The actual question being asked at the end: can we use AI to get rid of our writers and proofreaders and just feed you generic word salad garbage for maximum profit?
I think if you went slower not only could you improve on the information(as you are very intelligent) but you could make it sound smoother as well. And you could get across to a larger audience as well.
It seems that she has to work hard just to enunciate the words but I agree, slower would be smoother and more natural. She seems like a nice person but she really isn't suited for this role. She has only shown minimal improvement since starting this role and really doesn't have an aptitude for it.
@@MoreBollocks-ui2zs I think she has the aptitude but talks to fast for her thought process. Allot of really intelligent people talk slower in order to further innumerate our thoughts. I think if she did we would see a larger improvement.
2:06 Is this a chat gpt bit, i feel like severity scores of 10 only exist in theory? 5:27 Did hak5 just do that thing where they 'pictures right here on the screen' and not superpose the image? 1:59 was this ChatGPT? I think 10 score is too narrow for reality 4:07 state sponsored hak is generally from local. I agree.
CVE scores of 10 are rare, but there have been two or three already in 2024. I remember one that affected GitHub, and another in Postgres I think. And there was that supply chain / social engineering attack that put a backdoor in a common Linux compression utility. I'm not sure if that got a CVE number, but I think it would score a 10.
Why can you not get someone for this channel who actually sounds like they know what they are talking about and not just reading from a script they obviously dont understand.
Not only reading from the script, it sounds like it was done on the first take as well. Pro tip: when you say there's going to be a picture of the individual you're talking about in the story, make sure to put up the picture in post.
