Lost Tomb Of Jesus Scam - Unearthed - The Talpiot Tomb 

@Tim Edin its also not uncommon ,though not necessarily what's happening at all, for people who have worked their entire lives building their entire careers on the current story that they take a dogmatic approach to the situation. after watching these back to back, both side put forth some good evidence, i would have more questions for this video as its responding things like were all the 19 names the the registry spelled the same that referred to Jose. just different things like that to clarify things for me. Either way very compelling and interesting stuff :) hope to learn more about these tombs and if there has been more debate.

I agree with you Tom

Top box is an atheist organization.

Simcha made a piece of propaganda, there is plenty of scientific literature to read on this matter which all contradict Simcha's findings. After all, the guy is more of a filmmaker / Indiana Jones than an archeaologist. Most importantly, before we get into ANYTHING about the rarity of names, ask yourself this most obvious problem: *Why is the poor family of a carpenter from Nazareth being buried in a rich mans tomb in Talpiot/Jerusalem???* Thats like some poor family from the Philadelphia hood dying and being buried 150 km away in a marble masoleum the ritziest "richy rich" cemetary in West Chester!?!?! They don't seem to address this glaring discrepancy.

@@ralphralpherson9441 he has only put forward an argument. There is no proof and he hasn't claimed that. He has never declared himself an archaeologist, only himself a film maker.

For those denigrating Simcha, it's because their world view and very belief system has been rocked. They ignore the science and evidence.

i very much like and follow simcha, he asks all the questions others dont and isnt so closed minded, that he blindly believes stuff. revealing the truth, is often uncomfy for the 'establishment'. i also find it very ignorant for one scholar to discredit another......it just makes everything political when it shouldnt be.

@@clairelouise4063 He has not revealed anything. He has no proof that was Jesus' tomb. That is his and the atheist Cameron's idea. No proof at all. Apparently, the scientific community didn't put much faith in their assumptions either.

@@nebulahound He has no science to back him up. His goal is to discredit Jesus, same with the atheist Cameron.

That is realy proof is a whole family jesus nazareth, don't be deny

Agreed. The Gospel of Thomas IS Powerful. The True saying of Jesus. Much older than the his story that was made up centuries later.

​@@andreaspease9935it was not authentic that's why it was rejected

I'm with you on that.

You should be asking your self .if jesus is caming again then how is it going to play out when muslims do not believe in jesus.where will they go.does jesus have jurisdiction over muslims.

@@mblau899 meh 😒

If "Jesus" wasn't crucified and resurrected (if he even existed), Christianity is false. If you don't care, you're not a Christian. Blood atonement/resurrection is the entire BASIS of the faith.

@@CaptainKirkDiggler meh

Or Yehoshu'a ben El Elyon...

@@alanschuetz9552 is that the same name in Hebrew? I don't know much Hebrew.

Alexandros Lysais "Yeshua bar" is Aramaic. "Yehoshu'a ben El Elyon" means "Joshua son of the Most High" in Hebrew. 'Iesous in Greek corresponds to Yehoshu'a in Hebrew. Examine Joshua, the son of Nun, in the Septuagint (LXX) as well as the Dead Sea Scrolls (DSS) and the Masoretic Text (MT); it's 'Iesous and Yehoshu'a [yod-he-vav-shin-ayin], respectively.

@@alanschuetz9552 thank you!

Alexandros Lysais You are most welcome! May your family and you be written in the Lamb's Book of Life.

😂😂😂 Hmmmm... wonder who? 😂

I would agree that no proof is good enough when someone does not believe, because there is hard physical evidence of what the Bible states as being true but a lot of people do not accept the evidence because it goes against their beliefs or traditions One major example is the true site of Mount Sinai, the real site of the Exodus can be verified by hard evidence, such as burnt peak of the mountain split rock that Moses broke for water (with water marks / erosion) the Altar that had the golden calf / bull on and so on, everything that the Bible states can be found at the true site which is in Saudi Arabia Where as the Traditional site (St Catherine's Monastery) does not have any evidence of what the Bible states because that site is the wrong one plus it is still in Egypt, when the Bible clearly stated that they left Egypt

@U.S.S. Scambalam Read what I said again... You want to believe or disbelieve that is your choice but what I said is 100% fact / true You can look for the evidence if You liek there is plenty of videos of what I stated here on youtube But for some reason I do think You would be one of those that no matter what the evidence says it would never be good enough for You That is your choice

@U.S.S. Scambalam I agree that there has been confusion and truth mixed together I would estimate (this is just my own estimation) that any and all religions teach approximately 3% truth and 97% BS, the BS they teach is what furthers their own Agendas and gains them money and power over the people that follow them Yes sometimes belief does get in the way of learning, or finding out the truth, I agree, but that also works both ways and for everyone both believers and disbelievers alike Just for clarity I do not follow any man made religion like I said they are all full of BS primarily I do personally believe in God and Christ and the Bible and from what I have found out personally, the Bible is true If people followed the evidence without any prejudice and without following what man made religions state as truth, then they would get to the actual truth

@U.S.S. Scambalam Nah I dont think I will as it does seem You are just looking for a discussion that You get to belittle others that believe different than Yourself and I don't want any part of a BS discussion when You obviously do not want and adult conversation or to find the truth out

Nice summary. Wasn't it Winston Churchill who said "Lies, damned lies and statistics"?

I agree. One thing that's VERY WRONG about how this video started is that it was doing its best to debunk Simcha instead of applying the same rigor and critical analysis that Simcha and his crew applied to come up with their theory. This video has NO HYPOTHESIS of its own. It was REACTIONARY- meaning the prime motivation was to defend Christian orthodoxy and from there attack Simcha's findings as hoax. True, we can debate the kind of statistics used in the Simcha-Cameron video- but this "debunk" video leaves out too many details when it questioned the argument on the cluster of names. This video carelessly forgets- it's not just the name "Mariamne" that Simcha considered- but the "Mara" that comes before it- as well as the "triangular markings" and the possibility that the "cross" before Jesus's name was deliberately put there NOT as a cross but as a "tau" to distinguish it from the common practice of putting random crosses to mark the position of the lids on the bone boxes or ossuaries. Ironically, this video also analyzes the occurrence of "Jose" as "common" based on a LIST of NAMES under Joseph- not on the actual ossuaries found. That's already suspect- because ALL JOSE names would include even the JOSEs that were buried OUTSIDE OF THE SPECIFIC TIME FRAME of the JESUS FAMILY and THE ONES THAT WERE BURIED WITH OTHER JEWS NOT ASSOCIATED WITH JESUS. I think the Simcha calculations may have had a slight margin of error as all statistics go- but the computation was done IN THE CONTEXT OF THIS CLUSTER OF NAMES NOT RANDOMLY APPEARING IN ANY OTHER OSSUARIES BELONGING TO THE TIME OF JESUS. If this video intends to debunk Simcha's theory, then it should have clearly argued that there is the exact SAME CLUSTER OF NAMES identifiable with Jesus's family which has the SAME EQUAL or HIGHER PROBABILITY OF pointing out the location of JESUS'S TOMB. But no. They're not interested in ANY other theory as to where Jesus's tomb is. Obviously, this video simply wants to expose any weakness or loophole and OVER-stretch it, forgetting that Simcha's investigation couldn't have been based on PERFECT EVIDENCE since they were well over 2000 years old AND the BONES in the ossuaries had been re- buried without any consideration as to the possibilities Simcha himself had raised in his video. To debunk Simcha, this video has to do THREE THINGS: 1. Prove that there is ANOTHER CONTEXT in which those names may occur and how that CONTEXT is a more persuasive explanation. 2. Prove that ALL the FINDINGS were BASED ON CONTAMINATED DATA and SOURCES or that the EVIDENCE was CONTRIVED. In other words, for a scam to be a scam, you have to prove HOW the EVIDENCE WAS PLANTED- ARTIFICIALLY PRODUCED and MADE TO LOOK GENUINE. 3. Prove that Simcha has anything to gain from trying to investigate the phenomena in the manner that he did. He's NOT DEBUNKING Christianity, after all- it is THIS VIDEO which is making that assumption. This video is simply NOT interested in Simcha's investigation from a scientific perspective NOR in finding the truth about Jesus's tomb. It simply wants to debunk the previous investigation (and its accompanying theories) in relation to what it GROSSLY perceives as a THREAT to Christianity. This video didn't even attempt to rebut counters to their assumptions- like HOW it's equally possible that the followers of Jesus might have done EVERYTHING to hide the family tomb to UPHOLD Jesus's "physical resurrection" at all costs. Simcha's video offered counterpoints to their arguments THEN rebutted those counterpoints. This video, on the other hand, is clearly one-sided. Likewise, NONE of the three points or conditions above have been met by this video to be considered a decent counter to Simcha's investigation and conclusions. Remember: Jesus was executed as a criminal before the coming of the kingdom of God was EVER realized in the way Jesus prophesied it when he was still alive. If you were his follower- how would you convince everyone that he speaks the TRUTH about God's kingdom despite his powerlessness against Rome and his fellow Jews? Is Christianity based on WISDOM or SUPERNATURAL FACTS? Is the wisdom of Christianity so fragile and vulnerable that it would fall flat on the face of any question regarding Jesus's "human" existence? Jesus's followers may have been as human as any one of us. It's their faith that elevated them to the status that made them extraordinary human beings (almost superhuman) in the eyes of the world. What's NOT debatable is that the people surrounding Jesus back then made extraordinary sacrifices to defend the wisdom of a man martyred by haters and narcissists in an age of chaos and bigotry. Love your enemies- is what Jesus taught. He wanted everyone to embrace humanity as a common identity. There's no Jew, Gentile, master or slave. Everyone is thy neighbor, thy mother or father, thy child, thy brother or sister. I believe in Jesus, and yet- I still believe Simcha's investigation has more merit and honesty.

"...Thou doth protest too much, methinks" you mean.

What he was saying is that more test should have been perforormed on the substance they found in the oxuaries. Not sure if it was even full bones. But I do agree more test should have been ran.

Archeology is simply not sience. So you always have to rely on the believes of single individuals. Same applies on the pyramids btw and thats a clear example for how wrong archeologists can be

😂😂😂😂😂😂

That guy isn't even an archaeologist. He's not a scholar. He is a journalist with an agenda. We can look at evidence and weigh it against each other. It's fake though that really matters. I don't believe Jesus was married anymore than I believe he was gay. I personally believe there is motive too put certain things amongst the Gospels that humanize and or flaw Jesus. What would be the point of Jesus to Marry . It's a very humanistic view of God. If people have any faith and read the last few lines of the Bible then they would know that adding all this stuff is quite irrelevant and kind of wrong. Maybe most of us need to worry about understanding the words that are already there rather than adding a bunch. He was once claiming that they had found the Caiaphas of the Bible. No I don't have a problem with that. What I have a problem with is his claim that because two crucifixion nails had supposedly been found with him then it must have changed the whole narrative of the Bible and he must have been a good guy. Even if he had been buried with crucifixion nails what crucifixion nails might they be? It didn't even mean that he was a good guy before Jesus died. It could have meant that he was a good guy after the fact. There was nothing but speculation . He seems to have a bad habit of jumping to conclusions. I've enjoyed watching some of his documentaries but can pull out the speculation. I wouldn't be opposed to the fact that Caiaphas was a good guy. Go the way that he tried to make it was because of these supposed crucifixion nails is that he knew which oshuary belonged to Caiaphas and somehow the crucifixion nails made him good before Jesus died. Who even knows where those crucifixion nails came from? From what was said in that video crucifixion nails were something people either carried around or were buried with. Not because of some guilt-ridden thing but rather some kind of protection. So how would he even know that those were crucifixion nails of Jesus? He had to speculate a lot.

Israel will choke on its orthodoxy in the same way that the US is choking on its diversity.

Many parties do not want people to know if it is the tomb of Jesus or not they have a vested interest in keeping things like that quiet for political power and or money

Simcha wanted to know. You could see the excitement in his and the others eyes when he went into the tomb and wanted the truth. It's underlying when someone came out to order them to seal the tomb. Secrets that are hidden- maybe for protection, or for propaganda.. politics, power, money, etc, that's in Satan's department.

who cares

Your very first sentence is wrong. The second sentence is wrong. The third sentence is correct. Because all tombs in residential areas are restricted. Read a book, and no, I don't mean the damn Bible. Like an actual book.

@@roo3434 So your response is telling me I’m wrong, followed by insults. Cause clearly, if you say it’s wrong, it must be so and you know well enough to know what books I read or don’t. Yeah, definitely dialogue to take seriously-LOL

I thought the inscriptions on the tombs were very disputable. Some scribe marks were ignored while others were highlighted. They even admitted the inscriptions were atypical, looking more like "graffiti" or "casual" inscriptions. I think further investigation is very warranted and agree that the blocking and censoring is very suspicious, so I remain open minded.

@@roo3434 so the finding of a tomb with an obvious holy family living in it from the markings, which would rock the Christian world and their resurrection beliefs doesn't merit an investigation because of a residential rule?🤣🤣🤣🤣

all of the scholars in the film each one of them have retracted themselves from what they said earlier or heavily modified what they said. But most of you dont do enough research for that

@@MrTahref why are you everywhere trying to destroy,please shut up,i keep finding you on every video

@@dcc-randomstorieswithmel7424 Nah, people defending Simcha who made a movie full of lies will hear the truth. If you dont know who Simcha is try to do some research about that person. Its also the reason who this video is made, to show the movie Lost Tomb Of Jesus was a scam.

The more likely scenario, Simcha cherry picked his “science” to fit his narrative and sell his documentary.

Jesus never had supernatural powers as claimed in the bible. Elite church forces lie Paul. History is written by the winners of war.

The pharasees planned everything... Matthew 28:12 And when they were assembled with the elders, and had taken counsel, they gave large money unto the soldiers, 28:13 Saying, Say ye, His disciples came by night, and stole him away while we slept. 28:14 And if this come to the governor's ears, we will persuade him, and secure you. 28:15 So they took the money, and did as they were taught: and this saying is commonly reported among the Jews until this day.

The angel said the body wasn’t moved though so I bet the Pharisees killed another innocent man the same way as Jesus to cover up the ressurection. They probably used the same crown of thorns too. 🤷🏼‍♀️

You're learning faster than I did. I used to think Christian "scholars" had something to say. Took me a long time to figure out it is a scam taking advantage of our apelike mentality. I know there are some who are so twisted they actually want the bible to be true. But the majority? All paid for, their livelyhoods depend on it. And the perks, like easy access to innocent children.

I agree with you greeko the documentary kicks a little dust in the air but not enough to call the original a scam... they never proved it was false or even close, and the original never said it was, they said it was probable and most likely, but no one knows

IAA enjoys lying?

@@angelarigido7161 not really but they might be protecting some things without spitting the real reasons. There are a lot of factors as to why they have to end the exploration to a screeching halt but it's too hard to give unjust speculations abt it. However, Simcha only curiously theorizes but never claimed anything as a fact for it to be labeled as a scam (because they never even got to the end of their investigation to end w/ a final conclusion) just like what this docu is claiming

al of the scholars in the film each one of them have retracted themselves from what they said earlier or heavily modified what they said. But most of you dont do enough research for that

The arrogance of the film is proclaiming that the possibility of that being the tomb of Jesus is nil.

all of the scholars in the film each one of them have retracted themselves from what they said earlier or heavily modified what they said. But most of you dont do enough research for that

And this video is offering the reasons why it is not possible. This offends you simply because to a uninformed person only would it be possible. And the only reason why you believe it is possible is because you want to believe that for the evidence and expert opinions conclude it cannot be due to the manifold evidences against that possibilty. But dream on, I don't mind, the only one you are harming is yourself with the offense you take to anothers right to refute the rubbish put out by this imaginary hypothesis. No doubt you also believe you originate from an ape, or is it a fish, or a rock.

A higher power would be there for all to see. Delusional people always have an excuse... Well he wants to be mysterious. Or he has reasons of his own. And the best one is, he wants you to believe on faith... Christians, living proof mankind has a common ancestor with monkeys.

They’re not afraid - only concerned to put down deception. The resurrection is attested to abundantly. Whether Yeshua was married or not has no bearing on the truth of the scripture. That being said, he was probably not given what is and is not stated. Christianity survived and thrived on the sole basis of the witnesses to the resurrection- not a dead Messiah but a living Messiah.

@@Mikha335 What witnesses?

Bart Bannister Read it and you will see.

​@@Mikha335 I thought you said, "The resurrection is attested to abundantly?" I assume the book you want me to read is the bible. You'd think there would be more evidence than that, if it really happened. I already know, none of the historians, philosophers nor politicians, living in Judea at the time, say a word about Jesus or any miracle. Even the bible doesn't know what year he died. Nor the year he was born, for that matter. I guess the bible trumps reality.

They were reburied by the authorities as is standard practice. I am not aware of anyone knowing if the location was kept track of for these specific bones.

they were reburied.. "the lost tomb of jesus" movie did mention it..

Buried... but bones 🦴 from the Caiaphas tomb were not buried and can be visited... they may even be on display...

TRY AGAIN .. NO IT DOES NOT SAY SHE CLAIMED THE BODY .. 1 THE TOMB WAS SEALED (SUPPOSED TO BE) .. 2. IN THE SHOW IT SAYS THE BODY STAYS IN THE TOMB FOR A YEAR . 3 THE ANGELS INTERCEPTED THE WOMEN AND TOLD THEM TO GO TO GALILEE

@@larryreinhart5555 John 19:38 upon hearing of Jesus' death this secret disciple of Jesus asked Pilate that he might take away the body of Jesus. Jewish law at the time of Jesus' death would only allow a direct family member to claim a body from a cross, other wise the Roman's would let them rot on the crosses !!! ( kinda the point ) This secret disciple they lead you to believe is Joseph of Aremathia.....not a family member no matter what else you believe ! He was in fear of the Jews, so why would he announce to the Roman's that he was claiming the man they wanted dead ?

Not a true statement.

Joseph of Arimathea arranged with the Sanhedren for him to be taken down quickly and he claimed the body. It was a joint thing.

@@2degucitas The body of Jesus was in the Tomb and Jesus rose on the third day.

it is same reason why anti christian are using the tomb to claim it was jesus because of it is his tomb it could mean jesus didnt resurrect

Well said.

you're right, what matters is to be good, help people animals, people close to you locally, not with evil charities, but with your own will, have fun and bring as much life into the world as possible.

@Modern Spirit How do you that Australia or the so called South America is not actually up?

picky picky picky

Absolutely

@Modern Spirit do they stand on their heafs there?

He arose again and ascended. Again? ?

Exactly. We have nothing to be afraid about, we know it's going to be provem to be wrong. And further investigation is necessary to prove that.

@@ashley_brown6106 👈I think thats the weird he was talking about.

Absolutely this is the most sane comment I've read on here.

I noticed the box of James was put there after being around elsewhere for a much longer amount of time. That's going to get somebody's ire up. I also noticed the expert helping decipher what was scratched on the "Jesus" box said jeshu. It did not say the equivalent of Jesus Christ. Jesus of Nazareth. Alpha and Omega. Other tomb discoveries have in my lifetime as I have seen these come up and documentaries were presented. One of the televised theories for the lack of bones was that during the crusades, the knights templar got there first and stole His bones. Another strange speculation was they took them to the new world and laid them to rest. I wondered, if you were to do this? And your savior is the Christ? Why move bones from a site speculated and leave the box? It's all speculation without enough evidence. The evidence to the resurrection is much greater, it's also written about by non believers. Sure there has been scribes or copyists who added things or thought they corrected things. The Creeds have survived in antiquity. They are accepted by scholars.

Well then you arent looking for truth. You're looking for spiritual opium.

@@doubleugly1594 'Blessed are those who have not seen, and have believed.' - John 20:29

@@Yiskah777What is that supposed to mean in this context?.. im fully aware of John 20:29, what does it have to do with my comment?

@@doubleugly1594 Glad you know it. But still you're seeking for the truth about Jesus. What kind of truth? Truth or a flaws?

it kind of makes a difference if the person you follow is lying to his followers about being the son of God.

Christianity is based on the resurrection. Of course we love Jesus as a man too, but without his divine nature our whole religion is a hoax

@@ashley_brown6106 No matter what, He was divine, One should follow Heaven instead of church dogma and rigidity

@@taya1584 if it is PROVEN that Jesus wasn't resurrected (which I highly doubt) his whole divinity is questioned.

@@ashley_brown6106 Each one of us has a different relationship with Jesus, those who are afraid and must follow the church dogma and those who trust Him and love Him no matter what

Nice fairytale.

Indeed it was. Amen!

Truth is stranger than fiction because fiction must adhere to what seemed possible at the time. Plausible to the hearing. If you wanted people to believe a false story, you wouldn't tell verbatim and maintain your truth even unto death by burning, beheading, impalement, or even crucifixion for yourself !

Yeah, this film is trying to debunk the other film with no context or other proof besides looking around for something to back up their story.

I don't think either side has concrete argument either way. I think it's interesting and it's a possibility, the rebuttal film seems to want to remove the idea that it's a possibility. And the rebuttal even said that many have deciphered and read these names as this but they found one person who reads it differently and that sealed the deal for them. That's kind of more politics than science. The original film honestly I was okay with listening to it but I was rather uncomfortable when they started talking about the possibility of Jesus having a son. As it goes against everything I believe. However who am I to say. The people arguing against the tomb are simply saying that's not what they learned...that's not in the Bible so that's not true. However they don't seem to take in the fact that the Bible is a collection of scripture that was assembled by men who by definition are imperfect, so how can the Bible be perfect. You can easily see it today as people in power want to rewrite history.. only a fool would believe that that hasn't happened in the past with the Bible, the important thing is you take the spirit of your faith. None of these professionals know for sure either, no matter how smug or arrogant they are, their knowledge is imperfect because they are imperfect.

@@jimeagle1155 it's interesting you say this because Jesus did have a son. The history that you have been told comes from the elite "Christian authorities", basically the Roman Catholic Church and fellow Christian cronies. If we study history and not blind faith, we come to the conclusion that Jewish people were not Buddhist monks or Catholic priests in terms of celibacy for holy men and women. The church would only allow celibacy as a means to reach God, while Jewish faith was ok with marriage. Our culture has been brainwashed by powerful church officials with narratives to fit their own agenda. Joseph was his biological father, Mary his mother. They were married. It happens. The bible has Joseph seen all over with her. What else would be the reason they're together so much? Science and history are our biggest teachers. Not blind faith dictated by power hungry popes and church leaders.

​@@kingcarriere8323 estás equivocado tienes que estudiar más la historia, los textos sobre Jesús son anteriores a la iglesia misma de roma así que no hay tal conspiración ni compinches como dices, de hecho fueron perseguidos y ejecutados por decir la verdad de Jesús! hay más de 10 mil textos acerca de Jesús de la época, solo hay 10 de plantón y no tienes dudas sobre platón, eso es porque estás sesgado....

Sounds more like it’s super convenient for you not to accept critical thinking. Seems a lot more plausible you’re in denial than that this video has a biased agenda getting in the way of basic science. I further suspect if this were an equivalent debunking of “proof” about Muhammad / Islam you’d be magically less upset or resistant to accepting its accuracy.

Word. But what does Chuck Norris have to do with this?

Damn you are simple minded.

@@andersandersen6295 Not as bad as the idiot you seem to be.

So you wrote your own gospel, which isn't in the bible. Alas, what's another fairytale? Christians, can't agree among themselves and they want to run the government.

@@bartbannister394 Nope, no need to write anything... Instead interpreted what the meaning was. By the way, anybody can run our government better than the criminals we have right now.

1 in 330,000 chance it's not.

@@woodspirit98 How did you arrive at that figure?

Simcha is a very fine film maker and investigative journalist, but he is in no way an archeologist. I enjoy his shows, and his take on history, but I don’t think he has all the answers.

He is not an archeologist but Investigative Journalist ,,,

He's a film maker and that's about it.

He's a rat looking phony.

They were dishonest on this one

This is exactly my belief regarding this video or the others, coz if jesus hasnt been resurrected with his whole body how could his nail mark and spear mark be seen and touch by mortal called Thomas...???

If jesus hasnt been ressurrected wholly how could his nail mark and spear mark be touch by mortal beings like Thomas....

@Paula Wallace It would seem by your comment, you reject Jesus Christ as the deity. If I understand where you are coming from correctly. Just because in your own self centered brain has no Widom from God. Does not make you right. It's sad because you could not be more wrong. Wrong on the most important matter of your life. Nothing in the world more important than ones own Salvation.

@Paula Wallace What is your point? Even demons in the New Testament new who Jesus was. The demons bowed down to Jesus. Does not mean if you know your Bible, you will see the Kingdom of God.

@Paula Wallace Jesus and the Creator is one in the same. God made himself into a man, The Holy Trinity. (God the Father, God the Son, God the Holy Spirit. ONLY ONE GOD! Only God can heal the blind and raise the dead. There is a RU-vid channel called, Acts 17. The host of the channel tries respectfully converting Muslims to Christianity. In doing so he links Old Testament Scriptures with New Testament Scriptures to explain the deity of Christ. I challenge you to listen to, Billy Graham on RU-vid. You can type in search, "Billy Graham, Demons"or "Who is Jesus".

Kind of like what's happening with the events of January 6, 2021.

@@nebulahound omg really smh

that tomb is real...they also found the “Christ Hole” where he was crucified and where the Blood of ...go look up Ron Wyatt...

@@srgtsav Haha Ron Wyatt. He was a scam artist, not an archeologist.

@@chriswinchell1570 Why? Because he didn't give you what you wanted or expected?

@@M.Campbell-Sherwood Because there’s no documentation of anything he ever claimed to find. Everything he claims must be taken on faith which is where we started. He added nothing to the equation. You are the one who is satisfied merely because he gave you exactly what you wanted. Seems pretty coincidental.

@@chriswinchell1570 Ah but thats where you're wrong. There is documentation of many of the things he found. Barbara Walters even interviewed him when his Ark (the boat) find hit the public. The Turkish Government even made it official in June of 1987. There are newer things being released to this day. Also I'm never satisfied with anything less than the truth and I'm very careful when it comes to the study of Archaeology. I like to do my own research on Archaeological digs and come to my own conclusions and hypotheses. I mean I did study it after all. I really do think I know how to judge whether something is true or false from evidence given and from the evidence provided over the past 40+ years this is real.

yeah really do,

Both films are highly biased..

Moshe one has to wonder...they are trying so hard to disprove the very existence of God

@@Stormlucy111 Not quite so, but for the clergy it's very inconvenient findings and they have to sort to these experts to discredit original publisher Simcha Jacobovici without giving him a saying in this video.

"...they have to sort to these experts...", what do you mean by that? do you imply you are a better expert?. You are provided with a hypothesis from Simcha and you got provided with evidence that disproves Simchas claims. Unless you are a radical religious fundamentalist, where do you see evidence that the documentary is biased?

I agree! I was just about to say this. This doesn’t need to be titled a scam.

Plus Jesus Family would have been more Safe If they lived fare away from Jerusalem.

According to the Israel antiquity authority there’s significant evidence to suggest that the names on the ossuaries were altered before they were purchased by the Israel antiquity authority from Oded Golan, who is currently serving jail time for Forgery and Fraud, and the illegal trading of antiquities, he confessed to altering the James ossuary and one of the others.

I agree, it really doesn't matter to Christians. This is an archaeology money making opportunity. Pity they didn't say where they put Jesus's bones though. His DNA could be used to resurrect him... again.

If you watch the documentary on it there they explain that the bones were all buried together under the direction of the government something along those lines

true

If you actually watch the video the lost tomb of Jesus it explains to you what happens to the bones they were re-buried in a secret location why the all ossuarys were put in storage

I saw the first video and don’t recall any information stating where the bones are. Going to have to watch it again.

Well, He did die on the cross.

But none of that has been proven false separately

@@KingLarbear Good point, thank you!

@@MSHOOD123 It is possible that the process of the spirit leaving the body caused an energy burst, such as radiation, that left the body unrecognizable. It that were to happen then only those at the ascension would know that it actually was his body. Any authority would deny it, stating that he did not raise from the dead and this body was not his. Not saying that is what happened. Just putting forth a theory that might explain it.

A true Christian! Absolutely correct!

The resurrection is pivotal

How exactly?!???

@Roger Johnson -It is way more loikely someone is sitting back laughing at the ones that found Yshua’s tomb WITH BONES and all... smh. Don’t we know he ascended to heaven already? Did he put back on His flesh to walk around for a while and be seen only to lay back in the tomb again? Wouldn’t that tomb have been occupied by then? If this has someone really believing that’s Him and His Whole family in one small place ( cuz we all make it to the exact same place when we die) , that person doesn’t know the nature of the Bible of history or the ways of man.

Statistics show that the probability of these names occurring together in one tomb are 960 per million. There have been only about 150 tombs found with inscribed ossuaries. See Dr. Tabor's book.

"I find it odd that as soon as they found the boxes, they snagged them and hid them away for years." Oh you mean along with the hundreds of other oshuary boxes they snagged and hid away in a massive warehouse for years? There is nothing especially fantastic about these boxes being "snagged" as part of a batch of 100's of boxes. Why do you place such importance on just those boxes and ignore the rest of the "snagged" boxes in the warehouse? There are 100's of snagged boxes in there, why no similar importance on those. Or are you just going to convieniently ignore those? And it should waiver your faith if the ressurection is proved false, you're just too ignorant to see why it should waiver it. You are not a true follower, obviously. You are following a massively watered down version of christ where it doesnt matter if he was resurrected or not. Thats just odd. I think you are following a corrupted version of faith, but thats on you. Best of luck connecting with diet christ... HEY EVERYBODY!! DONT HAVE TIME FOR JESUS? THATS OKAY, COS NOW YOU CAN HAVE JESUS ANY WAY YOU WANT HIM!!! DONT CARE WHETHER HE WAS RESURRECTED OR NOT? DONT WANT THAT BURDEN? THATS COOL, NOW YOU HAVE CHRIST LITE? SHAPE HIM ANY WAY YOU WANT HIM! HE'S LIKE STRETCH ARMSTRONG, STRETCH HIM TO ANY FORM THAT SUITS YOUR BUSY LIFESTYLE!!! DIET CHRIST, FOR WHEN YOU JUST DONT HAVE THE TIME. Follower of Christ? Give me a break.

They claimed he didn't exist and it was all a fairy tale... So now they believe ?

The guy who owns the garden tomb is claiming bs on this family tomb. He claims Jesus was in the garden tomb 🤷🏼‍♀️

It has big implications for the resurrection though.

Bunch of garbage 👎 They can surely twist things . Jesus married how ridiculous.

You ever tried LSD?

@@scottowen2056 Not all visions are drug induced.

Mass hallucinations are extremely improbable and never happen over a period of many days

Jesus's resurrection could have been bodily as well...have you ever heard of any one going missing or dieing and the body not being recoverable or found....what would the family do...I'd tell you what I'd do I'd buy a coffin bury it put a head stone on it and then visit it when i missed him or her...this could be very well what happened.

Most critical thinkers do😊

and Santa's favourite reindeer was Rudolph. Everybody knows that!

@@djollyrodjeur your mockery will not be tolerated on judgement day. I pray u repent before God humbles you on that Great Day! Books will be opened!! Blessings!

They secretly took his body, its not like they are going to tell where his body lay, as jesus was an example for his claims of being the son of god, so they said he rose. If it were your family member would you do the same?

@@Seriouslydave have you done that to you dead family members? did you take the remains of one of your dead loved ones days after they died? come on! use your civilized mind..

@@nadra2409 yes, we took them from the hospital, to the funeral home, to the grave site, those systems werent around 2000 years ago, you ever heard of egyptians? They would take the innerds out and mummify their rich and royal, and 70 days later move them to their tomb, whats your point? Jesus was pretty infamous, he was put in a public tomb, then moved to a private one as the family suspected he would be desecrated. How is this difficult for you to believe? They made up the story of his body dissapearing ascending so they wouldnt get in trouble for grave robbing and he was gods son so it all adds up.

@@Seriouslydave you are not only a liar but also an impostor...

@@nadra2409 face it man jesus was real, he was just like the mega church ministers of today, and the miracle healers. Its the greatest story and the biggest show on earth. Like all the other religions, its real because you believe. Very entertaining to the rest of us.

That's irrelevant

Thats a very good point!

But other people do not believe in Jesus ressurection neither believe that Jesus is the messiah

@@keithdunham8139 Where's an elephant?!

Most of this hyped denial of possibilities is specifically to cater to American non orthodox Christians for whom a literal interpretation of the stories is important. It's like a baalzvuvian bubble those people live in that requires them not to think critically or consider anything except what is basically a corporate crafted reality. Church is big business in the U.S. and they can't afford too many people considering the mystical or esoteric streams of Christianity, much less leave archaological and scientific questions as questions. There has to be absolute certainty that their way is the only right way and everyone else is going to hell, which makes them superior. The pa$tor they're keeping in luxury cars and private planes will lose money if they actually think.

@@nicolelasher did you get your v ax yet?

@@nicolelasher I’m American and this is so fucking true. It’s sad and pathetic.

What, so seeing eye sneaks like you can catalogue people for their own ends? No thanks. Privacy is a person's best weapon in this world. Why is it important that others know who I am or who I was? I am unimportant. If you are that interested in the record of me, then you have life issues. If its that important to me to leave behind a record of myself, then the issues are mine. I have no such issues. The people who loved me will remember me, and then they too will die. This is the way of a true human being, we're born, we live and we die and there's no need for you to know about any of it. If someone wants to dig up my bones in 2000 years and say that I was a personage of great significance, more fool them. It's simply not important that they know who I was.

You would be disappointed. But if your dead, you won't be feeling anything, including disappointment.

Don't hold your breath, though... Or you'll "learn the truth" much quicker than you'd expect

could've been carved in the 80s.

Exactly!

People are so easily misguided. This could have easily been an early 2nd or 3rd century attempt ti disprove christianity

The names carved so sketchily on the ossuaries could also have been put there in anticipation of their occupants' deaths. This accords with the idea that the tomb was actually that of Joseph of Arimathea, who paid for it and the ossuaries in advance of the historical deaths of their occupants-to-be. In any case, Jesus himself seems to have died in India, as marked by a small temple in Delhi, having been spirited off by some of his disciples to make the resurrection stick.

Huh? Didn't he show Doubting Thomas the holes in his wrist/hands?

I read that too, it shows how some confusion can be started and if we don't read our gospels often enough, we may just let them get by with it. Of course the Creeds tell us right, In short form. Heaven is "above" us, but in what sense? Death and Hades is below. We bury our dead, otherwise they stink up the place.

Haha now that's funny!

It's Astrology, Always The Ruler was The Sun, First was Saturn/El/Allah/Lucifer, now it's Jesus/The Sun/Father of our days. That tomb it's in the sky, the southern cross -- 21-25 December.

@@Se7enStars369 I have it as the sun is light. Just as the Son is light. Son of Man and Son of God. Satan is darkness bearing light. As is the moon. The moon is the light of Allah, which is not Yah) The moon is the reflection of light , bearing light. Or light bearer.

If you're talkin' about the "christian" "heaven", it's definitely a descent...