Lost 3.0 Stub Driver Review

Подписаться 539

Просмотров 6 тыс.

50% 1

Watch as we review the all new Lost 3.0 Stub Driver, a stepped-down and “stubbed”, low end/high performance, smaller wave-ripping machine. Fitting more effortlessly into small pockets or quick dumpy sections than the Sub Drivers, it is perfect for small beach break.

Опубликовано:

18 сен 2024

Ссылка:

Скачать:

Готовим ссылку...

Добавить в:

Мой плейлист

Посмотреть позже

Комментарии : 7

@AEVMU 10 месяцев назад

Is the rocker pretty similar with the Sub Driver 2.0? Also, does this have a more pulled in tail than the Sub Driver 2.0? They seem so similar.

@geronimomendezelizalde4448 7 месяцев назад

I'm ok with all the theoretical bull shit that is amazingly explained, don't get me wrong I do apreciate it. But don't forget to show more the freaking board... I mean shape in general, deck, edges, tail thickness, widest point area, nose, forward orientated shape, etc. Havent seen anything of that. Really helps people decisions, specially for people that live outside usa that dont have retailes and Buy online. Love Lost surfboards.

@sealanimccall1787 10 месяцев назад

What size would be best for someone who is 5'4 130lbs currently riding a 5'5 lost v2 grinder in SD 2-3ft waves? I like the model I just don't know how small i should get? Nervous about the lack of liters in 5'5 model.

@1flatabs 4 месяца назад

Thank you for the informative videos. I do notice that there’s no V out the back… I guess that will essentially just make the board more stable and predictable…? And without the V, and to compensate for more of that stability and loosen up the board there is the continuous rocker… I am assuming yet still, the board might be more stable overall than a sub driver 2.0 with the V out the back… Do you think this will be the case? Essentially, I’m just looking for a board that is good for a small waves, that is high performance is stable/predictable overall but loosens when on the tail. I am a front footed surfer for the most part. Thanks 🤙🏻

@matty9094 Месяц назад

Think you’re on track with those assumptions. The big difference IMO between the 3.0 and 2.0 is the rocker profile. The driver 3.0 and 3.0 stub have more kick in the tail than the 2.0 series. Holding the board in my hands the tail is more pulled in too I think. Those attributes would slow the board down to give it more control in steeper waves, so I think that’s why they took out the vee and made it a double concave - to balance out the rocker and add some speed and looseness since it’s geared towards smaller waves. The result is a really responsive board that should excel for an active surfer in 2-5ft punchy waves. The design approach (performance outline and performance rocker but with lots of concave to counteract it) is very similar to what Sharpeye has been doing for a long time (ie, Disco, Inferno 72)