LIKE A TESLA? 2021 Ford Mustang Mach-E First Edition Review 

Mach 1

Mach 1 since it is not a name plate betrayal

Can u stop acting like this channel is seen by soccer moms and silicon valley dads.

ᴍᴀᴄʜ 1

I'd get the Premium AWD or wait for the GT if I was into American vehicles. But I'd get this over a Model Y any day.

🤣👍

For real

FORD dealer markup the 1st Edition MUCK-e by $10,000

@@markplott4820In the US. My son in Florida just purchased a first addition because the person who placed the order financing feel through. He was at the dealership looking and test driving a base model when the salesperson told him the first addition setting in the rear lot sale had fallen through. He paid sticker (No markup) and was given several freebies from Ford. The next day he had his electrician install the included 240 charger in his garage. He loves his Mach E. I looked at and test drove a premium Mach E in Maryland and there was no markup. It a fantastic vehicle that rides and handles like a performance car. I look at it as a hatchback instead of an SUV. With the new Broncos, Mach E and the new Mach 1. Ford is hitting it out of the park. Regarding your box hauling. Does the frunk work?

@@markplott4820 Some dealers tried that and Ford shut them down.

Yeah Apparently this time he did his homework properly.

@@user-cz8lv7lw5u yeah exactly!

than*

What? All this time Jakub has been the one more informative than Yuri though?

Those two properties will make them the fastest depreciating cars. Demand induced inflated, new price with fear induced WalMart low, used prices!

And you are beta tester if you buy the first edition

Unless it's a comic book or other collectible.

I’d pay for that

I’ll greatly appreciate it

'I've got a lot of problems with you people!'

🙋🏻‍♂️

pretty please, Jakub?

just remember to stab and GO!

Simple math: Full charge range X 80%.

@@heathwirt8919 no! Batteries tend to drain slower the closer they get to around 60 % of charge. So no, that "simple math" wouldn't be so easy, every battery acts a bit differently.

@@vojtechvokoun 20% less stored energy in KWH multiplied by the Miles per KWH would give an accurate prediction. A KWH is a fixed amount of energy.

@@heathwirt8919 you are forgetting about the losses - batteries aren't 100 % effective and the effectiveness is lower on 100 % than on for example 80 or 60 percent.

@@vojtechvokoun Distance testing has shown that remaining range and charge percentage are in fact a relatively linear function and used to predict remaining range. Your comments on losses and effectiveness are vague and not supported by testing.

10/10 rant

He actually looks terrified, lmao

Lol!!!😆😆😆

🥰

DetroitBorg!!! Wow! 😮 Nice to see you here! 🤗🐾

detroit borg!!!! hope you’ve been well.

It is beautiful!!!

It's Ford

Sounds like antiquated laws all around. How does Tesla charge in those States?

@@TheStraightPipes Tesla also bills per minute in those states.

+1. They just fixed this in California a couple of years ago. Really sucked if you ended up at a slower DC charger and had to pay the same rate.

One good thing on the horizon is that six major power companies that serve the southern and southeastern states have formed a charging coalition to establish utility-provided L3 charging within their respective jurisdictions. I live in Mississippi, a state that has one Electrify America charging location and one other single 50kW Greenlots charger, and it not part of the Federal "electric highway" plan (only 2 states are not - MS and South Dakota) so this Coalition will make it possible for EVs to drive across my state, rather then driving around it.

The US electrical grid also can't support the change to electric yet, so it's not practical to buy one here until major changes are made.

The best subscribers on RU-vid

Regular Car Review

@@srafiku9388 BS channel.

Good to see government corruption is alive and well in Canada just like in the US. America may cease to exist over the next 12 months.

It would cost $56 billion in the US and come in 3 years late.

Note that Tesla is opening its chargers to non-Tesla vehicles soon via adapters. Of course, there are fees, but you can use them. That's really good news! It means all electric cars will have a reliable, decent charging networks.

Tesla is opening up its chargers to non-Teslas for a fee, which should resolve the issue.

Pretty much our car buying videos

Why not just make 80% the new 100% and anything over is like a Scotty Bonus on the warp engines of the Enterprise?

What about medially? Unless you meant literally. :) Teehee

Vertically, there's work to do... (helicopter reviews please?)

Right like some get boring you stop watching lmao they make you actually want these cars and it never gets boring

I couldn't get better diagonally though

Vaan Ravishankar lmao bro what😂😂😂😆🤷🏾‍♂️

Don't thank Ford. Thank disgusting liberals.

@@bedlambikes There are so many other things polluting our environment, and people just wanna point the finger at cars. Like, it's so stupid.

@@originallyik elected democrats mandated auto manufacturers to make electric cars.

@@originallyik Transportation is the largest contributor to US greenhouse gas emissions. Perfectly reasonable to prioritize vehicles in combating climate change.

@@NathanRyanAllen Yes, in the US. But, worldwide, statistics show that electricity and energy produce just as much, if not more, greenhouse gas emissions. The United States is doing very well anyway in controlling our emissions of greenhouse gases compared to the likings of China o r India. Targeting transportation such as cars and buses is not going to fix climate change. After all, the world isn't ready for such a drastic change in the industry. Electric vehicles can happen later, not now.

Difference being the mustang 2 was just slow and ugly, this is literally an entirely different car, electric, awd, and most importantly an SUV so not really the same thing, but yea the name probably will help sales

@@Dat4valveGuy I totally agree, it's extremely different. I'm not fully sold on the Mustang name, but at the end of the day I'd rather Ford keep making Raptors, Broncos, and GT500s, not to mention the '16 Ford GT; so if they need to sell an electric crossover with the Mustang name, then sure, I get it. People were mad at the MkV Supra being BMW, mad about the C8 Corvette being mid-engined, and mad when the Gen 2 Raptor had a V6. I don't think Ford would have put the Mustang brand on a new model unless they were sure it wouldn't tank their branding.

@@perotekku I mean yeah from a sales perspective I’m sure it will help them but hopefully it doesn’t become a trend for ford or any manufacturer to name a car the same as another when the only thing they have in common is taillights

Fr. Why does everyone saying “it’s not a Mustang”? Clearly is. It’s better than a normal mustang. I bet I’m a few years everyone will come to their senses and like it.

@@Jeepin290 Where is it better? It clearly lacks a lot of the fun factor you get from a Mustang. Might have a slight edge over a comparable Tesla in cornering, but that's about it.

I don't think you even know what that means you just said it to be generic XD

I disagree. I think the best line is “the government is the government” 😂

Is there anyone who knows about this crypto currency trading and investment stuff? I need to get into it please..

The biggest factor that separates the "expert" from the beginners is knowledge investing with an expert is utilizing that knowledge and experience till you become one, smart move..

I really wanted to trade Crypto currencies but got discouraged by the fluctuations in their price..

@@lizbethfranco5503 That won't bother you if you trade with a professional like Mr Bernado Green his strategies are really good in binary options..

@@josephpoker8914 I totally agree with you, I trade with expert Bernado Green , came across his name in an investment magazine. His trading strategies are top notch..

And now I got to that part or video, whoops.

Lmfaoo

Did it make your pretentious meter explode 😂

You don’t like minimizing button clicks on infotainment... fine

We've already reviewed the mach e when it launched in December lol

@@TheStraightPipes Right, I know. For some reason I read your description and read "Ford Mustang Mach-E GT", but then I realized that doesn't come out until the summer. My point stands, between you guys and Doug DeMuro, that's the earliest accesses I usually see. BTW Sofyan on Redline ordered the MachE GT

for what

@@devestator1007 to have the sound and speed of a TTV8 without having to spend TTV8 gas money

@@masterreach97 🤣🤣

that is one of the features i would like to have on electric cars, to have engine sounds

@@ZhiwaJ I want speeder sounds from star wars 😎👌

just call it a Mustang, for fucks sake, and quit being a child.

That's not how it works. The charging problem is due to the LOW user number. As more and more people use electric cars, more effort is put into the electric infrastructure. Basically, you can't do this kind of reasoning where you assume the number of users increases but we do absolutely nothing to improve the infrastructure. Basically, as more and more people transition to electric cars, better chargers will come into play, faster chargers will come into play and more chargers will come into play. Because of the importance of electric cars on the total cars, more care is put into making sure electric cars have good servicing. The best example of this is.. Literally Tesla which he refers to a lot in the video. Because Tesla has a lot of electric vehicles, its infrastructure is actually pretty good whereas the other chargers all belong to companies who don't have a big foothold in the market so they don't put enough effort. All of that is basics of scaling economies.

@@dzello TLDR - so more people at an electric charger that already takes 8x longer than filling a gas tank is better? hahah

@@MrSchn3ll Actually... Yes. You think our petrol infrastructure was this good when it began? Of course not, it was garbage. But because more and more people got petrol cars, more and better petrol infrastructure was implemented. The more people adopt something, the more it becomes relevant and the more people invest into making it better. Once 25%-35% of cars are electric or something, expect electric infrastructure to be everywhere with absolutely no slow chargers at all (all fast chargers). You'll go anywhere, plug your car and be ready in 5-15 minutes. And that's if you even go anywhere because you can do it at home while you sleep. So in like 10 years, your car will be fully charged at home. You take it, you drive like 1000km no problem. And charging doesn't take long because batteries charge quick unless you 0% to 100% them. If you do short trips, guess what... You don't charge at all. So let's say you just daily drive to get to your job, you'll never go to a charging station at all. Compared to gas cars, that's a 100% improvement.

@@MrSchn3ll tl;dr - in like 10 years, you'll either never stop at a charging station (daily drive) or stop 10 minutes at one (long distance drive).

You just charge at home every night. These are commuter cars. I can’t imagine going to a public charger unless going across country once a year for summer vacation.

It’s pretty easy. Name it

Because the name has a high performance connotation

Followed closely by the new puma

@@anhondacivic6541 😂

Despite all the economic crisis this is the right time to start up an investment

Stocks are good but crypto is more profitable

I wanted to trade crypto but got confused by the fluctuations in price

That won't bother you if you trade with a professional like Mr Mark

I heard that his strategies are really good

1996 Ford ka

74-78 Mustang ii - Jakub

Ford ka 1996 is Big time fun!

Ford Ka looks great. Espocially rear.

@@TheStraightPipes the second gen KA looks worse but the first gen is stunning