⚠️ATTENTION, READ THIS⚠️ Y’all, this wasn’t meant for any disrespect to pilots. Pilots are awesome! This was just a trend, I have respect for every single pilot out there (Except you suicidal pilots that bring innocent people down with you)
@@GreenAxolotIyou do the trends you want to do? Ohhhhh…so I can literally place an uncontrollable crash to a literal emergency landing which none died? IS THAT WHAT YOU CALL “NOT DISRESPECTFUL”??, I’M NOT TRYING TO BE A CRYBABY OR ANYTHING BUT I’M REPORTING YOU. YOU THINK YOU ARE COOL WHEN YOU DO WHATEVER YOU WANT WITH THESE TRENDS BUT YOU AIN’T.
@@Nobodyaske_d He doesn’t realize it, but he actually does mean it. If people die and he does this trend because it’s popular, it doesn’t mean it can be more disrespectful to the pilots and people. All of you are gonna say “omg pilots are so sigma ohio fanum tax rizzler, so sigma 🍷 🗿” but sigma never makes you cool or well-respected if you compare something easy more than hard things.
He did that on purpose! That was Air Canada flight 143, AKA The Gimli Glider! They ran out of fuel due to a mistake in calculations between volume and kilograms. They were coming in too fast to get on the runway, so Captain Pearson used a glider move called a 'side slip' to lose speed and height in a hurry. He'd never even done it in a glider, but did it in a 767, brought it down, and landed safely. In fact, that same plane was fixed, nicknamed the Gimli Glider, and only recently got retired!
@@ofelianuezca3944 It doesn't matter just because he said that he respects them doesn't mean that the video doesn't show otherwise this so called "trend" really needs to stop
i reccomend you change the message from "other pilots crashing" to "pilots trying their hardest to save their plane" since it can be quite offensive to some people although all the crashes are caused by pilot error, its better to be on the safe side. all the pilots no matter what mistakes they made, they are just humans, we arent perfect
STOP THIS TREND. seeing people disrespect pilots who did the best they could when faced with impossible situations and accidents makes me SO mad. Please, please, please, there is a difference between an emergency landing and an horrible, horrible, accident. These pilots tried their best and to see them being disrespected like this just make me so so mad and sad. Please help stop this trend.
I agree with the original comment. This trend should be stopped, the pilots did the best they could in such a stressful situation, they should be respected more.
That's the thing: in the two crashes what're shown as 'other pilots' crashing, the pilots DIDN'T try their best. Both crashes were due to pilot error. Fed Ex 80 didn't flare at 7.8 and use the throttles after the first bounce, and Asiana has THREE pilots in the cockpit and still let the damn thing both get below the glide path AND get so low on speed the stick shaker activated. There was absolutely nothing mechanically wrong with those two planes. The ONLY possible outside issue was Fed Ex having to modify landing for gusty winds that were still within landing limits. The only good thing about these crashes were that there was a minimum of casualties. (Two on Fed Ex, three on Asiana)
Watched a whole documentary on the 4th one. Dude was a mad lad! He was out of fuel so the engine shut down before he could make it to an actual airport so he had to slow the plane down by drifting it like you would a glider and then landed on an racetrack💪 they were able to fly it back for repairs 😎
@@GreenAxolotISome people argue pilot error because they didn't land anywhere else, not knowing that, with that particular damage, there was no way they were gonna land ANYWHERE. If they wanna get pissy at ANYONE about JAL123, get mad at the various defense forces that were arguing about who was in charge that kept anyone from getting out there faster.
Its called a Side slip Its basically crossing the controls to Quickly decend while not losing too much speed Its mostly performed by glider pilots But This captain PERFORMED IT IN A BOEING 767!
Qantas 32 may have seemed “Oh no big deal it’s just the engine and a small park of the wing damaged” THE WIND WAS SEVERELY DAMAGED AND THEY COULD HARDLY CONTROL THE PLANE DUE TO DAMAGES
Dude, the first one that everyone says it was an emergency landing wasn't was not an emergency landing. They were flying out of control but they managed to land safely without hardly any damage to the passengers
NONL NONONO, these pilots did their absolute best to save their passengers even though they didn’t make it, the others actually succeeded but they should get the same respect, they tried their best as so far to lose their job just to save their passengers even though they failed. Respect them both, or don’t respect any.
No, they actually didn't. First off, the Fed Ex is a cargo plane. No passengers. Second, both Fed Ex and Asiana crashed due to pilot error. There was NOTHING wrong with those planes whatsoever. The Fed Ex pilot didn't react properly to the bounced landing, and Asiana had THREE pilots in the cockpit and still couldn't watch their instruments well enough to keep their plane from crashing. Also, only 3 people died on the Asiana flight.
People dying in crashing chaos: this dude: nah not sigma Pilots doing an emergency landing: this dude: now THATS sigma (PS yea I read the pinned comment)
those pilots are trying hard to save the plane while the other pilots are fine with the little damage and the pilots in the other side cant deal with such a damage pay respect to the pilots
