Strwbrrygutz Nate’s luck doesn’t give a crap about accuracy. The devs at Naughty Dog confirmed that Nate’s luck is the main reason. bullets never directly hit him, and is the soul reason ex-military personnel have missed countless shots on him. So it’s not that Lara is bad at aiming (trust me, she has crackshot accuracy, Screwattack even said that in this video, I DID watch it), but Nate’s luck gives him temporary immunity to any fatal shots. Note that I said “temporary”.
Y'all complaining about the ending, but the real issue is that they use 3 different versions of Lara and combined all of their best qualities, yet only one version of Nathan Drake exists, not at all a fair match up. They should have just used the Lara from the survival time line.
Would've probably been closer but I think Lara still would've won. That iteration of Lara has taken more physical punishment than Drake and while she might not have the same athletic feats as him, when it comes to fighting we see her kill somebody for the first time then basically immediately take on the same kind of groups Drake does.
It doesn't matter. Classic, Legend, and Survivor timeline versions of Lara would all beat Nate individually. Everyone already knows Classic and Legend Lara would absolutely shitstomp him, so that doesn't need to be expounded on. Survivor Lara has proven to still be more durable, and smarter, than Nate, while having great misdirection and stealth skills. She has tanked blows that would outright kill Nate. Not to mention she has a crafty arsenal that blows Nate's away. With the events of the last 1/3 or so of Shadow of the Tomb Raider, Lara makes Nate look like just another brainless, nameless thug unfortunate enough to be in her way. He's a random npc to her.
Naruto0116 the how was just for the sake of the visible battle the battle itself isn't how they would fight necessarily just the result of what they found Laura wins yes the ending may have been a bit lackluster but honestly this idea for a death battle is lackluster
The animations are just for entertainment purposes, and don't actually decide the outcome, but I do agree that it was a little ridiculous how this battle ended.
Nate and Lara are just about to hit each other when a gunshot goes off and Indiana Jones is like “Got room for one more?” Then Nate and Lara shoot him because as cool and skilled and well, badass as Indiana Jones is, even the most realistic video game characters in any genre are bound to outdo characters from movies regardless
It would've definitely been better if the helicopter rotor missed Nate and landed near his crotch, but Lara was nearby and shot his head, finally finishing his luck
As an Uncharted fan, I 1000% agree. Would have been great too if they had exchanged a quip or two, or if Nate had just said one last resigned "oh, crap," before BANG
As an Uncharted fan, I do not object to the results of this battle... just the execution of those results I mean, I guess it could be argued that Nate’s store of luck just ran out at the end there, but that just means Lara just kinda won by default...
@@averymarshall-weeks8505 Same. Deathbattle treats luck like a weakness, rather than a strength. When someone has luck as a power, by definition, they CAN rely on it. Think Domino from Deadpool.
@@mikerainbow11 Domino has luck as a defined mutant power. Nate has it for plot convenience. Plot armor is not something included in a DB, even with this being early in DBs run.
@@kingsantacruz2866 nah not even as a plot convenience. Its even stated in the games through the characters about how insanely lucky he is, and how they're scared it'll run out. He's litterally just incredibly lucky
Lara never reloaded her handguns and she uses her ice pick on a stone wall while falling probably 30 mph. Then climbed up and chases Nate down while he’s in a car and somehow gets on his vehicle. Ok buddy
BurnedToTheGround no but we'll mention the animation has nothing to do with the outcome since somehow after many years of death battle people can't seem to comprehend that it's just for entertainment purposes and they've said this multiple times.
It's the internet people complain about anything and everything, if it was actually a real legitimate answer to their question then they wouldn't be happy either... The real answer being the script writers because they make the characters and the stories, or if you wanna go even more into it, no one would win because they both aren't real lol.
The fact that Lara Croft’s Japanese voice actress Yūko Kaida is also Claire Redfield and Nathan Drake’s Japanese voice actor Hiroki Tōchi is Chris Redfield From Resident Evil so its basically Brother vs Sister
*Lara and nathan are shooting bullets at eachother* her stray bullet acidently hits the grail knocking it down Nathan catches the grail with ease before it hits the ground because of Lara's stray bullet, she activates the trap for both of them Lara: WHAT HAVE YOU DONE?!
Everyone complaining about Croft winning and I'm like, dude. She fought DINOSAURS. Poor Nate was just burdened with coming from a universe that ran on LOGIC and REALITY. Plus, Death Battle ain't kind to people who just "wing it".
Mitsuki Horenake Nathan drake isn't completely realistic though. Because even a lot of the things Nathan does is impossible. He may be skilled and athletic but many of the things he does is simply not possible for any human being. Especially all those people he fought in uncharted 3. Where did he even learn to fight? We know that he was trained athletically by his older brother but that doesn't explain where he learned to take out multiple goons and brutes. Or where he learned how to shoot
I think DB favored professional training over being self-taught, though. Lara had the money to learn a lot of techniques to defend herself. Nathan taught himself to fight, and maybe that Navy Seal guy they mentioned taught him basic survival skills. It's Zoro vs Erza all over again. Zoro was in a school. Erza taught herself. Zero won. Apparently teachers are the best, I guess.
Mitsuki Horenake it makes sense though don't you think if you have someone to teach you. You will be able to get much better cause you don't have to waste time figuring out the basics
the thing is, nathan drake has fought demons, a tribe of ancient warrior trolls, and has gone toe to toe with a superhuman soldier on crofts level or higher (lezardevic). on top of that he survives literally everything. luck has never failed him once so i dont know why screwattack thinks it should here.
Look, I can appreciate a Helicopter fatality as much as the next guy, but that did feel kind of cheap considering what each combatant was capable of. Like have Laura shoot him or something when he's down on the ground; that's satisfying and likely. Having the helicopter blades survive the explosion and have the perfect angle to come in and kill drake felt... cheap. I know this might be arguing realism in a fictional fight ring between different fictional characters, but this feels like the Helicopter won deathbattle and not Laura and her axe of Helicopter Slaying
Balkura Nate being the kind of fictional character he is and what he stands for deserved a Warrior's Death. not a failed QTE. that's my only gripe in this episode. Even if my favourite did lose. but I accepted it once this was announced
You realize that the death battle series is not about the actual fight right? I mean it's nice to see an entertaining simulated fight but Death Battle is about anaylising 2 opponents, determine the more likely winner by stats and analysis, and then handle it to a team of animator who do an entertaining video where they are told who the victor is. I'm more a Nathan Drake fan than Lara Croft myself, but she is indead superior in strenght, feat and weaponry so even if Nathan could indeed win, out of 10 fights the winner would end up being Lara 7 time over 3 for Nathan.
i think the way bayonetta lost is a half demon vs a human or is she a human and didn't zoro lose 2 swords got two new better swords lost one new sword got a better sword i should relay re watch that and that 9 sword style trick
I think the "Screwattack favors females contestants" thing came up after the Tracer vs Scout DB because they miscalculated/left out so much in Tracer's favor. If we are only looking at that particular death battle then it is certainly suspicious, but one only needs consider the history of the show to realize that is not the case. Not only have men beaten women in numerous battles in the past (don't remember the exact breakdown) but also Screwattack just does bad research in general and they often make mistakes or leave out game changing information. This isn't something limited to the battles where women win over men. Basically it's an unfounded assumption born from Screwattack's poor research habits.
"Nathan suffered a bullet wound in the same area of the body, and while he powered through the pain for a short time-" Okay but you're leaving out that he also went through a strenuous train escape while it was falling off a cliff, took down a mercenary hand-to-hand and stole his gun, then came out on top in a shootout with several dozen other trained mercenaries and assassins.
@@lancefontenot9333 No she didn't. She made it through a cave collapse, multiple wolf attacks. Then was captured by the cultists many of whom were trained former Russian soldiers and special forces. Escaped and killed a bunch of them. Found Roth and treated his broken leg. Climbed several cliffs to get to the transmitter from a wolf den. Scaled the mountain fighting her way through numerous batches of soldiers with heavy weapons including aa guns and grenade launchers to reach the antenna and call for help. Zip lined down from the antenna and when the rescue plane blew up slid down the mountain dodging crashing plane parts. It is near this point that she para glides down the mountain crashes into numerous trees, finds the helicopter and treats her reopened injury.
Not to mention he stumbled into the freezing cold for quite a while until Tenzin found him. And even in 3 where he had been tortured and then managed to escape the pirate shipwrecked place, continues fighting for nearly an entire 24 hours
It wasn't. The animation is for fun. Lara's superhuman reaction speeds, agility, strength, and speed were the deciding factors. In a real fight Lara pulls faster and puts 4 bullets center mass before Drake has his gun drawn.
Geoffrey Sorkin To be fair here, Nate’s luck is the exact reason why ex-military haven’t hit him with bullets in the past. Not to mention Nate also has some extreme crack-shot aim. Also, Lara’s fast but not THAT fast, she’s certainly faster than Nate, I’ll say that. Also, stronger opponents haven’t been a problem for Drake in the past, look at Lazarević and the guardians of Shambhala. Just to name a few.
Given her Superhuman agility, speed, and reaction times, in a real fight she pulls faster and puts four bullets center mass. That's why they say the animation is for fun (and what fun it is)
The animation is for fun. A realistic fight between them ends very fast. Lara pulls faster (superhuman agility, speed, and reaction time) and puts four bullets center mass. Doesn't make for an exciting death battle.
@Evan Malcolmson Everything you just said except the ending is a gameplay mechanic. Nate got shot in the stomach and barely survived. Lara got impaled through the stomach, and spent three days fighting an army. Gameplay mechanics are not feats. Also, fine, Lara shoots him in the head. Her massive speed advantage still exists. She puts four bullets center mass and two to his forehead.
*Character who is supposedly lucky gets impaled by a low-probibility rotor* I get that the fight is for entertainment but why even mention Nathan's luck if it's not gonna be part of the fight?
Oh come on, he survived a jeep head first into a brick/stone wall AND the helicopter exploding AAAAAND the fall to the ground. :P How is that not showing his luck?
"why even mention Nathan's luck if it's not gonna be part of the fight?" To be fair, he had a ton of lucky spots during the battle. Including but not limited to: Surviving what should have been a fatal car crash only to land in front of a working helicopter, and dodging dozens of gunshots from a skilled marksmen. I would guess that the end is supposed to reflect that luck can only get you so far.
ow they showed his luck, survived the jeep explosion, the helicopter explosion and the fall on the ground, but they also said sooner or later luck runs out, the rotor was the symbol of it...
First off the jeep shouldn't have exploded, just a crash, second Lara didn't hit any major component on the chopper, so it would not have just exploded. I rate this death battle a 5/10 for bad physics and a notable bias.
Arch Angel that was a motorcycle it wouldn't even be able to get far in the sand it would react as the sand was quicksand and besides we all knew Nathan was going to win and when the girl threw that mountain climbing hook there's no way in hell or Heaven that the f****** helicopter would explode so easily Nathan got impaled AND shot TWICE what happened to Tomb Raider girl it doesn't matter she should have lost f*** the Tomb Raider girl all hail Nathan all hail Nathan all hail Nathan
I still don't believe how Lara throw her pick hard enough to counter the pull of gravity, the push from the helicopter blades, and the air drag that would come with it. logically and scientifically its not possible
Honestly I'm fine with Lara winning I'm just not fine with how she won I just thought it was lame that they incorporated her throwing the axe at the helicopter and then that being the thing that killed him the odds of the blade hitting him much less being intact are so small it disappointed me
Typically (if we take the writers' claims at face-value) there's an algorithm (meaning: math) that leads to a "most likely answer". Sure, if things play out a certain way then Drake might win, or Pinkie kills Deadpool, or Starscream flattens Rainbow Dash... But typically after this myriad of scenarios are considered there's one winner who has a notable lead. To invoke a reference from above: Dante the demon-hunter from "Devil May Cry" MIGHT have lost once or twice in a sample death-battle to the demonic Bayonetta...but it's not hard to see that most of the time the guy whose job is "kill demons from the pits of Hell" will most likely succeed at killing a demon that rivals those from the pits of Hell. They then seem to select the outcome that best reflects the important factors. Switching weapons has been done, super-modes have been done, letting both sides deal their full potential has been done, and (hell) having each side take the other side's full potential is even often the breaking point. Hell, a lot of the contentious outcomes seem to stem from this: THE HULK SHOULD HAVE SURVIVED BEING DECAPITATED! GOKU WOULDN'T BE KILLED BY SUPERMAN SO EASILY! STARSCREAM IS A ROBOT, SO A MERELY-MAGICAL PONY SHOULDN'T BE ABLE TO BEAT HIM IN A DEATH MATCH BECAUSE HE CAN SURVIVE MAGIC! The list goes on, that a lot of the conclusions (and particularly those that people disagree with) come to whether the respective parties' "Finishing Move" will or won't be able to actually finish their opponent. Thus one or thirty or a hundred matches probably had Laura punch Drake to death and then double-tap him to ensure that he stays down. But the helicopter scene was used and mentioned as an important accomplishment and demonstration of her skills, and thus was involved in the chosen solution.
The animation is just entertainment, they chose a cool looking end to the fight instead of, say, smashing headfirst into a stone block or being at the center of an explosion.
Agreed, the way she won was just stupid, even in Tomb Raider or Uncharted logic. Plus the fact that she caught up to Drake was absurd, she fell pretty far down and somehow caught up. It should have ended in a gunfight or hand to hand combat.
I just thought about it a little before I watched the video. I was actually hoping they'd prove me wrong. But if what they said about both of them is true is still leans towards Lara. My biggest issue is that Lara didn't actually kill Drake.
@@leoakough5409 ????? What for? Chalice is revealed, Lara doesn't react. Lara shoots chalice (no bullets from Drake) and look shocked, Drake catches chalice and gets berated. You have yet to convince me Drake was at fault here.
What intelligence???? He's a dumbass yank who stole his identity and has nothing but luck. Lara is a prodigious gymnast and a phD archaeologist too boot. Drake couldn't spell that. Uncharted is overrated as fuk
The ending was such a goddam cop-out, it's ridiculous. Also, how did Lara have time to climb up the pillar, get in her motorbike and catch up to Nathan who had a fair head-start?
People don't watch Death Battle for the analysis. They can say the animations don't matter, but people are watching *because* of the animations. No one really cares what these two dickweeds have to say about the characters.
Badalight The animation is for entertainment, but if it makes no sense then Its just stupid. Lara wouldn't have time to catch up to Nate, therefore they shouldn't have written the fight like that.
It would be nice if the both series merged. A game with Lara and Drake teaming to do something would be awesome. I know this is impossible, but it would be nice...
Tbh, this fight really shouldn't have a "winner", let alone be a fight at all. This is a fight between two regular humans with a knack for adventuring and are really good at being resourceful. While they have these similarities, it doesn't feel right to pit them against each other because of who they are. Lara is a living symbol of feminism (in a good way), while Nathan is an extremely relatable and likeable character (more than Lara imo); one where we can put ourselves in his shoes and really know what he would be experiencing in that moment. So, pitting them against one another just feels wrong because it feels they don't belong here. P.S. The way Nathan went out was super anti-climactic and bull. If he's going to go out, he deserves to go out respectably! Comment if you agree.
Nathan feels super relatable indeed. And there’s to many feminists symbols out there in game. I kind of felt like Wiz and Boom Stick were trying to appease feminists subscribers.
+Douglas Glass Lara should win. She has the strength, skill and feats advantage. Also, the animation is not what determines who wins. Only the research determines who wins
Luck is Nathan's greatest strength, and you kill him with an ungodly amount of bad luck? Why not just have Lara impale him through the face with the axe then he just explodes instead?
Because that would be boring and anticlimactic. When you look at all the other flashy ways people have been killed on this show, you gotta try SOMETHING different. Besides, the fights are made for entertainment anyway. It's the facts and analysis that determine the winner.
acemckillayoface And this isn't anti-climactic? You can barely say she killed him at all. And yeah, thanks, I don't care who won. That ending was just really lame. It could have happened to Lara instead, (which would make more sense) and it would still be really lame.
sos sos okay Nathan had never ever escaped by helicopter and he actuallys hates them ,in the second game he says it himself,and also wdym fiting death? Nathan did not deserve to die like that
It would have been a better ending if instead they had just dropped the artifact and just banged there and then in the desert. Especially if they get interupted by Sully: _"Goddamn it kid, I'm getting too old for this!"_
It would be better if it landed next to him, he'd get up, say some smart line and Lara would kill him off right afterward. This ending was really lame, especially because we didn't really feel like it was Lara who killed him.
Zach Lawler the death battle cast that came out after this explains that the battle could have ended at several points, they just decided to have fun with the ending
Exactly this. Nathan's level of luck is unbelievable, yet the way they killed him is simply him being unlucky. Lara outclasses him in strength, speed, skill, etc., and so this ending is an utter joke.
Advancements of Science Society Did you forget that Lara was the one who made the helicopter explode? That's a pretty direct way of dying, and Nathan was lucky to survive the explotion and the fall. So I think you are grasping at straws here.
the duel was lame. Like really lame, and I don't mean the who won, just the exectuion was really bad. They fight, then run away and Drake lost because of random heli propeller stabbing him......Random factors are so lame. Might aswell actually penetrated him with arrow in cool way, than random death
TheNextInfamous I was expecting that I thought his luck would run out by get hit by Laura's arrow. but no it had to be some random propeller blade that kills him
It should have missed by inches and then have him shot in the face or something shortly afterward. He was grounded and weaponless in that instance, so the propeller just felt like an excuse for "Hey, let's make this kill as over-the-top as we can!"
I like to think that if it were in a game, the moment the place started falling apart, they'd actually have helped each other get out since they're not really enemies, but more rival treasure hunters. Then Nathan would lose the grail on a following stick up, but get back at her by reobtaining the grail and *ultimately* losing it at the end.
YoungBlaze Of Chitown they would complain that this video was sexist. same with the tracer vs scout. scout is faster than tracer I did the research. they have to please the feminist because people are so sensitive.
*facepalm* the ending was VERY contrived. I'm not arguing against the fact that Croft is superior to Drake, I just wished the final blow was more believable, and up close and personal.
Agreed. They said themselves the only way she could beat a helicopter with a hand axe would be to hit the air intake, and they didn't even put one on that copter. Pretty lazy.
Yeah, also she hit the helicopter right below the propeller. It wasn't even close enough to the props or anything else do any real damage to the chopper, the axe would have just fallen out, just leaving a hole in the chopper.
my biggest issue with deathbattle is that they combine different versions of a character into one instead if actually picking one version of that character.
Lzxm oh they do it a lot with this fight they should have just picked one and I'll admit old Lara would win but not reboot This makes me scared for crash vs spyro if they ever get to it
Like with link , yup they dont know what the hell they are doing or talkig about combining several diffrent variations/reincarnations into one guy with all his weapons and abilities.
Well, I was wrong. Man that would have been an awesome ending. They both end up living, they look for the Grail, can't find it, only for Indy to be up on a cliff or something, says "Amateurs" then as he walks away says "I swear I left this somewhere else..."
They both were after the false grail- the true grail wouldn't be shiny and opulent, and Indy knows it. Indy probably found the true grail in the ruins after they left, leaving Lara humiliated and branded a murderer since she attacked Nathan without any provocation even though he had gotten there first. :3
After watching a ton of battles between superpowered planet level beings, it’s nice to see a good old fashioned shootout between two (mostly) ordinary humans.
It is now season 4, this show has been going on for years, and half of the people in the comments section STILL don't understand that the animation doesn't determine the outcome.
Historian474 Yeah, I just wanna say that Laura could've won in a more entertaining way. How'd it explode by hitting the side? THEY even said that the Helicopter explosion thing from the front was almost impossible. They should've ended it with a dessert shoot-out after Drake landed. At least THEN Drake's luck and adaptation skills would be nulled.
Lara would win. But I still don't like how they had Nate die to a falling blade when luck is Drake's forte. He even survived a giant falling chandelier by being in the perfect middle of it.
I don't think people realize how they make Death Battle. They find out who wins and they don't care how the actual battle plays out as long as the person they decided wins.
To those who are saying "Lara shouldn't have won! They only made her win because she has a bigger franchise/ she's a woman!" I have two things for you: 1) From the view of someone who hasn't played any of the games (AKA non partial) I can tell you that Lara definitely won. She was stronger, more durable, and she was trained by professionals. The only thing I can think of that he had an edge on her is jumping and sheer luck. 2) If you think the only reason she won was because she's female then I can tell that you are either a butthurt fanboy or a sexist. Look at Deathbattle's history: There are plenty of fights where women lost to men. Sometimes the episodes and characters aren't well researched, however that doesn't mean that Deathbattle would make a character win because of their gender. If you saw this video and your first thoughts are about gender, I'm pretty sure you're focusing on the wrong aspects of this series. She won because she was better, not because she was female. Also loosen up, this series is meant for entertainment. If you don't like watching Deathbattle then stop watching it, it was made for entertainment purposes if it fails to entertain you then don't watch it. Also just to let you know there are people who watch these videos to escape from politics, so stop dragging it back into the lime light without a good reason.
Elijah Wahlman The animation for the battle is an artistic interpretation of what *could* happen and shouldn't be considered anymore than that. The battle itself is meant to be fun to watch not "This is exactly what would happen,". Just because the animation doesn't make sense at some point doesn't take away from the fact that she would win if they met.
Well, the show isn't made for entertainment lol. the entire show is meant for " who would win a death battle " If people find it entertaining it's a bonus but okay.
Seriously don't like this one... Not because Lara won. No no. Drake's my boy, but Lara's had far more history, thus far more time to push stuff to the extreme, where Uncharted tries to keep things completely grounded and realistic, with a twist at the end. I dislike it because this is just piss poor quality, especially to be a premiere. Lip sync was awful. That looked more like someone cosplaying Drake than Drake himself. The fighting was already too slow, then they had the nerve to add in slo-mo. Neither stayed true to character, as Drake constantly runs *towards* danger, but they made him out to be a coward here, constantly running instead of fighting. Then, even though she would've won, their reasoning for it is just nuts. Like the bullet thing. Yeah, that was badass what she did. But it's not like Drake just passed out. He was already fighting people with rocket launchers while running and jumping across trains. He kills his way up and gets shot. He survives that crash and does a salmon ladder climb (that's not exactly easy in peak conditioning). This is all while constantly losing blood (Lara's wound was plugged), which would sap his energy even more, and the severe change in climate and altitude, as that train headed into the mountains, towards Shambala. So he's suddenly in the cold, possibly going into shock, and the air is a lot thinner. Add in him not having efficient oxygen usage due to still fighting people even beyond the crash, other survivors, and everything, that feat is a *lot* more damning for Lara than it is for him. It wasn't as simple as him getting shot and passing out. Again, still agree she would've won (chick's fought gods man), but extremely poor quality in this vid.
Theinen84 I think at this point they really a little too much on outrage views and people wanting to see what happens than making quality videos. I mean they are putting episodes now at a faster pace, however if that results in a poorer analyse of the fight and poorer animation I'd rather they do it with less frequency. And remember there's a financial incentive here, the more views they get the more money they make. I'm not going to accuse them of anything without more evidence, however in the vast majority of debates with a financial incentive there is almost always a bias.
Lara was made before video games gave two shits about physics while Nathan Drake was made to be relatively grounded by video game standards since, yknow, Naughty Dog Lara definitely wins
DC he shoves it just a little bit to fall off a cliff we can assume its slightly imbalanced. He dosent push it continuously for like 10-15 feet forward on even ground....
Honestly, the only reason that Lara won is because all of her games are pretty unrealistic. The Classics make no sense, but they do have a point in saying that she is the better fighter, because she was military trained. I love Nate way more than Lara, but I'll admit that he'd loose in this matchup
The reasoning was actually good this time. They proved that Lara was stronger and had shaken off wounds better than Nathan. They also said that Lara was formally trained while Nathan is not and that she generally handles high pressure situations better than Nathan. There's also the fact that Nathan relies on luck so taking all this into account, I fail to see how it could've been better.
So far, according the Uncharted games, he has had bad luck getting into bad situations, but good luck in getting out/surviving them. A helicopter blade perfectly hitting him is extremely bad luck, given the aerodynamics of a half broken helicopter rotor blade
Your kinda missing the point here. Yes her winning the fight is accurate but they should have ended it in a way that was reflective of her advantages and not in a way that was contradictory to Nathan's strengths. For example if the fight ended with them fighting hand to hand with Lora edging out the victory then it wouldn't be a problem.
see while i love Lara she is just like every villain drake has gone up against. shes just another rich treasure hunter to Nathan. and we all know how it ended with them. hes even fought and gotten the better of foes that are stronger and faster than him. Lara like all the rest is cocky and knows shes good a fact which Nathan takes advantage of every time.
+MrUsoutlaw but lara is trained in martial arts, she adapts to combat and skilled with weapons. Nathan is just a dude who is good at basic brawling and somewhat good at shooting guns thats it. hes not meant for combat
Chill out. The death fits with this genre. It was never gonna end in a fist fight. He'd pretty much would've lost big time if it came down to that. Plus they had to make it fun and exciting.
I don't care if Lara wins, Nate is still my favorite character. At least he knows how to have a little bit of fun. Actually, if they joined forces, they'd be unstoppable.
Cast Lara Croft The Tomb Raider: Alicia Vikander/Shelley Blond/Judith Gibbins/Jonell Eilliott/Angelina Jolie/Keeley Hawes/Charlotte Sparey/Camilla Luddington/Abigail Stahlschmist/Harriet Perring/Francesca Aston/Minnie Driver/Heidi Moneymaker Nathan Drake The Seeker Of The Uncharted: Nolan Ramsey North Young Lara Croft: Rachel Appleton/Emily Carey/Maisy De Freitas Indiana Jones: Harrison Ford Jill Valentine: Kari Wahlgren/Atsuko Yuya The Joker: Lucas Schuneman/Wataru Takagi Sweet Tooth: Fred Tatasciore Grandmaster Yoda: Frank Oz King Mickey Mouse: Bret Iwan/Takanori Hosino Xoyad: Phillip Sacramento/Hochu Otsuka Lex Rothul: Gianni Matragrano/Tsuguo Mogami Alexander Joseph "Lex" Luthor: Gianni Matragrano Doctor Victor Von Doom: Steven Kelly/Toru Okawa Tony Stark/Iron Man: Reagan Murdock/Eiji Hanawa Burec Wyaxen/Xanmabt: Gianni Matragrano/Akio Otsuka Bruce Thomas Wayne/Batman: Ben Affleck Akuma/Gouki/Oni: Richard Epcar/Taketora Maxuka/Gioxuk: Phillip Sacramento/Akio Otsuka Shao Kahn: Gianni Matragrano/Tetsu Inada Leo (Arte): Gianni Matragrano Additional Voices: Eileen "EileMonty" Montgomery
