The video only covers some aspects which should be given a thought before you are going to select any OS and so accordingly the winner of the debate is decided in the video. But still there are many things to be considered before choosing an OS but are not mentioned in the video (which will make this video much longer & the purpose to give you awareness in lesser time will not be fulfilled), so keep in mind that you have to choose OS for yourself based on your own needs and priorities, this video only discuss some popular aspects which people usually look forward to before choosing an OS.
The video is in such a organized way, that you can clearly understand the reason for choosing LINUX or WINDOWS according to your personal preferences🥰🥰
@@kjejon1 Sure it is perfectly fine to be used, but still most popularly used one is Windows because of it's simplicity and availability of mainstream applications.
I was on Windows 10. Yeah it wouldn't let me upgrade and I was getting tired of it anyway so I installed Linux Mint on one computer and kept the other computer on Windows 10. Just in case. Haven't even turned on the computer that still has Windows 10 in over 60 days but I'll keep Windows 10 installed on it....for now.
I did something similar which is Dual Booting Linux and Windows 10, I did it months prior as soon as they announced Microsoft Copilot, plus my other reason is that I don't have enough memory on one hard drive to update any further
Very similar here. I have a backup Windows PC, separate to my main one which I moved to Linux Mint a few months ago. After a couple of months, I realised I hadn't switched on the Windows PC for a while. It spent 10 minutes updating and then decided I could no longer access my OneDrive Personal Vault via the file manager (not a problem two months earlier). Bye Windows.
The answer is if you have brain cells Linux if you don't like me and just want to play the game Windows I'm not learning command lines I'm not learning CMD not doing any of that give me a UI and I'll click the button that says play
Windows 10 and 11 are both objectively better than any Linux distribution. Oh and Linux being secure....LOL...that IS a fable. A false one as well. It's an Emmentaler cheese of new and very old vulnerabilities and bugs from kernel to DEs, applications, graphic stacks, windowing protocols, etc...
Respect your opinion mate but, calling Linux a ‘security cheese’ is a bit of a stretch. Linux benefits from being open-source, where vulnerabilities are often patched faster than on proprietary systems like Windows. In terms of security, Linux excels with its permissions system, being less targeted by malware, and its customizability. As for Windows 10/11 being "objectively" better, it really depends on the use case. For servers, privacy, and open-source flexibility, Linux often comes out ahead. btw, thanks for the LOL moment - gotta love a good Emmentaler cheese reference though.😅
@@technetiumm " vulnerabilities are often patched faster than... " --- when there is someone for it. You have no idea about the amount of still unsolved serious vulnerabilites in every layer of Linux (from kernel up to user space, in everything), many of those no one cares about anymore (no person to patch available). I advice not to research it too deep either, it's a scare for life. Linux can be (and should be) hardened for added security by the user, if someone is technically inclined and has a lot of times, yes, and there are publications for it to help that, but Linux is not automatically more secure. That's a cute myth coming from the lower amount of targeting.
And Windows was famous that they didn't fix security holes because it would break compatibility, so they left security holes wide open and fixed things on service pack (and that break stuff). In reality there isn't much of difference in vulnerabilities because almost all Linux distributions and Windows are made similar development process. What makes difference is that Linux based operating systems allows much better to strip off extra functionality and make minimal OS dedicated for task, and removing all unnecessary code where security holes might exist. That is where Linux based operating systems wins Windows easily. This feature together with that Linux is defacto standard on servers, most of the computer infrastructure runs on Linux. Not Windows 10 or 11.
Linux is faster and you can do pretty much whatever you want on it. Also Microsoft is spying on Windows. If you capture your internet packages you can find some packages going to Microsoft. And you are mostly safe on both if you dont download things that you dont know. On Linux you can use nearly any program that you can use on Windows but if the program's creator decides to remove it you cant use it on Windows (like adobe flash or paint 3d). I like paint 3d its easy to use but Microsoft is going to remove it. Windows' only point is gaming, Linux can be harder to use but there is always a solution to your problem on the internet.
There was major error in video. Windows is not what developers love. Let me explain: What is the current status in software, Microsoft made colossal mistake back 90s. They had huge market position but instead of standardizing stuff, they choose greedy route. Details were kept secret and they put expensive price tag to native development tools. Microsoft stock skyrocketed for sure but all the brightest developers that made startups since late 90s see though that and they didn't want to build their business that is based on royalties to Microsoft. What happened is that Microsoft lost whole generation of developers to open source stack and even Sun Microsoft strategy worked better and Java gained popularity. Microsoft was left to older, previous generation established companies that were already adopted DOS/Windows. To make situation even worse, Microsoft was always late to embracing web technologies. Today there is literally million software available for FREE. Stuff that we could only dream back in 90s, and easiest way to use those is build software top on Linux. That is caused that people with programming skills use all technology for free and they build businesses, and then there are plebs using Windows and they pay subscriptions to use tech.
You make an interesting point about how Microsoft's approach in the 90s led many developers toward open-source solutions. It's true that open-source technology has gained massive traction, providing developers with powerful tools for free, especially in areas like Linux and Java. However, it's also important to recognize that Microsoft has made efforts to embrace open-source in recent years, with initiatives like the acquisition of GitHub and the development of cross-platform tools like .NET Core. It's fascinating to see how both proprietary and open-source ecosystems have evolved, each offering distinct advantages.
Linux had a reputation for being difficult to use, only accessible to highly technical users. However, distributions like Linux Mint are designed to be user-friendly, making Linux accessible to everyday users without needing expert skills.
Linux Mint is not the only distribution Linux have, so you cannot judge whole Linux based thing on a single distribution which was designed to be user friendly, while there are bunch of distributions still out there that require technical knowledge to operate.
Think about that some might lack a confidence to talk in public, even if that's a video, or do not deem own voice suitable for narration. Who knows...this voice over however wasn't as bad as others and the video has SOME truth in it, even if it isn't correct entirely or didn't fully disclose everything.
