Limitless: Top 7 MASSIVE $500.000+ online Poker Pots!

Подписаться 24 тыс.

Просмотров 62 тыс.

50% 1

Free Training by BluffTheSpot: 7 secrets to crush 3bet pots! (For a limited time)
Click here to check it out: www.bluffthespot.com/7-secret...
In this video, MMAsherdog reviews Limitless' Wiktor „limitless“ Malinowski is undoubtedly one of the (if not THE) best online Poker players right now!
Born in 1994 in Poland, Limitless is a former professional handball player who started playing poker seriously in 2014.
At first, he played freerolls and the lowest stakes available for online cash games. Over the next two years, Wiktor Malinowski managed to become a regular at mid to high stakes online cash games playing under the alias "limitless".
In August 2020, Limitless caused a stir when he offered a heads-up challenge to anyone, playing while drunk on Joey Ingram's podcast. (Well, almost anyone. Because Limitless said he won't play LLinusLLove drunk) This offer resulted in some crazy heads up high stakes poker action. Like for example, when Limitless battled LLinusLLove at $50/$100. In this video, you can see MMAsherdog reviewing some epic high stakes hands from this match: • NEW HEADS-UP SERIES! l...
For a short time, Wiktor Malinowski held the world record for the biggest online poker pot in the history of no-limit hold em when he won an $842,438+ pot from Michael Addamo, beating the previous record of $723,938 won by Di Dang against Tom Dwan back in 2008.
However, his record was beaten just a few days later when Ali Imsirovic won a pot of $974,631+ playing online poker. You can see MMAsherdog reviewing this huge poker pot here: • BIGGEST POT in ONLINE ...
But Limitless isn't just super successful when it comes to online cash games, as he also had some great successes in tournaments, including:
-In 2018, limitless won the World Championship of Online Poker $25k High Roller Turbo, winning $726,000+ in the process
-In June 20020, he won the partypoker High Roller Club $25,500 Main Event, winning $443,750
Here you can find some other exciting high stakes heads up matches in which Limitless battles some of the toughest regs on earth:
ONLINE POKER HEADS-UP SERIES! limitless vs. moglimiranda - MMAsherdog reviews High Stakes Poker:
• ONLINE POKER HEADS-UP ...
limitless vs. Fiilismies fireworks at $100/$200 - HU Series - MMAsherdog reviews High Stakes Poker:
• limitless vs Fiilismie...
Limitless vs. makeboifin:
• "F*** Your fancy plays...
Limitless vs. Michael Adamo at $200/$400:
• "Limitless is definite...
Click here to subscribe now: / @bluffthespot
▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬
MMAsherdog: Biggest hands at NL40k:
• MMAsherdog: Biggest ha...
Biggest Triton Poker Pot Ever:
• $2 MILLION POT! Bigges...
▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬
Want to get your game to the next level?
Discover the secrets to poker success in the BluffTheSpot Academy!
Check it out here: www.bluffthespot.com/bts-academy

Опубликовано:

16 ноя 2020

Ссылка:

Скачать:

Готовим ссылку...

Добавить в:

Мой плейлист

Посмотреть позже

Комментарии : 90

@BluffTheSpot 3 года назад

Free Training by MMAsherdog: How To Make More playing Poker by studying less! (For a limited time) Check it out here: bit.ly/how-to-make-more-money-playing-poker

@marshalllawrence8731 3 года назад

that QA CALL would happen if I played 0.01/0.02 on GG, turns out we the same level player just play different stake

@timf7813 3 года назад

Love how you analyze hands man great stuff

@BluffTheSpot 3 года назад

thanks! I appreciate it!

@PokerHero 3 года назад

72s. Can't wait to try that line out.

@BluffTheSpot 3 года назад

Good luck :D

@WretchOnYT 3 года назад

As joe Ingram would say, “there is no longer bad plays, just low frequency plays”. Lol

@PokerHero 3 года назад

@@WretchOnYT Haha good one. When in doubt, just pray to the RNG Gods for a low frequency number.

@Zenji26 2 года назад

Great vid MMA I always find it funny how some of the plays hence the j-9 hand without the money I would’ve believed it was played at nl 10 😂

@Zenji26 2 года назад

Also when TAN shoved the 2 pair A-10 he’s never getting called by worse it’s for sure a bluff I would’ve just called in that spot because there’s no point in raising at least in my mind maybe that’s why I’m not playing at that level :)

@PokerHero 3 года назад

Can't wait for the reviewing MMAsherdog's big hands! 😀

@BluffTheSpot 3 года назад

I already did that. You can find the video here: ru-vid.com/video/%D0%B2%D0%B8%D0%B4%D0%B5%D0%BE-TsQCNspmJ3o.html

@PokerHero 3 года назад

@@BluffTheSpot I meant part 2! I already watched the video you linked a while back.

@hypemania 3 года назад

The deuce definitely wasn't gonna change anything Woww actually...slow down Wiktor can have 72

@ritswik 3 года назад

Now I'm scared to play poker

@stevegoldy2196 3 года назад

Can you review some hands from the LLinusLLove v BERRI SWEET match please?

@BluffTheSpot 3 года назад

Sure, already on the list :)

@stephen3762 3 года назад

The AT looks more like a leveling value shove to me. What would he be trying to get Wiktor to fold? A set of 3's or 6's?

@sesloajit5185 3 года назад

On the flip side what is he trying get called by?

@seiferxd 3 года назад

obv mid flush like 8high

@Giropafiroure 3 года назад

@@seiferxd obv not folding, less if you are limitless and less if Tan have Ax or Kx with spade as a bluff. Why really bluffing in a spot where youre winning a lot by bluffcatching? You lose vs flush combos that never fold (so you will lose more) and probably winning (not really a raise flop by gto) vs just 6 set combos... 0 SENSE. If river would have brought a doubled card I would love it, blocking best fulls and nut flush. But in that spot... It sucks

@bonniedinkis Год назад

there is literally no hand which would bet river for value that is beating AT. also, set of 33 or 66 should really ONLY check back the river if you plugged the hand into the solver, it would probably overbet jam with good flushes and some As blockers, and check back low flushes and all non flush value hands.

@sudstahgaming 3 года назад

That A10 hand represents my whole poker career

@chnwowsb1586 3 года назад

it's pronounced tan like tanned I corrected u last time with the T-ara one lol

@II-no5oi 3 года назад

I don't really understand why he should turn AsT into a bluff which beat every single bluff limitless could have and block As flushes. It's way too strong to turn into a bluff. May be tan could turn his weak AsX one pair to bluff time to time to rep flushes for As blocks flushes. But if he turn his AsX two pair into bluff it's quite sure that he is way overbluffing. And if he turn his two pair into bluff, where is his bluff catcher? Only weak flushes and sets?

@MK-qz7fw 3 года назад

Way too high in your range to bluff and he can't shove for value. He's btn clicking.

@milansimic8862 3 года назад

VIKTOR BAG GG POKER

@timkemmerle9274 3 года назад

Okay so I have a very long question but I feel that I need to provide a lot of context in order to get a proper answer from you all. I am relatively new to poker and have recently became a pokercoahing premium member. I have a full time job and love it so I do not plan to leave it anytime soon. Basically, my main goal in poker is to get good enough to where If I had too I could live comfortably off my poker winnings. Again that is not my plan but that is the bare minimum of how good I would like to become. I mainly play online now at 10NL. I have no interest in sitting on my computer and grinding out the micros to make money. My goal online is not to make money but to practice, put volume in, and get better so when it comes to live poker where the real money is at I will be a much better player. I eventually would like to be playing 2/5 and 5/10 live or even higher if possible and be able to win with a solid win rate. I will grind the micros as long as possible for the soul purpose of getting better. So my question is should I play zoom poker or regular table poker as I climb the micros online. I realize that zoom poker is much harder and there is less of an edge but I am not playing 10NL, 25NL etc. to make money I am simply playing to get better. I am leaning towards zoom poker because if I could play about 2-4 tables of zoom I would be able to put a significant amount of volume in a short period of time which would allow me to prioritize studying. I want to prioritize studying because like I said I have a full time job and cannot play all day everyday.

@hoxton4832 3 года назад

Zoom for sure

@antihackerify 3 года назад

Idk If the live play is the same as online, but i would say it doesnt matter wich table you play, i think regular tables Will have a dinamic a bit closee to the live play, and If you are new tô poker, i highly doubt you can make money playing 4 zoom tables

@timkemmerle9274 3 года назад

@@antihackerify I would not be playing the micro stakes to make money I would be playing to get better. Which is why I was leaning towards zoom because I could get so many more hands in per hour

@antihackerify 3 года назад

@@timkemmerle9274 i play zoom, i was playing 9 tables, but my game was not that good because i didnt have time tô think enough, then again, i never played live poker, but from what i can see on the tv shows etc.., the players at nl200k, are waaaaaaaay worse than players at nl10 zoom, so, gl for u.

@CheddarmanGeo 3 года назад

You should play one table of zoom if you are playing to improve.

@MichaelMuryn 3 месяца назад

TOC (+/- is for win/lost pot for Limitless) 0:55 72s vs ATo (Chris Brewer) +500K$ 4:04 78s vs KKo (J0hn Mcclean) +509K$ 7:55 AQo vs J9o (tan4321) -522K$ 12:44 Ks4s vs AsTd (tan4321) +527K$ 19:05 AQs vs JJo (Chasewind-Xx) -542K$ 21:56 Chasewinbd-Xx said in chinese: 谢谢老板 which means: Thank you boss 23:12 JJo vs AKs (Linus Loeliger) vs QQo (Kuznetsov) -548K$ (winner QQQ) 6-bet-call-call 25:40 AAo vs K5s (Michael Addamo) -576K$ Result-oriented conclusion: Play 72o/s, 78s, J9, K4s, K5s Fold pre AQofDeath, JJ, AA, AK, etc. JJ and QQ might get lucky, but that is villain's luck. This was my master class.

@moodybuddha 3 года назад

Limitless said he will play MMAsherdog drunk, what do you think?

@BluffTheSpot 3 года назад

Would definitely be an interesting game :) However, I'm not specialized at heads up and prefer 6max

@28Rolex28 3 года назад

What a luckbox

@wishkv420 3 года назад

AK was so ahead .. let see .. wow QQQ zHold

@elpeter5442 2 года назад

This guy is crazy, he doesn't feel love for money..

@Stefanburakov 3 года назад

Yin nam bjorn? Mikael Thuritz?

@omerlaleli 3 года назад

2 questions. Is tan really bluffing in AT hand? Normally it seems like a bluff but he may think that he can get called by worse by levelling him up. And second question what is the right play there? Without the dynamic of the game can he find a fold or it is an automatic call?

@gorydays28 3 года назад

I think wiktor prob not heroing without a spade and there aren't any flopped 2P with a spade, and we have the As so he can't have like As6x or As3x. So even if he's raising flop with worse than a flush for value like 63,T6, it's debatable whether he calls down after going 3 streets. So AT seems purely bluffcatcher by the river which I guess he turns into bluff. Not sure tho since we know wiktor doesn't like to fold xD Also we saw another hand (not sure who vs) where tan turns a top pair into a bluff in a deep 3bet or 4bet pot, raising flop and blasting off. So he is for sure capable of turning decent showdown into bluffs.

@omerlaleli 3 года назад

Yes i guess i know that hand tan played againist imsirovic where he had 79 i guess. But it was a different situation because he was gonna loose almost always so he was obligated to turn his hand into bluff. But here it is kind of he doesnt have to. Ur explanation is fine but it leads us to not to turn hand to bluff. Because we know that wiktor is gonna make the call almost always with set or bigger first he has enough odds and second there is a dynamic between players. Thats why i thought that it is not a bluff it is a value heavy push expecting call from worse by levelling him up which is possibile i guess

@gorydays28 3 года назад

@@omerlaleli I agree just calling seems like the play to me, just trying to reason that he probably was bluffing not value shoving

@gorydays28 3 года назад

Also consider wiktor didn't 3bet which removes some strong Ax heros that would fit your levelling theory.

@DannManeuverZ 2 года назад

Lol when you say yeah you know visktors 72 IS always posible 😂😂😂😂😂😂

@alexanderlinton6946 3 года назад

Pretty sure the AT shove is for value. This isn’t PLO

@sesloajit5185 3 года назад

AT did not shove for value

@stephen3762 3 года назад

@@sesloajit5185 Gee great point.

@adamskibrapmanlolage 3 года назад

@@sesloajit5185 Yes he did.. he blocked the nut flush so he assumed the other guy had 2 pair and shoved for value

@sesloajit5185 3 года назад

@@adamskibrapmanlolage and what two pair is that? (T6s) call pre and (65 and A5?) That didnt 3 bet pre? A5 is just ridiculous unless its specifically As5x and Tan has the As. The only hand that calls are 65o (marginal call) but you expect a world class player to check raise middle pair on a monotone board, barrel on an ace turn and then bet on the river and then here is the kicker calls a shove? I haven't even gotten to the problems with the bet sizing. What world do you live in where that's even remotely possible? The only hand that makes sense as a two pair is T6s and A3 (as x/r bottom pair for protection makes sense and I'm not even sure Malinowski would do it on a dangerous monotone board without atleast a spade). Those are the only two pairs that make sense. You think Tan is trying to get value from 3+ 6 combos? No this is obviously not a great bluff as you shouldnt turn your premium bluff catchers into a bluff but it's a bluff.

@mindw0rking 3 года назад

16:32 lmao. Ofc he is value raising at small bet from Limitless. Why would he bluff with top 2 pairs

@jason9979 3 года назад

I really really hope ur a troll. Or else gtfo ^^

@masticloxpoker1006 2 года назад

@@jason9979 no people are actually that bad at Poker, even now even after solvers even after all the youtubers analyzing spots etc.

@user37437 3 года назад

MMA is 1k/2k game with straddle is NL2k or it is NL4k game?

@edwardhalmarack7122 3 года назад

nl100k with straddles

@BluffTheSpot 3 года назад

It's nl100k with straddles. You need to multiply the big bling with 100 in order to come up with the correct "NL". for example: $1/$2 is NL200. $100/$200 is NL20k; etc.

@biszkoptbiszkiewicz1054 2 года назад

When you play with 72, when you 3bet, when you call 4bet with this hand, you are fish amator. When pros play with 72 he is super strong player shark. I need play with "pros" for bitting easly