List of All Anti-Tank Guided Missiles in use by the Ukrainian Ground Forces Today 

Slava Ukraini! Greetings from Norway. We sent you M72 LAW anti-tank weapons and other equipment.

You better kill 30 million of them

@@Onnarashi I'm surprised they didn't mention the munitions sent by the Scandinavian states and Germany. This is far from a comprehensive list.

Ukraine has been developing some formidable missiles of its own as well

@@CreamCobblerFiend The more Russians you kill, the most likely they end up giving you a a few days in a year to do another Victory Parade. Imagine you're trying to squeeze a cockroach (little Germany) under your glorious foot (Red army), but losing it instead (30 million casualties)... the heavy weight of the lost foot still managed to kill the cockroach, and so you celebrate for the rest of your existence, thinking that you achieved the impossible

These will not work well againsto ERA armour

I guess they are unguided also, as this list lists guided missiles?

@@zenko247 yeah at4, Carl Gustaf, and that German Bazooka ( that's what I like to call it) are seen mainly as bunker busters. I mean they could do some damage but not to the degree as an atgm..

@@zenko247 NLAW and Javelin: allow us to introduce ourselves. ;)

@@zenko247 You mean the Panzerfaust 3 with the Tandem Heat Warhead specificaly designed to defeat ERA Armor? :)

They listed Konkurs as no 3. No 7, SKIF, is the export designation for Stugna-P. RPG-7 is not a guided missile.

Rpg7 isn't guided

TAMBIEN LES HA FALTADO DECIR LAS 1365 UNIDADES , QUE HA ENVIADO ESPAÑA , LOS C 90 Y LOS C 100

And Stinger

@@ilpatriota8241 stinger is a SAM not used to destroy tanks

Yeah. Also didn't see them using them until now......:-( Would like to see, before I believe.

Cause' it is ineffective against explosive reactive amour

@@zenko247 yes but is amazing against VCC.

@@zenko247 The Panzerfaust 3 has a bunch of different rockets, thus it’s not really possible to say they‘re ineffective, as it depends on what rockets Ukraine received. If they received tandem heat rockets they’re of course also pretty effective against ERA. The latest version used by Germany would be DM72A1 rockets which are an improved tandem HEAT rocket. It’s said to penetrate more than 900mm RHA behind ERA, thus you can bet that it’s more than capable enough of destroying the tanks Russia has deployed to Ukraine.

nah... malytkas were in service at least on former yugoslavia countries still few years ago and we are talking about original not next generations...

Y LES HA FALTADO DECIR LAS 1365 UNIDADES QUE HA ENVIADO ESPAÑA LOS C 90 Y LOS C 100

Out of many anti tank missile you choose rpg-7 which is even not an anti tank missile

There is no best. There is only the best for a certain situation

Not yet a guided system.

Worst to best

Wow! congratulations on this incredible success!!! Write your address, we will send you your much-deserved cookie.

Except you weren't though 😂

nope javelin as 2500meter range = 2.5km...US military does use only metric sinze long time to not confused with the other NATO countries who use metric

@@leneanderthalien 2.5 miles, 4 km

Salo Uronili!

@@user-xl4xp5bx8m I understand. You're all about Russian nationalism. Ukrainians aren't ment to be more successful then you, they are supposed to be trampled under you feet. It's really sad, you chop the top one percent of wealthy individuals off both countries and Russia is still a $#!+hole. Ukraine is still a wonderful place to live. Tell me, are you one of Putins propagandists living in country? If so do you think he will let you live since you can attest to covering up his crimes? War crimes that is, see you at the Hague in a best case senerio.

Slava Ukraini!

@@chrissinclair4442 And you try to find free time, take a piece of paper and a pen. And then using the Internet, compare in a column Russia / Ukraine over the past 30 years: how many nuclear reactors have been built; how many ships have been built; how many million kilometers of roads have been built; how many aircraft have been built; how many tons of cargo were delivered into space on rockets; how many people flew to the ISS; As for nationalism, you watch less media, in Russia no one cares about skin color, hair color, the language of the speaker, we don’t have people with swastikas walking around and yelling slogans. Well, as for all sorts of courts in The Hague, I don’t remember that the presidents of the United States and Europe would be tried for bombed: Iraq; Libya; Yugoslavia, etc. We will never understand each other, since you live in a country of double standards, you blame the Russians, but you do not notice your bloody hands.

Metal scraper’s dream come true😁$$

Plenty, it seems.

Yes, because it's still discussed between Scholz and Putler.

yes some Milan was send from France to Ukraine, but France did not speak about...

C 90 is unguided. This is a list of guided missiles. There is a difference you know. 🙄

Were you saying Viva Iraq, viva Lybia, viva Serbia, viva Syria?

@@ozymandiasnullifidian5590 no i am american. Why would i support dictators? 😂

@@Oz_Darkr1d3r What dictators? First, you are not a world policeman, and even if there is some dictator, who gave you the right to make wars, military interventions, bombardments in which so many civilian innocent populations died because you think someone is a dictator and you should change that one with a dictator which will be your pawn? Who will punish your dictators? Your country after WW until now made almost 80 coups all over the world, usually to change someone you don't like with your dictator pawn, as in Chile when your CIA made a coup against Allende and placed that fascists Pinochet. Second, you attacked Iraq because allegedly Hussein had weapons of mass destruction, but after you found nothing, you invented a lot of stories, destroyed the country, made a mess and power vacuum from which spawned ISIS. Why did you destroy Lybia? Do you know what kind of living standard those people had? But your country had a grudge toward the man who was holding that country together, a country that is intrinsically unstable because there are 3 tribes that hate each other. You destroyed their life just for "reasons". Why did you attack and bombarded Serbia? Serbians were fighting separatists, irredentists, Islamic radicals, but you decided that Kosovo is a nice place for building that enormous military base Bondsteel and you bombarded that country, ripped part of it, and made that puppet pseudo-state Kosovo...And you had a face to speak about the annexation of Crimea that was always Russian? you, hypocrites. You tried that s**t with Syria too, you killed ten of thousands of civilians, but there were Russians and you suddenly stopped in your binge destruction. Yes, I also wonder why would you support dictators, because you don't live in a democracy, your country is a militaristic plutocracy, the biggest bully in the world, and you are the cause for the war in Ukraine, that sucker Zelensky really thought you andNATO will help him... go, and you will start a thermonuclear war, you will be gone too.

@@ozymandiasnullifidian5590 US is not the only scum. Russia and China too. All superpowers with nuclear weapons and white supremacist and communist, all of them are scum.

@@ozymandiasnullifidian5590 After WW2, the USSR supported revolutionaries and coups as well. Iraq was attacked in the First Gulf War because it invaded Kuwait and Saudi Arabia, Saddam Hussain never signed a peace treaty. Iraq is now a democracy and is far from a puppet of the USA. Libya was attacked due to a UN resolution to protect the Libyan people. Ghaddafi sponsored the Lockerbie Bombing, at that time the UK wasn't his enemy. Serbia wasn't fighting separatists, Croatia and Slovenia both legally voted to leave Yugoslavia, Serbia responded with military force. And talking of Bosnia, the ICC found that Serbia was committing genocide against Bosnian Muslims who were not radicals. The USA has access to Italy/Greece, so why have a base in Kosovo that isn't secure and is surrounded by Serbia? KFOR, the peacekeeping force in Kosovo, included Russian troops. Kosovo and Crimea are not the same. Kosovo declared independence by its own volition and broke no international laws doing so. The Russian actions in Crimea was an annexation and broke several international laws (the UN wasn't allowed to monitor the vote, so it's void). Declarations of independence, if of your own volition, are allowed, but annexations are not even if it used to be 'yours'. NATO is providing weapons which have proven to be far more effective than anything Russia has, along with other equipment, training and crippling sanctions. We don't need to directly fight Russia, we'll just use money like the previous two times. Syria, the Americas were bad, yes, but Have you not seen what Russia is doing, its worse. They purposely target civilians, use cluster bombs and phosphorous and support a regime willing to use chemical weapons on its own people. You say America is militarised and a plutocracy. Russia is even more so. In the USA many don't look up to the military, but in Russia signs of the military are everywhere and criticism of it repressed with imprisonment. Russia is far more corrupt that the USA. Russia started the war by crossing the border with a huge invasion force. Don't worry in a thermonuclear war you won't have to worry about the USA any more, because you'd be gone too.

Because it is the only one known to be capable of destroying any armor system on the battlefield. It is also a Fire and forget weapon unlike the ones you mentioned. The Javelin gives the ability to fire, drop the expended munition tube, reposition, and load a new missile tube and fire again quickly.

Because UNLIKE you the soldiers on the front Know what they like

All those thick armours you mentioned are on the front and sides of the tank, the Javelin missile hits the top of the tank where the armour is much thinner. This is why the Javelin is the best ATGM at the moment.

LES HA FALTADO DECIR LAS 1365 UNIDADES QUE HA ENVIADO ESPAÑA EN SU PRIMER ENVIO , LOS C 90 Y LOS C 100 , PESAN MUY MUY POCO, SON DESECHABLES , DISPARA Y HUYE , SON LOS MEJORES PARA COMBATIR EN CIUDADES

@@josetoledorivera5208 C90 = M3 ... I see the advantage ... small weight 4.8kg. And C100 = Alcotán-100? Penetration 700 mm, that is pretty good.

Yes France did send some Milan, but was hidden...Milan is a french-german missile system, extremly efficient and unjammable, but need a tripod to be use

NLAW is a guided missile with proximity detonation

The nlaws is self guiding

@@zenko247 no its not its aimed and fired like a LAW66 or 72

@@montys420- "no its not its aimed and fired like a LAW66 or 72" That's incorrect. With unguided recoilless weapons you have to manually adjust for distance. The NLAW's missile makes adjustments midflight to keep the flight path as straight as possible. So, the gunner only has to aim at the target, or slightly above the target in top attack mode. The NLAW also has a mode where it takes in account the angular velocity of the launcher (how fast you're aiming left/right), and then the missile makes the adjustment shortly after launch to move into a collision trajectory. Apart from those two adjustments, it doesn't take in account the target, like traditional ATGMs do. So, if the target suddenly moves in unexpected ways, the missile will still mis. That's the downside of this system. The upside is that it's lighter than other ATGMs and it can be fired as quickly as unguided recoilless weapons.

@@AleksandrKramarenko still in the same category, just cause it has a computerised gyro to help for using on moving targets, is still aimed by looking through a scope/ or iron sites on RPG and 66 manually, no guidance required after launch!

Ukraine without weapons from the EU and NATO wouldn't have been able to slow the Russians almost to a halt. Unfortunately, if the enemy captures weapons depots, they'll get some of your weapons.

>> However the Russian army is just as advanced and have a superb competent and a high quantity of troops and tanks that is already on the verge of overcoming Ukraine. They are running away in big numbers and leaving their equipment behind. Their original plan was to take Ukraine in 4 days. The vast majority of the non-russian analysts agree that both the plan and implementation failed greatly.

@@FR-nt4ei They are not running away man, they did try Plan A which wasn't up to their expectation which was a quick victory by airborne infiltration and the mass spearhead attacks by the conscript, young soldiers along with the hardened Chechen forces which were repelled. However the main army has already moved in to take up the staging ground areas outside of the key cities and the key supply centers. They are only holding back the forces so that they do not get shelled by artillery and are conducting precision artillery strikes on necessary targets while they continue to encircle the main cities. The Russians have time on their hands and every day they are like a snake, constricting, closing the supply lanes, taking out the key installations, bit by bit, like death by suffocation. Ukraine did really well against the Russians and they performed admirable against all odds. However the sheer firepower and quantity of troops along with good mobility of forces meant that Ukraine doesn't have much time before she capitulates

@@ConstantineJoseph "They are only holding back the forces so that they do not get shelled by artillery and are conducting precision artillery strikes on necessary targets while they continue to encircle the main cities." My family is in the cities that they are shell with "precision strikes". They are wiping away entire neighbourhoods. Bombing schools and hospitals, residential buildings. 400 houses in Kharkiv alone are gone. My uncle's home is gone. Was that the necessary target? My parent's friends were driving out of Chernigiv by car, entire family is shot dead. You don't know what you're talking about. These things are just insensitive. Russians don't have time on their hands with all the sanctions. I'm not saying their army is weak. I'm saying that it's not motivated. Every day Ukraine is ramping up its global mobilisation and getting more help from the West. Russia is trying to get Syrian mercenaries and Belorussian forces into the war. They can't hold and police the cities they took. And they didn't take a single major one yet.

Russia continues to make huge tactical and stategic errors. Their field-craft looks very suspect and the logistical competence is laughable. Whatever happens now, the reputation of Russian Army and Air-force will never be the same again.

@@FR-nt4ei They are slow because they don't intend to level Ukrainian cities like they made Grozny into a pile of rubble. They are trying to win over the populace rather than making them mince meat buried in rubble. In Grozny, Russian tanks were known to have driven over building rubble as there could be anti tank teams or suicide bombers hidden beneath or inside every crag and hole. That was why they had to have a massive extermination strategy to root out all opposition. Not so in Ukraine because the Russians consider Ukraine a brother and apart of the Russian heritage, being the ancient homeland of all Russians. That is why the operation is slower due to the limitation of shelling, precision striking of enemy positions. Russians will usually not fire until fired upon as they want to take in tact homes and in tact buildings. They do not intend to level everything.