www.terryslync... saemobilus.sae... #terrencehoward #lynchpin Song / Lead guitar / jam improvisation titled "The Heavenly Piece" by Chris Monk Seely (Sellye) aka Me. lol
keep going brother don't let them break you and stop seeking their approval or help their ego won't let them do it so just keep on building on your own your message was heard am sure the right people with open mind will gladly contact you for assistance
Does it though? Multi rotors are inefficient and this is much less efficient that a quadcopter. The only option for efficient long range air travel is to use wings.
terrence, you inspired me a lot with your ideas - thanks man! p.s. your message is out - people need time, it's always the same. it's annoying that ignorant people are the loudest.
He had no ideas that align in any way with reality. Logic or the scientific method. 😂 seeing disingenuousness idiots catalyze and even dumber Public around their intentional stupidity is sad to see. And destructing the species
Kool, Kool kool... Amazing all the best to all the beautiful young people who are sooo, inspiring even to an old guy like me. Howard and his 1x1=2....woke up the real minds and push the youth along... Amazing 🌹
unless he gets some sort of funding and assistance I don't think it's possible for him to do all that research on his own with private fund I think that's why he went out and try to spread what he came up with so far
❤I am a believer in your abilities and I love listening to you talk about your work!! (I don’t dig the music chosen) Do some videos of you talking about your work, I love hearing your voice. ❤
Wish I could make lynchpin, your the man Terrence! I bet Terrance was thinking to himself in the whole show with Eric was everything your debating with is still in straight lines 😂
That Rogan episode was epic from the standpoint of having a discussion between the 2 for the world to see. That was a great act for Eric. I can't say enough about how it was organically done. On the flip side, I wish I would have walked away getting a clear answer as to exactly why Terrence is wrong. I hope that episode leads to more answers.
Slang eyes can’t come up with anything new or creative they been stealing information for so long they can only copy what others do, China man will never be innovative, only make cheap copies
@@tact1calshot989Paper. Gunpowder. Porcelain. Fiat currency. Modern agriculture. The list goes on of course. I don’t know what specifically animates your hatred of whichever people groups, but at the minimum, you could at least base your hate off of reality and not demonstrably false statements.
Bolivia just had a failed coup from Chinese military SUV junk that was supposedly better than the American humvee....THE FRONT AXEL SNAPPED HITTING A CURB 😆😆😆😆😆😆😅😅😅😅😅😅
Listen to all these haters that called him crazy, now coming around and saying well its novel but im now an expert in this thing i didnt previoulsy believe in and it can be better. Just stfu
What do you think is so special about this? Anyone with even slight experience with drones would know that this is possible but there is no point. I think you have fallen into the trap of thinking this is special, it isn’t, it uses the exact same concepts as loads of other aircraft. The fact that he got it working doesn’t change the facts that it is inefficient and overly complicated and has no advantages over a quadcopter, anyone with even basic engineering knowledge can see this.
This specific drone configuration is an awesome demonstration of over-actuated control allocation and a testament to the flight control software skills of the actual engineers that pulled it off, but nothing more. Terrance Howard achieved nothing here by throwing money at smart people. The concept of an omni-directional drone has been done before and with far simpler motor configurations than the "lynchpin." Turns out, they're all far inferior to much simpler platforms from a mechanical simplicity/efficiency standpoint (shocker). Point being: there's nothing really magical here. Just cool engineering packaged in a particular shape that made a man feel all tingly about his insane ideas.
@@GoCreateTech what application needs a drone to hover upside down or on its side? Practically none, if you need to hold something at a specific orientation then use a gimbal. Also drones hovering upside down is very much doable, even with a quadcopter, just reverse the motor direction, “3D” pilots do it all the time. You are just making clear that you don’t understand what you are talking about. Compare this to a quadcopter, this is overly complicated, inefficient and will be slower whilst providing no practical benefit in terms of movement.
Well said. I’m glad to see some people like you commenting on this, unfortunately it won’t be enough to convince all his followers, like the ones who have replied to you. I do wonder what experience the people supporting him and calling everyone that criticises it “haters” have. Likely no engineering experience at all. Thinking about this drone, there is not really any movement (ignoring orientation) that couldn’t be achieved with a quadcopter and if you need to control orientation then use a gimbal. This is just inefficient and overly complicated. Even if you remove gravity then a quadcopter with a gimbal would still likely be better.
How so? This is more expensive to manufacture, more complicated to operate, and has may more potential points of failure. The use cases are very niche and omnidirectional drones have already been doable in different shapes at least since 2017. A cube framed body would already be be combinable to create a single larger drone. Can you explain to me what the newly opened use cases for this type of drone are that I'm not understanding?
@@FlatlalaYou can add modules in-flight to add more lift power. That’s the only thing I can remember right now. Oh, and you can break the modules up in-flight so the smaller modules can pass through small spaces. Then reform once through the small space.
@@brykit1972 okay but none of that is specific to this design, you could do all you describe with quadcopters too. This is just an overly complex and inefficient design. You also need to remember that propellers interfere and interact with each other, sticking lots of these together in a clump to add more lift wouldn’t really work as the propellers will interfere.
Not everything needs a soundtrack. (omg). I'd hazard a guess that so many fans have massive issues with interacting propwash, which is why it's SO wobbly the second it moves in the slightest. The ability to turn the camera upside down is neat, but a gimbal on a regular quad can do the same thing with stable video. It's an interesting technical accomplishment. Not sure it's more much. :/
Something tells me the Lynchpin can make amazing visuals if you attach a line laser ( from a laser level) to every edge and fly it indoors. I also have no idea how you controlling it with a traditional 4 DoF remote. Are you translating with sticks while rolling and pitching with knobs?
This video is in response to those who appear to not have the attention span to watch the prior 19 minute DEMO reel beyond the 30 second mark and are thus, falsely making the erroneous assumption that the Lynchpin aircraft is all just CGI woohoo. I don't really feel like I need to nor should I have to do voice over explanations to dumb down prior content that fully explains the Lynchpin technology projects and explicatory video with reference links provided in each video description. All branes are brains folks! Use them! Enjoy the content... Here is a full development VLog journal playlist to content on this my personal channel documenting my role in the project. Cheers. ru-vid.com/video/%D0%B2%D0%B8%D0%B4%D0%B5%D0%BE-3j2odoBeWXM.html
can anyone explain the advantage of this type of drone outside of the interlocking of other drones and that it obviously looks really cool. wouldn't this type of drone use more energy than one that points it's propellers straight towards the ground?
There are many advantages in commercial applications beyond the main one being a scalable bondable swarm drone system that can lift variable loads depending on the mass of the objects to be carried, delivered or assembled. The design can also fly with 4 props poyting downward as in any normal quad copter. It is a self referencing gyroscopic navigation system which can fly underground or swim in water without GPS just for starters. For more advantages and details see: saemobilus.sae.org/articles/lynchpin-a-novel-geometry-modular-tangential-omnidirectional-flight-01-16-03-0018#view
These would be great for killing machines. A gun attached to this could point at any direction and even track into any direction without being limited like a quad.
Is there a simulator for a Lynchpin? As a 3D mode pilot, it makes me curious how it would fly with one FPV cam. There are certainly several modes possible. 3D mode with gravity, 3D mode without gravity, 360 degree mode, ...
That man named Eric came on the show for his own noteratiy. He was promoting himself. People who hold hogh office, are normally self important! No average citizen knows who that guy Eric is! 😂
@@feelincrispy7053 yeah, it was disappointing to learn he doesn't really have a revolutionary new way to do things, but he never even touched on the decoupling and planet creation theories in this episode
@@feelincrispy7053The only fool was Eric. He literally didn't disprove a single thing Terrance said. He told Terrance multiple times not to use metaphors or analogies to prove his point. Then wverytime Terrance was saying or asking something Eric didn't understand or couldn't explain he would tell Terrance to "stop teaching" and "stop hitting on 19" etc. This is not how you conduct yourself if you're the one who is correct on the given subject.
Call me simple or somthing but why not just use a old school metal gyro right in the center and keep things the same around and build from there in terms of keeping the gyro going or just build outward from the gyro yea im prob just k simple guy
Yes, it's original music I made for this video compilation as is most of the music on my channel because YT has a tendency to copyright strike non-original material. Thus, I make my own tracks whenever I can and have time to do so when I'm not recording with Ashes At Dawn as the lead guitarist. Hope ya dig the tunes... :)
The next step is colective pitch. Very well tuned for fixed angle propellers. Anyone who was flying quads and tiny DIY Heli's ten years ago knows exactly what I'm talking about.
@@ZedLead pointing out extremely obvious flaws does not mean someone isn’t innovative just practical. Whatever way you want to look at it a quadcopter is superior, less mass, less complexity and it can achieve the same sorts of movements. In the vast majority of applications this has no benefit but plenty of downsides compared to quadcopters. Even if you think about fluid motion for cameras, you can already do that with a quadcopter and gimbal, just look at what they use for Hollywood, a two operator system, one flies the drone, the other controls the camera, there is practically no shot that this could capture that a quadcopter with gimbal couldn’t.
I’m so glad you made it. As someone who builds drones, I don’t really see the advantage. Normal quad copters can FLY in 6 degrees of freedom, but only HOVER in 1 degree. I can’t picture the use case where multi degree hovering would be an advantage.
The system is designed for commercial underground and underwater inspection services and also unlimited bonding to adapt to variable loading for the aerial construction, wind farm and maintenance industry. It operates without GPS. saemobilus.sae.org/articles/lynchpin-a-novel-geometry-modular-tangential-omnidirectional-flight-01-16-03-0018#view
@@chrismonksellye4608 so what advantage does it have over a quadcopter with a gimbal? Adapting to the environment and working without GPS is a separate issue. Just look at optical flow, it works without GPS and is even available on cheap quadcopters now and it is possible to add other kinds of sensing to it. Anything you have developed to make this hold position with GPS and adapt to environmental or loading changes can be applied to any other drone. Again your comment just reads like buzz words with no real understanding behind them.
@@chrismonksellye4608 Too bad humanity is growing down instead of up. "Such power" could really help, but nooooo, it must be gatekept by imaginary gatekeepers.
Glad ya dig it. SRV by no means. lol. Although he was definitely an influence. It's just me jamming away with myself on this one. I called the track "The Heavenly"
seems novel and it works, but its far from mechanically efficient, as unsprung mass is higher than a quad-rotor, and the control systems must be a headache (vs. quad axial rotor). how does lift performance with mass compare to a traditional drone? eg. transporting goods
@@comment.highlighted so what can it do that quads can’t then? There is practically nothing that this can do that couldn’t be achieved with a quad and a gimbal, like is already widely used for commercial and industrial uses and already exists on consumer drones too.
Cool idea but why? What advantage does it have over a quadcopter? It doesn’t even seem like it is any more agile but it is larger, uses more motors and weighs more so is less efficient.
How precise are controls? How does it compare In weight capacity to regular drones? Do you know how sinus and cosinus work when we apply them to angled forces?
