List Of All Active Aircraft Carriers That Are In Service (2021)

Подписаться 363 тыс.

Просмотров 2 млн

50% 1

Check out the Military playlist from the Buzz: • 10 Most Expensive Mili...
------------
Video description: Aircraft carrier is considered the most valuable sea-based asset, and offers an incomparable military instrument with its ability to project tactical Air Power over long distances. Yet only few countries have them and there are only 22 Active Aircraft Carriers. This video presents a list of all the Active Aircraft Carriers of the world that are in service.
Enjoy watching. Cheers!
------------
Credits:
free3d.com/
www.turbosquid...
www.turbosquid...
www.globalsecu...
grabcad.com/li...
www.the-bluepr...
military.wikia...
www.valka.cz/E...
www.turbosquid... by Omegavision
www.turbosquid... by Infinite3dfx
www.turbosquid...
www.turbosquid... Omegavision
www.turbosquid... by Omegavision
www.turbosquid...
www.turbosquid...
www.turbosquid...
www.turbosquid...
------------
FAIR-USE COPYRIGHT DISCLAIMER
* Copyright Disclaimer under Section 107 of the Copyright Act 1976, allowance is made for "fair use" for purposes such as criticism, commenting, news reporting, teaching, scholarship, and research. Fair use is a use permitted by copyright statute that might otherwise be infringing. Non-profit, educational or personal use tips the balance in favour of fair use.
The Buzz does not own the rights to these videos and pictures. They have, in accordance with fair use, been repurposed with the intent of educating and inspiring others. However, if any content owners would like their images removed, please contact us by email at-thebuzz938@gmail.com.

Развлечения

Опубликовано:

27 авг 2024

Ссылка:

Скачать:

Готовим ссылку...

Добавить в:

Мой плейлист

Посмотреть позже

Комментарии : 2,2 тыс.

@Roset595 2 года назад

Other countries: "Yay I made the list!" USA: "I am the list."

@royinglemon3654 2 года назад

FUCKING "A"

@onlythewise1 2 года назад

all roads lead to new York thanks to great whites or Europeans

@williamsupinski64 2 года назад

America...Fuck yeah! Coming agian to save the mother fuckin day yeah!

@onlythewise1 2 года назад

@@williamsupinski64 ya right

@williamsupinski64 2 года назад

@@onlythewise1 um, it's a joke. Have you ever seen the movie'Team America' its funny as hell.

@filippomunari8147 2 года назад

fun fact: after WW2 italy can’t have aircraft carriers, we overcome this problem calling them “navi a ponte lungo” (long-deck ships) this is what is called a pro gamer move

@giuliomachiavelli3414 2 года назад

O portaeromobili

@taotao98103 2 года назад

I guess the UN just look the other way otherwise people can use their eyes.

@thelitsquad2718 2 года назад

I believe it was recently announced that Japan was going to have an aircraft carrier

@aflyingcowboy31 2 года назад

@@thelitsquad2718It's not classified as an aircraft carrier, after WW2 a similar thing happened to Japan as with Italy. Under the Japanese constitution "land, sea, and air forces, as well as other war potential, will never be maintained" so to get around this the Japanese have labelled their "aircraft carriers" as Multi-Purpose Destroyers even though for all intents and purpose it is of course an aircraft carrier.

@jdb47games 2 года назад

The Royal Navy in the 1970's initially classed the Invincible class carriers as 'through decked cruisers' as the British government had taken a policy decision a decade earlier to build no more aircraft carriers.

@patrickfinnegan9106 2 года назад

So I will note that multiple light aircraft carriers or amphibious assault ships were noted for other nations outside of the US. The US not only has 11 active supercarriers (all of which have an air wing twice the size of the next nation's largest), but also an additional 16 light carriers/amphibious assault ships that carry 25+ aircraft, including the VTOL, F35-Lightning II and Harrier.

@dreadfulbodyguard7288 2 года назад

US isn't preparing for war with other countries. They are preparing for alien invasion.

@cascadesouthernmodeltrains7547 2 года назад

@@dreadfulbodyguard7288 for that we need the Iowas back in service. Didn’t you see the movie?

@RealHank1791 2 года назад

@@cascadesouthernmodeltrains7547 Don't forget the South Dakota class. 3/4 the length but faster without compromising armor or armaments.

@cascadesouthernmodeltrains7547 2 года назад

@@RealHank1791 that gives us 2 more ships.

@maolo76 2 года назад

A hypersonic missiles from a Mig31 and everyone would be sunk

@Rockhound6165 2 года назад

I had never seen an aircraft carrier before. Until one night we were driving past NY Harbor and one was anchored there. I was simply blown away how massive it was. It was as tall as a skyscraper.

@Lemurion287 2 года назад

I used to live near Bremerton WA, and I remember driving past the mothball fleet and the reserve carriers were so big it felt like they were towering over you. Just stunning.

@tuftyterror983 2 года назад

Live in port orchard just across the water from Bremerton. They still have one or two mothballs, but over half of em got scrapped recently.

@Lemurion287 2 года назад

@@tuftyterror983 yeah, this was almost 20 years ago, and I was living in Port Orchard at the time.

@tuftyterror983 2 года назад

@@Lemurion287 yeah. Thats cool. Port Orchard is still, well, Port Orchard. Just a small-ish town with lots of antique and thrift stores.

@larryoneill7432 2 года назад

That’s the USS Intrepid. It’s a museum now

@misterboot6682 2 года назад

As a Canadian I don't like war but I'm happy we are friends with the Yankees 😅

@MacTac141 2 года назад

Hopefully Canada finally starts investing in our military. We have more coastline than any other country and we can’t even protect it ourselves, let alone project any semblance of naval power If Australia with an economy hundreds of billions smaller can afford 2 aircraft carriers, what’s our excuse for being so weak?

@Justin-ui5ti 2 года назад

@@MacTac141 I suppose because Canada has considerable protection with the US military. Alaska is to the North so Canada has Northern support from there to ensure that Russia doesn't get any ideas. The defense of Canada is in the best interest of the US because if Canada is ever attacked, the US is in grave threat of getting attacked. Australia doesn't have that luxury, hence why they have to be a bit more investing into their military defense.

@starwarsfannumber 2 года назад

And us veterans are also proud of our candidan allies and we are not Yankees that was a baseball that had no players go to the war when just about every other American sports teams did

@cpa2132 Год назад

You guys are the best neighbors, you better believe we'll have you backs when needed 🍻

@sachithkn6512 Год назад

Just wait.., don't over happy... U Have khalistan society and Muslim society

@meme_thunder 2 года назад

"The Boeing AV-8B Harrier" As a Brit, that sentence hurts me.

@davidrussell8783 2 года назад

It's OK if you want to refer to it as McDonnell Douglas )

@vergulli12 2 года назад

Wait until that Harrier lands on the USS George Washington 😛

@jbloun911 2 года назад

Brits made junk as usual so the US had to make it actually work. Sorry Redcoat

@meme_thunder 2 года назад

@@davidrussell8783 No. The Harrier is a British plane made by Hawker Siddley. The design was sold to Macdonell Douglass a few years later. I want to call it the Hawker Siddley Harrier because that's it original name.

@meme_thunder 2 года назад

@@vergulli12 Still an origonal British plane that the US just bought the design off.

@themarqq 2 года назад

Russia: We have a Carrier, we are military power. USA: Hold my beer..

@Tonyx.yt. 2 года назад

US: we have the most powerfull armed forces in the world Taliban: hold my rusty ak...

@jayscott8583 2 года назад

@@Tonyx.yt. Blame politicians.

@Tonyx.yt. 2 года назад

@Andy Mills russia never claim that and ukraine gets foreign weapons, without them they would get fucked, and anyway they had far superior equipment and numbers than taliban "army"

@billyhgunn 2 года назад

@@Tonyx.yt. Russia we have never lost a War Taliban: Hold my hooka Ukraine: Hold my Chernihivske

@billyhgunn 2 года назад

@Andy Mills Ukraine No, you used to have one of the most powerful Armies in the World

@sws5833 2 года назад

As a Canadian I wasnt aware of the size of the U.S carrier fleet and the number of aircraft they all can carry, DAMN thats some serious firepower, id be proud if our navy had even a tiny fraction of that strength

@alsmain794 2 года назад

No need for all those ships my Canadian friend, the US has got your back.

@Chpow01 2 года назад

@@alsmain794 You're not wrong... well, at least as long as a Republican is not in the Whitehouse.

@donnieb2000 2 года назад

@@Chpow01 Really ? Biden has only HURT and DIVIDE the USA. Trump put america 1st while democrats Incite 4 years of riots , a phony russia hoax, 2 sham impeachments, left americans behind to die, a wide open border as 2 mill illegals pour in with Fentynal killing more americans then covid, 40 year high inflation, sky high crime and murder as they DEFUND police, sky high gas, food, energy prices, vaccine mandates as Biden FIRES 1st responders, and now war in ukraine ALL Bidens FAULT as he stood by and did NOTHING until it was too late, but actually gave putin the green light when he DESTROYED american enery independence giving putin the leverage as he now fuels europe, not to mention this CREEP is caught LYING to our faces daily and the Doosh bag was HIDING in his basement all during covid putting himself 1st while TRUMP BROUGHT the WORLD A VACCINE front and center like a TRUE LEADER even catching covid while Democrats prayed for his death.. Never in my life seen so much evil and destruction to America and i once was a democrat. So get educated dont be a dumb ass follower of fake news..

@cameraz99 2 года назад

@@donnieb2000 -- You funnier than Chris Rock. Lol!

@donnieb2000 2 года назад

@@cameraz99 Funny you cant debate what i said that wasnt True. Fact you mentioned Chris rock tells me you support physical violence which makes sense your a Trump Hating democrat, RIOTS, HATE, VIOLENCE is what you value. Tell me what again Biden and the democrats have done for thre american people again. Come back when you have facts and a grown ass mature response. Typical Democrat response. lmao

@albertocastoldi9951 2 года назад

Actually US Navy has 10 more carriers: 8 LHDs and 2 LHAs, each capable of carrying up to 20-22 f 35Bs....Anyway one of the LHDs (Uss Bonhomme Richard) has been decommissioned last year due to a big fire while was in a naval base...

@fredjones7705 2 года назад

Shame about the Bonny Dick. I used to see her in San Diego when I was making bicycle deliveries.

@kyleaugustine6886 2 года назад

I remember that fire. Shame what happened to her.

@tunnel598 2 года назад

7 lhds now that lhd 6 is gone

@RB25luv 2 года назад

🇺🇸💯🇺🇸💯🇺🇸

@erikahl7180 Год назад

🤓

@frankd.4528 2 года назад

I like to think I am a partial owner of those Nimitz class carriers every time I pay my taxes!

@khaccanhle1930 2 года назад

Nah, those boats are a reminder, "We own you"

@neilmanhard1341 2 года назад

You are. Every captain of every US Navy/Coast Guard ship knows who paid for them and treats them accordingly. USS is short for "United States Ship" - no question on who owns it.

@neilmanhard1341 2 года назад

@@khaccanhle1930 Ah, another person that believes the US military is a force of oppression. Well, don't expect us to come and rescue you anytime soon (or ever).

@mitchlesinski7803 2 года назад

@@khaccanhle1930 based on ur name … we actually own YOU bud.

@Dbodell8000 2 года назад

Your not!

@crispyglove 2 года назад

I think it would be more accurate to say that HMS Queen Elizabeth was named after the super-dreadnought HMS Queen Elizabeth which was named after QE I.

@jonfklein 2 года назад

Wow! This puts US naval power in perspective. The USA has 11 of the 22 total aircraft carriers in operation in the world and all of them are far larger than the other country's carriers.

@wstavis3135 2 года назад

As others have pointed out, the US also has 10 or 11 "amphibious assault carriers" which also have a standard air wing of either 6 F35Bs or 22 F35Bs when configured as purely CVs. This makes them as capable as the British or French CVs and more capable than any others in existence.

@jonfklein 2 года назад

@@wstavis3135 What's the saying, 'Speak softly and carry a big stick'? They have the big stick part down, that's for sure. But the speak softly part, not so much - would help them in their foreign policy I think.

@starwarsfannumber 2 года назад

Put this into perspective the USA navy ls the only force of this planet that would make our airforce break a sweat seriously if war broke between our navy and air force alot places will sank from all navy vessels and aircraft laying at the bottom the ocean the f22 raptor is king and our airforce got and answer for the world's navy the only force

@Axispaw1 Год назад

@@wstavis3135 Maybe you need to do a bit more research before commenting. The QE class can carry over 70 aircraft in a time of war, 50 of which would be F35B. Combined with the increased range, and far better sensors make the QE far more capable than a WASP class. The CdG can carry over 40 aircraft in wartime including 30 Rafale and E-2 Hawkeye (far better AEW than anything the WASP carries) and also has VLS for Aster 15. American amphibious vessels are incredibly powerful by all means, but lets not disparage the French and British carriers just because you love America.

@anonymous-go1tq Год назад

@@Axispaw1 I’ve only met British people online and most of them where pretty mad about that war 300 years ago still so I have no issue flexing Americas military power to them now the French part I agree with

@saltyroe3179 2 года назад

Besides the Wasp Class and America Class the Japanese have what they call Helicopter Destroyers. The latest are bigger than IJN WW2 carriers and have operated F35 fighters.

@rakisuzuki-burke4148 2 года назад

The Izumos are also being converted into actual carriers.

@bob_._. 2 года назад

If you're consider Spain's assault ship "Juan Carlos I" an aircraft carrier, why not include the world's 29 other assault ships? They all have full length flight decks and conduct aircraft operations.

@aceisto2268 2 года назад

The Juan Carlos I its main purpose are fixed wings aircraft operation, most of the rest of those shops CAN operate aircraft but they are mainly amphibius ships or helicopter carriers

@bob_._. 2 года назад

@@aceisto2268 I see. Thank you.

@crazyjds 2 года назад

Also the surface may not be rated to handle the heat of sa a landing harrier/f-35, which may require modifications. I think the Japan did that to thier helicopter destroyer.

@kitkat47chrysalis95 2 года назад

Because if those ships where classified as aircraft carriers then several countries would be breaking international laws, for instance: aircraft carrying assault ships may pass freely through Turkish waters into the black sea, but assault ship aircraft carriers may NOT. Also Japan is bound by international law to not operate "aircraft carriers" but aircraft carrying assault ships are A'Okay

@kitkat47chrysalis95 2 года назад

Surely several governments would object to this video if she included them, and it may even be taken down at their request.

@jerski14344 2 года назад

U.S.Navy's Wasp-class (40 tons) and America-class (45 tons) should be in this list as they can carry and operate F-35 and Harrier jets, even Helicopters are technically a type of an "AIRcraft", Wasp-class is even heavier than the No. 1 (Chakri Naruebet) and No. 2 (Juan Carlos I) on this list, COMBINED!..

@RoKenX2 2 года назад

i was going to post this =P but you said it better than i could anyways =p

@ginge1394 2 года назад

But they aren’t aircraft carriers. They are amphibious assault ships.

@ginge1394 2 года назад

@fuckyoutubepolicy staff however they are not classed as aircraft carriers. They are amphibious assault ships.

@ginge1394 2 года назад

@fuckyoutubepolicy staff this is where you’re wrong. An aircraft carriers main purpose is to provide air superiority and its primary usage is that of aircraft. The wasp and Americas Maine purpose is spit a fuck load of marines and their equipment on a beach somewhere. The jets are a third or fourth tier of operation on the ship. What’s the point in calling it an aircraft carrier when it doesn’t function anything like an aircraft carrier?

@KVZ55 2 года назад

@fuckyoutubepolicy staff Not easy for the US carries get close to Taiwan when war broke out because China has hypersonic missiles that can sink the US carriers.

@7thsealord888 2 года назад

Unmentioned here, but the Royal Australian Navy has HMASs Canberra and Adelaide, which are based on the design of Spain's 'Juan Carlos[ (which WAS mentioned). They only carry helicopters at present, but do have the "ski-jump' for operating STOVL aircraft.

@ghostpants6661 2 года назад

I don't think they are counting the Heli carriers

@andresmartinezramos7513 2 года назад

But since they don't operate fixed-wing aircraft, they don't fit the definition of a conventional aircraft carrier. Otherwise, one might argue that a frigate capable of deploying helicopters is also an aircraft carrier.

@johnhoward4397 2 года назад

@@andresmartinezramos7513 The video is about 2021, today. The Spanish have 15 Harrier II Plus like USA marines LHD, may be Australian in the future could buy 15 or 20 F35

@andresmartinezramos7513 2 года назад

@@johnhoward4397 Precisely, as things stood in 2021 the Canberra sub-class did not operate fixed-wing aircraft.

@andrewcraig5689 2 года назад

@@ghostpants6661 They are not included as the US runs 8 Wasp Class and 3 America Class Carriers that were not mentioned including the Boxer which was deployed in the against the Somali pirates as seen in the movie Capt Phillips.

@dangernoodle7700 2 года назад

When people don't realize that the rest of the planet's definition of "Carrier" is our definition of an Amphibious Assault ship (US has 10 of them), whereas our definition of "Carrier" is the rest of the planets definition of Super Carrier (US additionally has nearly 13 of them plus to our Amphibious Assault ships).

@TravelwithPavel 2 года назад

Yeah all the other non US carriers look cute compared to US ones.

@Regunes 2 года назад

@@TravelwithPavel Charles De Gaulle?

@TravelwithPavel 2 года назад

@@Regunes yeah and? Charles de Gaulle is pretty small compared to Nimitz class, its just only other nuclear powered one, but thats it, but its leas than half the size.

@pougetguillaume4632 2 года назад

@@TravelwithPavel france has a larger carrier in the works for a decade or two named PANG (porte-avion nouvelle génération), it's quite a bit bigger than the current one but still pretty small when placed next to a super carrier. CDG load displacement: 42 000 tons PANG: 75 000 tons nimitz/Ford: 100 000 tons quite a decent chungus and a CATOBAR too

@TravelwithPavel 2 года назад

@@pougetguillaume4632 I know

@ryangiesbers 2 года назад

The absolute power and superiority of the US Navy is insane.

@johnhoward4397 2 года назад

If you consider marines LHD with Harrier II plus like Spain, 8 more. The most powerful navy and very far of the others. But there are many tactic and solutions applied for example by navantia in LHD juan Carlos primero as multipurpose ship that americans and marines learnt for apply too.

@johnhoward4397 2 года назад

Marines working with Spanish LHD learning operations and tactics with multipurpose misions ru-vid.com/video/%D0%B2%D0%B8%D0%B4%D0%B5%D0%BE-J9dWFGyd17o.html

@JInfinity7 Год назад

Yup...I don't get free healthcare bc of those carriers. ...edit: relax, it wasn't literal commentary. I'm well aware its more complicated.

@rkfan101 Год назад

And the undersea navy is nuts too

@kd8opi Год назад

@@JInfinity7 you don’t get free healthcare for a lot of reasons.

@williambowling8211 2 года назад

One important distinction in assessing the power of these carriers is that all non-US carriers, except Charles de Gaulle, are STOBAR (or STOVL) which significantly limits their fuel/combat takeoff load.

@jamesevans938 2 года назад

however unlike most STOVL carriers the queen Elizabeth carrier was designed to have catobar retro fitted if the need arises

@inwedavid6919 2 года назад

@@jamesevans938 sadly this will never happen as the price of the retrofit is too expensive.

@simonpinkerton4905 2 года назад

Or alternatively, the steam/electro catapult puts such an enormous strain on the fighter jets airframe, that the US carriers need to be so big that they need to carry a huge inventory of spare parts. After a typical 8 month deployment, on average only a third of those fighters are able to be flown. The US Gov't doesn't tell you that, but as an engineer, I will.....

@jamesevans938 2 года назад

@@inwedavid6919 I know plus we don’t have any aircraft capable of catobar carrier operations the only way I see it happening is during a war so US navy aircraft have more options as to where they can land and take off from or if something catastrophic happens such as if America loses most of their carriers. But I’m sure the reason behind why they designed the class to be retrofitted with catobar is because good to have that option available in case it’s ever needed

@eagle_rb_mmoomin_418 2 года назад

STOVL increases the fuel/combat load back up from STOBAR 🤦. The lift to get off the carrier is generated by the ramp and the lift fan. The F35B off QE is comparable to an F18E/F without range extending tanks in range and fuel. The landing procedure in the QE doesn't require extra fuel for bolters. The SRVL landing mode is the reverse of the take off to increase fuel and bring back.

@DrDre-ps4sd 2 года назад

I like how every country with an aircraft carrier is like a Nickel size with maybe 1 or two. Then the US is like hold my beer, I got 13 nuclear carriers

@ovrwrldkiler 2 года назад

And this video didnt even include our assault carriers that use VTOL aircraft and helis (despite inculding other VTOL only carriers like Italy's). There's another ~10 of those too.

@enoughrope1638 2 года назад

The HTMS Chakri Naruebet is open for tourists. The ship has no operational fighters left and lacks the funding for maintenance/fuel. It is claimed to leave port once a month and travel under its own power. I genuinely think the Royal Thai Navy should dock her in freshwater (up a river perhaps) and keep the ship in reserve. Sealing off unused compartments, a handful of dehumidifiers, and they will save a ton of money.

@sergiom9958 2 года назад

That would be a smart move. Spain made her and also her sister (an original) ship, the AC "Príncipe de Asturias" (Prince of Asturias). Unfortunately, because the obvious lack of apreciation from the spanish political class and average Joe / Jose; the ship was desmantelated for lack of founds when it could had been stored for better times. The dumb ass policiticians considered that the money they could get from the scrap metal was worth the loss of it (and they sold it when the metal price was at its lowest).

@thibautmallet1194 2 года назад

nickname of the ship is the THAITANIC :-)

@dougmahone Год назад

Not open for all tourists. Only Thai nationals can go onboard. Foreigners are not allowed.

@carlocalo3364 2 года назад

Italians carriers now have F-35B onboard.

@spicetrade8839 2 года назад

Solo la Cavour o anche la Garibaldi?

@carlocalo3364 2 года назад

@@spicetrade8839 solo la 550 Cavour, poi non lo so se ci sono anche sulla Garibaldi.

@joey_ramone_96 2 года назад

@@spicetrade8839 si utilizza "il" per le navi della Marina Militare Italiana

@stephenparallox 2 года назад

If there is anything I have learned from Italian history... you don't f#ck with Garibaldi.

@kabouterwesley83 Год назад

Isn't garibaldi being decomissioned as soon as the new ship trieste is in service?

@gunnyboone9079 2 года назад

the United Stares has 11 carrier groups on station ar all times, With 4 in reserve.

@imperatorsteve 2 года назад

Just goes to show why the USA is almost bankrupt

@FlashPointHx Год назад

The Italian one looks like a WW2 era ship. Its also cappuccino colored - so adorable!!

@slappy-chicken 2 года назад

I'm proud to have served in the US Navy. Ironically, I never set foot on a ship since I was attached to one of the Navy's few expeditionary ground forces.

@kitkat47chrysalis95 2 года назад

Wtf?

@kitkat47chrysalis95 2 года назад

I need to know more about this weird phenomenon

@slappy-chicken 2 года назад

@@kitkat47chrysalis95 Look up Navy NECC

@naverilllang 2 года назад

@@slappy-chicken we can't expect the marines to do all of the work, now can we?

@andresmartinezramos7513 2 года назад

@@naverilllang Yeah, that's what the army is for

@CS-np2oo 2 года назад

If you've never seen a US carrier in person...these pictures do them no justice. They are HUGE and a sight to behold. Saw one in San Diego when visiting and caught it in Port by chance. You'll NEVER forget seeing one in person.

@justpat1420 2 года назад

i wish i could see one of these giant ships and the USS Missouri in a fleet, a endless dream to see these 2 Super ships on open waters.

@logawinner 2 года назад

Yes

@Krucifus 2 года назад

They're basically floating cities with a population of 5500+ including the airwings when out on deployment.

@sachahector5674 10 месяцев назад

I can only imagine. The Charles de Gaulle aircraft carrier looks like a behemoth of a ship when in person, and it is dwarfed by all the other US aircraft carriers.

@kimberlymonte8849 9 месяцев назад

I was on board the USS Midway ( decommissioned and turned into a museum), saw the Carl Vincent when it was in dock during the same trip, 2000’s. Also saw the Enterprise in doc during the early 1980’s. They are indeed huge ships!

@jameskee2412 2 года назад

good job including the 11 Nuclear super carriers of the US but completely forgetting about all our amphibs. They were certainly good enough to be included for Italy.

@edlee8949 2 года назад

The US is still the No. 1 when it comes to tonnage, numbers, technology, crew experience, and also the jet fighters it carries.

@foxyawayfox8547 2 года назад

number 1 when it comes to Tonnage but nothing else

@gamewizardks 2 года назад

@@foxyawayfox8547 LMAO. Wrong. If anyone wants to pick a fight if they think they are better, why haven't they? Yeah, it's called Force Projection. Our mothball fleet of ships is bigger than almost any active Navy, btw.

@derail6996 2 года назад

@@gamewizardks hell our museum ship fleet is larger than must active navies!!!!

@foxyawayfox8547 2 года назад

@@gamewizardks most other countries sell or scrap thier unused warships, Why would countries want to go to war with america? theres no gain in it. An Australian and swedish submarines have sunk an american carrier in war games. The technology that america use is also used by many other nations. Yes america has a massive fleet but that doesnt help when faced off with nations that have the best anti ship skills

@foxyawayfox8547 2 года назад

@@derail6996 most active navies sell or scrap thier unused warships

@sergiom9958 2 года назад

The LHD 1 "Juan Carlos 1" has three sister ships (all of them made in Spain). One made for Turkey (the TCG Anadolu) and two made for Australia (the ALHD Adelaida and ALHD Canberra).

@Datsnice97 2 года назад

The two Australian ones actually use the prefix HMAS instead of ALHD

@yakamoooo 2 года назад

Navantia Company is the one builds those ships..and as I know, LHDs are not technically "aircraft carrier" even though they are carrying aircrafts.. maybe this list based on "the ships that planes land and take off".. because HAMS Canberra and HAMS Adelaide and TCG Anadolu has the same point that they are not suitable for fighters or bombers to land and take off..

@jiukam 2 года назад

Anadolu is Juan Carlos's sister thats true but a little different and Turkey building her in its own docks.

@jiukam 2 года назад

Btw greetings to dear Spanish friends from Turkey!

@Scorpanian 2 года назад

@@yakamoooo They are built for planes such as harriers and f-35's, the ramp is retained on the Australian ones, no doubt to facilitate possible use by British and American aircraft.

@randomwalk5095 2 года назад

4:30 please correct it now Nave Cavour C 550 is updated to carry F-35 15 are expected to be on in early future

@floralwallpaperenthusiast6631 2 года назад

I never realized how many carriers the US Navy had! Great video

@davidb3155 2 года назад

The US navy is the world's largest airforce. The US Airforce is the second largest 😂

@L0rd0fLight1 2 года назад

@@davidb3155 other way around

@MrKobus-rz4qy 2 года назад

@@davidb3155 other way around

@davidteer80 2 года назад

We also have 9 Amphibious Assault Ships which carry F-35B stealth fighters.......

@janus3555 2 года назад

@@davidb3155 Other way around. (Source: I'm a USAF 2W1 on F-16s, F-22s and taught on F-35's for a year)

@aryanyadav3690 2 года назад

*INS Vikrant* soon gonna join the list within just 2 months 🇮🇳 Now in Sea Trails 😘

@frankmueller6522 2 года назад

Go forward, America and India! Long live the Nato and its allies! Long live freedom! Down with all dictatorships and terrorists all around the world! Best wishes from Germany!

@tforaodg 2 года назад

@@frankmueller6522 😆

@Mr.someone777 2 года назад

@@tforaodg why are you laughing

@thelitsquad2718 2 года назад

@@tforaodg It's not like Russia or China using crappy Russian carriers could ever hope to compete

@jayscott8583 2 года назад

@@thelitsquad2718 unless they produce better steel then what they export it will rust and sink in 3 years

@mat3o557 Год назад

This was a great US navy video 👏

@sergiom9958 2 года назад

Spain made the HTMS Chakri Naruebet and also her sister ship (the original) ship, the aircraft "Príncipe de Asturias" (Prince of Asturias). Unfortunately, because the obvious lack of apreciation from the spanish political class and average Joe / Jose; the ship was desmantelated for lack of founds when it could had been stored for better times. The dumb ass policiticians considered that the money they could get from the scrap metal was worth the loss of it (and they sold it when the metal price was at its lowest).

@dcanmore 2 года назад

too small and out of date, if the Príncipe de Asturias was still in service it would be 40 years old and a useless relic. Juan Carlos I is the replacement and much better ship able to use the F-35.

@ernstschmidt4725 2 года назад

why spain needs a carrier anyways isn't like they still have colonies to take care of.

@johnhoward4397 2 года назад

@@ernstschmidt4725 Because Spain have Canary Islands, African Cities Ceuta, and Melilla, and Chafarinas Islands. The S80 Submarines can operate Tomahawks misils.

@destroyerinazuma96 Год назад

You forgot every kid who launches paper planes.

@NahFam13 Год назад

Aircraft manufacturer: "How many aircraft carriers do you want?" US: "All of them"

@romnix9000 2 года назад

Really impressive carrier force from the US, happy to be in NATO !

@amirardalan1903 2 года назад

Other Countries: Overcompensating for something USA? USA: Yeah weak allies

@lucadesanctis563 2 года назад

Weak allies didn't invent friendly fire tho and didn't get their ass beat by few Vietcongs/Muslims

@greyembrey1964 2 года назад

@@lucadesanctis563 please tell me your not French... The US had to bail France out of Vietnam.

@Aron-ru5zk 2 года назад

@@greyembrey1964 and France is the reason the USA exists as a country.

@thomascatty379 2 года назад

@@greyembrey1964 he isn’t French, he’s Italian

@xPhoKingAznx 2 года назад

@@lucadesanctis563 As oppose to the "enemy." Global super power Russia is getting smoked by a country the size of Texas. Ukraine doesn't even have jungles.

@SpookyFow Год назад

It's crazy that our Navy has 6-7 more Ford class Aircraft carriers in the queue to be made and launched within the decade.

@b2tall239 2 года назад

Would the air wings on the Chinese carriers be known as "People's Liberation Army Navy Air Force"?

@emintey 2 года назад

It's reported that the carrier carries a small battalion of Chinese helicopter borne marines which makes them the "People's Liberation Army Navy Airforce Marines".

@meejinhuang 2 года назад

That air wing can't carry weapons and take off on the ramp, so its the Democratic People's Liberation Army Navy Air Force only for show air wing.

@hwg5039 2 года назад

@@meejinhuang The J-15 fighter cannot FULL LOAD its ammunition when taking off, your comment is just stupid

@jerryumfress9030 2 года назад

@@emintey 😆very true sir

@BlackEpyon 2 года назад

I can't get over them using the term "People's 'Liberation.'" Given the context, it's a contradiction in terms.

@loodwich 2 года назад

"HTMS Chakri Naruebet" was made in Spain with the design of the previous Spanish aircraft carrier "Principe de Asturias"

@lexluther3337 Год назад

Vikramaditya was made in Russia (USSR). As a matter of fact it is soviet carrier "admiral Gorshkov", that was in service since 80-s and then in 2000-s it was modernized and sold to India.

@johncronin7875 Год назад

Not active…essentially a Royal barge

@kristianmolloy8622 2 года назад

they should also mention that russian Carriers come with a Tug on top of there aircraft complement just in case

@opieg7333 2 года назад

More of an aircraft barge, than carrier.

@TheFlyingZulu 2 года назад

Do you know who has the second most powerful Air Force in the world? The US Navy's aircraft component.

@arjunparameswaran6740 2 года назад

Indian Navy INS Vikrant is the new addition to the list

@brentsrx7 2 года назад

I like how the narrator forgot to mention that the Liaoning is an old Kuznetsov-class carrier... Considering the R's and L's of the matter, Winnie the pooh would not approve.

@violetsther3739 2 года назад

How is that relevant?

@fernandomirandilla9088 2 года назад

WOW, now that's a lot of US aircraft carrier.

@lisaroberts8556 2 года назад

Imagine there use to be even more of them in the early 90’s. At times during the Cold War. 20 US Carriers use to roam the Sea Lanes around the World.

@jonathanbair523 2 года назад

And we got a few more smaller carriers that can launch a full marine unit that has its own battle group from ship to land...

@SamuBlackeart 2 года назад

Juan Carlos One. You killed me !!

@taotao98103 2 года назад

when you introduced the Russian carrier, you showed the Liaoning carrier in the photo, when you introduced the Liaoning carrier, you showed the picture of the Shandong carrier.

@mubbles1066 2 года назад

You can always tell the Russian carrier by the thick black smoke it’s oil engines use,that’s when it’s not actually being towed by tugs….

@sputnikalgrim 2 года назад

The carrier battle group just might be the most intimidating military flex ever.

@DarrenMalin Год назад

one nuke and it is all gone.

@tlxatom7004 Год назад

@@DarrenMalin 1 nuke isnt enough. Even our WWII carriers were able to withstand multiple warheads

@Webi Год назад

@@tlxatom7004 The carrier could withstand a WWII nuke for sure. A modern nuke? 1 shot kill. Tsar bomba? entire fleet gone.

@odysseusrex5908 Год назад

@@Webi Tsar Bomba was just a demonstration device. It was not deployable as a weapon. Well, I don't know, it would have made one hell of a land mine.

@Webi Год назад

@@odysseusrex5908 yeah but that was 60 years ago I would be surprised if something even stronger hasn't been theorised or even made by now.

@larryoneill7432 2 года назад

I served on 3. USS Midway, VF-151. USS Carl Vinson VS-29. USS JFK AIMD.

@Addy46725 Год назад

I also served on the USS Midway, S-7 Div, USS Carl Vinson, VA-196, and USS Boxer LHD-4, Comm

@trevorlewis847 Год назад

I served australian army in early 80s,in Qld and Us navy visited every year ,I got a cigarette lighter from a yank sailor and it was the Carl vincon and back then it was a cruiser, unless me memory going,actually writhing this the uss Carl vinscends comes to mind🤔😂

@Auror37 2 года назад

Juan Carlos = giant floating 2x4 design. It's brilliant.

@ChandranPrema123 2 года назад

Wasn't INS Vikramaditya an Ex-Russian Carrier that's what I've heard

@Chickenworm9394 2 года назад

It was a modified Russian ex-Kiev Class aircraft carrier

@SUNNYSTARSCOUT365 2 года назад

Nó vốn là một tàu tuần dương hạm mang máy bay được sửa đổi lại của Liên Xô.

@littleregrets8810 2 года назад

Yes it was... it has served us well

@anguswaterhouse9255 2 года назад

same with the indian nuclear subs but not for long they're jacking up their defence because of a certain northern nieghbor

@theindianagenda5819 2 года назад

The Indian INS Vikramaditya is so heavily modified you'll hardly recognise that it was originally the Baku. THe Baku was a hybrid carrier which carried not only aircraft but a whole lot of anti-ship and anti-surface missiles as the Russians intended it to be able to operate solo as they could not build so many carriers plus the escort ships to protect them to be able to challenge American aircraft carrier numbers. The Baku had a smaller flight deck because of this and it operated VSTOL aircraft that can land and take off vertically like the Queen Elizabeth does. THe Indian NAvy wanted a full blown aircraft carrier and because of the lesser number of carriers needed could have proper escort ships for each carrier so the missiles and guns were removed from the Baku and that whole front section was also made part of the flight deck and a take off ramp was added so that aircraft may take off more easily. So now the Indian NAvy uses normal non vertical take off planes off of what is now a much more conventional carrier. As a matter of fact, the Indian NAvy has been operating carriers since way before the SOviets. India has been operating carriers since 1961, way before the Soviets or Chinese had them but we usually just bought foreign carriers and just recently did we build our own carrier called the INS Vikrant which is very similar in size to the VIkramaditya, the ship is currently in sea trials and will join the force soon. THank you to whoever took the time to read that long string of info.

@RogueMenacegaming 2 года назад

My dad served on the Eisenhower (And George Washington), makes me happy to see them both on this list :D

@Simonb1977 2 года назад

Oh, I misread your comment. I taught he served under their command.... I made me question, how...

@RogueMenacegaming 2 года назад

@@Simonb1977 lol

@Ansardianti 2 года назад

@@Simonb1977 lmao mans a time traveller

@stephenodell9688 2 года назад

i was on the Ike pre-commissioning crew and nine years later she was the last ship I was on, also Nimitz.

@typehyuga607 2 года назад

I am currently on the ship

@billfulgenzi2287 2 года назад

It's interesting that the narrative omitted giving the gross tonnage of the US Navy Aircraft Carriers. Also forgot to mention that each carrier comes with a complete strike group designed to settle any dispute. The USNs carrier fleet are all capable of being at sea for and unlimited time. The rest of the worlds Carriers rarely if ever leave port. Now, let's talk about the USNs 10 assault ships...

@Krucifus 2 года назад

The carriers cannot stay out for an unlimited amount of time. I'm not sure where you heard that. They need periodic maintenance and rehauling, which is why deployments rarely last over 7-9 months followed by 18 months in the shipyard. They can, however, go very long periods without refueling of the reactors.

@dougmahone Год назад

@@Krucifus They don't do 18 months in a shipyard after every deployment.

@chrispontius4325 Год назад

@@Krucifus They CAN stay out indefinitely. They can receive everything out at sea called under way replenishment, which includes fuel(for the planes), food and spare parts. They supply planes to ports to swap out crew and mail. The Carriers have near unlimited fuel because of their reactors. The ships have water distillers for fresh water and has air filtration systems to keep the air clean while the ship is locked down during combat.

@Ryu-hx5yy 2 года назад

Japan operates two aircraft carriers the JS Izumo and JS Kaga Now its technically specified as a multipurpose destroyer but if the other non-aircraft carriers are there, why not these ones.

@Aron-ru5zk 2 года назад

They don’t operate with fixed wing aircraft, the list would be twice as long if they included helicopter carriers.

@Ryu-hx5yy 2 года назад

@@Aron-ru5zk I guess that is a valid point. But the thing is that this video was titled All Active Aircraft Carriers. (But I guess this video is just a bunch of inconsistencies in general as non-aircraft carriers were present as well.)

@PancakeBoi Год назад

Because up until recently, under law japan isn’t allowed to have “aircraft carriers” so they just operated what they called “defense helicopters destroyers”

@sierp13pl 2 года назад

Italy: we have an aircraft carrier UK: we have 2 AC USA: you're sweet 😂😂😂

@JuanGarcia-ig4zl 2 года назад

Dont you mean: USA: your cute 🤣🤣🤣🤣

@llamudos9809 2 года назад

Prince of Wales and Queen elizabeth can carry 72 aircraft each. So the info on here is way out. It can launch and stow a jet every 2 minutes and complete 100+ sorties /day. Only a US Nuclear ACC can do better.

@Axispaw1 Год назад

@@jbloun911 actually no. The US carriers can't launch in certain weather, the British ones can ;)

@Axispaw1 Год назад

@@jbloun911 the US relies on money to be superior. Your forces in general are terrible. You marines are barely marines 😂 The SAS/SBS alone could take out half your forces 😂😂

@jbloun911 Год назад

@@Axispaw1 I don't speak to our vast subordinates...😂😂😂 Betas. SAS use M4s and buy American night vision that we invented 40 yrs ago that all our forces use. Brits try to copy but can't...😂

@Axispaw1 Год назад

@@jbloun911 Either way, they'll still knock out half your forces. Anyway, what about the vast majority of everything military related that the yanks copied from the brits? We invented the aircraft carrier and everything that goes along with it. The tank, the machine gun, the list goes on. You wouldn't have the jet engine if it weren't for us and you wouldn't have nuclear bombs without us. You wouldn't have rockets without the Germans. Is there anything you guys actually invented?? It's actually pathetic 😂😂😊

@Axispaw1 Год назад

@@jbloun911 oh and speaking of pathetic, stop liking your own comments 😂😂😂

@Robert-ex2qp Год назад

I went to the Intrepid Aircraft Carrier Museum in NYC and after seeing all the dents in the steel plating, paused and thought about what it was like in WW2 on this ship in battle. The living quarters in the decks below were cramped and all steel, gives me a better perspective of what they all endured.

@dumbnewyorker7379 Год назад

She actually was hit by a kamikaze and nearly sank during ww2. 1 plane nearly did her under

@SuperMelllo Год назад

Arrived on time. Granddaughter said it really helped to carry her new baby and still have a hand for her two year old to hold

@ExMachina70 Год назад

In 1942 Japan had four fleet carriers. The US was nice enough to decommission them.

@pranavtripathi6336 Год назад

I love how the aircraft carrying capacity maxes out at 90. I guess they figured that's the most number they could fit while retaining the general structure, maneuverability and combat capacity. That is still extremely impressive, being able to deploy 90 fighter aircrafts in the middle of the ocean and engage in anti aircraft and anti ship warfare itself while acting as a command centre for the naval strike group. Absolute badass ship

@jon-unicorn-doxxer Год назад

prob so that it can still pass the panama and suez canal

@ricksterallain Год назад

Yup, pretty much it. They need to fit in those cannals.

@rad4579 Год назад

The plural of aircraft is aircraft. There is no such thing as aircrafts.

@sloopypotato Год назад

USA ships design got limited by panama canal unlike IJN if they survived till now they probably have twice the size of that

@TheGalahad78 2 года назад

In fact, the name of the Spanish carrier should be "Juan Carlos the First", not One.

@oliverhoffmann1335 2 года назад

How many Carriers you want? USA: yes!

@fallenicarus2685 2 года назад

If you consider the amount of light carriers the US has. And the old carriers that are museums now (can be reserviced) the US has almost 25-carriers

@DarrenMalin Год назад

almost 25 O.O ? 1/2 a ship is sunk 😄

@417jumps3 2 года назад

Fun fact - the total flight deck space of all 11 US Super Carriers is over 4x greater than all other operational carriers listed in this video..

@jbloun911 Год назад

Need more space

@cabriskus4700 Год назад

And the Ford class carriers are even bigger!

@virgilio6349 2 года назад

Brasil and Australia: "What if we told you we where once in the list aswell?"

@johnhoward4397 2 года назад

No planes on board 2021, no Harrier Plus II and Skip Jump platforms only for helicopters.

@nicholassmith7359 2 года назад

Speak softly and carry a big stick, we don't do well on the speak softly part but damn that is one hell of a stick we got.

@RandalColling 2 года назад

World forces; "we have air-craft carriers"! US; "hold my beer"

@jaanushiiemae2164 2 года назад

Kuznetsov is not active since 2018 and will be again functional maybe in 2023. Knowing Russian realities it is more probable it will be decommissioned or sold.

@madlfcdc5890 2 года назад

In terms of naval capabilty, NATO has absolute dominance and dwarfs opposing countries. Not just aircraft carriers but naval combat vessels especially from the US and the UK. Both have cutting edge technology and nuclear submarine fleets to make enemies of NATO think twice about any confrontation.

@Raksasaification 2 года назад

uk?

@user-yv6ji3ex5f 2 года назад

北约有胆量惹敢打核战争的疯子吗？

@gregutdmglaucos3757 2 года назад

the French navy is at least as powerful as the British navy, we are the only ones with the United States to have a nuclear CATOBAR, plus 3 multi-mission helicopter carriers and 10 nuclear submarines. And overall France and the United Kingdom are very comparable in order of magnitude, number of inhabitants, economy, technological level, armies.

@Lemurion287 2 года назад

@@gregutdmglaucos3757 the Mistral class helicopter carriers are the only area where France has an advantage, they are objectively better than Britain's Bulwark and Albion. The UK has two carriers to France's one, and a much better nuclear submarine force since most of the UK's attack subs are the modern Astute class while the majority of France's are the thirty to forty-year old Rubis class.

@gregutdmglaucos3757 2 года назад

@@Lemurion287 The 2 British aircraft carriers are not comparable, I think you know the limits of the Queen Elizabeth Class but you twist reality to please you. (I warn I use google translate) The Charles de Gaulle is nuclear-powered, so it can navigate the globe without refueling, it has a catapult that allows it to take off radar planes and fully loaded fighter planes (thus with the maximum of fuel and weapons), it carries more planes than the Queen Elizabeth, it has neither nuclear propulsion nor catapult. You must use very expensive F35s rather than cheaper and more efficient Eurofighter Typhoons, and your fleet is too small to form 2 full groups. I did the accounts and the French Navy has 42 combat aircraft against 22 for the British and the French Air Force has 195 combat aircraft against 161 for the British, and the same ratio for ships 111 against 55.

@joshuademoraes 2 года назад

Sea: How many Carries you want uncle Sam? uncle Sam: No problem son.

@theEVILone0130 Год назад

As an American I don't like war either. But I'm glad that we can call Canadians our friends.

@johnholt9399 2 года назад

They should be rated by displacement not length. QEs are bigger than pretty much anything non US in the world today.

@graveperil2169 2 года назад

sort them by crew size and then the QE's will be on the bottom they are very high tech ships

@georgesmith4509 2 года назад

You omitted the two aircraft carriers in the RAN HMAS Australia and HMAS Adelaide. They were purchased new from Spain and are similar to the Spanish Juan Carlos class. They are capable of carrying jfs 35 aircraft.

@jamiematthew4986 2 года назад

America- "Awe. .you got two little carriers. That's cute....."

@ishratfirdousi7182 Год назад

Enter the hypersonic missile. Carriers will be used as floating hotels or even cruise ships. Unless they want to do a Titanic.

@senorelroboto2 2 года назад

2:25 I thought this was a video about aircraft carriers in service, not aircraft carriers being serviced

@josephwoodard9885 2 года назад

Burn...

@timopkokko 2 года назад

To be honest, I was an engineer and would try to enlist if I got fired from my current science and software engineering job. I love those carriers way too much. I know, I would be just one

@timopkokko 2 года назад

That is so immense infrastructure. There have to be thousands of people just to keep one of those American carriers operating. The Americans can take care of 50. Russians cannot take care of one. Instead, they start killing their own kind, while their total capital production is less than that of the Netherlands. The Russians think they are super-power by killing children. Well, that kind of does not work at all. It will backfire, badly.

@M_Ladd Год назад

US needs more aircraft carriers!

@devinheiner5692 2 года назад

Fantastic. We'll continue to our secure nation & it's allies. 100%.

@alexanderzippel8809 2 года назад

I am surprised how many countries possess carriers

@theutgardianchannel1952 2 года назад

first half of the video: multiple nations, the other half: next the USS...

@quantomic1106 2 года назад

How many carriers do you need? USA: "Yes"

@ddewaard3265 2 года назад

gotta say, the robo voices are getting better and better. it only really annoyed me when all the operations a ship was in were summed up because the word "operation" was repeated in the same way every time.

@danielgregory3295 2 года назад

Fun to hear "helicopter" as well...goofy syllable accent.

@jesseabrams5054 2 года назад

The Russian government should turn the admiral Krustchez into a floating smoke house! Literally add water wheels and a house blues band!

@jackmann9031 2 года назад

Is the Kuznetsov even active? Or do you count the 3 tugboats required for her to move?

@SoloRenegade 2 года назад

isn't she being decommissioned now after her latest incidents?

@humorpalanta 2 года назад

@@SoloRenegade She is technically in active service because... reasons. But yeah. Even if it will ever move again on its own, not in the near future...

@SoloRenegade 2 года назад

@@humorpalanta Sure, same as USS Constitution is in active service. Except that USS Constitution is actually capable of putting to sea. But both are equally as useful/practical in modern active service.

@humorpalanta 2 года назад

@@SoloRenegade Hey, Russia has an aircraft carrier in ACTIVE SERVICE and no toxic internet commenter can take it away from them!!!! :D :P :P :P

@BlackEpyon 2 года назад

They'll keep repairing it when funds are available, but TBH, the Russian Navy is in a pretty sorry state compared to their USSR days. They're putting a lot of money into that Belgorod and it's nuclear torpedoes, and their hypersonic missiles, in case things ever get hot between Russia and the US. But Russia isn't really in the force projection game any more.

@dbyers3897 Год назад

This is an inadequate list. There are many other vessels capable of fixed wing VSTOL, tilt-rotor & rotor-wing operations. Starting with the US Navy's LHAs, LPDs & LSDs. They have around 45 large vessels, out of a total fleet of ~500, which are capable of operating multiple aircraft for military purposes. More vessels are always under construction as replacements or to expand capabilities. Many nations have built vessels in recent years which may be modified to operate 5th generation VSTOL aircraft. Japan has four DDH "helicopter destroyers" which are in fact light carriers with full flight decks. F-35 fighters & V-22 tilt-rotors are changing the way naval & marine forces with operate as I write this.

@dylanrossouw2982 2 года назад

Everyone forgetting about Australia again

@Boeing777FR 2 года назад

Only France and US have nuclear powered aircraft carriers 💪

@hydewhyte4364 2 года назад

There's a good reason for that. They're damn near impossible to scrap.

@notalizard6994 2 года назад

@@hydewhyte4364 They are also not allowed in a lot of countries territorial waters because those countries have bans on nuclear reactors.

@oddjobkia 2 года назад

they still need resupply of food, and jet fuel.

@melangellatc1718 2 года назад

Who the fvck really cares?

@ohboydiamonds 2 года назад

@@notalizard6994 but it doesnt matter since the whole point of a carrier isnt to be in friendly waters, but unfriendly waters, where they arent allowed. but because "territorial waters" stop 14 miles out from shore, you can still position a carrier close to a country without being in their water

@leonardo718 2 года назад

Italy 1)Cavour 2)2018(Trieste) F35 A- F35 B Out Garibaldi 1985!

@SeveralWeezelsInaTrenchcoat 2 года назад

Trieste isn't in service yet

@PINECONEZ_PRODUCTION Год назад

Ever seen that scene in pirates of the caribbean, at worlds end where the pirates were happy excited to see the enemy ship, and only see one, but the fog clears to show the entire armada.... yeah that's the us vs the wolrds carriers

@rickyvito84 2 года назад

You forgot the new italian Trieste's class!

@dkev001 2 года назад

Russia has no active aircraft carriers. The one they had, caught fire and the dock desinged for it sunk. Also, the US has an additional 9 active carriers. 8 Wasp class and 1 America class Assault ships which carry the F-35B. They are the size of the French carrier.

@RB25luv 2 года назад

🇺🇸💯🇺🇸💯🇺🇸💯🇺🇸

@Regunes 2 года назад

but they're not nuclear (are they?)

@truckerfromreno 2 года назад

The 2 new British Carriers are huge and are a stunning design. Very impressive.

@2010kb1 Год назад

We’re glad Britain is back in the carrier business.Big help keeping the free commerce sailing.

@gregoirenoble1564 9 месяцев назад

What is stunning in their design ? Having no catapults, arresting gear and nuclear propulsion ? 😂

@ramonsanchez6903 Год назад

Great video and research review

@jorgejustin461 Год назад

Japan and Australia in the corner. "yes, we have no carriers. Carry on."

@jeffnaslund 2 года назад

The US has some serious firepower

@samanthaweber4486 Год назад

The US is power personified.

@edwardbuckner5031 2 года назад

The US has around 27 carriers, 11 supercarriers, and 16 light carriers. I mean Russia and China together only have 6 carries I believe. The lighter carriers all have F35. WTF

@sdorr 2 года назад

When mentioning China and Russia's naval resources, its best to also mention how many of any class are actually capable of movement/deployment/engagement. Both those naval "powers" remain unimpressive, euphemistically speaking.

@relicthominide5546 2 года назад

@@sdorr There are nothing about impressive or unimpressive in the name of this video) Maybe thai carrier is impressive, i think not) So, it is just not a list of all active carriers, if irussian indian, and some other carriers missed)

@dougmahone Год назад

the US does not have any "light aircraft carriers" The AMPHIBs that yo are refering to are Amphibious Assault Ships used for transporting a Marine ARG and landing them on a beach. They have big flat bottoms and are mostly useless in the middle of the ocean where an aircraft carrier prefers to operate. They are for operating close to shore and don't count as aircraft carriers.

@williammorley2401 Год назад

Edward Buckner, and you still lost in Vietnam and Afghanistan!

@Riky_yari 2 года назад

You forgot the italian lhd Trieste. The Cavour now operete whit the f35

@johnymachine7149 Год назад

Today's reality is that 1 supersonic missile of the Zircon type is enough for you and you've got rid of one aircraft carrier.

@sasha1990blr Год назад

Металлолом... Особенно если учесть то, что и кинжалы и цирконы способны нести тактическую ядерную боеголовку, очевидно что будет потоплен не только авианосец, но и вся группировка сопровождения.