List of US Naval Vessels to be decommission this year in 2023

Подписаться 360 тыс.

Просмотров 102 тыс.

50% 1

Our Sponsor Aura Protects What You Value Most in One Easy-to-Use App Proactive protection for your assets, identity, family, and tech - so you can rest easy. Click on the link for 14 day free trial: aura.com/buzz
----------------------
Today the buzz will present the list of all US military naval vessels that will be decommissioned this year in 2023.
--------------------------
Credits:
hum3d.com/360-view/?id=214723
hum3d.com/3d-models/ticondero...
hum3d.com/3d-models/uss-freed...
hum3d.com/3d-models/cyclone-c...
------------------------------
FAIR-USE COPYRIGHT DISCLAIMER
* Copyright Disclaimer under Section 107 of the Copyright Act 1976, allowance is made for "fair use" for purposes such as criticism, commenting, news reporting, teaching, scholarship, and research. Fair use is a use permitted by copyright statute that might otherwise be infringing. Non-profit, educational or personal use tips the balance in favour of fair use.
The Buzz does not own the rights to these videos and pictures. They have, in accordance with fair use, been repurposed with the intent of educating and inspiring others. However, if any content owners would like their images removed, please contact us by email at-thebuzz938@gmail.com.

Развлечения

Опубликовано:

27 мар 2023

Ссылка:

Скачать:

Готовим ссылку...

Добавить в:

Мой плейлист

Посмотреть позже

Комментарии : 364

@thebuzz4108 Год назад

Click on the link for 14 day free trial: aura.com/buzz

@blackangel1690 Год назад

USA is same as Japan and UK that they relied on their warships and navy unlike Russia or Germany who is realized in their army only !

@Au60schild Год назад

FYI - A submarine is not a "ship". It's a "boat".

@johnross6314 Год назад

Every time I see this, I get sick. These are essential right now. Fully effective. Nothing to replace them. LCS not counted in my comment.

@joevicmeneses8918 Год назад

USS Chicago & Key West famously described in Tom Clancy's "Red Storm Rising"

@jwrockets Год назад

@@KennyInSubic I was on briefly from '95-96. Torpedoes and Sonar.

@aidanacebo9529 Год назад

hey, I've read that one. was camping out in the oregon hills and the local general store had a little free library. picked up that one and another about F22s facing off against a re-imperialized japan. red storm rising was a great book, really felt like you were in there with the bubbleheads.

@billwebb9643 Год назад

Don't forget the Foche! LOL!

@benbo4394 Год назад

The coast guard might be really interested in those LCS

@ericmason349 Год назад

They have too many problems. The mono hull type has a transmission-propulsion problem, and the tri hull type has cracks in the hull. The "modules" never worked.

@danielkapp9468 Год назад

The mono hull freedom class would be easier to fix, but will likely require some significant modifications, and will likely look very different from their current design. The tri-hull on the other hand, should never of left the computer, at least not as an aluminium ship. I remember seeing that one on popular mechanics as a kid and literally thinking, thats a stupid idea, I.E. how a paperclip breaks?

@robertkarp2070 Год назад

No, those LCS Class ships were designed disasters. Not even the Coast Guard would have a use for them except for target practice.

@warhorse03826 Год назад

no, but the cyclone-class ships would be perfect for the CG. I hear we may be giving a few of them to ukraine.

@Sshooter444 Год назад

No, they're not.

@McsMark1 Год назад

Whoever made B52's and F15's needs to start building Navy ships.

@carlweeks539 Год назад

Boeing for the B52 and Mcdonald Douglas for the F15. Mcdonald Douglas no longer exists it was bought and merged with Boeing. So you are requesting Boeing to make ships. Boeing also has a large number of other military and civilian aircraft still in service.

@McsMark1 Год назад

@@carlweeks539 You're Too LITERAL Carl. Yes, I know who Boeing and Mcdonald Douglas were and are, I meant THE MEN AND THE ZEITGEIST WHO ENGINEERED AND THEN BUILT those "ships". It's an America that's gone forever, replaced by one that's Woke and concerned with GENDER instead of designing and building BIG STICKS that strike fear in our enemies and last forever.

@dbyers3897 Год назад

You just answered your own question. Military aircraft & ocean going military vessels are like eggs & bowling balls. Similar in shape but otherwise different.

@McsMark1 Год назад

@@dbyers3897 You don't understand what I'm saying. Yes I know military aircraft & ocean going military vessels are like eggs & bowling balls. What I mean is THE MEN AND THE ZEITGEIST WHO ENGINEERED AND THEN BUILT those "ships". It's an America that's gone forever, replaced by one that's Woke and concerned with GENDER instead of designing and building BIG STICKS that strike fear in our enemies and last forever.

@jimdennis2451 Год назад

@@carlweeks539 Boeing made the old hydrofoils.

@tamer1773 Год назад

Sad to see these cruisers laid up, but from what I've read and learned from people I've spoken to the littoral combat ships never delivered what was promised or imagined. They were poorly thought out, poorly designed, and poorly armed ships that were a solution in search of a problem.

@kendallevans4079 Год назад

That describes most of the military equipment. It's designed to create jobs in the congress men's district so they look like working class hero's and get votes. Does it work? Was it needed? Who cares

@jamessimms415 Год назад

USS Gabriel Giffords is reportably unarmed

@steven4315 Год назад

@@jamessimms415 If you want inject politics into this, the LCS program was the brainchild of Secretary of the Navy England under President George W. Bush.

@kendallevans4079 Год назад

@@jamessimms415 And her husband will exploit her injury into a political career

@r.s.w.k4569 Год назад

36 billion wasted on this piece of crap. UNBELIEVABLE. That could have bought 10 Seawolf SSNs, imagine having a fleet of 13 Seawolfs right now instead of these crappy ships. The entire South China Sea would be a naval graveyard of scuttled Chinese destroyers, frigates, and amphibious ships.

@Zagoreni02A Год назад

So many ships been decommission but to little entering service.

@whatdoesntkillyoumakesyous6707 Год назад

I guess newer modern technology makes up for some of it

@Husker513 Год назад

They replaced by more technology ships

@MarcG7424 Год назад

Not enough ship yards to build replacements as fast as needed

@janvandeven906 Год назад

Waste of money i think using ships for a few years only

@niffy99 Год назад

LCS 5 was not commissioned in 1992, it was in 2015

@RetiredSailor60 Год назад

Hard to comprehend how long the Ticos have been in service. I remember when USS Vincennes arrived in San Diego around 1985. I was stationed on USS Cape Cod AD 43 1984-86 then. Was able to tour Vincennes. How Star Trek-like it was back then.

@libfab1 Год назад

Yep, I was part of the commissioning crew of CG-59. The first time I went into CIC when everything was lit up it was jaw dropping.. To quote the TAO when he looked over at me with mouth open... "Pretty cool huh!!"

@dougearnest7590 Год назад

Star Trek indeed. Reminiscent of the episode "The Ultimate Computer" - the Yorktown became the test bed for the "Smart Ship" program, in which a computer network was responsible for running the integrated control center on the bridge, monitoring condition assessment, damage control, machinery control and fuel control, monitoring the engines and navigating the ship. When someone entered a zero in the wrong field and the computer tried to divide by zero -- everything crashed. The ship was dead in the water for almost three hours. Rumor has it that wasn't the only time the ship needed to be towed back into port.

@hallmobility Год назад

I was there at the same time! The year was 1988. We watched USS Vincennes arrive in San Diego bay from our Santana 20, in between races. Back from a deployment in the Persian Gulf where she had the distinction of shooting down an Iranian airliner full of people. Many exciting racing memories from San Diego bay where it blows like crazy.

@RetiredSailor60 Год назад

@@hallmobility My assistant class leader from A School was on Vincennes when the Iranian Airbus was shot down. It was his first deployment.

@jamesk370 Год назад

The Freedom Class remind me more of Coast Guard High Endurance Cutters than Navy warships. I wonder if it would be feasible to transfer them to the USCG for that roll? At least it would not be a total loss on the money spent.

@jim2lane Год назад

I doubt the USCG would be interested in them. They have a horrendous service record in regards to maintenance costs. Continually breaking down during deployments, often requiring being towed back to harbor

@stevengrant8668 Год назад

Cracked hulls in blue water travel, because of hull weaknesses. Not good for the coast guard.

@michaelmaddy278 Год назад

How about the costal patrol boats that’s being decommissioned, wonder why the COASTGUARD couldn’t use them for smuggling operations, or other missions that doesn’t require the use of the large cutters. Never know when drug cartels will start using armed smuggling ships, they have used home made submarines to smuggle drugs to the U.S. it just seems like this administration is doing its best to drag our country down the toilet.

@hallmobility Год назад

Nobody wants these ships. Latin America? Nada.

@bozhijak Год назад

@@stevengrant8668 Damn. The concept is sound though.

@jwrockets Год назад

I was aboard the Chicago 1995-1996 in San Deigo just prior to being homeported to Pearl Harbor.

@anthonyschirillo4377 Год назад

It is a bad time to decommission these ships. Especially when we only produce 4 ships a year (and some of those are logistics ships, which we also need)!

@samuelcallejo1268 Год назад

Some of the Ticos are falling apart unfortunately due to age and use. What's outrageous is the decommissioning of the LCS. Some were commissioned as late as 2019. Unlike the Ticos which gave us decades of service, these LCS gave 10 years or less and have a troublesome operation and maintenance issues. LCS definite waste of Tax Payer money.

@Joshua-dt5vi Год назад

It actually 7-9 but yeah

@Husker513 Год назад

1 American ship=10 Chinese

@charliedontsurf334 Год назад

It’s a good thing these ships will be replaced before China attacks Taiwan. Oh wait…

@NFS_Challenger54 Год назад

I would just recommission the Iowa-class battleships, for their effectiveness and power projection. Also, I think they would be cheaper than the LCS.

@briangriffith3985 Год назад

4 year old ships being decommissioned.... they love to waste taxpayers money, right?

@garyechols9458 Год назад

The Freedom class couldn't perform their mission. The remaining six under construction will be refitted for a different mission.

@briangriffith3985 Год назад

@@garyechols9458 still a waste of taxpayers money. always heard from when i was small, " do it once and do it right " all this tech and data and experience and still they build shite...

@matthewhuszarik4173 Год назад

When decommissioned are these ship put in mothballs for several years or decades? In the case of a war it would be a lot easier and much faster to refurbish and recommission these decommissioned ships than it would be to build new.

@Mark-ki7ic Год назад

@@garyechols9458 I heard they were pier queens, spending more time getting fixed then at sea.

@sethwinslow Год назад

No one “loves” wasting taxpayer money. That does not mean these ships proved to be cost-effective over time. They have not, and there are myriad reasons for this. But keeping these ships in service would be throwing good money after bad. Keeping these ships in service *WOULD* be wasting taxpayer money. Admitting a mistake (the LCS design and changing the LCS mission mid-design and post-deployment, which meant it was unsuited for the tasks it was assigned to) and moving on is the appropriate move for the DoD and USN. From the fact that you can’t understand this, I can only deduce that you’ve never made a mistake in your life. Or at least never admitted one. I’ll give you the benefit of the doubt and assume you’re perfect. Well, thanks for being you. It’s good to meet someone who has never made a mistake in his life. I’m impressed with your genius.

@jesseterrell1462 Год назад

Correction: USS Milwaukee was commissioned in 2015 not 1992

@FerretJohn Год назад

Well that hurts, I know the LCS's didn't deliver what was hoped for, but even so decommissioning ships that had only been up for less than four years, that's an expensive learning experience.

@Einwetok Год назад

All the contractors got paid, they could care less.

@FerretJohn Год назад

@@Einwetok Well, they won't be scrapped, despite their lackluster performance they're still good ships. We'll probably either give them to the Coast Guard of sell them to one of our allies who have a better use for Corvettes

@Elthenar Год назад

@@FerretJohn If I am not mistaken, the ships that are being decommissioned are due to severe cracking issues. Too severe to try and repair. They are going to be scrapped. Those first few ships had a big design flaw, I believe it was due to mixing metals leading to galvanic corrosion.

@Sitoirien Год назад

Wrong date of commission for Milwaukee, it was 21 november 2015.

@SimonBarrett74 Год назад

I bought a USS Mobile Bay Zippo lighter off the docks in Sydney when it came out with the USS Independence in the early 90’s. I wish I still had it. Sad to see it being retired after many years of service.

@artvictor5044 7 месяцев назад

This year in the months of September or October2023 if I am not mistaken there were additional 2 cyclone class patrol ship that was transferred to the Philippine Navy by the US Navy which bringing the total of 3 cyclone class patrol ships now in the inventory of PN. That patrol ships were now deployed and patrolling our EEZ territorial sea in the West Philippine sea.

@desimonevd Год назад

The LCSs were a waste of resources and money. But the others… we’re going to be missing, and needing, them before too long.

@tstahler5420 Год назад

The Chicago was one of our boats when I was on the McKee (AS-41).

@boataxe4605 Год назад

And now she faces the same future as the city that she’s named after.

@metallifreak100 Год назад

Are the Arleigh Burke Class Destroyers and Nimitz/Ford Class Carriers the only decent surface warships the navy has procured in the last 25 years?

@johnkranick1287 Год назад

Someone should go to prison for the LCS Program!!!

@robertkarp2070 Год назад

No, mistakes were made, yes. Everyone makes mistakes, no one is perfect. Someone gave a convincing sales pitch. It's not just one person that makes the decision, it goes before a panel for review. The figures looked good so they approved. Someone might have gotten dismissed over it but no one is going to prison, no crime was committed.

@davidpeters6536 Год назад

I am no navy expert but I was wondering if some of the subs and ships might be useful to other navies. The AUKUS agreement is looking to supply subs to Australia and the UK coastguard seems short of vessels. Time for a "yard sale"? I met some of the Bunker Hill crew in 1991 when they came back from the Gulf and stopped off for some R&R at Patong Beach in Phuket, Thailand. About 8-10 of the guys took over my bar for an afternoon as they liked my music choice. One I became good friends with and saw him almost every day they were off duty. He gave me a Bunker Hill cap and a Desert Storm Zippo.

@machinesofgod Год назад

I was onboard one of the oldest LA class submarines. It was a great boat but over the decades of use, it became very obvious that it was time for her to be retired. The newer Virginia class subs have way more advanced capabilities and they'll be of better value and service for Australia and the USA over the long run than old used LA 688 boats.

@joseantonioplaza8596 Год назад

In the first Mobile Bay battle in 1781, spanish general Bernardo de Gálvez defeated english troops commanded by general Campbell, supporting american independence. The second battle of Mobile was the english counterattack to gain the place, but spanish defeated them again. The 3rd (naval) battle of Mobile was fought between the Union and the Confederacy in 1864

@moderna.f.p.6750 Год назад

Why U.S dont want to sell or donate those decommision battle ships to their allies? Specially to Philippine Navy.

@nicoins1598 Год назад

Maybe it has advance technology

@moderna.f.p.6750 Год назад

@@nicoins1598 so what for to be an allie?

@gryph01 Год назад

The cruisers are close to end of thebhull structural life. They would end up sitting in dry dock more than being at sea. Ditto for the Cyclone Class. And don't even get started with the Freedom class... pure basket of lemons

@Blackreaper95 Год назад

Because these ships are usually expensive to maintain and require American support systems to function which adds to the price, you'd be better off buying from an EU country because they build with export in mind whereas the US Navy builds ships to support US Navy combat doctrine.

@vlogsnijonas99 Год назад

The 2 cyclone class uss monsoon and uss chinook will transfer in the Philippines

@JeepWrangler1957 Год назад

You cannot tell me these ships cannot be refurbished and serve for another 20-30 years. Boy those LCS' are sure a good bang for the US taxpayers (sarcasm)

@polonez611 Год назад

Please Make video about top10 most advanced Kamikaze drones

@glennjohnston2267 Год назад

Some really good ships going bye bye.

@Einwetok Год назад

And some SINKEX specials.

@philthai99 Год назад

I really like the Los Angeles class nuclear submarines.

@Chris_at_Home Год назад

I worked on the 694 Groton when it was being built. I was building out cables to hook to sonar equipment and I wired the main communications panel which took over a month. I quit and went back to school and never went back.

@garyechols9458 Год назад

Los Angeles class is being replaced one for one by Virginia class. no loss of ships.

@Trek001 Год назад

You may like the _Los Angeles_ class, but there was a ballistic submarine from the Soviet Union back in the 80s that was chased halfway around the world by one and that boat's skipper hated it

@bbstacker4926 Год назад

Yet another BIG MISTAKE to decommission the CG class of ships. Yes, they are rather old and hard to maintain, but why would you decommission an entire class of ship without a planned replacement, just stupid. As for the LCS ships, they should have never been built in a large qty. After the first 1 or 2, they should have been able to figure out they were worthless, had no real mission and stopped building them.

@realistic.optimist Год назад

Going to have a cruiser shortage but the Flight IIA and Flight III Burke's are so close in capability ...

@OlsenTheWonderDog Год назад

Why can’t the LCS’ be repurposed for another mission, such as ASW or even to replace the coastal patrol crafts that are being decommissioned?

@billwebb9643 Год назад

Because they're barely seaworthy

@fktrctqd7942 Год назад

FreeDoom -Классно по пилили бюджетные деньги! Так держать! )))))))

@threefishing Год назад

Right now a ready state of parking most of these would be more wise. unless we have replacements for them. and we don't

@NFS_Challenger54 Год назад

I get decommissioning of many of the Ticonderoga-class cruisers, but what's up with decommissioning the LCS ships? Some of those only seen at best 5 years of service.

@jayss10 Год назад

Poorly engineered half baked program at best. The vessels never were able to reach their full speed potential due to hull cracking and bearing issues with the power plant. Yep. Our tax dollars down the drains for a program that was never properly engineered.

@NFS_Challenger54 Год назад

@@jayss10 That's one of the reasons why I like vessels from the WW1 and WW2 era. Can't beat engineering like that. I mean an 80-year-old battleship has MORE use than many of these half-assed new-gen warships.

@robertkarp2070 Год назад

They were a huge money burning mistake. Bad decisions were made on that one. They were a design disaster.

@matthewhuszarik4173 Год назад

Do they put these ships into mothballs for a decade or two incase of a war? Building new ships during a war would take much longer than taking these ships out of mothballs, refurbishing, and then manning them.

@matthewhuszarik4173 Год назад

I guess at least some of these ships continue to be used when transferred to allies.

@sidmoe81 Год назад

Why are some of these very new ships built in 2019/2020 being decommissioned

@RoboticDragon Год назад

Gear problems that are too expensive to fix. They have some being built that are instead being modified instead.

@dbyers3897 Год назад

Because they're crap. Why do ya think?

@dougearnest7590 Год назад

I could have sworn the US Navy had more than two ships prior to 1987. In fact, I'm sure of it, since I had served on at least three of them prior to that year.

@dbyers3897 Год назад

What's your point or do you have one?

@dougearnest7590 Год назад

@@dbyers3897 - I obviously have one. If you have to ask, you either didn't watch the video, or if you did you won't understand my point. Have a nice day.

@dbyers3897 Год назад

@@dougearnest7590 Correctamundo, sir.

@hannymcfee Год назад

Two ships having that name prior

@ricardoreyesjr7750 Год назад

PC4 and PC9 are transfered to Philippine Navy.

@leonardmichaelmarkrandrup2375 Год назад

If only the US Navy can transfer some of the cruiser to the Philippine Navy as a stop gap force multiplier in the West Philippine Sea.

@Au60schild Год назад

They've reached the end of their service lives. They're falling apart.

@givi7910 Год назад

Bago ka mag bigay ng opinion isipin mo muna kung makakaya ba ng pinas ang maintenance cost ng barko armament/weapons palang ng cruiser nayan prolly cost more than 200m+ usd kulang nga pondo ng pinas para makompleto ang armament ng Jose Rizal class frigate.

@leonardmichaelmarkrandrup2375 Год назад

@@givi7910 wag mong maliitin ang kakayahan ng bansa natin. Kung kaya natin magpagawa ng bagong bapor, bumili ng bagong frigates at may darating pa. Kahit pa bagong fighter jets KAKAYANIN NG BANSA NATIN ANG MAINTENANCE. DI NAMAN NUCLEAR SUBMARINE O KAYA AIRCRAFT CARRIER ANG SINABI IBIGAY. DI KO IGNORAMUS.

@robertkarp2070 Год назад

They probably can be if the Philippine Government wants to buy them. A lot of decommissioned US Naval Ships are sold to foreign countries.

@billwebb9643 Год назад

If they're worn out, it would probably cost a fortune to make them viable again

@superstorby Год назад

Are the Ticos going into reserve of getting scrapped?

@joebfnl1079 Год назад

You know I could have sumed this entire video up in two minutes?

@johnjenkins8782 Год назад

I've been working as long as those subs, i wish i could decommision

@jimtownsend7899 Год назад

Just like the city she was named after, the USS Chicago was once proud and strong, but is now soon to die. And those POS Freedom class LCSs - Didn't even get 4 years out of them. Some ships are still shaking down in the same amount of time these canoes were in commission. Anybody else feeling like me and wishing they could get their hands on one of those Cyclone class PCs? Sure could have some fun with those!

@billwebb9643 Год назад

Or a Pegasus-class hydrofoil. That would be fun too.

@DThinkTalker Год назад

interesting

@mtarango Год назад

my brother in law is on the Bunker Hill, the decommisioning is in August, and sinking is in September

@moraez Год назад

Some politicians and their cronies need to be in jail for the LCS fiasco. They knew these boats were pieces of $#!+, yet they continued to line their pockets with taxpayer money.

@lynnfuentas9236 9 месяцев назад

Monsoon and Sirocco were transfered to the PHILIPPINES.

@jonharper4478 Год назад

Given the situation with China, and that we as yet have no real Cruiser replacement on the horizon, I feel that decommissioning any of the Cruisers would not be ideal until we had newer ones to replace them. Ordinarily I'd trust the brass at the Navy in their judgement, but the Military has proven to be extremely short sighted in recent years. My faith in their judgment is sorely lacking.

@dundonrl Год назад

The Flight III Burkes outside of not having as many VLS cells is far superior to the Ticonderoga class CG's in warfare! It's just because they have so much newer technology.

@hallmobility Год назад

"Only the woke will get promote"--Cho Bai Dung

@austinhughes1924 Год назад

So half of them are submarines.And the other half are ships that are barely a couple years old.

@thomasdragosr.841 Год назад

...and China says YEAAH!

@garyK.45ACP Год назад

Can we buy one surplus?

@georgepantazis141 Год назад

Australia 🇦🇺 should get the freedom class,🇦🇺🇬🇧🇺🇸🏴‍☠️👍maybe a connderoga cruiser or two.

@dbyers3897 Год назад

What the fudge would they do with a cruiser, numbskull?

@gameactual Год назад

I genuinely wonder if these will actually be decommissioned given the current geopolitical situation

@dbyers3897 Год назад

Ya gotta have crews & no branch is reaching their recruitment or retention goals.

@michaelmaddy278 Год назад

If the Biden administration has it their way they will be.

@baremetalmafia Год назад

By my estimation, both the recruitment shorts and ship retirements are fully on purpose IN LIGHT OF the issue with China. As if it provides some benefit to someone, not me and you. But someone.

@billwebb9643 Год назад

give them to the Ukrainians. They sank the Russian flag ship despite not even having a navy. With a couple of actual ships, they'd probably drown the entire Russian fleet.

@MrKim-kv2vv Год назад

Hmmm, wonder if the PC’s will be heading to UA 🤷🏼‍♂️

@bertoneautomotive7172 Год назад

We should be get those Littoral Ships for our Navy. There are some problems with it, but we could live with them and we could do our modifications in our own yards at a much lesser cost

@Au60schild Год назад

Dude, do you know how big those ships are? They'd never fit in your yard.

@stevengrant8668 Год назад

Those littoral combat ships were a mess from the start. When you have a ship, designed to fight in foreign coastal waters, that can't sail across the ocean to get there, because the hull cracks? There isn't any fixing them.

@bigbake132 Год назад

Which Navy is that?

@EviLThoR74 Год назад

DC the Freedom class? wow, such a waist of tax payer coin!

@map3384 Год назад

Can’t believe how many Reagan eta ships were still in service.

@robertkarp2070 Год назад

They are over 30 years old. That's pretty much a typical time of service for Naval Ships with a few exceptions.

@rhaxeedo 4 месяца назад

Why so many ticonderogas? But no new cruisers replacing them?

@arvinvanjavieralmonte188 Год назад

THESE TWO OF CYCLONE CLASS HAS BEING RETIRE THIS YEAR OF 2023 WHICH SHE TRANSFER OF 2 CYCLONE CLASS BY PHILIPPINE NAVY AS GENERAL MARIANO ALVAREZ CLASS OF PHILIPPINE NAVY BEING A PART OF LITTORIAL COMBAT FORCE

@garycleveland6410 Год назад

Decommissioning the Ticos is not wise. They should build a cruiser replacement.

@RS4xDave Год назад

No it is 100% wise. Trust me on that. They’re completely falling apart. As someone who may or may not be on one. It is a very very good idea.

@garycleveland6410 Год назад

@@RS4xDave Be that as it may, a new cruiser wouldn't be a bad idea.

@RS4xDave Год назад

@@garycleveland6410 Agreed. We canceled the CGX program for the LCS and DDG1000 program so that got canned. Unfortunately the cruisers are literally falling apart… I’d talk about how bad it is if I could but I’ll just say it’s pretty bad…

@garycleveland6410 Год назад

@@RS4xDave Having been retired military myself, I don't doubt it.

@Sarge395 Год назад

LCS Boondoggle Class

@wallisenein9903 Год назад

But what are they thinking, we cannot lose the Ticos. The US is not in a position to eliminate ships, we have many external threats, the Navy must reconsider, they cannot cruise as valuable as the Ticos.

@Noel-to9kf Год назад

If denomination gave Philippines ship and submarine in feature..

@eddieschwab864 Год назад

With the United States so worried about the situation for Taiwan rather than decommissioning them and slating them for scrap maybe we should sell them to Taiwan for a dollar a piece. Do that as a big up yours to Beijing for covid-19

@wheels-n-tires1846 Год назад

Works for me... Theyll be right at home moored with the Kidds...!!!

@Noel-to9kf Год назад

Retired submarine and ship give Philippines navy feature

@enardpring7691 Год назад

Philippine should have acquire decommission ship from US to straightening our navy capabilty in Benham rise..

@davidspurgeonjunsan3211 Год назад

Lol you think those ships are easy to maintain?

@lynnfuentas9236 9 месяцев назад

They have monsoon and Sirocco from usa last March.

@wvt5825 Год назад

The Freedom-class was a waste! 🔥🔥💵💵🔥💵💵🔥💵💵🔥💵💵🔥🔥

@noahmizrahi9834 Год назад

where is the USS John Paul Jones? I served aboard the USS Voyager un captain katheryn janeway

@lindahanson9549 Год назад

JPJ was in San Diego a few days ago

@giod6266 4 месяца назад

MG, these Freedom class ships are just 4/5 years old! Why just decommission them? Give them to Georgia, we have no Navy what so ever! And Cyclone slass ships also would be good ships to protect our black sea coast.. Give these ships to us!!!

@reybombay4095 Год назад

Lots of LCS ships to be decommission, lots of wasted money.

@dbyers3897 Год назад

Get over it. They tried to build radically new systems & they don't work as needed and/or are too costly to maintain, train or upgrade. Hundreds, probably even thousands of responsible people were involved in the design & manufacture process of these vessels. Better to admit the mistakes & move on.

@76Starship Год назад

Litoral not literal. Holy shit.

@shannonwoodcock1035 Год назад

How much money did we throw away with the LCS Class? Are they so bad that they can't be improved to be kept?

@SuperMaxdragon Год назад

Those ships were a flawed concept, and continued production was solely for the preservation of shipyard capacity. The shipyards that produced them are now switching to the constellation class frigates.

@scottjackson5173 Год назад

Some of these ships. Especially the submarine and the cruisers. Should all be taken in hand, for reconstruction and modernization. The reason for this is simple. Limited ship building ability, and China's fast growing navy. It will also provide some desperately needed jobs, to fight homelessness in the coastal regions. The Little Crappy Ships should never have been built. Still, these are new hulls designed as would be warships. Removal and replacement of unreliable systems with off the shelf systems installed instead. Say electric motors and LM 2500 gas turbines. Could be a game changer. Sea going blue water hulls are going to be desperately needed. Doing what is necessary to keep up our numbers of hulls in the water. Could be the difference between victory and defeat. From decommissioning to recommissioning should be the desired outcome for the next few decades. Especially when it comes to aircraft carriers. Building additional dry docks on the coasts, and the Great Lakes region. Is something that should also be undertaken.

@perpetualgrin5804 Год назад

The Australian Navy will purchase almost anything painted grey.

@neverluckybooster2689 Год назад

I don’t get it. They are removing ships at this point in time?

@Blackreaper95 Год назад

They are out of date and their replacements are being built and others are being finalized on the drawing board.

@alanwilliams4443 Год назад

@@Blackreaper95 Some, but no new cruisers are proposed.

@Blackreaper95 Год назад

@@alanwilliams4443 I believe the Navy is doing away with cruisers, it's understandable since the Arleigh Burke Flight III and DDG-X will be able to do everything cruisers can do with less crew members and lower upkeep costs, not to mention they can build more destroyers and make them faster.

@HRHolm-bi6zu Год назад

Being decomissioned, but being replaced also?

@dbyers3897 Год назад

If you wanna maintain fleet strength then that's how it works. Would you sell your clunker then go look for new wheels? Not if you can't afford to go without a ride.

@127EZ Год назад

Hive to Philippines

@tombeck2792 Год назад

"mo-bill, not Mobile Ala.

@Acc0rd79 Год назад

With China building up their Navy at a much faster rate than the US is, maybe it's time to slow down the chopping of these ships that are only 30 years old. Give them another 10 years while you have full size replacements.

@carolinejayes157 Год назад

They should sell them to allies ,at a knockdown price.!

@Husker513 Год назад

Ok, went to the Pentagon and do this

@phillipmoore3822 Год назад

Some Frigates out of San Diego,shame that their going

@caldasrafa Год назад

she is? it is is more apropiate on this case

@mikebrase5161 Год назад

No one will be held accountable for the LCS failure.

@dbyers3897 Год назад

Yes, by all means, let's spend millions on looking into the 41,000 people involved in these two projects & maybe a few will pay a fine, loose a pension, get demoted. Genius, pure genius. The Pentagon needs you, bro.

@mikebrase5161 Год назад

@@dbyers3897 you could've just stfu since you seem clueless how Procurement and Bureau of ships works.

@rickjones8735 2 месяца назад

I’d really like to know what happened to all the officers and civilians that had anything to do with the LCS program and development. They all should be in jail for such a colossal waste of taxpayer money.

@michaelusswisconsin6002 Год назад

They started to get rid of cruisers.

@puirYorick Год назад

LCS = boondoggle by the manufacturer. Shameful waste of taxpayers' money

@justinzak5025 Год назад

LCS are just tragic

@jjhead431 Год назад

Criminal mis-management of the US Fleet. Admirals need to go to jail.

@marcboss6 Год назад

Man the US should demand a refund on those littoral ships. 4 years? Seriously

@robertodemonte4251 Год назад

Why did the Freedom Class remain in service for so few years ? ...are they that bad ?

@user-od1yi5iq1k Год назад

Bad sea keeping abilities, troublesome engines and a lack of upgradeability. They are a good example of the how the US military industrial complex wastes taxpayer money by the billions.

@gryph01 Год назад

@@user-od1yi5iq1k Exactly. Have to keep the executives and shareholder in the money

@fanman71 Год назад

US Navy's foolish decisions. They have a version that Saudi Arabia purchased that is far more effective w/ proper weapons packages such as 16 VLS, 5 inch cannon, Harpoon missiles, etc.

@robertwhitehead8671HMCS Год назад

Wonder if the smaller ships might be sent to Ukraine?

@wwclay86 Год назад

Why? Haven't we given them enough??

@robertwhitehead8671HMCS Год назад

@@wwclay86 well lest just say I think Everyone let them down. Those that's signed the Budapest Memorandum most should have done more. Let's talk the ship its going to get gutted out of all critical items then sent to a company that will pay the goverment to scrap at penny's a pound into more basic resources most of the time that's India or some such country . As in my opinion India is siding with Russia in this the most part I think it's time to cut them off too also the USA might be able to charge Ukraine more then the penny's a lbs thay might get scraping it

@wwclay86 Год назад

@@robertwhitehead8671HMCS cut everyone off.

@robertwhitehead8671HMCS Год назад

@@wwclay86 ya starting with no more lobbyist donating to politicians no more money from the NRA no more Pharmaceutical company's maybe then there will be some honest politicians and rednecks can finally understand the constitution can be changed like the 18th amendment that stopped the sale of booze but was changed to permit the sale

@saleendriver Год назад

Considering the "leadership" we are stuck with in 2023, this is a horrible time to shrink the fleet. Guarantee the Puddin' Head regime will not be replacing these fine ships and will further cripple our country.

@bertdejesus3578 Год назад

Lots of those Littoral class was one of those controversial ships. What a waste of tax payer money!!!

@badgrfan Год назад

How about decommisioning a certain u.s. president?

@neverendingmods Год назад

Some of these ships are only 3 yrs old! There is no reason to be decommissioning most ships scheduled other than a money grab by military and certain government officials. And you haven't even touched on airforce losing the A10 warthog.

@reggieballares3804 11 месяцев назад

Bakit hnd natin bilihin yan.

@PzkwVIb Год назад

Can't you get an announcer that actually can speak standard English and one who understands what they are reading?

@barrysharp9792 Год назад

I totally agree. Got fed up with " Shedilled " Being English I know some Americans use different words for things than me, and that's fine. But to completely mispronounced a word is terrible. Who designed these auto speaking bots ?

@dbyers3897 Год назад

The Ministry of Information of the People's Republic of China has provided this briefing for free. You're welcome.

@theodoreolson8529 Год назад

30-year Navy veteran here. The only thing here that makes me cringe is the computer voice narration. It's pronounced litTORal not "literal". A video like this would be far better if accompanied by commentary to explain context as to why now.