ome99 As the phrase goes, it sounds good on paper. However, in practice, these things are hard to pull off. All parties - not just Labour.

@@commercio3564 Yeah buddy, very substantial critique right there. Sooo convincing.

@@commercio3564 ???? Are you okay?

Yeah cos if i'm a billionaire, id stay in a country with a racist communist leader that is going to take all my money. Doesn't matter how many laws and regulations are made to tax them they aren't going to stay here. This is a key example of why socialism doesn't work and will always fail, its unrealistic and never thought through.

Did anyone crunch the numbers? Where is this 400B gonna come from?

@@ten_tego_teges. Yes, Dianne Abbot crunched the numbers, and it's going to cost about, about, abboouutt 150 quid.

@@eg2524 lol a conservative calling someone racist😂😂😂. Give me one thing he's said that's racist.

@@hy1967 Can't think of anything wrong with Jeremy Corbyn apart from... Invited two IRA members to parliament two weeks after the Brighton bombing. Attended Bloody Sunday commemoration with bomber Brendan McKenna. Attended meeting with Provisional IRA member Raymond McCartney. Hosted IRA linked Mitchell McLaughlin in parliament. Spoke alongside IRA terrorist Martina Anderson. Attended Sinn Fein dinner with IRA bomber Gerry Kelly. Chaired Irish republican event with IRA bomber Brendan MacFarlane. Attended Bobby Sands commemoration honouring IRA terrorists. Stood in minute’s silence for IRA gunmen shot dead by the SAS. Refused to condemn the IRA in Sky News interview. Refused to condemn the IRA on Question Time. Refused to condemn IRA violence in BBC radio interview. Signed EDM after IRA Poppy massacre massacre blaming Britain for the deaths. Arrested while protesting in support of Brighton bomber’s co-defendants. Lobbied government to improve visiting conditions for IRA killers. Attended Irish republican event calling for armed conflict against Britain. Hired suspected IRA man Ronan Bennett as a parliamentary assistant. Hired another aide closely linked to several convicted IRA terrorists. Heavily involved with IRA sympathising newspaper London Labour Briefing. Put up £20,000 bail money for IRA terror suspect Roisin McAliskey. Didn’t support IRA ceasefire. Said Hamas and Hezbollah are his “friends“. Called for Hamas to be removed from terror banned list. Called Hamas “serious and hard-working“. Attended wreath-laying at grave of Munich massacre terrorist. Attended conference with Hamas and PFLP. Photographed smiling with Hezbollah flag. Attended rally with Hezbollah and Al-Muhajiroun. Repeatedly shared platforms with PFLP plane hijacker. Hired aide who praised Hamas’ “spirit of resistance“. Accepted £20,000 for state TV channel of terror-sponsoring Iranian regime. Opposed banning Britons from travelling to Syria to fight for ISIS. Defended rights of fighters returning from Syria. Said ISIS supporters should not be prosecuted. Compared fighters returning from Syria to Nelson Mandela. Said the death of Osama Bin Laden was a “tragedy“. Wouldn’t sanction drone strike to kill ISIS leader. Voted to allow ISIS fighters to return from Syria. Opposed shoot to kill. Attended event organised by terrorist sympathising IHRC. Signed letter defending Lockerbie bombing suspects. Wrote letter in support of conman accused of fundraising for ISIS. Spoke of “friendship” with Mo Kozbar, who called for destruction of Israel. Attended event with Abdullah Djaballah, who called for holy war against UK. Called drone strikes against terrorists “obscene”. Boasted about “opposing anti-terror legislation”. Said laws banning jihadis from returning to Britain are “strange”. Accepted £5,000 donation from terror supporter Ted Honderich. Accepted £2,800 trip to Gaza from banned Islamist organisation Interpal. Called Ibrahim Hewitt, extremist and chair of Interpal, a “very good friend”. Accepted two more trips from the pro-Hamas group PRC. Speaker at conference hosted by pro-Hamas group MEMO. Met Hamas leader Ismail Haniyeh several times. Hosted meeting with Mousa Abu Maria of banned group Islamic Jihad. Patron of Palestine Solidarity Campaign - marches attended by Hezbollah. Compared Israel to ISIS, Hamas, Hezbollah and al-Qaeda. Said we should not make “value judgements” about Britons who fight for ISIS. Received endorsement from Hamas. Attended event with Islamic extremist Suliman Gani. Chaired Stop the War, who praised “internationalism and solidarity” of ISIS. Praised Raed Salah, who was jailed for inciting violence in Israel. Signed letter defending jihadist advocacy group Cage. Met Dyab Jahjah, who praised the killing of British soldiers. Shared platform with representative of extremist cleric Muqtada al-Sadr. Compared ISIS to US military in interview on Russia Today. Opposed proscription of Hizb ut-Tahrir. Attended conference which called on Iraqis to kill British soldiers. Attended Al-Quds Day demonstration in support of destruction of Israel. Supported Hamas and ISIS-linked Viva Palestina group. Attended protest with Islamic extremist Moazzam Begg. Made the “case for Iran” at event hosted by Khomeinist group. Photographed smiling with Azzam Tamimi, who backed suicide bombings. Photographed with Abdel Atwan, who sympathised with attacks on US troops. Said Hamas should “have tea with the Queen”. Attended ‘Meet the Resistance’ event with Hezbollah MP Hussein El Haj. Attended event with Haifa Zangana, who praised Palestinian “mujahideen”. Defended the infamous anti-Semitic Hamas supporter Stephen Sizer. Attended event with pro-Hamas and Hezbollah group Naturei Karta. Backed Holocaust denying anti-Zionist extremist Paul Eisen. Photographed with Abdul Raoof Al Shayeb, later jailed for terror offences. Mocked “anti-terror hysteria” while opposing powers for security services. Named on speakers list for conference with Hamas sympathiser Ismail Patel. Criticised drone strike that killed Jihadi John. Said the 7/7 bombers had been denied “hope and opportunity”. Said 9/11 was “manipulated” to make it look like bin Laden was responsible. Failed to unequivocally condemn the 9/11 attacks. Called Columbian terror group M-19 “comrades”. Blamed beheading of Alan Henning on Britain. Gave speech in support of Gaddafi regime. Signed EDM spinning for Slobodan Milosevic. Blamed Tunisia terror attack on “austerity”. Voted against banning support for the IRA. Voted against the Prevention of Terrorism Act three times during the Troubles. Voted against emergency counter-terror laws after 9/11. Voted against stricter punishments for being a member of a terror group. Voted against criminalising the encouragement of terrorism. Voted against banning al-Qaeda. Voted against outlawing the glorification of terror. Voted against control orders. Voted against increased funding for the security services to combat terrorism.

A comparison would definitely help voters pick what they feel is right.

I think in a previous video they said they'd do that once all their other manifesto vids are up?

Yeesh, can’t you guys do anything for yourself? They’ve literally read every page of the manifestos for you and given a summary. It’s not hard to actually sit down, compare and decide for yourself.

Melvyn Cross Its unfortunate, all of Scotland used to vote Labour but since the SNP got established they have never really had enough support to come close to a majority. Labour supporters mostly have to hope that nobody gets a majority and Labour and SNP are able to form a coalition.

@@distantj only time will tell ,I'm hopeful that they'll plan something

🌐🌐When things don't go right nor left, go center🌐🌐

@@Deranfan r/ENLIGHTNEDCENTRISM

@@ABC-ej1sd r/ENLIGHTNEDCENTRISM is a tankie sub. Its just a bunch of strawmen about moderates and calling everyone to the right of Bernie sanders a fascist. r/dirtbagcenter is the superior alternative

@shad lol. M8, you're taking the piss, yeah? You're being lied to. Tories are lying to you.

Last night car cras best comedy in ages opps sorry today went down like lead balloon 14000 pounds will be taxed lies only 80 ooo to be taxed manefesto pages falling out each day look forward to next crash

And God help the rest of us if they get in...

@@octowuss1888 I feel like this would be too much change All these things will add up and probably melt the countries economy down

Both parties are planning on things that will effect our economy. Labour and conservative parties both have polar ways of seeing the world. One will aim to please the richest and the other will aim toward those less affluent. They will always have to get their ideas passed the other so the worse ideas can usually be blocked. Look at what the parties have voted to get through and what they have tried to block and don't let anyone (especially the media) make your mind up for you.

😂

🍆💦

Ye it’s almost like they’re too good to be true

@Ted Bundy what's anti-British?

@Ted Bundy well I think being truthful is probably quite a good idea when it comes to education. Also why not have another referendum ? Sounds like a good idea now that people how shit of an idea it is.

Your Mum

@@mdcclxxviepluribusunum1066 It's a joke mate, really not that deep.

@@Katzian this guy gets it

@@Ozma2 Not as much as your mum gets it.

@@El_Descarriado heh nice

You better buy some pins then.

g s 😂

@glyn hodges On the contrary, I think it's likely they'd be living in a happier world under a labour government 🙂 the Tories don't seem to have handled the last few years that well. Can I ask why you're not so keen on Labour?

@glyn hodges he wanted peace? What a monster.

Meg X have fun letting your children be in debt for the rest of their lives causing more austerity, for every £1 borrowed by tories labour are offering £28. Me and you considering your working will pay so much more in tax as the rich will simply move their money to avoid labour taxing them. Labour think they have a Forest of money it’s going to bankrupt our country like they did last time. You can’t offer all this free stuff it’s unrealistic it will cause problems in a few years.

@@foreigndrip8207 true, I'm on nmw, all £10 will do is inflate prices. If labour get in no doubt the housing market will become saturated as buy to let investors sell because of labour's right to buy and low rent threshold. Welcome back 17% mortgage rates.

Who needs to buy a house anyway if they are building 150,000 chocolate box council homes at better standards than traditional private ones. We are an island, urban sprawl will devastate our country, welcome more flooding because of the lack of natural drainage. Sustainability.... Building is oxymoronic, no matter how sustainable they try to make them they ultimately cause damage.

Corbyn would be a disaster for this country

No need to emphasise *WORKING* in your comment

I don't know if the UK would benefit from emulating France whose economy has been quite poor and whose people are not happy, or would be capable of emulating Norway which as a country basically lives on top of a giant sea of oil.

@@trebah662 you're not wrong in that oil is a major part of the Norwegian economy. But still worth noting that high taxation is also part of how the Norwegian/Scandinavian model works.

@@trebah662 The people in France aren't happy because of Macron and his social policies, and also because the system is fundamentally capitalist. How you can even attempt to spin French discontent with their state of society as an argument against bringing Britain's system closer to that of contemporary (Western) Europe?

@@trebah662 Perhaps, Italy, Denmark and Sweden, Finland also have greater spending the Lab Plan, and hey of that ain't your cup of tea, np. Just wanted to put some perspective to counter the whole, oh it's a socialist hellscape amount of spending, it's worse than Venuzuela comments. (hyperbole added for effect) :p

@@trebah662 Isn't Norway's oil company nationalised? I think that is a good policy to follow, don't you?

And an owl

@@TruckerJenkins82 owls are cool

@@user-mx3kv9bi2c owls are EVERYTHING

Dave Davidson My thought too

The money tree somewhere apparently

This is a long term manifesto, the Conservatives just brush issues under the carpet not addressing fundamental systemic problems that the country has in the process. At lest Labour lays it out for you to see, with the Tories its a Paul Daniels magic trick.

Probably the same money tree Theresa May shook to give the DUP £1 Billion

Dave Davidson It's fully costed but mostly through making corporations and rich people pay similar tax rates to other western countries

Haha yeah right, vote for this if you want to struggle at the bottom when Labour increases the number of cheap workers to flood working class areas. As a working class Northerner I am not interested in anything Labour has to say or offer. They detest the working class with a passion, in turn the feeling is very much mutual.They are a party for middle class faux lefties, mostly in London. They're ignoring the working class wish to Leave The Corporation ( vile EU ) and will continue to make our lives much harder due to the free movement of cheap labour/skivvies that they plan to increase even further. A party who cared much more about protecting a muslim block vote then it did about protecting many, many THOUSANDS of working class children being raped and abused throughout the North and beyond. Happily this vile party are about to be wiped out in their former heartlands, we'll never return to these anti democratic and anti working class cretins.

Richard Fanders it’s Corbyns magic money tree.

Young people don't understand this, they really think the rich and companies will pay their fair share. The top 50 families have already started to move their money and assets abroad. It will be the middle & working classes who end up finding these ambitious projects.

I would say look around 2:20

@@ryangriffith5551 Forrest

@@bravoalley228 not specific at all. Just reduce and increase, doesn't sound like they know the numbers to me.

Not sure wealth inequality is that bad. Denmark has highest wealth gini in OECD and they have excellent public services. It's a case by case thing where you have to tailor the system to work for everyone. It might be easier to leave some privileged people and just get it done, rather than wage war with then in name of justice.

@@ten_tego_teges why do we have courts if justice is so unnecessary? Im sorry but u got slave mentality there protecting those who can afford to contribute their fair share n help mitigate the environmental/climate damage they have proportionally contributed the most. Mother natures bill is due

@@ten_tego_teges we're talking percentages here - no one is saying 'take all the money from the rich', just that this distribution isn't working for society, let's move the numbers slightly. I find it astonishing that we live in a world where the top x% of earners are asked to contribute a little more and there is such a push back

2:27

it's a costed manifesto, so it's not left out. let's not forget that many of the policies they are suggesting we actually used to have! you know, back in the "good old days" boomers are always going on about

@@peachskull do you mean the policies that nearly bankrupted the country in the 1970s? Consider how well labours costing will hold up when the people expected to pay for it decide to move their wealth out of the country... like they did in the 1970s. Every time Corbyn speaks, assets fall in value.

@@peachskull It's not costed that well, most of the policies have no cost attributed with them, the ones that are costed make it look pretty bleak. The first costed policy in the manifesto (page 13) is £400 billion.

Rich bastards will pay... I hope

In your own words, how to did the Iraq war, institutional anti-british racism and bank bailouts benefit the British working class?

Diaper Dude Why is Corbyn responsible for Blair's actions that he actively opposed?

@@that_pac123 He's in the same party that carries the same filth and has the same bloody history. The moral and sensible thing to do would be to break away and form a new party. But, clearly new labour's reckless and destructive course was not enough to "break the deal" for Corbyn. Now, think about it like this: would Corbyn have joined the BNP (basically nationalistic old labour) ? No, of course he wouldn't because "bla bla racism" or something you reckon? But doesn't that mean that "racism" is considered more of a deal breaker than literal mass murder and destruction?

ChristianIce anyone who still cares about brexit is just keeping your country in the embarrassment of the last 3 years. just drop it man

@@scoobyrds I am not british, kid.

Vote share higher than 2010 & 2015 but lowest seat total since 1935, also you tripping the manifesto was great

Australia will gladly accept those billionaires and millionaires while the UK and the US fall apart just like all other failed socialist and communists countries have before.

@@The_Desert_Tiger Well you are as corrupt as these billionaires, for you like billionaires money is the highest value. Such minds have no affection or care for humanity, "corruption of highest good is the greatest evil".

@@edris47 No, I am just not jealous of their success like you and live in reality

​@@The_Desert_Tiger You must to be a jealous person to keep talking about it, maybe you should allow some fresh air to your mind, so you can think little differently. No one is saying people should be rich, but are you happy that some fellow human beings are sleeping on the street or have no food to eat, children are sleeping on the street, you may have enough money that you think you will not be such a situation, I hope you wouldn't, is humanity all about money, how a person who is using others labor and resources of a country and accumulates enormous wealth can care about another human being, you may know where this quote is from. "Love is patient and kind; love does not envy or boast; it is not arrogant or rude. It does not insist on its own way; it is not irritable or resentful; it does not rejoice at wrongdoing, but rejoices with the truth. Love bears all things, believes all things, hopes all things, endures all things. Love never ends." So I don't envy anyone, I am sorry that there is so much suffering in this world, those rich people will not suffer from lack of goods, but they suffer like a beggar in the street, because their inner emptiness cannot be filled by material stuff. They cover their inner ugliness by outward beautiful things, just look at few families that are in the news, Trump, Queen's family, and people around the Epstein, I hope you get the point.

Greytruth Could you explain what the renewal of trident means please? I agree with all of their other policies but I’m not too sure what that one means exactly😓

@@megadeshia2011 Its the UK's nuclear arsenal. It costs a several billion to keep running every year. People argue it's a deterrent but I can't think of a situation where they would ever dare be used. They are far too destructive to be useful. In my opinion it would be better to invest the money on smarter military assets that we would actually use rather than something that we would never use in any sensible way.

Greytruth Ahh I see, thankyou for helping me understand. I completely understand what you’re saying for sure!

Assuming Labour wins, which hopefully they will

As a French leftist, this is quite disappointing. What about the beheadings? Joke aside - this manifesto is disappointing in that it does not question Capitalism but rather provides Capitalism with a spare wheel that will keep it going, not unlike what is happening in Sweden & such. Very disappointing and disengaging, especially knowing that this is as far left as British politics will get for this GE.

@@peaceandlove2O Well unfortunately you need to be pragmatic in politics, as much as Id love for a complete overhaul of the country, it just wanted work in the polls, I even feel like this manifesto might be too much

@@Ibrahana. This is getting ridiculous. When you look at social movements, people are crying for left-wing politics. Who are the polls polling, for whom and what for? Never the prole.

@@peaceandlove2O Well we will see whether or not the majority want/understand the necessity of the change promised by this change. If they do and by a decent margin it can be safe to assume Labour will go further with its next manifesto

Why? Do you want the same for all of the Express, Sun, Telegraph etc lot that circle jerk over the conservatives non stop do the same?

No, you weird people have the majority of mainstream media on your side and call bias every time neutral reporting is actually done 😂

Why do you need to know this information ? You should visit channels that agree and disagree with your own view point.

This would be very interesting. I'd imagine it would be broadly in line with the general under-25 demographic

Social platforms are generally the place for under 25s, so this outpour of labour support is to be expected.

Gerwin Bergsma I agree, the voting system needs to change, but from Labour's point of view, why would they? They're one of the two parties the first past the post system actually benefits. But besides that, I would much rather the system changed to proportional representation. Both the Greens and the Lib-Dems are offering that.

As said by Corbyn, it is not a none stance but a neutral stance. He won’t campaign either way, which I feel a politician should do in a people’s vote, as it assists impartiality and means he wouldn’t have an agenda other than that of the people. He should not have an opinion, and let the people decide. Neutral is a stance, and is perfectly legitimate.

Because they fear change and cannot imagine a world where poor billionaires suffer so badly with slight tax increases

Villa'till idie without billionaires where would we get our jobs?? You know how much billionaires pay in tax? We need them, they will just move to another country

Because their policies are sensible

it could be because they dont like the idea of spending their children into massive national debt. not saying that the tories are any better but really do you think these promises will cost nothing?

@@lewispowell1681 But the Tories have destroyed everything that makes the UK good or at the very least tried. The NHS used to be the best healthcare service and they privatised and underfunded it, they destroyed the police force, the fire fighters and I've heard they even defunded programs that fed poor kids food at school. Your argument sort of breaks apart when actual human progress and benfit is being halted by the Tories for private profit. And labour releases how they will pay for it so it's not like it's coming out of nowhere. The main reason could be misinformation and believing things like you do. Are you guys willing to destroy every worthwhile institution in the UK and possibly even break up the union if this goes on, just because you think labour will take your money away and leave you in debt?

Yeah it sounds just like the usual haywire dream, solar and wind is unreliable for being a main energy source, just look at germany's stats. But there were something about nuclear power which gives hope. Sadly the gay propaganda in schools is pushing it too far progressive for the average person despite the twitter loudmoths, its gonna cost them heavily

We pay far more in, for example, train fare prices now than we ever did in taxes that went to British Rail. Everyone moaning about not wanting their taxes going to vital public services, so that the British taxpayers share ownership of their own services, seem to think they are getting trains and so on for free.. no, every journey I book is over £100. First class fares are up to £500. It's insane. I got a high-speed TGV, first class, from Paris the entire length of France to Nice just this April for £85. The privatised trains now are an absolute joke around the world - more unreliable than ever, FAR more expensive.. no, sorry, extortionate and trying to book journeys between all the different company's trains now can awful. I regularly miss connections due to badly co-ordinated schedules between different companies and delays are more common now than they were when it was British Rail and the Tories were deliberately undermining and de-funding it, just as they are now doing with the NHS, to grease up the thick electorate to accept privatisation.

The UK had bad power cuts twice this year, once last year... once the year... :)

D S But [randon country] didn't try 100% green and had power cuts as well. Your statement proves nothing except that you don't understand much about energy production

Nope. No tax rises for anyone earning less than 80k

If you’re on £80k a year, then yes; your taxes will increase by 8.20 a week. But the free internet pledge alone will save you around £35 a month, so you’re already better off with that. Then there’s the retrofitting houses to make them energy efficient, that’s around about £400/year. Vote Labour, pay an extra £8.20 a week in tax, but save yourself hundreds year on year.

Anybody with experience of a Labour government knows taxes will go up for all not just those earning over £80K. It is not feasible to think this could be all be funded out of the top 5% of earners. Some the there proposals include replacing inheritance tax with a £145K lifetime allowance tax, removing the dividend allowance and drastically increasing dividend tax. Increasing capital gains and fuel taxes.

And when the rich move all their money away so grabby Corbyn cant get his hands on it who do you think he will tax next?

The largest single new source of revenue will be to increase corporation tax levels to the same level as Germany and most other countries. In 2010 the tories lowered the rate for corporations. While public services and the NHS were gutted, while the poor paid for the failures of the rich and greedy via austerity, businesses were given a tax break.

*high-steaks* Sounds yummy.

Damn it, it's ghandi, don't nuke me please

Arnò Mezzanotte no. Steak isn’t yummy, say steak is bad or ill launch nuclear ICBM

They said labor'd tackle those issues and reverse tax cuts on the rich so..

As with Labour’s last manifesto, it’s all costed out and balances.

That would require standing up to the US. I dream of a day when the EU just taxes all the American corporations and stops a drainage of capital across the Atlantic.

*their taxes

@@ten_tego_teges it's not America you need to be worrying about its China.