@@-Monad-no. I've listened to this 2hour 30 mins video multiple times in the last 12hrs in full and I cba to hunt down what is clearly there. Yes I do expand on lots of my answers, but you claiming there isn't a single instance where I answer with just a "yes" / "no" is fucking ludicrous 🤣🤣🤣🤣 Clown.
Saying you go by "they" is an attempt to compelle speech because you would only use that pronoun when talking ABOUT him, not TO him. That means, you're talking to someone else. You're supposed to comform to his delusion even when he isn't present. That's asinine.
2:26:26 - "Ken dolls are male. Barbies are female." Ah, yes, the disappointment of getting your first Ken doll and checking to see if they included the primary anatomy like Barbie has the boobs, but all you get is smooth plastic...Ken dolls are "male" 🤣
Does anyone remember Addison? I just scoured a bunch of old Pinecreek and Pinecreek Politics videos and can't find anything. Is this just a made up story about being on the show, spending "hours and hours and hours" playing poker for "years and years and years"?
@@ADDISON396 Tbf she didn't know it's been confirmed like that. We were ALL wondering this initially, and you yourself wouldn't want us to take it on pure assertion.
@@Jamie-bu9cqyou guys spend all day speculating about complete and utter bs psychology/psychological motivations. PCs discord is full of insane speculation about my reasoning based on incredibly ludicrous and uncharitable interpretations of what was said. There was evidence provided, Reid stated so in the video you both watched, PC saw me screenshare and scroll through DMs showing I played and bought in. To not believe at that point is to believe I fabricated evidence and somehow convinced Reid to lie..... Fucking lunacy... 🙃
Do not give in to these people whatsoever when it comes to language. Speak the exact same way people would have 30, 50 or 80 years ago and either mock them or tell them they are incorrect if they do otherwise.
@@user-pn8ke3kf5f the problem isn't all language change, the problem is intentional attempts to change the language for by a deranged, resentful minority groups in order to achieve deranged , resentful , hateful political ends.
@@user-pn8ke3kf5f the problem isn't all language change, the problem is intentional attempts to change the language for by deranged, resentful ,hostyle mynority groups and traytors in order to achieve far-reaching political ends that reflect their mindset
You'd think PC would remember moaning about myself (and others, but also picking lines I'd said and challenging em) from the sei board meeting video he covered, as well as hours of playing poker and multiple stream appearances, but guess I must just be THAT forgettable. Maybe I could become an MI5 agent, I hear forgettable is the type of person they go for 😉
@@bradchervel5202you do understand that PC accepts my claim? I guess I fabricated all the evidence and somehow convinced PC to believe it via gaslighting, but you, genius internet commenter, managed to see through all that. Well done, ya got me 🙃🙃🙃🙃🙃🙃🤣🤣🤣🤣
I don’t understand why you are being so pedantic and intentionally obtuse in the beginning about the overall contour of the discussion. You clearly understand the point he’s trying to make….a simple “yeah I didn’t have the beginning, and I’m sorry I cut out the last 12 minutes” and that makes you look like the bigger person and him like he’s quibbling over nothing.
@@PineCreekDougsure and that sandwiched 8 minutes of apparently(?) not understanding his point and quibbling over what seems like nothing. If your goal with a lot of this engagement is showing inconsistencies and the craziness of woke-trans-supporters, I’m pointing out a way to improve the optics of your side, and optics is really all that matters if that is your stated goal.
@@kurtjohnson9911Doug is being asked to oblige him it is fair that he understands to what? As far as what I understood Addison thinks it is a BIG deal that Doug won't SLIGHTLY alter his video. Either it is a big deal or it isn't. Addison is confusing and it takes time to figure out a puzzle.
@@franklindzioba13 My stance stays the same and I repeat it over and over again ("I have issues with the way the video was cut as it gives people a slightly different impression than if it wasn't") as well as additional side points (like "it seems things were strategically cut, like every single time he granted an argument to us") I was extremly clear, and it took Doug a few times to understand what I was saying (He'd often rephrase it and I'd point him back to my origional phrasing) If Doug had said "I agree to disagree" earlier, I woulda said what I said, something like "okay cool" and woulda made my point about people being less likely to engage in the future with that and moved on. Yea I was insanly mad about it, thats why I *checks notes* didn't bring it up, and immediatly moved on once Doug understood my position and said he disagreed.... Yeah that STINKS of someone making a big deal out of it......(sarcasm as I know you guys aren't great at detecting that) Insane how much these commenters just see whatever they wanna see when the video is directly in front of them regardless of what actually happened lmfaoooo
So far he's only linked it once, on a pinned comment during the last Live. But it expired when the Live ended. This vid is from the Digital Gnosis discord channel, though
