Low Profile Bladeless Flush Mount Ceiling Fan with Dimmable LED Light by Mcestna, Demo and Review 

I'm glad you found it helpful. Thank you for letting me know! :)

Thank you! He is a such a cutie but loves to get into everything! :)

@@ErinReviewsIt yes he is!!

@@sagnbaby ❤❤❤

Hi! If I turn it off from the main switch that can mess up the pairing sometimes. So maybe that is the issue? Or the batteries? I use mine every day and it is still working well for me. But I am sorry to hear you are having an issue. If those don't work I would contact the seller on Amazon.

Hah! I know. It's a weird way to describe this type of fan but that is how it is described. I believe it is because the blades are inside the light circle so they are protected and can't hit anything outside the circle. :)

@@ErinReviewsIt: OK, but just because they're errantly described like that by the manufacturer doesn't mean you have to follow suit for the video, right? You can show the product and nip that error in the bud through your video, right?

@@HelloKittyFanMan Sorry, I think there is some confusion. This is industry standard. If you google the term "bladeless ceiling fan" you will find a whole category of products that are similar. The concept is that the fan is inside either a cage or the circle. Basically, that the fan blades are not exposed at the ends. I hope that helps you on your buying journey. :)

@@ErinReviewsIt: Heh, if that's the "industry standard" then they need to relearn how to make reasonable terms. Besides, it sounds like they copied from Jimmy Dyson and his "bladeless fans." Even those aren't bladeless, but at least in those you don't normally even see the blades. So even if that's supposedly an "industry standard" term now, you still don't have to follow suit by just going right along with it. Why not try using smarter terms than they do, so you can at least show your audience that you know better than to use inaccurate terms? And if you can't stand the idea of doing that, then why not put quotation marks around "bladeless" at the very least?