Тёмный

Luxury to Last - Rolls Royce Silver Cloud Car Review 

ARCHIELUXURY
Подписаться 71 тыс.
Просмотров 27 тыс.
50% 1

Please visit my FREE Luxury Goods Reference Library Website www.luxurytolast.com
This is an excellent site all about Luxury Goods and features heaps of free information and heaps of great photos. Best of all I am not trying to sell anything! JUST A GREAT RESOURCE FOR ALL Luxury Goods lovers!
www.luxurytolast.com

Опубликовано:

 

7 мар 2011

Поделиться:

Ссылка:

Скачать:

Готовим ссылку...

Добавить в:

Мой плейлист
Посмотреть позже
Комментарии : 36   
@peterfeltham8065
@peterfeltham8065 4 года назад
I have always thought of this car as the most beautifull automobile ever designed.Thank you for this review.
@68Jaguar420G
@68Jaguar420G 2 года назад
Rolling sculpture at its best. While it is now dated it remains elegant and a perennial star.
@colingianella7172
@colingianella7172 Год назад
If you thought the brakes were spongy, then the mechanical brake servo has not been set up correctly. After 50 years working on all 3 variants of the Silver cloud, I can say that the vast majority of them have not had their brakes set up properly, that includes the brake linings, wheel and master cylinders and all the intricate mechanical systems which all have to be spot on. When they are, then the brakes are perfection.
@pesamas0000
@pesamas0000 2 года назад
🌷🌷🌷🥰🥰🥰thats very beautifull interrior and color thankyou . Absolutely
@chriskappert1365
@chriskappert1365 Год назад
Most beautifull Rolls Royce ever made , still my number one choice . Never mind the oldfasioned driving with heavy steering or brakes , the looks and interior alone do it for me . In modern traffic with loads of trucks you rarely pass 60 miles an our , so all this power and Nurburgring ability is purely academic bull anyway . I would happily float at 60 miles the whole day , just being in that wonderfull interior , admiring that jewel of a dash and steeringwheel , looking over that long bonnet .
@jamesatkinson6480
@jamesatkinson6480 2 года назад
I was told that the V8 variant had double headlights, (5" diameter sealed beam) while the 6 cylinder had single headlights, (each a sealed beam of 7" diameter). I did drive a 1957 Bentley for several weddings (Adelaide, SA) during the early 1990's, and you could say the brakes at low speed were 'tricky'. You had just 'one go' at braking with power assistance, then you had to just about 'stand' on the pedal in the immediate second 'go'...
@68Jaguar420G
@68Jaguar420G 2 года назад
Not really. The SC1 was a 6 cylinder model while the V-8 was introduced into the SC2. Both the SC1 and SC2 had single headlights. The SC3 was introduced with the V-8 and had the 4 headlights for it's entire production run.
@jamesatkinson6480
@jamesatkinson6480 2 года назад
@@68Jaguar420G Thanks for the information. At the time I drove around in a Chrysler Valiant wagon which had a low compression 4.0 litre 'Hemi' engine. Once did 160km/hr. along a stretch of country road, but now with a State speed limit of 110km/hr, most likely a fine (from point-to-point cameras) would ensue.. That car used a pair of dual 5" sealed beam headlights too..
@JSDesignHK
@JSDesignHK 6 лет назад
Dear Mr Archie Luxury Although I certainly appreciate your homage to the Silver Cloud, unfortunately many of the photographs you supplied are of particularly badly redone cars (eg. backwards mounted grab handles and picnic trays, Nardi steering wheel, etc). Additionally, even as Rolls-Royce stated in their brochure, the Silver Cloud was designed for “the owner-driver, lady or gentleman”. The long wheelbase version, however, was designed for “the owner who requires a chauffeur-driven car for business but prefers to drive the car himself at weekends”. Air conditioning was offered by the factory starting in 1956, three years before the announcement of the V8-engined Silver Cloud II. I’m sorry that you haven’t driven a superbly-maintained example, because if you had, you wouldn’t have experienced “spongy and weak” brakes or “floaty” steering. When properly set up, the brakes are superb, as is the steering, which is via superimposed power assistance. The car is not “almost two tonnes” but is slightly over two and a quarter tonnes, with the standard saloon weighing in at 4,558 pounds. Lastly, the slant-headlamped Silver Cloud III 2-door saloon and drophead coupé have unfortunately been nicknamed “Chinese-eyed” so often by the motor trade that it has stuck. More appropriately, the correct moniker is “Koren-designed” after their designer, Vilhelm Koren. You are correct in stating that one should buy the best that one can afford. I add the caveat that one should know exactly what a correct and original car should be. With kind regards.
@mscott3918
@mscott3918 5 лет назад
JSD HK Excellent and concise comment. I have owned a 1964 Silver Cloud III since 1982 and wouldn't swap it for any of the current range. It's steering and brakes are precise and for a car of this vintage and weight it's acceleration is respectable. I don't expect to get 0 - 60 in 4 seconds or whatever, but then, I don't drive it like that. I have had the engine overhauled and the bodywork and chrome polished. It is a constant pleasure to drive, and at my age, 62, I don't anticipate getting another car.
@EnglishLawyer
@EnglishLawyer 5 лет назад
You are so correct
@colingianella7172
@colingianella7172 Год назад
Chinese eye continental was mainly known as the “Graber line”
@user-vh8mu1xv4t
@user-vh8mu1xv4t 17 дней назад
I love the uk 🇬🇧
@antwunbarbary9843
@antwunbarbary9843 6 лет назад
yes. ok. look. good
@deardaytona
@deardaytona 11 лет назад
VIDEO: Y U NO BE LOUDER?
@kennethdecker4148
@kennethdecker4148 3 года назад
Reupholstering a Silver Cloud to original specifications is not only expensive, but technically impossible, since the method used then is now in violation of environmental regulations.
@EEnnisjr
@EEnnisjr 3 года назад
Pathetic description about this car.
@steelman86
@steelman86 12 лет назад
I'll bet that if a person could muddle through the obnoxious audio clicking etc. this may be an interesting video to watch but the noise was too much for my nerves!!! Please redo with quality audio as I'm sure it would be informative, thanks ever so much...
@johndean958
@johndean958 5 лет назад
take so nerve pills..you fool.
@yjon4004
@yjon4004 7 лет назад
Even though they were not very much fun to drive, I can appreciate your love and admiration for the Silver Cloud however you do need to get some of your facts straight, for example, there is no such thing as a 1965 or 1966 Silver Cloud either l, ll or lll. The Silver Cloud was introduced in 1955 and was discontinued in 1964 to be replaced by the Silver Shadow introduced in 1965 and ran until 1976 where it was replaced by the Silver Shadow ll in 1977 if your going to go to all the trouble to make a RU-vid video you might want to take the time to double check your facts first.
@JSDesignHK
@JSDesignHK 6 лет назад
With all due respect, there were indeed 1965 Silver Cloud IIIs, and in fact I owned chassis number CSC71B which was originally delivered in August 1965. The last Silver Cloud III to be delivered was chassis LCSC77C delivered in May of 1966, although the last built was LCSC83C delivered in January 1966.
@EEnnisjr
@EEnnisjr 3 года назад
You don’t know much. The SC lll was discontinued in 1965. The ‘63 to ‘65 had 4 headlights. Sixty two down only 2 headlights. There is no ‘66. Possible leftovers from ‘65 that were titled as 1966. I have never been able to confirm that. They understeer very bad. Try pulling up to a Valet and explain there is no park. The attendant will never figure that out. The brakes are very difficult to set up as set up with the transmission. Only a very experienced RR mechanic can do that. The best of luck finding one. The transmission was actually a tank transmission. They should have used a GM 3 speed transmission. The change from 3 to 4 was rough. I just drove in third around town, and forth on the highway. Not enough A/C unless you are lucky enough to find one with optional front and rear. Other than that, it’s an extremely reliable car as even for everyday driving.
@colingianella7172
@colingianella7172 Год назад
Sorry to correct you but the Silver Cloud continued into the 1966’s in coachbuilt format whilst the `Silver Shadow was introduced in 1965. They ran concurrently until all the Cloud chassis were used up.
@colingianella7172
@colingianella7172 Год назад
There is in fact a parking pawl on the Silver cloud automatic box which is engaged when the selector lever is in reverse and as soon as the engine is switched off, the pressure drops to zero allowing the pawl to locate.
@tumbiwuhazza
@tumbiwuhazza 11 лет назад
You really should re do the sound on this. It is dreadful.
@johndean958
@johndean958 5 лет назад
Bull-its great and down to earth. Snobbery is out.
@cookingprof
@cookingprof 10 лет назад
This car is limo. Best used for brides. Phantom V is the best new model. (IMHO)
@alexp3752
@alexp3752 8 лет назад
+cookingprof It's a very nice Boxmobile...
@kennethdecker4148
@kennethdecker4148 3 года назад
The Phantom V was actually based on the Silver Cloud Ii and continued that designation through the run of the Cloud III (and early portion of the Silver Shadow). The Phantom VI was essentially identical to the standard Phantom V, but with updated, Silver Shadow engine and drivetrain.
@tangatoto362
@tangatoto362 10 месяцев назад
Oh dear…. What a waste of time…. Is that the best you can do for such a magnificent iconic vehicle…. 3rd hand fuzzy photos ….!!!! Utterly woeful .
@wholeNwon
@wholeNwon 8 лет назад
It always amazed me that a car that was so physically beautiful was so unpleasant to drive. The speaker attributes that to fact that the war had been over for "only" 10 years. But the '55 Cadillac, which cost about 1/3 as much, was a joy to handle and quite usable even by today's standards. The Cadillac and similar U.S. cars were far more advanced. RR was still using a GM gearbox from 1939, the steering and suspension were very primitive and braking...well, the systems were redundant but oddly "powered" from the transmission. Rustproofing, as I recall, was nonexistent except for some of the aluminum custom-bodied versions. I've driven one of them as well and the standard saloon, as bad as it was, handled better! The chauffeurs who drove the long wheel base models really earned their pay.
@marinelifer1752
@marinelifer1752 7 лет назад
My 1960 Cloud has a 4-speed auto transmission; did Cadillac? The suspension was not primitive; it is still one of the best riding cars and the engineering is ingenious. The steering is typical non rack-and-pinion in feel and centreing; the steering ram runs only when needed thus lasts longer and provides better feel at speed. You wrote about the brakes being 'oddly powered from the transmission', as though it is undesirable; I suggest that you research the reasoning to this ingenious feature. Anyone who feels that the car is unpleasant to drive, has not driven one very much. After driving mine for a few hours the car seems to shrink around the drive and even that long bonnet is no longer unpleasant to navigate in town. The car accelerates very well and is ticket-bait. Rustproofing was in the form of an airtight box chassis and Cosmoline. What would I change about my car? The usual for a classic car: 3-point seatbelts, rack-and-pinion steering, 4-wheel disk brakes, climate-control.
@peecee681
@peecee681 7 лет назад
You should research the history of Rolls Royce automatic transmission development and use. The transmissions used in the Silver Cloud were American General Motors designs lightly modified then manufactured under license at Crewe. In regard to your question about the automatic transmissions used in the 1960 Cadillac, yes they were four-speed.
@mscott3918
@mscott3918 5 лет назад
wholeNwon I am interested in how several people have said that it is not a nice car to drive. I have had my 1965 Silver Cloud III since 1982 and don't find it unpleasant at all. Sure, it doesn't have all the modern aids that so many people have, but it is a proper car and I wouldn't swap it for, say, any of the current range offered by Rolls Royce.
@wholeNwon
@wholeNwon 5 лет назад
@@mscott3918 I had forgotten my comments from 3 years ago, so I listened to most of the video again. The SC III that you own does perform better than previous models and the disastrous crank shaft failures are unlikely. Minor changes were made from earlier models. I have never driven a SC III, so I can't compare them with others. I do recall that we owned a '63 Fleetwood and that was very pleasant to drive and easily capable of dealing with modern traffic. I can't remember its having had a single mechanical failure...wait, a water pump was replaced. AC was really excellent. I certainly do agree with you that the current offerings by "RR" are much less appealing stylistically. I would call them hideous. But I don't think they are intended to appeal to people with good taste.
Далее
Stylish: Rolls Royce Silver Cloud III | Drive it!
5:27
Finger Heart - Fancy Refill (Inside Out Animation)
00:30
INCREDIBLE ROAD TECHNOLOGIES THAT ARE INSANELY COOL
20:01
1963 Rolls Royce Silver Cloud III (Sorry Sold)
18:18
Просмотров 32 тыс.
1963 Rolls Royce Silver Cloud III
4:04
Просмотров 30 тыс.
Rolls-Royce History
19:53
Просмотров 155 тыс.
Bentley S3 Continantal Flying Spur 1963
3:25
Просмотров 81 тыс.