I really wonder how he can talk about a framework of a deal about a ceasefire although everybody knows Netanyahu doesn't like a deal about a ceasefire!!! Netanyahu says this openly and clearly.
The Japanese tradition of *inviting U.S. officials to the atomic bombing commemorations* is intriguing. Shouldn't it elicit strong reactions in Japan, just as it would if the United States invited 9/11 perpetrators to the anniversary ceremonies of that event? Miller's use of the term "celebration" to describe the anniversary of the atomic bombing did not escape me. What's celebratory about it? Perhaps the appropriate words would be "day of remembrance."🙂
@@Odetojoyous But they woudl not conduct this war without weapons and billions of dollars from US. Miller does not have problems telling Palestinians what they need to do.
Assuming, for a moment, that the administration's *recurring lie* that Sinwar was "always the decider" in Hamas was credible, would not it be *reckless* to remove "the decider," given his importance to the ceasefire negotiations?
When was the U.S. not trying *to hurt* Iran's economy? What were all those *decades of sanctions* about, if not to destabilize Iran in the hopes of effecting regime change?
It would be worthwhile to see funny man Miller *compare the track record* of Russian presence in the Sahel with the "Western" counterpart. How long have "Western" forces been active in the Sahel? Had the region's security and economic situation improved before *their sackings* in favor of a Russian intervention? Turning to historical precedence, I can say, with great certainty, that "Western" interference in Southern Africa during the apartheid era was more destabilizing to the region than its Russian counterpart.
You are dreaming. He is an effective in communication US government positions. It might be hypocritical, but so are the policies he s talking about. He is only the mounth piece
