Тёмный
No video :(

Level I CFA: Long Lived Assets Lecture 2 

IFT
Подписаться 129 тыс.
Просмотров 39 тыс.
50% 1

This is Reading 26 for the 2021 exam.
This CFA exam prep video
Intangible assets
Capitalising versus expensing
For the Latest "Quantitative Methods" Full Videos and other Free Materials - Just click here: ift.world/pass...
For more videos, notes, practice questions, mock exams and more visit: www.ift.world/i...
Facebook: Pass.with.IFT

Опубликовано:

 

6 сен 2024

Поделиться:

Ссылка:

Скачать:

Готовим ссылку...

Добавить в:

Мой плейлист
Посмотреть позже
Комментарии : 28   
@IFT-CFA
@IFT-CFA 3 года назад
Active learning is proven to increase understanding and retention by 3 times! To master the Level I Curriculum in 3 simple steps - visit: ift.world/active-learning/
@shamskala9333
@shamskala9333 Год назад
Thanks, one of the best summaries in CFA, if not the best,
@mitaleesinha251
@mitaleesinha251 3 года назад
you mentioned there will be a separate video on the Cap vs Now example. Where can I find that?
@buseaktas3315
@buseaktas3315 3 года назад
+1
@isbahajaz278
@isbahajaz278 3 года назад
Have we been able to locate that?
@abylaysyzdykov7378
@abylaysyzdykov7378 3 года назад
I am little bit confused regarding the CFO and CFI. If we are buying equipment, why are these costs not shown in the CFI in the case of expenses (15:00)
@IFT-CFA
@IFT-CFA 3 года назад
Expensing does not impact CFI. Under capitalization, the €900 purchase is treated as an investing cash outflow. IFT Support Team
@ayushnegi5313
@ayushnegi5313 4 года назад
Hello sir, at @6:00 isn't the 1st point's last sentence and 3rd point's last sentence contradicting to each other. How can we capitalise on development costs in US GAAP? isn't the 1st point stating that both research and development costs are expensed in US GAAP.
@varunravi7753
@varunravi7753 4 года назад
The first point is for all intangible assets except software development The 3 rp point is only for software development
@IFT-CFA
@IFT-CFA 4 года назад
1st points related to intangible assets developed internally for sale; 2nd point relates to intangible assets developed internally for internal use. IFT support team
@dheerajboppi7531
@dheerajboppi7531 4 года назад
Can you pls explain ROE calculation if we do NI/Equity ie 490/1490 for end of year 1, that's come to be 33%. 24% and 20% for end of year 2 and 3 respectively and the same follows with NOW.
@IFT-CFA
@IFT-CFA 4 года назад
in denominator, you need to take average of total equity i.e. for Year 1, average of total assets at Time 0 and Time 1. IFT support team
@reecerosario5509
@reecerosario5509 4 года назад
@@IFT-CFA why do we need to take the average ?
@abhishekchoudhary6395
@abhishekchoudhary6395 4 года назад
@@reecerosario5509 because equity is a balancesheet item but net income is income statement item and balancesheet is always at the end of year but net income is during the year so in order to make them similar you have to take average like we do in inventory turnover ratio i hope you got it
@amanupadhyay8765
@amanupadhyay8765 3 года назад
@@abhishekchoudhary6395 thanks! that cleared it up!
@kakacricket
@kakacricket 4 года назад
broo 16:20 just went over my head where did those numbers come from
@IFT-CFA
@IFT-CFA 4 года назад
shareholders’ equity for a company that capitalises the expenditure will be higher in the early years because the initially higher profits result in initially higher retained earnings IFT support team
@dmoneymonroe
@dmoneymonroe 3 года назад
Hi I think there is an error at 15:41 - shouldn't cash from operations for CAP be 490 not 790? These videos are life savers by the way.
@dmoneymonroe
@dmoneymonroe 3 года назад
just kidding im dumb
@moongarg6418
@moongarg6418 3 года назад
Hi, I am not able to understand in the calculation of ROE,for Company where PPE is capitaized,the value of PPE at the end of year1 is taken as 600?
@IFT-CFA
@IFT-CFA 3 года назад
Yes because it is taken net of depreciation, i.e. 900 - 300 = 600. IFT Support Team
@amanupadhyay8765
@amanupadhyay8765 3 года назад
In simple terms, you're mentioning in the balance sheet the worth of your asset - which decreases by 300 every year because of depreciation. That is why, it's 600 and then 300 and after the 3rd deduction in its value, the asset value of PPE goes down to 0.
@barszczula8159
@barszczula8159 3 года назад
@7:14 us gaap shouldn't be expansed?
@IFT-CFA
@IFT-CFA 3 года назад
Under US GAAP: Software for internal use: All development costs should be capitalized. Software for sale: Costs incurred to develop a software product for sale are expensed until the product’s feasibility is established, and capitalized after the product’s feasibility has been established. Determining feasibility involves judgment. IFT Support Team
@laithb
@laithb 2 года назад
@@IFT-CFA I think you are mistaken here, as the text reads: " Costs incurred to develop a software product for sale are expensed under GAAP until the product's feasibility is established and are capitalized thereafter. Similarly, companies expense costs related to the development of software for internal use until it is probable that the project will be completed and that the software will be used as intended. Thereafter, development costs are capitalized." The treatment should be the same as IFRS, and not capitalize the $120,000.
@arijoymondal1490
@arijoymondal1490 4 года назад
In the slide " Intangible assets developed internally" the last point under US GAAP - shouldn't it be similar to IFRS i.e, expense till feasibility established and then capitalised (as per curriculum) instead of capitalise all development costs?
@IFT-CFA
@IFT-CFA 4 года назад
It states, like IFRS, all development costs for internally use intangible assets are capitalized. IFT support team
@laithb
@laithb 2 года назад
@@IFT-CFA I think you made a mistake here, the treatment for US GAAP is similar to IFRS in that $30,000 are initially expensed and then the remaining amount after feasibility has been established is capitalized, rather than capitalizing the entire amount. "The treatment of software development costs under US GAAP is similar to the treatment of all costs of internally developed intangible assets under IFRS". Please advise. I think you are trying to explain Example 3 from the curriculum, you would be right except for the way you worded your question here in the video, you forgot to mention that prior to starting the project it had established feasibility, ONLY then would it completely capitalize the entire amount, otherwise treatment is similar to IFRS.
Далее
Level I CFA: Long Lived Assets Lecture 3
20:35
Просмотров 36 тыс.
Level I CFA: Understanding Income Statements Lecture 1
17:45
Modus males sekolah
00:14
Просмотров 8 млн
Butch REACT to Creative way to fix damaged tile!
00:46
Просмотров 727 тыс.
Level I CFA: FRA Financial Reporting Quality-Lecture 3
27:18
Level I CFA: FRA Financial Reporting Quality-Lecture 1
24:43
Level I CFA: FRA Income Taxes-Lecture 3
16:45
Просмотров 62 тыс.
Level I CFA: FRA Inventories-Lecture 3
21:48
Просмотров 42 тыс.
FINANCIAL RATIOS: How to Analyze Financial Statements
23:57
Understanding Financial Ratios
11:48
Просмотров 215 тыс.
Modus males sekolah
00:14
Просмотров 8 млн