Lefties losing it: BBC journalist ‘humbled’ by Guyana’s President on climate change 

THIS!! Exactly!! Just because they don't feel "representation" or disagree with their policies doesn't mean anyone should care!! The self entitled, self importance is truly disgusting. Heaven forbid we look to success and work ethics. Progress. Not regression the way these woke cult idiots seem to push these days. Utterly ridiculous to listen to. Good for The President for standing up and staying strong towards the idiotic "criticism". He handled that whole thing so well. How is the BBC STILL on air these days. Like the View I will always wonder how anyone can stand watching the blatant LIES and agenda. Gross. I miss when the norm was actually Journalists. NOT all these paid mouth pieces for the left. DISGRACEFUL. Sad I would rather watch Rita on Sky News than anything on American television and news. Or go here to RU-vid to other channels to get the news. Ect.

Colonisation never stopped😂 they still own everything they ever got to

It’s my country you fool. I was born here

@@evenbetterthanthereaIthing it's not colonization. It's not a Country attempting to move in and take over. It's a relatively small group of people with an overblown sense of self importance combined with delusions of grandeur.

​@@evenbetterthanthereaIthingIt's happening to Brazil and it's Amazon. Unfortunately our current Pres. is weak.

That Sackur is a prick.

I agree!

He knows what he's talking about!

Wow these lefties often display litteral child like behaviour. There is working class left then theres will do anything but work lefties Woke but cant get out of bed in the morning

Whenever an ignorant "Greenie" utters the mentally-devolved phrase, "Man-Made Climate Change" or "Prevent Climate Change" the Earth laughs in Volcano. Just one small active volcano releases more toxic and greenhouse gases in just one month, than man has ever produced. 🤣

Not only BBC, but i think your country itself should be ashamed. I think you guys don't remember what you've done to other countries.

@@kfx3907 oh yeah cos we're the only ones to do stuff to other countries 😂 you're just as bad as the BBC presenter

@@kfx3907 if you're gonna hold anyone to a standard you must be at it yourself, which perfect country are you from?

@@kfx3907 And I guess the Portuguese, Spanish, Germans, French, Dutch and others did nothing according to you. Sad to say but you should be ashamed for displaying your racism on the world stage. No doubt you consider yourself a victim of colonialism rather than your own ignorance and prejudice.

Perfidious Albion.

And the British will be also sending its Military to defend Guyana against the designs of Maduro of Venezuela. Guyand being a former British Colony and a current member of the Commonwealth of which the British Crown is the head.

​@@rajdialnandram5676 The commonwealth is closer to a book club than it is to the old empire. You can't even defend Europe properly at the moment, calm down on the whole world police thing. Remember the Monroe doctrine? The UK won't be coming to the Americas to do much of anything without explicit US approval.

That sneering BBC interviewer should be named Rudy, cos he takes rudeness to a new level.

@@AlunThomas-mp5qo Steven Sucker!

Was the crow cooked by global warming?

At last! Somebody standing up to the pompous, self righteous, sanctimonious arrogant Stephen Sackur. I'm VERY surprised old mate Stephen didn't apologise for being WHITE...

@@neil999ish That's just the sort of stupid comment one expects from a climate loonie. Are you scared to go outside alone? I know you are scared of all the other bullshit you swallow.

Yep. The nwo paid puppets and pathetic nwo snake oil science.

Some people LIKE, Big Black C0CK!

I don't stopped end of 2020

I really believe, that Sir John Reith, the first Director General of the BBC ( British Brainwashing Corporation!) would be turning in his grave!

I asked nobody and they said they love 'Strictly'

And the way he looks over his glasses while talking to him.

It’s his style you clowns. We need more journalists like him actually fucking talking to people instead of standing on a balcony at the hotel or simply reacting to something someone said. Very few western media outlets are willing to do this kind of interview.

Mr Sucker, shame on you

A white man talking to a black/brown(well really Indian origin) But it doesn't matter to them! He's not an equal as per them... It's a disease called colonial hangover

Colonialist wearing the cloak of Leftist-Woke sainthood!

Stephen Sackur literally said to Professor Noam Chomsky in a BBC HardTalk interview, *_“are you still confident in your own righteousness.?”_* I nearly fell off the chair. [Chomsky - who is 96 this year - and still as sharp as a tack immediately replied, “yes, but i’m not that confident”.]

Because the whole bloody world seems to run on fear these days...

Because that's true "Green" economics, as opposed to the b.s. served up by the MSM.

Honestly though not that those forests actually do anything about the carbon footprint since they basically produce almost just as much carbon at night as they produce oxygen during the day. That said, the US does not have the right to lecture anyone about anything and neither does the UK or any other country in the imperialist alliance.

@@thenonexistinghero Creating oxygen is no mean feat, given that we are an oxygen breathing species. In addition, the global death rate due to climate causes has drastically decreased for decades as our fossil fuel based economies have more than mitigated climate impacts, esp. winter heating of housing as winter cold is 9 times as deadly as summer heat. Therefore the Net Zero agenda is not only irrelevant but also deceitful.

@@connorduke4619 I'm not saying creating oxygen isn't a bad feat, I'm just saying that... the forest isn't exactly contributing to decreasing CO2. But yeah, net zero is irrelevant and deceitful. Everything that western governments and major corporations are promoting these days is deceitful and they are ignoring the actual important issues.

@Maadhawk Media was never neutral, they were luring you in to a false sense of security.

Remember when there was almost no censorship and deleting and shadowbanning of comments on RU-vid in the 2000s and early mid 2010s?and the algorithm did not suppress or promote videos according to their agenda or narrative? pepperidge farms remembers Remember when most big name RU-vidrs weren't so political,now half of them make propaganda videos against certain countries that are also blatantly pro US even though their channels historically had nothing to do with geopolitics

And Fox 😅

💯 🇬🇾😎

Congratulations. Keep the forests alive.

Is life there good?

Guyana and Suriname both are the friend of India(Bharat) because both have connection with india through big indian origin population

98% chance all that oil money will go into his pockets and the other ruling elites. Always does in these poor, under developed countries that suddenly become resource rich

Dr. Ali has 5 University degrees. 1 is a Bachelor's, 3 of which are Masters degrees and 1 which is a PhD! He was also given another Honorary degree last year! His parents were educators (teachers/professors). This moronic BBC reporter underestimated who he was dealing with!

No homework needed to be done. Its something every Guyanese knows.

The Guyana President is obviously a highly educated man,

@@kathleenstrelnikow5356 Dr. Ali has 5 University degrees. 1 is a Bachelor's, 3 of which are Masters degrees and 1 which is a PhD! He was also given another Honorary degree last year! His parents were educators (teachers/professors). This moronic BBC reporter underestimated who he was dealing with!

Great point.

Private jet more than likely

He said he was in Guyana when in reality he was standing in front of a screen with a video from Guyana.

He flied with the gust dragon

First class I bet.

😂😂😂 gyal! True!!! 🇬🇾🇬🇾🇬🇾

He should have said “Lemme stop yuh RASS right there!” 😂😂😂

Are u zorestrian, our indian army field marshel name is Sam maneskshaw

​@@shubhamshetty7792*was

Rita is ALWAYS right and tells the truth with humor. Love her and Sky News Australia!

Exactly

Hypocrisy & pretentiousness (repeating my previous comment) The UK & the Netherlands are already doing exactly what Guyana about to do. & The UK has mismanaged their own oil drilling related investments/profits.

He’s not even a BBC journalist, never has been. Still a moron.

BBC CNN ALJAZEERA are not journalists they are ACTIVISTS with AGENDAS

What does being well spoken have to do with it 😅😅😅 ? Did you not expect the person with the top job of Guyana to speak well ? Hmmm

All BBC presenters are like this. The BBC is like a rotten apple with worms protruding from it.

They love Hamas too.

Even that aside, he's talking to a president of a country. That a-hole has no respect. If I was the leader of a country I'd lock him up for the next 5 years.

Stephen Sackur SUCKS!!!

​@@beachbum433Amen!

Guyana has done a fantastic job of preserving all of its forestry.

And it really is the world’s fastest growing economy.

100% from south africa. Wonderful to see a president standing up to this pseudo science and nwo disease. I pray your country is blessed with wealth and peace in the years to come. The shift has begun.

@@janetpretorius4604 Just what South Africa needs instead of the idiots running, that should be ruining, your country.

@@janetpretorius4604Thanks for recognizing the illness and praising those willing to administer the cure. Respect from the 🇺🇸.

May God continue protecting him and his family

Guyanese, not Guyanan!

@@Supah84it’s okay. He didn’t know. You never made a mistake??😏🙄

@iamwell5654 It's about correcting a mistake. I have seen similar videos, and many people say "Guyanan," which is not a word in any language. When you're not sure of the nationality of a person of a country, you're better off saying, for example: the president of Guyana instead of the "Guyanan" president. Hope this helps.

Yeah, thank you for taking care of the forest and then destroying the world by releasing all that oil....

Woke is not “the west”.

​@@jonah9861 most modern woke ideologies originated in the West.

Indeed. The Woke Cult wants to destroy not only the West, but also everything that is Good, True and Beautiful.

Woke is the west

yup, self inflicted loneliness. Sad...that she will probably never have a loving stable relationship...

@@johnnyrotundo6483 Not self inflicted loneliness, this woman is blaming the family unit.

🎯 yep... People like her are always unattractive and socially awkward. 100% jealous resentment

​@@beautifulseattleI think you've misunderstood what's being discussed.

@@lilmike2710 My apologies 🙏

She's so fat that she creates new dimensions every time she eats.

They've always been biased.

There was a time they were not left of a cliff looney though. There was a time they were not a meme

All the MSM in America has been an embarrassment, in tatters, and highly biased for quite a while. It was building up its left-leaning ideology, and it all exploded when Trump took office. They have gone so far to the left that they drive around in left-hand circles. I cannot wait to see their minds, and everyone else's on the left mind🤯, explode when Trump wins the election in November and is sworn in January to become the 47th President of the United States! We need him back in the White House, and hopefully, he will be able to clean up the mess Biden left just as he did when useless Obama and his annoying wife left the country in shambles. 🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸Trump 2024🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸

Yes BBC use to be one of the most neutral and factual, I guess George soros has invested on this media.

There’s a masterful Firing Line episode featuring Kingsley Amis in 1972 I think, discussing the left wing bias of the BBC , so you must be very old?

@@roughhabit9085 That was also before the Internet and the instant sharing of information. Their biases were less apparent then.

Stephen Sucker was put in his place😂😂😂

Just curious when BBC was trusted?

@@liang306 not since more than 30 years ago.

spectacles that are made from oil he want to stop.

Spot on, these BBC pundits seem to talk down to real people with real problems. Sack the cretin and see how he gets on outside the bubble he is in.

His sheltered life arrogance is pure

To be fair, they're probably reading glasses. I have to do that if I'm reading & turn speak to someone or look at the TV etc

Yup.

now u know how the bbc tv license fee is use and why it is so high

Yup, they probably used several thousand gallons of gas to transport their crew to Guyana to criticize the president on carbon emissions.

Private jet I bet, 1000x carbon emission than any of us

​😂@@evenbetterthanthereaIthing

Nah probably business class including entourage. That’s still a far more significant CO2 footprint then sardines class.

100% they are so badly needed.

lol you won the internet today!

We have them, we just stopped forcing people into tjem

Too expensive.

We have the mental asylums. It's called society :(

Yes, but do you pay their licence fee?

I think you forgot to put the inverted commas around 'news'.

...and fueled by slanted hosts like that woman here. This crap is just as bad as Fox News.

​@@brian6xNot enough slanting of you ask me.

There was nothing arrogant about it. It was a simple question to which the President of Guyana over reacted to - there’s no need to shout.

@@jasonfernandes755 The president is sick of the green agenda scam. As most of us with a brain are.

BBC spreading their bullshit again.

​@@jasonfernandes755the president did not overreact . He spoke boldly and made his point and in the process knocked an arrogant BBC reporter down a few notches

@@noodengr3three825 The President's point was flawed. One good act does not justify a bad one.

probably on a HOT AIR Balloon.

The self hatred amongst politicians is sadly very much a European and Euro-offshoot society thing. Well done Mr Ali and Guyana

Educated? Does that include his reparations demands? He’s clearly not as well educated as you think.

​@@jimsim8736He doesn't want American style reparations where everyone gets paid $100k or whatever. He wants to invest the money in education, health, infrastructure and cultural revitalisation. We give foreign aid to corrupt countries and overseas wars so why not give these people some money to stimulate their economy and help their people?

Maybe human rights.

and he's right. (BBC guy)

​@@brian6x Who's right?

While I agree with that, what the president was saying didn’t really make sense as a stand-alone justification.

​@sirnato5218 Why not? Their forest contribute to offset carbon footprints, unlike many countries in the world who produce oil... That should be more than enough justification even if the world's opinions mattered regarding their right to self development using their own natural resources.

@@jaxsmith5540 That’s not quite what a forest does. A forest is a carbon sink, meaning that there is carbon stored there that is not in the atmosphere. Another is the oceans (which absorb some carbon dioxide, hence why they are becoming a little more acidic. Basically, they store carbon, but only as much as the forest is, if that makes sense. Keeping a forest around doesn’t decrease the amount of carbon released, it just means you’re not causing more to be released into the atmosphere. In that regard, logging is a little akin to extracting fossil fuels, and keeping a forest is akin to leaving it in the ground.

So you agree with him on reparations? Do some research before fawning over someone.

@@jimsim8736 - thank you for that. You are quite correct, it was rather sort sight of me to 'fawn' over someone from only hearing one statement.

@@sketchybuilder To be fair I still love the fact he nailed the pompous BBC prat.

@@jimsim8736I agree with him : democrats will pay the reparations.

The real irony is that about 96% of carbon is actually stored in our oceans as is our oxygen production.

Obviously, they are allowed to develop unless they do it the way the leftists want it done.

The funny thing about this is that it's actually largely been conservatives saying we shouldn't do anything because developing countries don't do enough....Back when George Bush pulled out of the Kyoto Protocol one of the reasons was because "it exempts 80 percent of the world, including major population centers such as China and India" (as if we wouldn't also be able to pressure those counties in the the future -- remember this was back in 1997. Even without getting an early start on transition as we would have had if the US had joined the Kyoto Protocol, China is still taking the lead on the transition. So we can see now, that it was dumb for the US to pull out just because 3rd world countries didn't also have any obligation at the point....the thing you are currently all laughing at this woke guy from a single clip? Do conservatives even realize that they are the ones that have constantly taken this position of "if 3rd world countries won't pull their weight, then why should we"???? Are they that blinded to what conservatives have done over the past 3 decades?

@@blueatlas5021 #1. Please stop using the tired old phrase "3rd world". It is a political phrase created to refer to non-aligned countries during the Cold War, and now over-used by clueless people on the internet to announce their pompous selves. #2. Developing (not "3rd world") countries will use any and every means at their disposal to better the lives of their people. Just as "developed" nations raped the environment for more than a century to develop themselves. Having ruined the planet, it's THEIR responsibility to cut THEIR consumption to keep the balance as others do the bare minimum to lift standards of living. Americans giving up their 4000 sq ft houses, pools and air conditioning? It'll be a cold day in hell. Till then, they can expect to be shown the finger in every climate conference. Besides, as you yourself pointed out, the hypocrisy is jarring when you consider that India and China, with their massive populations, living with a tiny fraction of consumption levels of an average American, are leading the world when it comes to climate goals.

But you rather miss the point that, carbon is not a problem..It's all a scam.

​@@shubs3566 I'm sorry I offended you. It seems though that your reading comprehension is lacking. *Developing (not "3rd world") countries will use any and every means at their disposal to better the lives of their people. Just as "developed" nations raped the environment for more than a century to develop themselves. Having ruined the planet, it's THEIR responsibility to cut THEIR consumption to keep the balance as others do the bare minimum to lift standards of living. Americans giving up their 4000 sq ft houses, pools and air conditioning? It'll be a cold day in hell.* Right, what I'm explaining here is that democrats are not problem regarding this....republican's are. That's why I gave the example of the Kyoto Protocol.... *Besides, as you yourself pointed out, the hypocrisy is jarring when you consider that India and China, with their massive populations, living with a tiny fraction of consumption levels of an average American, are leading the world when it comes to climate goals.* India isn't leading it, China is. And the reason I made this point is because for years republicans have been whining about "why should we do anything when China isn't doing anything"....they whined that despite the fact you mentioned about per person emissions being much lower...but why would any conservative American care about that? Get ready for conservatives to start whining about how we shouldn't do anything because India isn't "pulling their weight". The point of the Kyoto Protocol was to say, "hey, developing countries need to develop, they cannot be held to the same standards as countries that have already made their wealth from oil and emissions". And the US turned around and whined, "That's unfair to us!", like the idiots they are.

It comes to mind!

I wonder if she put ketchup on them first!

I will call her "fukin crazy".

With chips !

Yes. Emphasis on "SHE".

Guyanese, not Guyanan!

He should refuse to sell to England!

He doesn’t, he doesn’t want us drilling for gas and oil in the UK. We wants 69 million windmills….. These people are nuts

*WRONG* Leadership in the US and UK and other places are in bed with China and the climate tyrants. Communist China is poised to complete two enormous automobile plants tooled for electric cars down in Mexico. Their plan is to flood western nations that have capitulated to the Climate change cult, with their EVs. The US and UK along with the EU have all signed into the Climate Accords. They're poised to force gas and fuel prices WAY up so people switch to electric cars. 😏 Guyana has signed no such accord... Nor will they. They can and will drill drill drill baby drill!! Them doing so throws a giant wrench into the climate tyrants machines, thus ruining their plans. Believe me, these people have literally all sat around a big table and discussed all their plans for global rule. Guyana has ruined their plans.... The President of Guyana should do a great deal to protect himself. They don't like it whenever someone they haven't bribed or blackmailed comes along and goes against their plans... Just look at how they're trying to go after Trump.

Brits don't need it, they seem to think they can transition their country to run on magical rainbows and unicorn farts...

ya ,,Britain ,,, they are all hypocrites

China is the Worst. Go tell them that. See what happens to you. We need A Strong President. Not corrupt joe

Because the rich movers and shakers want that cash. How dare Guyana upset their wealth plans.

Not worth the money!

Same here in Ireland just to watch a load of leftists crap and lies on RTE defund both RTE and BBC propaganda tv .

Cancel it and get your entertainment and info from the jnternet.

Start some reforestation projects in the desert to compete with Guyana 😂

@@grijzekijker we had forests but the greens burnt them down to make way for green renewables

Australia sits on a mountain of coal and uranium and their electricity costs 50 cents per kwh. If communists took over the Sahara desert, there would soon be a shortage of sand.

@@grijzekijker Its already happening we do millions a year. WA did so many they ran out of seedlings at one point.

@@raclark2730 how long before they can be extracted as oil?

Great point!!!

The Muslims leaders will not take lectures from anyone on climate change to stop using their resources.

They have always been fallen.

You are joking. Sweden is terrible for cutting down old forests then replacing them with monoculture Forrest’s for logging. Sweden is a big country with a small population so the environmental destruction in Sweden is mostly out of sight, I live in Sweden so see the continual destruction of old forests by the big logging companies. I remember watching Greta the idiot talk about how a peat bog being dug up was good because it would then revert back eventually in those’d ands of years, peat destruction was stopped in UK some 30 + years ago. I’m sorry you need to see Sweden for what it is, it’s not good environmentally at all. I

Jabba?

They will say "get lost"

Only problem trees are getting cut down. So for every cut tree one needs to be replaced. Malaysia is cutting down their forests (and foreign) to plant their palm oil, China for their marvellous "infrastructures" and etc etc for many other counties are not helping with this issue.

@@dodohateswater That's pretty f***ing ignorant of you. China alone plants more new trees than the entirety of the US and Europe put together. And there's actually far more greenery on the planet right now than there was a few decades ago. Go educate yourself dude.

@@dodohateswater Yeah. Palm oil is devastating. Perhaps JSO should become JSPO. That would make more sense. Yes, cutting down trees for solar farms. I've seen complete hillsides, big hillsides, in China covered with them. It looks awful.