Let's split a Rust crate - Rust live coding

Подписаться 26 тыс.

Просмотров 2 тыс.

50% 1

Here is a video about exporting the JsonValue Extension Trait I'm using into its own crate.
This is part of the new live coding style. Feedback is more than welcome.
Crate URL: crates.io/crat...
GitHub repo: github.com/jer...
I'm trying to worry less about RU-vid views and the algorithm, and focus more on sharing what I think might add value. Feedback is more than welcome.
#rustprogramming #rustlang #ProductionCoding

Опубликовано:

5 окт 2024

Ссылка:

Скачать:

Готовим ссылку...

Добавить в:

Мой плейлист

Посмотреть позже

Комментарии : 13

@TarasShabatin Месяц назад

Thank you 🤗 Please, continue with the similar 🙏

@Amar-pb4bf Месяц назад

Using chatgpt for the documentation was a nice idea, didnt really think of that

@JeremyChone Месяц назад

Thanks. Yes, and the nice thing is that it can be used to check if our API and “concise documentation” are good. There would be more interesting work to be done with Agent to provide instructions on how to format documentation, including style and everything. Anyway, so much potential.

@Boronesss Месяц назад

your videos are all useful. thanks again

@irlshrek Месяц назад

so cool! thanks for making this

@JeremyChone Месяц назад

Thanks for the supportive comment. It's hard sometimes; it looks like those videos are net negative on subscribers, but got to follow the passion. Happy coding! and thanks again.

@gabrielkwong1878 Месяц назад

Love the content, keep it up. I think you can get more views if you make your titles more click baity like Rust Live Coding - Fixing my problem that I have with JsonValue Ext trait blah blah blah or writing my own library to solve this problem(s), just examples, not the best, but maybe an idea. Idk if its a good direction, up to you to decide that but just giving ideas that might attract more audiences and more views. The main idea is that why am I watching this and JsonValue Extension trait is maybe too vague? idk maybe not, not sure. The title is good and clear for the video as a whole and I guess I am talking about the "gaining viewershipness and clicks" aspect of it and maybe there is a best of both worlds here maybe?

@JeremyChone Месяц назад

@@gabrielkwong1878 Awesome feedback. I think you are right. Thanks for the comment, I will think about it.

@jackscalibur Месяц назад

Which theme are you using here? I like it.

@JeremyChone Месяц назад

I start with the default Dark Modern. Plus Google Material Icons (I customize some), and then I change some colors: "workbench.colorCustomizations": { "editor.background": "#000", // before: #1a1a1a default: #1F1F1F "sideBar.background": "#0f0f0f", "terminal.background": "#000", "editor.selectionBackground": "#004973af", // "#33669999", // "#ffDDFF00" "editor.inactiveSelectionBackground": "#33669999", // "#00DDFF21" "editorLineNumber.activeForeground": "#444", "editorLineNumber.foreground": "#444", } I change them once in a while. The funny thing is that I went pure black on the background because the way RU-vid encodes the video makes the code background flicker. So, black is simpler, and actually, I prefer it that way.

@jackscalibur Месяц назад

@@JeremyChone Thanks!