Lancair IV-P C-GAIP is seen taxiing, performing an engine run-up and taking off from CZNL in Nelson, British Columbia beginning the flight up to the Edmonton/Villeneuve Airport CZVL.
Great looking Aircraft....The main undercarriage legs looked very 'spindly'....Also good to see that Electric Tram in the background... Excellent video as usual......Steve.
I "flew" a IV-P around the world in Flight Simulator around 2004. It was a wonderful experience. The airplane is high -performance and very responsive to control inputs, which I gather is true of the real airplane. It was a pleasure to fly, however. As a certificated pilot I wish I could have the pleasure of flying the real thing.
@@TheHDAviation not an uglier than a C-210, but to me it look perhaps over loaded as it didn't want to climb after rotation, or does it have a large negative lift out of the elevator during high rates of change?
Unfortunately I've never seen a Lancair Columbia 400, I'd like to catch one in the future though. Just searched the Mako, that's one strange looking design in-flight!
Rough, uneven, Runway.... hadn't noticed it before but the back-taxiing portion of the film certainly demonstrated that and the takeoff roll reinforced the same.... Town or county needs to REPAVE the airport...
Cruise airspeed is around 180 KTS. True airspeed at altitude I typically see around 220 KTS. The Load does not play a role with speed. If anything the plane is much more stable when she's close to gross.
@@DanFrederiksen On Average I fly around FL220. Any more than that and the engine gets pretty twitchy. 290 KTS Ground speed? Maybe yeah. Fastest I've done is around 320 GND speed. But if we're talking air speed, it's 180kts. Indicated air speed. Regardless of Altitude.
@@TheHDAviation Yeah I believe that day it was pretty hot and humid, I probably wanted to gain a little airspeed before pulling out to keep the engine coolling in check.
@@cschieweck Significantly steeper than glide ratio back. one can also kink to the side immediately on take off for a natural loop back. The impossible turn is not.
@@DanFrederiksen Interesting. I'm not sure what you mean by a natural loopback, or kinking to the side after takeoff. Takeoffs are typically done straight in order to maintain maximum climb performance, any sort of bank angle decreases this ratio. For this particular takeoff, there is a significant climbout required about a mile out, I released a little pressure on the stick after the initial climbout in order to bank more speed from about 100 KTS to around 150. The Lancair does not fly slowly very well and gets hot quickly at slow speeds at high power settings. It also takes a lot longer and chews up more distance to build up speed in the climb esp if you are climbing out at VX. There was plenty of room to build up airspeed here which allows me to climb out at a suitable speed.
@@cschieweck if you fly straight and have to return to the runway shortly after take off due to engine failure you have to turn much more than 180 degrees but if you go to the side a bit right after take off then you are more aligned with the runway when you turn back. But never stall. Stall is very bad.