Thank you for learning with me! If you found this video helpful, please give it a THUMBS UP & LEAVE A COMMENT and be sure to SUBSCRIBE to my channel (I could really use the support!). Subscribe Here: bit.ly/2yRUQS1 -Anthony :)
It depends on the type of learner you are....how your brain is wired.....I really don't find these graphic videos helpful at all....abstract informations is better....it all depends
@It’s Me Savanah I’m watching this video after hours of frustration. Guess I’m not trying hard enough. Must be nice to be a math genius where everything comes easy to you.
I took math up to the Calculus BC level (in which I succeeded), yet when I had to take an entry exam for math for college, I couldn't believe how many things I never learned. As this was one of them, I appreciate you very much for making this quick and easy.
Repent of your sins and believe on Adonai Jesus Christ, believe in your heart that He has died for sins and rose from the tomb on the third day and let the Holy Spirit within you, and you shall be saved. - Jesus the Christ loves you, praise YHWH our Elohim - Evidence for Jesus Christ’s existence, crucifixion, and disappearance from the tomb (He rose from it): The Lord Jesus Christ did exist, gathered disciples, and was crucified and went missing from the tomb. To argue about wether He was taken from the grave or rose from it, is an argument a skeptic can make. Because well if you disregard the eye witness testimony of the disciples and there willingness to die for Christ, and humans won’t die for something they know is a lie, when Peter is pinned upside down to that cross, he could have said that it was a fake, but He didn’t because it wasn’t, what care would he have about death in this world if he knew for a fact he had assurance of a life in another, Jesus Christ did rise from the tomb and is the King of Kings and Lord of Lords. Now the evidence for the Lord Jesus Christ’s existence really isn’t hard to find a multitude of non-Christian scholars and historians mention Him within 150 years after the time of His life. One such is Tacitus a Roman historian who reported on emperor nero’s decision to blame the Christians for the fire that had destroyed rome in 64 AD. Tacitus wrote: “Nero fastened the guilt ... on a class hated for their abominations, called Christians by the populace. Christus, from whom the name had its origin, suffered the extreme penalty during the reign of Tiberius at the hands of ... Pontius Pilatus, and a most mischievous superstition, thus checked for the moment, again broke out not only in Judaea, the first source of the evil, but even in Rome…” In this Tacitus makes reference to not only Christians, but Christ calling Him Christus and confirming the Gospels going on to say that He suffered the extreme penalty (crucifixion) under the reign of Tiberius and by the sentence of Pontius Pilate, which like I said confirms the Gospels narrative. Another important source of evidence about Jesus and early Christianity can be found in the letters of Pliny the Younger to Emperor Trajan. Pliny was the Roman governor of Bithynia in Asia Minor. In one of his letters, dated around A.D. 112, he asks Trajan's advice about the appropriate way to conduct legal proceedings against those accused of being Christians. Pliny says that he needed to consult the emperor about this issue because a great multitude of every age, class, and sex stood accused of Christianity. At one point in his letter, Pliny relates some of the information he has learned about these Christians: “They were in the habit of meeting on a certain fixed day before it was light, when they sang in alternate verses a hymn to Christ, as to a god, and bound themselves by a solemn oath, not to any wicked deeds, but never to commit any fraud, theft or adultery, never to falsify their word, nor deny a trust when they should be called upon to deliver it up; after which it was their custom to separate, and then reassemble to partake of food - but food of an ordinary and innocent kind.” This passage provides a number of interesting insights into the beliefs and practices of early Christians. First, we see that Christians regularly met on a certain fixed day for worship. Second, their worship was directed to Christ, demonstrating that they firmly believed in His divinity. Furthermore, one scholar interprets Pliny's statement that hymns were sung to Christ, "as to a god", as a reference to the rather distinctive fact that, "unlike other gods who were worshipped, Christ was a person who had lived on earth." If this interpretation is correct, Pliny understood that Christians were worshipping an actual historical person as God! Of course, this agrees perfectly with the New Testament doctrine that Jesus was both God and man. You may have heard of the scholar Flavius Josephus who mentioned James as being the brother of the Lord Jesus Christ, which matches what Paul said calling James “The Lord’s brother” and there is another document that Josephus may have written which goes: “About this time there lived Jesus, a wise man, if indeed one ought to call him a man. For he ... wrought surprising feats.... He was the Christ. When Pilate ...condemned him to be crucified, those who had . . . come to love him did not give up their affection for him. On the third day he appeared ... restored to life.... And the tribe of Christians ... has ... not disappeared.” Now it’s up to debate wether this is the entirely original document of what Josephus wrote, or if a Christian had edited it. But regardless he wrote about the Lord Jesus Christ. Wether it was negative or positive like the possible document is. Anyways there are many other statements, documents, letters, and writings of all sorts from the ancient world talking about the Lord Jesus Christ and there is not one question if He was a real person or if He was crucified and went missing from the grave. That is clear as day, He is a real person, was crucified, and went missing from the grave. And He did rise from the grave. And for more evidence of the Lord Jesus Christ, there’s the Bible and you see there is no evidence the Bible is corrupted, a lie, created by the Roman government, folktale. It is the recount of the Disciples of the Lord Jesus Christ, now wether you want to believe it is up to you. And what profit was there in spreading Christianity, All the early Christian suffered persecution, beatings, and were killed. Another Scholar reported that James the Lord’s Brother was thrown off a building and then stoned to death for spreading the Gospel in Jerusalem. These people went to great lengths even giving their own lives for the Adon Jesus the Christ.
Repent of your sins and believe on Adonai Jesus Christ, believe in your heart that He has died for sins and rose from the tomb on the third day and let the Holy Spirit within you, and you shall be saved. - Jesus the Christ loves you, praise YHWH our Elohim - Evidence for Jesus Christ’s existence, crucifixion, and disappearance from the tomb (He rose from it): The Lord Jesus Christ did exist, gathered disciples, and was crucified and went missing from the tomb. To argue about wether He was taken from the grave or rose from it, is an argument a skeptic can make. Because well if you disregard the eye witness testimony of the disciples and there willingness to die for Christ, and humans won’t die for something they know is a lie, when Peter is pinned upside down to that cross, he could have said that it was a fake, but He didn’t because it wasn’t, what care would he have about death in this world if he knew for a fact he had assurance of a life in another, Jesus Christ did rise from the tomb and is the King of Kings and Lord of Lords. Now the evidence for the Lord Jesus Christ’s existence really isn’t hard to find a multitude of non-Christian scholars and historians mention Him within 150 years after the time of His life. One such is Tacitus a Roman historian who reported on emperor nero’s decision to blame the Christians for the fire that had destroyed rome in 64 AD. Tacitus wrote: “Nero fastened the guilt ... on a class hated for their abominations, called Christians by the populace. Christus, from whom the name had its origin, suffered the extreme penalty during the reign of Tiberius at the hands of ... Pontius Pilatus, and a most mischievous superstition, thus checked for the moment, again broke out not only in Judaea, the first source of the evil, but even in Rome…” In this Tacitus makes reference to not only Christians, but Christ calling Him Christus and confirming the Gospels going on to say that He suffered the extreme penalty (crucifixion) under the reign of Tiberius and by the sentence of Pontius Pilate, which like I said confirms the Gospels narrative. Another important source of evidence about Jesus and early Christianity can be found in the letters of Pliny the Younger to Emperor Trajan. Pliny was the Roman governor of Bithynia in Asia Minor. In one of his letters, dated around A.D. 112, he asks Trajan's advice about the appropriate way to conduct legal proceedings against those accused of being Christians. Pliny says that he needed to consult the emperor about this issue because a great multitude of every age, class, and sex stood accused of Christianity. At one point in his letter, Pliny relates some of the information he has learned about these Christians: “They were in the habit of meeting on a certain fixed day before it was light, when they sang in alternate verses a hymn to Christ, as to a god, and bound themselves by a solemn oath, not to any wicked deeds, but never to commit any fraud, theft or adultery, never to falsify their word, nor deny a trust when they should be called upon to deliver it up; after which it was their custom to separate, and then reassemble to partake of food - but food of an ordinary and innocent kind.” This passage provides a number of interesting insights into the beliefs and practices of early Christians. First, we see that Christians regularly met on a certain fixed day for worship. Second, their worship was directed to Christ, demonstrating that they firmly believed in His divinity. Furthermore, one scholar interprets Pliny's statement that hymns were sung to Christ, "as to a god", as a reference to the rather distinctive fact that, "unlike other gods who were worshipped, Christ was a person who had lived on earth." If this interpretation is correct, Pliny understood that Christians were worshipping an actual historical person as God! Of course, this agrees perfectly with the New Testament doctrine that Jesus was both God and man. You may have heard of the scholar Flavius Josephus who mentioned James as being the brother of the Lord Jesus Christ, which matches what Paul said calling James “The Lord’s brother” and there is another document that Josephus may have written which goes: “About this time there lived Jesus, a wise man, if indeed one ought to call him a man. For he ... wrought surprising feats.... He was the Christ. When Pilate ...condemned him to be crucified, those who had . . . come to love him did not give up their affection for him. On the third day he appeared ... restored to life.... And the tribe of Christians ... has ... not disappeared.” Now it’s up to debate wether this is the entirely original document of what Josephus wrote, or if a Christian had edited it. But regardless he wrote about the Lord Jesus Christ. Wether it was negative or positive like the possible document is. Anyways there are many other statements, documents, letters, and writings of all sorts from the ancient world talking about the Lord Jesus Christ and there is not one question if He was a real person or if He was crucified and went missing from the grave. That is clear as day, He is a real person, was crucified, and went missing from the grave. And He did rise from the grave. And for more evidence of the Lord Jesus Christ, there’s the Bible and you see there is no evidence the Bible is corrupted, a lie, created by the Roman government, folktale. It is the recount of the Disciples of the Lord Jesus Christ, now wether you want to believe it is up to you. And what profit was there in spreading Christianity, All the early Christian suffered persecution, beatings, and were killed. Another Scholar reported that James the Lord’s Brother was thrown off a building and then stoned to death for spreading the Gospel in Jerusalem. These people went to great lengths even giving their own lives for the Adon Jesus the Christ.
@@c4-quick-peek284 Repent of your sins and believe on Adonai Jesus Christ, believe in your heart that He has died for sins and rose from the tomb on the third day and let the Holy Spirit within you, and you shall be saved. - Jesus the Christ loves you, praise YHWH our Elohim - Evidence for Jesus Christ’s existence, crucifixion, and disappearance from the tomb (He rose from it): The Lord Jesus Christ did exist, gathered disciples, and was crucified and went missing from the tomb. To argue about wether He was taken from the grave or rose from it, is an argument a skeptic can make. Because well if you disregard the eye witness testimony of the disciples and there willingness to die for Christ, and humans won’t die for something they know is a lie, when Peter is pinned upside down to that cross, he could have said that it was a fake, but He didn’t because it wasn’t, what care would he have about death in this world if he knew for a fact he had assurance of a life in another, Jesus Christ did rise from the tomb and is the King of Kings and Lord of Lords. Now the evidence for the Lord Jesus Christ’s existence really isn’t hard to find a multitude of non-Christian scholars and historians mention Him within 150 years after the time of His life. One such is Tacitus a Roman historian who reported on emperor nero’s decision to blame the Christians for the fire that had destroyed rome in 64 AD. Tacitus wrote: “Nero fastened the guilt ... on a class hated for their abominations, called Christians by the populace. Christus, from whom the name had its origin, suffered the extreme penalty during the reign of Tiberius at the hands of ... Pontius Pilatus, and a most mischievous superstition, thus checked for the moment, again broke out not only in Judaea, the first source of the evil, but even in Rome…” In this Tacitus makes reference to not only Christians, but Christ calling Him Christus and confirming the Gospels going on to say that He suffered the extreme penalty (crucifixion) under the reign of Tiberius and by the sentence of Pontius Pilate, which like I said confirms the Gospels narrative. Another important source of evidence about Jesus and early Christianity can be found in the letters of Pliny the Younger to Emperor Trajan. Pliny was the Roman governor of Bithynia in Asia Minor. In one of his letters, dated around A.D. 112, he asks Trajan's advice about the appropriate way to conduct legal proceedings against those accused of being Christians. Pliny says that he needed to consult the emperor about this issue because a great multitude of every age, class, and sex stood accused of Christianity. At one point in his letter, Pliny relates some of the information he has learned about these Christians: “They were in the habit of meeting on a certain fixed day before it was light, when they sang in alternate verses a hymn to Christ, as to a god, and bound themselves by a solemn oath, not to any wicked deeds, but never to commit any fraud, theft or adultery, never to falsify their word, nor deny a trust when they should be called upon to deliver it up; after which it was their custom to separate, and then reassemble to partake of food - but food of an ordinary and innocent kind.” This passage provides a number of interesting insights into the beliefs and practices of early Christians. First, we see that Christians regularly met on a certain fixed day for worship. Second, their worship was directed to Christ, demonstrating that they firmly believed in His divinity. Furthermore, one scholar interprets Pliny's statement that hymns were sung to Christ, "as to a god", as a reference to the rather distinctive fact that, "unlike other gods who were worshipped, Christ was a person who had lived on earth." If this interpretation is correct, Pliny understood that Christians were worshipping an actual historical person as God! Of course, this agrees perfectly with the New Testament doctrine that Jesus was both God and man. You may have heard of the scholar Flavius Josephus who mentioned James as being the brother of the Lord Jesus Christ, which matches what Paul said calling James “The Lord’s brother” and there is another document that Josephus may have written which goes: “About this time there lived Jesus, a wise man, if indeed one ought to call him a man. For he ... wrought surprising feats.... He was the Christ. When Pilate ...condemned him to be crucified, those who had . . . come to love him did not give up their affection for him. On the third day he appeared ... restored to life.... And the tribe of Christians ... has ... not disappeared.” Now it’s up to debate wether this is the entirely original document of what Josephus wrote, or if a Christian had edited it. But regardless he wrote about the Lord Jesus Christ. Wether it was negative or positive like the possible document is. Anyways there are many other statements, documents, letters, and writings of all sorts from the ancient world talking about the Lord Jesus Christ and there is not one question if He was a real person or if He was crucified and went missing from the grave. That is clear as day, He is a real person, was crucified, and went missing from the grave. And He did rise from the grave. And for more evidence of the Lord Jesus Christ, there’s the Bible and you see there is no evidence the Bible is corrupted, a lie, created by the Roman government, folktale. It is the recount of the Disciples of the Lord Jesus Christ, now wether you want to believe it is up to you. And what profit was there in spreading Christianity, All the early Christian suffered persecution, beatings, and were killed. Another Scholar reported that James the Lord’s Brother was thrown off a building and then stoned to death for spreading the Gospel in Jerusalem. These people went to great lengths even giving their own lives for the Adon Jesus the Christ.
The Three great arguments: the cosmological argument, the teleological, and the moral argument. Starting with the cosmological. If there is a painting there must be a painter, if there is a book it must have a writer, and if there is any creation at all, it must have a creator. Now the things is scientists and atheists will even admit now that everything and all that there is came from a single point and TIME and SPACE both had a beginning at this point. It is called the Big Bang theory, which all that there is including Time and Space came into existence. Now so that implies whatever created it or set the Big Bang into motion, had to be Timeless(existed before time),Immaterial(existed before space), Personal(choosing to set the Big Bang in motion) so now we already have a pretty good description of something they resembles the theistic God, now let’s continue. But some will say “Oh another universe set the Big Bang into motion.” Well one there is no way to tell if there are other universes as they are outside our own, and two even if there are, some cosmologists say that even if there are, they all have to have a beginning and ultimate start. And so back to existing before time and space. Whoever set the Big Bang in motion had no beginning nor end, and is immaterial. Now having no beginning or end makes them infinite now being infinite we are starting to get some pretty Godly traits. So the basis of the cosmological argument is that you can’t have creation without a creator. Now for the teleological argument. The design argument. Now the cosmos is so fine tuned it is insane, if you were to stretch a tape measure across the whole known universe and move the force of gravity by 1 inch you wouldn’t have the universe ( I know gravity isn’t measured in inches, it’s just a way of explaining it), and if you didn’t already know Earth is in what is called the goldy locks zone or the habitable zone, as move is a little further away from the sun, we freeze, move us a little closer to the sun, we burn up. Another example is if the thousands upon thousands of giant stars that surround us. You Move any of them closer. The earth doesn’t exist, and Jupiter, without Jupiter the Earth doesn’t exist, there are asteroid holes in Jupiter’s atmosphere that are bigger than the earth, and if you didn’t know Jupiter is basically an Asteroid magnet because of it’s vast gravitational force. Now if the moon was a different size or any closer or further from the earth, we don’t exist, if the oxygen levels were just 10% lower we would all suffocate, 10% higher and we would have all kinds of fires. The cosmos and earth are fine tuned for life, that is the teleological argument. And not to mention the fact that the percentages for the earth to be where it is, how it is, and why it is are so rare it’s ridiculous there are billions maybe even trillions of planets yet we have found little to none that resemble the earth, and none with life, just think about that for a second, a vast cosmos with more in it than you could ever aspire to think of, and we are the only life in it, out of the billions upon billions of planets. Now the moral argument is the argument which we all know, it is the argument of right and wrong, inherently you know it is wrong to kill millions of people in a Holocaust, to sexually violate children, to torture babies. Now those were some pretty extreme ones, but the principle remains the same that there is an objective standard for what is wrong. Did you not feel wrong the first time you knowingly lied, or stole, or cheated, or hurt someone. If you have done any of those things, that is. And if there is no God there is no objective morality. In the Bible it says the law is written on our hearts. So if there is no God all morality is subjective. It’s your opinion against holsters, your opinion against the child predator, your opinion against the baby torturer and if there if is no God it means it’s up to your nation to decide morality. When the Germans were on trial for what they had done to the Jews and other minority groups. They retaliated saying that, “who are you to say that the opinion of your nation is better than the opinion of ours. Who are you to tell us we are wrong and you are right.” Bu the prosecutor stood up and said to them “ You know what you have done is wrong for there is a law above the law.” This is the law of objective morality that is written on our hearts. Without God there is no good or bad. There is just opinion versus opinion. And nothing is objective. But we know it’s objective. You know it’s wrong what hitler did. You know someone who sexually violates children is evil. You know that torturing babies is wrong. There is a moral law and if there is a moral law there is a moral law giver. You know there is an objective good and bad. And God has set this standard.
this is SO helpful because im someone who dropped math during my 11th and 12th grade, and never took it up during undergrad. This cleared up my concept so well.
Thanks for the comment, Roshan! I'm so glad that you enjoyed the lesson. I hope that you can give the video a thumbs up, subscribe to our channel, and continue learning math with us! -Anthony :)
Thanks a lot for making these kind of things. I normally wouldn’t watch videos like this but my teacher is horrible at explanations so this really helped a lot.
Wow! Lovely graphics. It was very easy to follow and understand. I really like all the colors and sound effects. I actually watched through the whole video rather than skipping boring parts. Great job! Thanks for the helpful video!
This is the best explanation for a math concept I've ever seen. It's clear, concise, and answers any questions you could have. I'm watching this as a review before my EOC testing and it's certainly gonna boost my score as I had for got this because my teacher isn't the most amazing at his job.
Why is this maths channel so good.... The graphics are fantastic - colourful and coded. The teacher revises what we know already. The teacher goes slowly and deliberately through each stage. There are plenty of examples. This is just best teaching practice. Fantastic!!
I struggled with that topic since 3 weeks. I watched a lot of video but I didn't understand until I saw your video. very simple and very well explained. YOU DESERVE MORE FOLLOWERS !
I think this may end up being my go-to channel for helping my son with his math. I'm great at it, but it's been 20 years and this gives me a refresher as well!
Praise Jesus Christ, thanks sir for this excellent video. You certainly receive 100% percent for your lesson. my mind is open again to learn this topic.
Its simple. If u have two equation substitute 0 for both equations and try to get tge points. Eg 2x+3y=6 First put 0 in x It becomes 3y=6 Hence y=2 Now put 0 in y It becomes 2x=6 X=3 The points are (0,2) and (3,0) draw this in the graph and u can u will get it
I'm having a hard time trying to see how he graphed the first example of linear equation. I know he said the y is -2 and then used the slope but how did he find the slope?
i have got a question; in school they told us that u shade the region that doesnot satisfy the equation but u r shading the region that satisfies the equation.
Thank you so much for the detailed explanation... it’s really very helpful ... your voice is clear and your speed is just right 👍🏻🌷🌷 I’ve watched a dozen of videos about this topic which was very confusing & very hard for me to understand until l watched your simple well organized video that makes a lot of sense ... MAY GOD BLESS YOU..
quick question: if the symbol is greater than or greater than or equal to, does that mean the shaded part is automatically on top of the line and vice versa???
Helped me so much because during class I was like I don't get this at all so difficult!!! And when I saw the full video I was like so easy !! I took notes 🙏🙏🙏 thank youuuuu
