Need to make one correction. The SL 1700 does not have a quartz lock mechanism. The orange strobe light and the 45 and 33 dials allow you to get as close as possible to speed accuracy. But again there is no quartz lock on this particular turntable.
Es exacta su corrección. Pero si está bien ajustado no es problema, porque mantiene muy bien la velocidad, con precisión. Tengo uno y jamás me ha dado problemas con la velocidad.
Bonjour, Je recherche un moteur, stator [(pour les bobines, une HS)] de Technics SL1700. ou auriez-vous une vieille Technics SL1700 en rébus pour choc ? Je suis en France (78). Merci de vos réponses Chris
Bonjour, ce n'est pas un nouveau, mais le tourne-disque vintage original de mon père. Malheureusement, je n'ai pas de telles pièces de rechange. Merci, René
The gathering! you made my day!, here in the USA no one knows about that band. Saludos! I found this turnatable in a local shop and I ma seriously thinking in buying , (that's how i found your video) Is the motor noise too noticeable?
Wrong, wrong, wrong! Why are you online with this when you don’t know what you’re taking about? It’s not quartz. The 1700 Mk II is quartz but not this. You didn’t show the return from the dead wax which is the best feature of the 1700 as compared to the 1200. You don’t go over any comparison to the 1200 which is the whole point of this product. But the worst assertions are that Stylus damage records. This is flat out stupid and wrong. Finally, Digital does not sound better than good vinyl on a good system (one that might include a 1700 in the hands of someone who knows a few things).
wrong wrong wrong. Stop spreading fake news. Analog stuff is always lesser, imprecise reproduction. and obviously the record and stylus degrade over time too. Modern, good digital is a perfect reproductoin of the recorded signal though. And also not even degrade re-playing it back over and over.
