Live Feeds: Demolition of home in Idaho murders | King Road house being demolished |  

The University of Idaho are disgusting for this, I don't why anyone would want to send their kids there after the way the university have disregarded the victims if this crime.

Yes....shame on all the shady things they've done.

They know who the killers are and will not allow the truth to come out .

@@BlackStump172yep!!

@@BlackStump172- you say “ killers “ What are you talking about? Please share!

Why? So people can put ridicous flower crosses up indefinitely and hold memorials every year forever?

It’s not considered a active crime scene and hasn’t been for a very long time🤷🏻‍♀️😂🤣

Suspicious for sure

@@josephk4932 well, that’s your theory because the prosecution has never said that and if they did then why would the defense team agree to the demolition of this house stop with all your conspiracy theories 😂😂😂😂

THAT'S THE NAME OF THE GAME, FROM DAY ONE. Who in the circle are they covering for is it someone, out of the picture.

That's where I would look!

SAME THING HAPPEN DESTROYING EVIDANCE ON THE DAY OF SEPTEMBER- 2001.

@josephk4932 That's what I keep on asking. What is the rush? What are they hiding? I don't trust the university, law enforcement, the prosecution, or the judge. None of them have done the right thing for the victims and their families. IMO, they are all corrupt. Sickening!

​@josephk4932 it didn't work that way... First of all, jury dont usually tour the crimes centre because that is one giant piece of hearsay, even with tour are organised, there are severe limit on what the jury can do, that's because unless Kohberger were there too and you put the jury in the same room with BF And DM at their original location, that represent nothing. Second, if this is such an exculpatory evidence when the juror can't hear Kohberger walking in, then the Defence have WAY MORE to lose than the prosecution, because they don't really need the house itself and the position to convict him, but he would have needed it to proof he is innocents, then why the defence agree to the tear down? Because it won't happen unless both side agree

Agreed!

This house is only a few wooden planks. Dylan heard e v e r y s i n g l e s c r e a m.

They're not babies, they're adults. If you did you job as a parent right and you started raising adults once they became ambulatory at 18 months, then they should have no problem being self sufficient, resilient, and able to thrive despite challenges in life which is a minimum threshold. But somehow I think you coddled them b/c you couldn't turn off your Oedipal devouring mother tendencies. In which case, they're "adult infants" who will be incapable to making it in the world....

@@Chad_MaxGood lord ! You do sound so superior .

We don’t want your babies. Enrollment is way up at UI, two years in a row.

I wouldn't feel comfortable sending my kids to most woke colleges or public schools, for that matter . We always want our children to be safe . Best to you and your family, stay safe .

​@ChadiusMaximus196 To be honest, I wouldn't feel comfortable sending my kids to most woke colleges . Kids are resilient but also public schools and colleges play a big part in forming them . Homeschooling is the only option for me . Also , I don't think you have kids , because it's a damn hard job keeping them safe these days . Chill out bucko !!!

It's not guaranteed that jurors will be allowed to visit the crime scene.

Totally agree

​@@joey7769it's a guarantee now with the house gone

@@josephk4932 But the trial is not for DM and BF, so you've just shown a good reason to get rid of the house. People need to focus on the killer and stop worrying about the two surviving roommates.

@@joey7769why wouldn’t they have gone to the house everyone else in the town trampled thru it without protective gear. Whole thing is bs

I've never heard someone say, "as a former juror." 😂 Probably because it's not coming from a place of authority. Juries are notoriously unreliable. They get it wrong constantly. They aren't professionals in the field of criminal justice and they work off instruction. You have no idea if potential evidence would be inculpatory (suggesting guilt) or exculpatory (pointing toward innocence) so you can't point to a win for the defense because the potential evidence hasn't been found, which is the very argument as to why the house shouldn't be destroyed. This comment got on my nerves because just stating that this is a win for defense shows your assumptions and proves the very issues we have with our jury system. They are terrible and proven bias. They are a real problem in this country and I wouldn't be bragging about being a part of it. Although, we don't really get a choice, do we. You could have the McDonald's worker down the road deciding your fate.

@lazydaisy2292 I served when there were laws and real consequences. You are right by instruction. You have someone's life in your hands that is the difference now a days weak people. Like California. The Death Penalty is law but a tiny weak coward of a man held up the execution I pain stakingly spent days contemplating the evidence and facts causing heart break for the family. That is what has happened to our supposed law and order problems and it is going to be much much worst . There is now no accountability. Put me in another trial. I will weigh the evidence observe the facts and hand down 100 more Death Penalties if it is proved beyond a reasonable doubt. One guy without immense military training doing this to 4 health young people in a wooden house without anyone hearing a scream in a small town is a miracle. Takes a 100 percent vote for a Capital Case. No one can be in any doubt. You bring all evidence including the crime scene if you are blessed enough to have it. This trial without seeing the crime scene will be hard to explain but as you said may now a days have someone who doesn't care about their country or their service as a juror. An honest juror will have to contemplate the above. Very hard sell with no crime scene. I have removed former as I served my country proudly and made the ultimate decision as required of me.

@@ashleysmith2509 sounds like you are proud to have imposed the death penalty, and almost take some kind of sick pleasure in it? "Put me in a trial" so you can impose 100 more death penalties?! The fact that the majority of jurors involved in death penalty cases end up traumatized from the experience and never want to be in that position again speaks volumes about your desire to have a hand in sending another 100 people to death. It's worrying that a former juror (yes, 'former' because you are no longer a juror) appears such an advocate for the death penalty, and at the same time has clearly made pre-judgments on the innocence/guilt of the defendant in this case.

@@christianjward you better believe 10000 percent I am proud of my decision. I had the decency and solid wisdom to put the family and victims justice ahead of my own loss by following the letter of the law of the State and Country I live. It was excruciating pressure to my own hurt but I chose to do what was right by the laws written to protect society from killers.

Agreed NOONE is gonna not think about that when they see that area

That’s a great point….. seeing the empty lot is more of a reminder. It’s like they are trying to erase what happened and erase the memories of 4 students. Everyone should protest around the University every day to shine a dark light until they finally have to close their doors.

Bet the neighbors are happy the "party house" has gone though.

Uk too 🇬🇧

I signed it too. Nothing like a jury actually visiting the scene. However we have no idea how much evidence has been removed or cleaned or attempted to clean. Personally. Nothing should have been moved in that house. Lock it up leave everything as is: most impact visually and sensorially on jury. They went in there so fast and started pulling stuff out. But, I am hopeful they got everything they needed. Digital just doesn’t hit the same as actually being in the physical place. We’re all numb when it comes to things we see digitally: not the same.

I signed the petition also and I'm from the UK 🇬🇧

A tremendous shame! Feel the same. Greetings from Germany. xxx

What if the knife was in there like the sheath was?

@@deliajones9541 The knife would have been mentioned by now, I guess....And do we know it was just "the knife" - meaning a knife. Could have been several weapons as well....

​@@josephk4932well then how do you explain the defense wanting it down ? Obviously if your guilty you don't want the house up to see how easily it is to go up and down stairs and wipe out 4 students .

The jury doesn't get that choice. It's up to the attorneys and judge. The prosecution doesn't need it. They have more than enough.

@desertsunset8025 Defence might be hoping that with the house down, it'll be harder to prove certain elements ​of the crime, some of the evidence or witness testimony. The State must prove its case, not BK, so removing a HUGE piece of physical evidence is a plus for the defence.

@@mykidsaresupercute I didn’t say they can make the choice. I said they had a right to see it.

@@josephk4932I’m not sure jurors have ever toured crime scenes-

They 100% are. 💯

@@josephk4932 Yes and is serving a life sentence it didn't take long.

Oh God.

I'm sure they'll rebuild

True.

How is this legal?

Defo should stand as a reminder to all Students not to repeat the crime in future

Feel there's a question of him guilty just not sure

Exactly!

They don't want to expose the alleged tunnel in the bottom storage/bedroom. Like in the photos. There's a padlock closet door. What exactly is it, we may never know now.

@@moondancerose7930 🤦‍♀️

They knocked down what they didnt want us seeing in the dark! Was the house completely gutted before this, shower bath toilet kitchen etc as not seen anything other than wood?

@@moondancerose7930 I saw thy door on a different news channel. I have only just started watching this upload, so not sure if you can see it on this. I haven’t seen the pics of this door anywhere else though. What are your thoughts on what is behind the padlocked door? A basement/cellar? I live in Australia and haven’t really followed this case too closely.

Allegedly, there is a tunnel entrance in the bottom bedroom that was used for storage. You can see it in photos. Supposedly, the tunnel leads to a University of Idaho faculty house that sits on a hill nearby.

My guess is the cover up for DM. I’m sorry, but I think she was involved.

@@KT-fm7dt Me also. Money talks...

Think $, university to pay less property taxes 2024 for empty lot.

There’s going to be a trial like JB said will commence in the late spring or beg summer. Please watch this video again. This is not a quick and fix process like seen in Hollywood movies. This is real life and that takes months and even years in some cases. It’s much more complicated than we realize.

Isn’t that what I said?

You are presumed innocent. Must be found guilty beyond a reasonable doubt. It requires all 12/12 jurors to find the person guilty and 12/12 again for the Death Penalty. If there is any doubt the Max Penalty is life.

Most all the time, their biggest moves are at the holidays, just before the Super Bowl.

Agreed

From day one not surprise!

Like a secret tunnel that was located in the bottom storage bedroom. You can clearly see a locked closet/door in the photos. Allegedly, it leads to a faculty house on a hill in the area. Rumors from Idaho.

My opinion is it should of been left standing, they messed up right from the start, should of left the furniture, etc. Left it the way it was when the crime occurred! Thanks 🙂 🚨 🚔

Yes...VERY UNUSUAL!

We don’t know all the facts. The people close to them obviously know more than us and must feel confident they’ve got the right and only guy responsible for their murders. Students aren’t going to protest against qualified law enforcement, lawyers and judges who we put our trust in to do their job correctly, especially with little facts confirmed about this case… from what we’ve seen they’ve got the right guy and tons of evidence that has yet to be released. Yes I agree destroying the house before trial is ridiculous, but if they have hundreds of pieces of evidence, 3d models, and walk through virtual systems in place going through the crime scene, which they do then maybe the house is just a grim reminder of the loved ones who died there.

@@jolieanne1374 I guess we will see come trial. I’m not that confident at this point.

It's because it's winter and in northern latitudes it's dark ~16 hours a day... The sun came up here at 8AM today... And it will be down by 4PM...

I’m sorry,, but I think his family are odd. They are not even attending the trial.

Who was it I can't remember

​@jasonexploring I can't remember, but police had a shoot out with him, and I think he was shot. He was a loose cannon.

I think his name was Brian too, I'm trying to find it

Yup and same for judge. They care about their paychecks and having a job.

Right too much was done too fast in my opinion.

Doesn’t matter. The house should not have been demolished until after trial. Period.

The most corrupt decision ever.

Are you a prosecutor? A detective? A forensic officer?

It is. I would say more evil than dumb. Dumb makes it sound innocent, and we all know someone, somewhere, knows more than we do.

@@NiecyB What is your issue because you obviously have one... You seem obviously bothered by anybody who is bothered by this house being torn down how odd to go after everyone

Agreed

Normally that is the standard

Yep if they wanted the house gone then get on with the trial

@@josephk4932 That is quite the details Joseph.... With very relevant points

must be biden voters

Why is it stupid.

It’s a BUSINESS decision, plain & simple.

@@lifeis2171it’s stupid due to possible evidence that could have been missed. It’s insanity to destroy prior to a trial. Absolutely baffling.

@@savinggrace1110It’s intentional I believe. Somebody doesn’t want there to be evidence.

Exactly. The fact that B.K. is sitting in jail in their town watching t.v. is a huge reminder.

yes, the land it sat on means nothing.. deplorable actions taken by the uni.

The knife is probably in there like the sheath was

@@deliajones9541 idk he is creepy enough to hide it and go admire it later or use it again

@@deliajones9541 The house was forensically searched. If the knife was there they would have found it.

Not to mention that the layout inside is odd and would be better to be seen in person

💯

If you think that’s bad, wait till Nov. 5th.

@@bubb5225 what happens Nov 5th?

​@@jolynnballard8124yea , I wondered also . Person sounds creepy to me . Imo.

Election night

What a waste! Did the kids ever get the rest of their belongings? Too obvious they are hiding truths!!! Ethan's parents must be big donors??? Bet his siblings know exactly what happened and were told to zip it up. So much stuff could've been reused. All other houses are cleaned and rerented. So suspicious why they did this.

I agree. I think they’re hiding something.. just a feeling

Not here when Christmas is over and the new years starts

I agree with the beginning of your statement that house should not be torn down yet. BUT please remember, we live in America, people are innocent until proven guilty. The media can make anyone look guilty and they have done an excellent job making him guilty in the court of opinion. For the record, I do think he did it but he deservers his day in court.

@@josephk4932Bearded podgy guy at the Grub Truck , with friends .

You can't move on UNTIL THERE IS A CLOSE TO THE CASE . The fact that they prioritized a demolition date over a trial date is mind boggling.....the house was left standing for over a year and people accepted it. Suddenly they rush to tear it down because "it's a 'grim reminder'? It's time for the community to begin healing " ? WHAT ? There is something behind this I think I know what it is.... with all the trial delays on behalf of the defense and now this . I have a terrible feeling there will be no trial.after all I think he's going to plea out in the coming weeks . I 🙏 I'm wrong but....... 😢

I am just sick watching this.

@@josephk4932As they should. That is exactly why I didn’t want it destroyed. The jurors need to physically see just how close they were to the murders. I think they were involved. Sorry. That is just my opinion.

I heard the president of the university grew up in that house. Don't know what difference that would make

You know nothing about criminal justice

You said it yourself, no one is going to forget those victims and where it occurred in that house but is that how those beautiful vibrant victims want to be remembered.

@Completetwilightfan Honestly, how can you make that assumption based on my comment when I was only speaking morally on the situation. I may not be an expert in criminal justice, however, I do know a thing or two about being a decent human being. Let me elaborate on why I believe they made a mistake.. Considering the information we have and the fact they have tried to keep such a tight lip on all the facts (I also understand that it is for the integrity of the case), I would like to believe that the investigators did a thorough job when collecting evidence. But what if they didn't? Yes, the FBI went in and obtained a digital layout of the home, but that is not the same as allowing the jury to physically walk through it; especially since the home had a very unusual layout. Furthermore, wouldn't it make more sense to be safe than sorry? What if there was something accidentally missed when obtaining evidence? It's more common than not for investigations to be mishandled and the perpetrator walk free, and the victims and their families never receive justice. If they have a slam dunk case for a conviction, whether it's Brian Kohberger or not, then that is great and the debate on the house being torn down or not will be irrelevant.. But what if they don't? What if that house is the last thing standing between whether he walks free or is held accountable for his actions? I'm just saying my fear is it was the wrong choice. There is nothing comparable to the jury being able to walk through that house. I want to see these young, beautiful souls and their families receive the justice they deserve because this entire situation is a tragedy!

@@britlovee443 morality doesn’t matter in criminal justice. They do NOT do jury walk throughs often like you see in movies, which tells me you know nothing about criminal justice, again. What will an empty house show them? Everything’s photographed. Everyone living there who sees the house everyday and is reminded of murdered kids is who’s opinion should matter. The prosecution and defense BOTH signed off on this, so it’s ridiculous for the public to pretend that they know better.

You are brilliant no one else has said that ......