Listening to the Voice of the Holy Spirit 

@nathandg0924 You must trust Pope Francis as well!

Bergoglio teaches evil

@JJ-hx8eo And not only the Bishops (as in a Council), but also the laicity that participated in it.

@ccl201 Pope Francis knows what he is doing. If you have really followed with the Synod, the "big problem" you present is unwarranted. The "confusion and chaos" is done by the social media and by certain individuals with schismatic tendencies.

Amen. ❤

Perfect response I was going to write a response, could not have said it better. Thank you Gob Bless

@constanceyeo199 His Holiness for the Pope; His Excellency for the Bishops.

@@SharonBoland-ui3ns And the Bishop of Rome is also the Pope. Big deal, lol! You must read the comment of the person I've replied to, if you haven't understood it wasn't mentioning Pope Francis. ☺

​@@therealong you just are not a happy person are you? Your comments to everyone have a rude tone to them. Do you know how to be kind? Do you know how to show love to the people that comment? Being nice goes a long way and makes people feel good, please try it, maybe you'll feel better too 😊🕊🙏✝️💜🤍💜

@@michellepriore5610 Here comes some "commentology" for you only. I didn't comment to everyone (as you inferred), and I gave some thumb-ups, and one thumb-down. I only made 5 comments around (you missed one), and the first one here was actually my very first one, 20 hours ago, as the time at the top shows. I can't see it has a rude tone, btw, and the "lols" are just ironical and in good spirit. You might have never seen really rude and nasty comments by trolls who only look for bickering and scoffing and to disrupt a conversation. Also, I always reply to the person in question, in context both to the video and the content of their comment, calling a spade a spade, and waiting to see the reaction of the person. (Many just make a comment on the first thing it strikes their mind and disappear.) When I click reply and the @name doesn't appear neither in gray, nor as hyperlink in blue, I copy it and put it at the top of my comment. Why, would you ask? Because there often are cases that have a long list of sub-comments without the mentioned @name, and it becomes quite impossible to know who is replying to whom and about what. (One example in my other replies, when I had to ask again.) Often those who comment only see the main comment topic and the very last one, or maybe they click reply to someone when their @name doesn't get tagged. in either cases that comment always becomes the last one of the series. (It's not like FB where each successive comment has its own sub-comments section) I have not seen any single comments by you alone, except for those four you have been "stalking me" with! Lol (irony again). Don't worry, you say nice things and make good points after all, though you missed the intentions of my comments: the use of correct terms and words and consistent concepts that won't contradict what one will convey. The answers reveal where the commenter is coming from. One cannot know by only one comment. However, like I wrote first here in reply to @constanceyeo199, (she never responded), the Ecclesiastical title to the bishops is His Excellency, while His Holiness is reserved only for the Pope. And it matters! Lol again! And also this one here is not a "sermon", it's a reflection of Bishop Barron's tour to Rome. (It's also important to distinguish between a form of speech from another one. Did you happen to listen to the interview with John Allen that was posted before this video? It has a lot of strange and ambiguous comments. Finally, and I'll go: did you notice that the guy I responded to above left the scene? I guess you didn't catch what he replied me, so you don't know. Pax Christi

Lol, here is he "Father", and in your other comment is he "Bishop"? Make up your mind about how you're going to address him. 🙃

​@@therealong that's not a nice response to Constanceyeo199. Whether ANYONE addresses him as Father or Bishop doesn't matter. Be nice and kind to one another. There's enuf negativity and rudeness in this world. Comment with love and kindness. 🙏🕊✝️🤍💜🤍

Constanceyeo199- I pray you get a chance to meet Bishop Barron, me too!! We can do a road trip to Minnesota to visit him 😊🙏🕊🙌💜🤍💜✝️

​@@michellepriore5610 ​ You have not seen yet, not responded to any of all the true negativeness that accumulated here since I replied to you in another comment. Some comments here are real wicked, against religion, Christianity and the Church, and even against Bishop Barron himself. That's not only "in this world", that's here, on this video! Also, on a second thought, you made a mountain out of a molehill, regarding my comments, cuz one always needs to retain a certain sense of humor as well.

@@therealong Sense of humor is not rude

I would like to heal the situation and have a conversation.

@@brendamyc3173 Are you replying to yourself? lol

Comments can sometimes be hidden. Although sometimes I add more to a comment so the comment is not a long paragraph.

​@@therealong here you are for the 3rd time in this comment section of Bishop Barron's sermon being rude to someone's comment. I think we need to pray for you to find peace, happiness and love in your life 🕊🙏✝️💜🤍💜

​@@brendamyc3173 I would like to meet Bishop Barron also. So does another commenter candaceyeo199. I said we can do a road trip to MN, you in?!?!?!😊😅😂

"By this they will know you are my disciples, if you love one another." I think I finally get it. The reason you Christians go running around obsessing about other people's sins, and collecting your stones, is because this one simple thing that Jesus told you to do is actually too hard for you. You cannot bear to love your fellow man, which is the one thing that God told you to do.

@@jenniferabel2811 I don't think you get it at all. Lying to people is not an act of love.

@@BensWorkshop Maybe! I admit, I am merely guessing that you disagree with someone's interpretation of the Bible. Christians are always disagreeing with interpretations and then pointing fingers at each other and sending each other to hell. I thought Jesus said, "Love one another. Stop judging one another. Forgive each other." God came to earth, and we killed him. Why? Because we judged him and said he was a sinner. He was working some miracles on the Sabbath, and so forth, and they said he was a liar and leading the faithful to accept sin.

@@jenniferabel2811 When jesus said "let he who is without sin cast the first stone", he followed it by telling the prostitute to sin no more. He didn't say it was not a sin. So my original point stands. Do not tell people what is sinful is not sinful. That would be a grave error and sin. The Catholic church is big on forgiving sin and accepting sinners. In fact the church is full of sinners.

@@jenniferabel2811 Simple but very good reply! LOVE, as Agape-Love, and Charity, in 1 Cor.13. You could have added though what Jesus said immediately before: "As I have loved you.", and that is was "a new commandment" He was giving them. Although it was to be found in the Old Testament as well, as "loving your neighbor as yourself", Jesus extended this Love to embrace all men, even enemies, in other passages of the Gospels.

@carmendamen1397 Of course not, should you have understood. There are channels that explain that. Seek and you will find. 🙃

The statement was about transexuals, so those who have received the sex change surgery but have repented. It is not about “transgender” individuals who are unfortunately still living in their delusion.

Ahhh! That helps a lot! Thank you very much. There's much to learn about the language of this group of individuals.

@user-dj5xx3ir4l Reading your comment shows only that you haven't really understood the purpose of the Synod, since you "firmly disagree"!

@@therealong Laughably childish comment. Believe it or not, it's actually possible to be well informed on the synod's stated purpose and firmly disagree with it. It is a clear sign of ideology invading your faith to suggest that it isn't possible to understand the synods aims and still disagree with it.

​@@therealong #4 rude and nasty comment to someone by you in this 1 sermon comment section. Do you ever have something nice to say or are uou always so rude and negative? As much as I don't want to but knowing it's the right thing to do, I will pray for you 🙏

@@therealongwhich would be what purpose? To criticize but not define doesn't advance your point

@@EcstaticTemporality You are also criticizing, without defining why. My critique is self-explanatory only in relation to the context, and to the comment of the first poster of this thread, who is expressing an oxymoron. He dodged and refused to explain the reasons behind his rejection (of the second term), nor the purpose of posting it, justifying the whole with his naive response. So, actually, I don't really have to "define" anything for you if you don't comprehend what I wrote, in the right context; he has! So you should have addressed him, not me, or commented something else, always in relation to the context. However, let me be clear first that I consider a comment by its expressing content, and successive new replies in relation to all previous comments. (Although I have already explained this in length to the person before you, (who accused me of being rude and nasty), in another comment here.) This is a Catholic site, yes?, and Bishop Barron is very prolific voice of the Catholic Faith in all its aspects, yes?. I can't really know your background and intentions so I have to suppose. You have jumped in with a picture of the philosopher Martin Heidegger, and a nickname reflecting his theories of "being and time", which gives the impression that you promote his existentialism, not the Catholic faith. Bishop Barron at least has other videos discussing Christian existentialism in philosophical terms. Why don't you listen to these? I can't even know if you're a Catholic, or interested in Catholicism, or even an atheist, or if you have heard of "The Synod of Synodality". Even Bishop Barron has a specific video explaining what it is. You ask me to explain to you what is the purpose of my criticizing? Well, I already told you. What is your point?