These students are being taught well and they will be held accountable to disseminate God’s truth faithfully, even in the at the cost and in the midst of losing everything.
The presence of the Spirit departedfrom the Holy of Holies when the curtain was torn when Jesus on the cross proclaimed "Ino Thy hands I commit My spirit"..Yes the Spirit's presence returned to the second temple and left as explained above
Dr. Alexander You are teaching on one of the most amazing prophecies in the bible. The tile is a model of the city and the typical siege equipment in that time period. The iron pan is the key to understanding the prophecy. The IRON PAN represents the army of Rome surrounding the city with a wall of roman shields. The starting point of the count of the 390 days is the year 454 BC. In this year GOD marked the year with a blood moon tetrad on May 6th 454 BC. The decree to rebuild the city and the walls issued to Nehemiah on Nissan 14th. The city being restored was a uniting action taken on by both Israel and Judah (New Start). Now the math 454 BC + 390 years = 63 BC the year that the IRON PAN Pompey sacked Jerusalem and turned the city over to the Pharisees. Now what do we have here? We have established the starting date to Daniel 9:24 Math again using the Nissan 14, 454 date. 454 BC + 483 years = 31 AD . Now back to Ezekiel 4 and the 40 days. In this passage he is bound representing Roman rule, and his arm uncovered is Christ visitation (Isa 53:1) and his prophecy of NO STONE REMAIN NO THROWN DOWN. This prophecy confirms the day for year count because they are linked together. Math time for the 31 AD date is 31 AD + 40 years = 70 AD the year Pompey began the siege and completed the prophecy with the destruction of the Temple. GOD BLESS YOU Rick Huntling PS the defiled bread is the Jews mixing the pagan with the WORD of GOD. You can verify this date on the NASA 5 Millennium Lunar Eclipse, 453 BC.
Love the teaching. I did notice the dispensational view came out here as he separates Israel from the Church. I believe there is no separation between the two and God has always had his Ekklēsia (Church, congregation, called out ones). Curious to here the exposition on Ezekiel 36-37.
Here it is 2020 look what is happening, we were surely warned I believe it’s too late, save yourself . Ezekiel 14:14 Though these three men, Noah, Daniel, and Job, were in it, they should deliver but their own souls by their righteousness, saith the Lord GOD. Act 2:40 And with many other words did he testify and exhort, saying, Save yourselves from this untoward generation
God means what He said, He will bring judgement and He will atone for His people. The Jews missed it when it all happened and here we have scholars and students lost in the same paradigm because like the Jews their eyes are fixed on 'a people' rather than God and His Presence. 'He was there' in the person of Jesus Christ and He is sitting at the right hand of the Father in His Kingdom. He is the glory of God. He is that temple described elaborately by Ezekiel - more grandiose and greater that that which was built by King Solomon. Jesus is the high priest, he is the most holy of offerings. He is the grain offering, the sin offering, the guilt offering and the burnt offering. Christ is the lamb of the Passover. He is the Lord who entered through the gate of the sanctuary facing east. He is the sanctuary! His that City, He is that promised land. He is to whom the promises point - He is the true Israel who fulfilled the law. Only He is circumcised in heart and flesh. Thus only He is worthy. It is only when IN Him can Jew or Gentile can ever be deemed worthy. Not without! If any man says otherwise, he blasphemes the Father and the Son. May we have the eyes to see and ears to hear!
I do appreciate Ralph's observation of the significant epistemological impoverishment that we face in this text as well, frankly, in a lot of the TNK and the so called New Testament. My question is - how does this significant dearth relate to the notion of this set of documents being some sort of reflection of divine inspiration and inerrancy when we don't have any idea even what it's talking about in so many instances? Would such confusion and ignorance really reflect the nature of the creator?
Greg Logan As Dr. Alexander points out, there are points where the interpretation of scripture are made clear in the text while some questions do seem to be intentionally left unanswered. It seems that the answers you really seek cannot be answered by any man; however, if the God described in the Christian Bible truly is who he says he is...ask Him yourself. I really don’t mean to be sarcastic or critical. IF God is who he says he is in the Bible, a God who desires a relationship with man on an individual AND communal level...God has every intention of answering any questions you may have. I pray you find what you are looking for.
You haven't a clue for your accusations. Your an atheist insecure in your unbelief so you troll these sites. Ezek. 4:1-5 begins in 454 bc and is fulfilled to the exact year as prophesy 390 years later with the siege of Pompey in 63 bc. Same with Ezek. 4:6-8 to the exact year as prophesy starting the moment of the Resurrection in 31 ad fulfilled 40 years in 70 ad with the seige of Titus. Most remarkable is Daniel 9-26 is from a decree issued to repair streets and walls in 454 bc to start counting to the Messiah cut off is fulfilled to the day and hour 483 years later in 31 ad. If this is not the one true GOD speeking the end from the begining what is? No proof will be enough for you anyways, so be it. The statistical probability of three prophesy separate 390, 483 and 40 events with all three begining depentent from a single year marked by a blood moon tetrade landing on 4 Jewish feast days has a statistical probaiblity greater than your existence happening on a rock 4.5 billion years ago in your primordial ooze. HE is YHWH the Alpha and the Begining, speaking the end from the begining and no other gods are capable. NASA 5 Millenium Lunar Eclipses; 453 bc
"the mana drama that goes on here in jerusalem" :D the control issue concerns consciousness no god might be in full control, exactly when he IS "only" watching. also from the intuition side of it all if you are seeing your will layed bare "infront" of you... what then becomes an "intervention"? and if we take the representational aspect of the act / the sign if you got either the world in unity, or single absolute acts point to you / acting you out how does this exactly make you the actor? i will please not take the pantheism insult here worldly conclusions aren't necessarily lacy like that if we consider the fact that within none of the hermeneutical tendencys we actually HAVE included some kind of beyond YET. that the would be the meta-aspect still: - the relationship of god to THE/his? world... is the creation always the property of the creator does the creator even want to KEEP it as his or her property? i wonder why, studied philosophy, plz dont take offense in my urge to input. bless you for these lectures! if an artist wants to destroy his creation after he gave it away, does he "take it back" within this act? in german - be-dauern... gott bedauert was er getan hat, and we will pay? :D no, not the god I know... "the god who is disappointed with his children" ya well right... i feel like i do have to confess that I see judgment coming even very specific and textual. i dont wanna talk about attitude now, im gonna enjoy more theological input thx :D can I say that you do have a bit of the kind of gesture and posture #like #biden? the moment you talk away from the book. ps.: #god im a sinner, but I HONESTLY don't feel in conflict with the word. all choose our paths, can never be too early.
