M1 ABRAMS vs OBJECT 775 Pancake Tank | Depleted Uranium APFSDS | Armour Penetration Simulation

Подписаться 98 тыс.

Просмотров 248 тыс.

50% 1

The Soviet Object 775 had an exceptionally low profile as it only had a crew of 2 and featured an autoloader. It also had some of the strongest armour of its time, to the extent that the upper glacis would only be vulnerable to APFSDS projectiles which entered service ~15 years after the Object 775 was being developed.
While it could be considered unfair to show it up against an Abrams, which entered service more than 10 years after the Object 775 was developed, it was chosen to show just how strong the armour was. (For comparison, the most powerful NATO kinetic round of the 1960's - late 70's was the Chieftain's L15 APDS projectile, which wouldnt even be able to perforate the top 90mm plate).
The Rolled Homogenous Armour (RHA) has been modelled as 300BHN hardness, similar to the T-64A and T-72 Ural. The M774 projectile core is Depleted Uranium, being ~26.5 x 345mm. A test model was made first, where the projectile's penetration matched the Lanz-Odermatt predictions: / @sysimulations
At 75°, the projectile can perforate ~114mm of 300BHN RHA (440mm LoS), meaning that it would have no chance against the 120mm of RHA and 70mm of textolite.
Amazing Thumbnail Artwork From: ‪@Warthunder‬

Опубликовано:

3 окт 2024

Ссылка:

Скачать:

Готовим ссылку...

Добавить в:

Мой плейлист

Посмотреть позже

Комментарии : 554

@SYsimulations 10 месяцев назад

Yes, it is a bit unfair showing the Object 775 face a tank 10+ years more modern, but the most powerful APDS projectiles of its era wouldn't have even made it through the 90mm plate.

@rykehuss3435 10 месяцев назад

What contributes to the increased effectiveness of these rounds over the years? do the materials change? depleted uranium is still used. The shape of the projectile doesnt really seem to change either. Muzzle velocity?

@exoterminator-01 10 месяцев назад

@@rykehuss3435 Velocity is one of the big reasons, alongside longer projectiles. Shape was expiramented with and had some good or bad effects. Tungsten and depleted uranium have been a long standing choice of material because of their properties when penetrating armor, especially the shearing of material at the nose of the projectiles to reduce mushrooming.

@jellevandervelde704 10 месяцев назад

@@rykehuss3435 The rods used get longer over the years.

@battleoid2411 10 месяцев назад

@@rykehuss3435 Newer rounds have much longer penetrators, and they have different shapes compared to the older one shown in the simulation that help prevent them from shattering. And yeah higher velocity also helps, one of the main things being looked at for the next generation of tank cannons is having much higher pressures, so for instance rheinmetal's 130mm isnt that much bigger than the 120, but it can fire a much more powerful cartridge which is much more important with KE rounds

@SYsimulations 10 месяцев назад

@@rykehuss3435 As most have said, its mostly due to increased aspect ratios of the projectiles and increased velocities due to longer gun barrels, higher chamber pressures, improved propellants, and lighter sabots.

@КанистраКеросина 10 месяцев назад

I just imagine author playing WT in his brand-new M1A, not penetrating 775, and just going into "fuck this, i'm gonna test this out" mode

@stigmautomata 10 месяцев назад

IIRC He has done that before to prove how bullshit WT's model often is, but in this case it's the expected result

@moreoriginalnickname4243 10 месяцев назад

I mean the M58 120mm APBC ricochets on a Panthers upper plate occasionally... I'd be asking shit too

@buscadiamantes1232 10 месяцев назад

@@moreoriginalnickname4243 it's so funny how the M103 underperforms... the AP shell weighs 23kg, flies at 1.067 m/s, but sometimes it spalls like it's a 1mm dart or whatever. Or bounces ridiculously like that Panther case, too

@KekusMagnus 10 месяцев назад

@@buscadiamantes1232 Volumetric has really made AP shells inconsistent as hell. It's genuinely hard to model what happens when a shell hits overlapping armor plates, but it feels like Gaijin has just programmed them to give up and bounce when it happens. Frustrating as hell

@irirjhrhr4645 10 месяцев назад

@@buscadiamantes12321 m/s is very slow

@obamnaprismus 10 месяцев назад

Now this is the type of documents War Thunder players should be leaking

@Mechanized85 10 месяцев назад

meanwhile, is that was funny thing? honestly.

@Cirno_Say_No_To_Zionist 10 месяцев назад

For what?

@Jason-jb1vs 10 месяцев назад

@@Cirno_Say_No_To_Zionist For fun

@Sillycet 10 месяцев назад

@@Cirno_Say_No_To_Zionistmaybe if the tank seem to be weaker than the actual document, the players will leak it to war thunder for that tank to be buffed

@Mechanized85 10 месяцев назад

Yeah, I don’t give shit those butthole nor trudthunder as well

@maxkeller102 10 месяцев назад

Being able to stop ANY DU APFSDS dead in its tracks is quite impressive

@seangunn4772 10 месяцев назад

Not any, just any of it's era

@iMost067 10 месяцев назад

@@seangunn4772 any for next 20 years

@seangunn4772 10 месяцев назад

@@iMost067 that is correct.

@mmneaapro596 10 месяцев назад

@@Vlad_-_-_ every tank/IFV is seen doing poorly against modern equipment tf you talking about Edit: don't waste your time reading after this it feels as if a group of bots joined the reply section to have an argument

@bigturn1051 10 месяцев назад

@@Vlad_-_-_any modern MBT without aps does poorly against PG-7V LMAO

@neromastic4512 10 месяцев назад

I am surprised the Video wasnt sponsored by War Thunder as the Obj 775 is in the game. And yes the 775 was one of the newest concepts of Tank Warfare in the 60s that got dropped in favour of the T-64 But its history is not forgotten as the most automated armoured vehicle for its time.

@LURKTec 10 месяцев назад

It was dropped because it was too specialized and soviets focused on the Kobra system that was being developed for 2A26 at around the same time.

@MarcinP2 10 месяцев назад

So glad I stopped playing.

@outrageoussharpie4107 10 месяцев назад

As a technology and engineering concept demonstrator the MBT-70 was far more impressive than this.

@LURKTec 10 месяцев назад

@@outrageoussharpie4107 Good thing this wasn't a tech demo but an actual tank.

@outrageoussharpie4107 10 месяцев назад

@@LURKTec pfft, copium. Neither entered service. MBT-70 was an actual tank.

@TheAllKnowNoble 10 месяцев назад

Bro probably had this happen to him in war thunder so he had to make a animation to prove it

@handsomeivan1980 10 месяцев назад

Just imagine how much more thicker the armor gets just by angling the hull a bit

@ghost963cz 10 месяцев назад

@@handsomeivan1980 ... not very much? angling the hull only really helps on tanks like tiger with vertical front armour

@xero6774 10 месяцев назад

@@ghost963cz a lot* ???? its the same as angling it vertically like this

@handsomeivan1980 10 месяцев назад

@@ghost963cz yes it does dog

@viktoriyaserebryakov2755 10 месяцев назад

@@ghost963cz What are you even saying?

@joejoemyo 10 месяцев назад

It's interesting how intensely the projectile normalized as it slowed down

@heinrichzerbe 10 месяцев назад

That is very impressive to be able resist the round at 500m.

@Richard_T800 5 месяцев назад

For a tank from the 60s fighting a vehicle build decades later, yeah it is

@dominuslogik484 5 месяцев назад

@@Richard_T800 to be honest its not really that impressive when you are considering the fact that you are shooting a near horizontal surface with the APFSDS. change the angle by just 5 degrees and its likely that the shot would go through so if said pancake tank is slightly angled forward from a slight incline on the ground or driving over uneven ground there is actually a sizable chance of penetration.

@Harloe1 10 месяцев назад

Ahh I love playing against 90’s tanks in my object 775. Thanks wt!

@daskollektiv4593 10 месяцев назад

The 775 isn't that good in war thunder

@Kwisss 10 месяцев назад

I feel its pretty balanced at 9.3. It does alright in most situations and against composite it just doesn't do that much or any ERA for that amtter.

@mr.abrams8112 10 месяцев назад

man i love fighting 2010s 2020's tanks in my 1970's tanks

@daskollektiv4593 10 месяцев назад

@@Kwisss yeah with two crew members and no armour on the gunner optic, its pretty east to kill

@KekusMagnus 10 месяцев назад

@@mr.abrams8112 Authentic Ukraine war experience

@cheekibreeki4638 10 месяцев назад

Pancake is the ideal form of an armored fighting vehicle.

@ImPedofinderGeneral 9 месяцев назад

is the ideal form of an soviet armored fighting vehicle.

@ratte6090 6 месяцев назад

Little pancake boy has HEART, able to eat an Abrams 105 like that. 120 would instakill, but that's a given to EVERY tank nowadays, so it doesn't count. we love you flat top

@ambientlightofdarknesss4245 10 месяцев назад

What would be really cool is if you could show the equivalent thickness of the angled portions of armor with say a block of tungsten so we could really get a reference on how OP angling armor can be.

@dasidiotentv8253 9 месяцев назад

there is a quite easy formula to get it [ X : sin( Y° ) = Z ], for example, at 30 degree (cause 90° would be face on) the thickness doubles and goes exponentially higher. but there is also the effect of the impacting angle itself wich will differ cause it has to do with the round itself on how its volume is and how the tip its formed.for example a pipe would directly eat INTO the angle where a needle will first try to bounced away.

@maevethefox5912 10 месяцев назад

Still feels odd that they initially launched the M1 in 1980 with a 105.

@tsugumorihoney2288 10 месяцев назад

also if you notice which type of ammo soviet tanks have, you become even more surprised since they shells could penetrated western tanks in any part since 2+kilometers -.-

@Roof_Korean. 10 месяцев назад

@@tsugumorihoney2288they us also could do the same as they still a heat which is just as a threat as apfsds

@Roof_Korean. 10 месяцев назад

@@tsugumorihoney2288the us thought that heat was best until they erased started being more common like the m48 had heat which go through any part of a Russian tank

@BladezAndrew 10 месяцев назад

@@tsugumorihoney2288 the latest possible apfsds round the M1 abrams could've faced when it first entered service was 3BM22 which can't pen frontally anywhere and it's unlikely that it would ever go up against that wtf are you on about. You'd be lucky to ever come up against 3BM15 or 115mm 3BM3 or 4 which are all slug rounds or steel. Not to mention soviet tanks largely used HEAT

@xapocotacox 10 месяцев назад

So the M60’s in the gulf war destroyed 100 tanks/armored vehicles with that 105. Only in use by some USMC units. They didn’t lose a single tank.

@DecidedlyNinja 10 месяцев назад

When you push the boundaries of tank-flattening so far that even the Soviet Army thinks it's too flat, you know you've gone mad. If only the designer could have offered it to the Swedes.

@handsomeivan1980 10 месяцев назад

Just imagine how much more thicker the armor is when the hull is angled

@steelnail1917 10 месяцев назад

It's called slope armour for a reason and the concept has been used since WW2 for example a 45mm thick armour plate at 60° becomes 90mm while not changing as much weight to a tank

@KekusMagnus 10 месяцев назад

@@steelnail1917 Actually the amount of metal inside a 60° sloped 45mm plate is the same as a 90mm plate of equivalent height. Sloped armor is extra effective because it makes shells shatter and/or bounce instead of absorbing them, which can make the sloped 45mm plate MORE effective than a 90mm plate. There are limits to this however, The advantages of sloped armor can be negated by either a very large caliber shell or by a very long APFSDS dart.

@ShuRugal 10 месяцев назад

@@KekusMagnus The secret is you need to put Flex Seal on the outside of the armor. That way, when a projectile encounters it, the glue grabs it and gives it enough traction to begin to roll like a wheel. Then the round will go spinning off over the top instead of penetrating.

@artruisjoew5473 10 месяцев назад

@@steelnail1917 tell me you failed geometry without telling me

@steelnail1917 10 месяцев назад

@artruisjoew5473 look it up. an angle at 0° is a wall and angle at 89° is almost flat

@afmo500 10 месяцев назад

Does anyone know of a video showcasing a recording of the sound of a non-penetrating hit of apfsds or other types of AP rounds from inside the tank? I'm curious about what It'd sound like and the db levels a crew could experience.

@ThunderBoltBoi 10 месяцев назад

now do 380mm rocket from strummorser vs OBJECT 775 Pancake Tank

@jammygamer8961 10 месяцев назад

comically flat tank vs comically large projectile

@Colon-D... 9 месяцев назад

To be fair, once You go high enough calibre with HE, the blast will rip apart and spall the tank with shockwaves.

@baudouindesaintroman6337 10 месяцев назад

What's the software you use for your simulations? Do you also consider Shockwaves?

@dmitryyankeerose8866 10 месяцев назад

Looks like ansys explicit (autodyn solver) It does shockwaves too.

@_thisnameistaken 10 месяцев назад

Ansys student workbench Explicit Dynamics

@revan999 10 месяцев назад

What about a turret hit?

@ZigzagEnd 10 месяцев назад

I'm really suprised that its at 9.3

@Kwisss 10 месяцев назад

Honestly from playing it its pretty balanced there. From being loud as a lawn mower, actually being defeated by composite/era/soft kill aps its not too oppressive.

@User-ph9xh 10 месяцев назад

I am very surprised a tank (not even a mbt) from the 1960's can hold up against the M1 Abrams

@Nisen3000 10 месяцев назад

simply soluttion: literly just hit the turret. its goodnight if that happens, and no way that thing will penetrate an abrams to the front

@Phantom-bh5ru 9 месяцев назад

@@Nisen3000only parts of its turret. The majority of it would stop this round just fine.

@quan-uo5ws 8 месяцев назад

@@Nisen3000 uhh... the turret is as well armored, if not more than the hull...

@Dan-yk6sy День назад

Dat slope...

@fish-qg4nu 10 месяцев назад

Someone’s been playing war thunder😂

@brosefmalkovitch3121 10 месяцев назад

On the trend of highly angled armored, it'd be cool to see a sim of how much energy a cold-war nose-fuzed US HEAT shell would impart on a BMP hull if the 'shoulder' of the shell hits first. I assume you probably play some GHPC and know what I mean. Any chance we'd get to see such a sim one day or would that be too complex?

@thanatosstorm 8 месяцев назад

They just recently brought in the M456A2 HEAT, which includes shoulder fuses. Much better odds on BMPs

@Observer29830 7 месяцев назад

I am pancake that is approaching, provoking~

@TFY-v8l 10 месяцев назад

And that ladies and gentlemen is why we got rid of the 105 lol

@notachair4757 19 дней назад

Wonderful A tank made by a tractor plant in the 60s that can stop semi-modern APFSDS.

@OliverInc. 10 месяцев назад

we all now why this video was made, Warthunder, and Warthunders 'super accurate' physics, (literally bounces bombs, as in the explosion ricochets of monsieur pancake.)

@davidwood2205 10 месяцев назад

Now, imagine this taking place at 2000m...

@random_person-i5o 3 дня назад

the DU penetrator just peals a way like a banana that thang is solid medal that has been compressed for 50 years and it peals away like a banana?!

@phantomthao1514 10 месяцев назад

Ok, i know you fs play WT. 😂, nice vid bro

@Silo-Ren 10 месяцев назад

Thank you 👍

@henryextreme9210 10 месяцев назад

Would be cool if you test the russian round and the dm 63

@АнтонМихайлов-н5у 10 месяцев назад

dm 63? what is this? mb dm 53? or dm 63 also exists?

@henryextreme9210 10 месяцев назад

@@АнтонМихайлов-н5у it's the best round germany have today I think, it is a bit larger than the dm 53, most of specs are classified but i've already seen some videos of simulations using it

@АнтонМихайлов-н5у 10 месяцев назад

@@henryextreme9210well, if the dm 63 is classified and almost nothing is known about it, it is impossible to correctly repeat its characteristics during armor penetration

@henryextreme9210 10 месяцев назад

@@АнтонМихайлов-н5у yeah I just dont remember at all if someone actually made a simulation with it but dm 53 would be interesting still

@Kwisss 10 месяцев назад

DM63 is exactly the same as DM53 but it has propellant that is less susceptible to catching on fire and exploding. Meanwhile to quote from Rheinmetall themselves for DM73 "“The DM73 maintains exactly the same penetrator of the DM63 currently in service,” Mr. Henselmann explains, “we worked only on the propulsion system, mainly to increase the combat range rather than to increase performances, as requested by the customer". DM73 is DM63 which is basically DM53 but with high propellant (which should still increase penetration in a way) that further increases its combat range. @@henryextreme9210

@Hydrazine1000 10 месяцев назад

Depleted uranium (well, just uranium overall, depleted, natural or enriched) has three properties that make it extremely effective: It has a very high density, it self-ignites upon impact (pyrophoric) and it self-sharpens upon impact (adiabatic shearing). Does the simulation model for the depleted uranium take into account the latter two? It's difficult to see, but the penetrator appears to mushroom, which is something DU is supposed to _not_ do due to the adiabatic shearing effect. (Oh, and there is a fourth property for DU that is also very important/convenient for its use: it is a by-product of uranium enrichment, so it is abundantly available and costs money to store, since it's low radioactive waste.)

@HSSdk 10 месяцев назад

DU does mushroom like any other material of the type, just slightly (heard 10-15%?) less. Overall DU is barely better than tungsten at all, by far the largest advantage being how cheap it is.

@gotanon9659 10 месяцев назад

@@HSSdk Reality says otherwise especially when we tested both against the most modern russian tank we got our hands on.

@aaroncruz9181 10 месяцев назад

Considering that the Russians could theoretically produce quite a lot of these rounds since they have invested significantly in the nuclear energy industry and can export nuclear energy to other countries,However they have not done so, as these rounds will still produce radiation even after it's use and last for years, polluting the environment and giving it's proximate population with severe illnesses as a result of chronic(long term exposure) to the contaminated environment, one example was the ammo depot explosion in Ukraine which had such shells which after it's self detonation produced a field 20 to 30 km radius of radioactivity, it occurred in the more secured regions of Ukraine, However if such artillery shells if we're to be used it would contaminate the soil,making the useless for cultivation, to avoid such situations they would rather spend extra on tungsten core rounds, since the cost of reputation might not have a label

@milanstragier6142 10 месяцев назад

Who would win? A state-of-the-art American MBT with always the newest and high-tech additions or a Russian pancake?

@dwarow2508 10 месяцев назад

The M1's latest variant has been outdated for at least 15 years

@Gracefulwarrior2124 10 месяцев назад

Tbf it is the 105 variant, not the 120 lol

@milanstragier6142 10 месяцев назад

@@dwarow2508 Reason?

@milanstragier6142 10 месяцев назад

@@Gracefulwarrior2124 Some humor please thank you

@dwarow2508 10 месяцев назад

@@milanstragier6142 Very poor mobility, no ERA, outdated optics (still used gen 2 thermals), sub par firepower compared to the Leo 2A6 or the T90M, no auto loader, far too heavy, fuel guzzler and no remote battle station

@metaworld567 10 месяцев назад

Just barely grazed the backing plate, and this is with a depleted uranium APFSDS.

@thezig2078 10 месяцев назад

It's not a modern APFSDS

@ThisFeatureKindaSucks 10 месяцев назад

It's a 105mm. Not modern

@chrisblack6258 10 месяцев назад

It's from the 80s, not a modern round.

@CEOofFriendship 10 месяцев назад

I think a simulation of the LOSAT projectile hitting a modern MBT would be really cool, perhaps like a T-90A turret cheek or even an abrams or leopards'. The energy transfer is insane and war thunder doesnt do justice to the complete carnage that would follow

@Tavsan123 3 месяца назад

Nothing trashed is leaked.

@Putter_WoT_Blitz 10 месяцев назад

@SYsimolations what is software you use to simolated a tank round impact armor?

@radoslavkosil7450 10 месяцев назад

Are you able to make torpedo simulation? Like air torpedo hitting Iowa class battleship to the side?

@chriskortan1530 10 месяцев назад

If the charts I found online are correct, even the next generation M883 would have trouble penetrating that armor

@donovanchau3483 9 месяцев назад

Me in WT in a M60A1 RISE using M774 being unable to damage the pancake frontally whatsoever: ☹️ (oh and the spaceship too)

@MGKTLGLDLG 10 месяцев назад

Maybe he was grinding US tech tree using M1 KVT and saw his M774 not penetrating the ufp of obj775.

@Wikchsawa 9 месяцев назад

I thought this was a laser, please make a laser one

@CJIABuK77 10 месяцев назад

А есть просчёты кумулятивных снарядов? Ломом сейчас стреляют редко

@rayotoxi1509 10 месяцев назад

the same but with a Kornet ATGM now please

@KekusMagnus 10 месяцев назад

Damn this thing really is a menace

@jellevandervelde704 10 месяцев назад

Warthunder has the 90mm plate as high hardness, would this make a difference?

@SYsimulations 10 месяцев назад

only slightly, but I couldnt find anything which said it was high hardness, so I went with the same hardness RHA that the T-64 was made of at the time

@jellevandervelde704 10 месяцев назад

@@SYsimulations Fair enough, still pretty impressive for a vehicle from the 60's.

@ЕгорКомиссаров-й1о 10 месяцев назад

@@SYsimulations 90mm plate was made of 51S high hardness steel

@zhuangsaur227 6 дней назад

But what about a 120mm round then???

@Agm1995gamer 4 месяца назад

Obviously 775 is more than 774 therefore ot is better.

@HEAVYgamer6521 10 месяцев назад

The problem w the obj 775 in Warthunder is that the mass efficiency of the array is 1.18 when it should realistically be about 1.07~1.08 Because Gaijin AGAIN applied the 775s LOS protection as a flat penetration equivalent.

@gotanon9659 10 месяцев назад

Not really suprising since the sim uses typical DU formulation not what they actually used in their APFSDS

@michaelbelonio3342 10 месяцев назад

War Thunder: yup, yup, accurate presentation

@egenindunyas4146 10 месяцев назад

pretty good for a steel-textolite armor considering textolite doesn't stop kinetic energy

@dominuslogik484 5 месяцев назад

textolite does actually stop KE projectiles pretty well, its not as good as steel but its much lighter than steel and for such a cheap and lightweight material it does an amazing job.

@ryangoslingIRL 10 месяцев назад

Another M774 classic

@KianaRYN 10 месяцев назад

longer apfsds can pen it right ? or can you do it with longer apfsds tungsten penetrator ?

@Zadlo14 10 месяцев назад

That's array with high hardness armour steel, not RHA. Array with RHA uses thicker textolite layer. And this array was able to stop 9M17P ATGM (equivalent to HOT).

@dwwolf4636 10 месяцев назад

This just might have penetrated if the DU went through the fin assembly.

@theamericanace5666 5 месяцев назад

And on the 7th day God made HEAT

@한울고-g4u 2 месяца назад

What program do you use?

@jafran 10 месяцев назад

if some russian high-up see this they will resume production

@MrMaciek640 10 месяцев назад

what are your analisys settings that produce such beautiful erosion?

@mouhmmedadil9782 10 месяцев назад

War thunder has mention that tank lowride soviet union.

@sopaphanpunchai5805 10 месяцев назад

Have narrator , great 👍

@bigbob1699 10 месяцев назад

What happens if hit on the turret or the side ?

@waldek7772 10 месяцев назад

space program

@ivan5595 10 месяцев назад

The opposite of strv 74

@hiphip4808 10 месяцев назад

Can you do a cannon ball vs say a modern MBT?

@S1su 10 месяцев назад

Do a triple bounce simulation.

@tagefilipsson785 10 месяцев назад

I think it would have penetrated if the round was fired from a bit higher up like it would have I’m real life because the m1 Abraham’s was taller

@noncog1 10 месяцев назад

The height difference angle at 500m out would be a fraction of a degree....

@danielnider6685 10 месяцев назад

@SYsimulations what software do you use

@berserkguts4185 8 дней назад

burning effect missed

@Wally-8964 10 месяцев назад

Can't beat a TOW tho

@asschezch 10 месяцев назад

what can beat a tow? aps???

@Wally-8964 10 месяцев назад

@@asschezch what you talking about

@Klovaneer 5 месяцев назад

This is nearly 800mm LOS thickness, even TOW-2 would be a gamble. If we are talking EFP top attack variants then no tank can take it and yet not a lot of them in service probably because it's unreliable and much weaker against soft targets.

@tankenjoyer9175 29 дней назад

it was literally made to beat HEAT rounds lol, it has Texolite Armor

@drrocketman7794 10 месяцев назад

M1A1 Abrams vs own gun

@timurrodriges4787 6 месяцев назад

What kind of site or program is this?

@MaKoV4k 10 месяцев назад

And what is this program called? I need it for the project.

@WilDBilL6969 10 месяцев назад

120 mm Cannon eat this tag for breakfast

@idiotidiot4522 10 месяцев назад

You are using second variant of a glacis with HHA faceplate. RHA glacis was thicker and slightly less angled. Source RGAE 298-4906

@Cruor34 4 месяца назад

I don't know if this is right. If it is, why didn't the Soviets/Russians make this tank, or at least make it tanks with this armor profile? We keep seeing these sims of Russian tanks tanking hits but in reality I see nothing but popped off turrets in every war they are in. I doubt every single one was hit in the side or top. Anyone have video of a Russian tank taking frontal a hit from a Western MBT and keep fighting? I have not seen it. I mean I get on PAPER due to the angle and materials this should happen, but reality seems to say otherwise.

@MinhNguyen-hz2zn 14 дней назад

Tank vs tank on the battlefield is extremely rare, tanks are usually destroyed by atgm, drones or mines

@Rono99 10 месяцев назад

😂 rly ? A 105 , that was made in 1980? No shit it will stop it

@Rek1emMScar 10 месяцев назад

yea a tank from the 60' is able to stop something that is about 20 year more modern....Its like Mutts never try... and only made vaporware.

@crymieze9003 10 месяцев назад

is it tough to simulate this on Abaqus ?

@thiagorodrigues5211 10 месяцев назад

this tank looks like it can only have a crew of dwarves

@matump9879 10 месяцев назад

Not really, some sports cars have very low profile too and have enough space for people

@thiagorodrigues5211 10 месяцев назад

@@matump9879 it has 2 people inside who have to handle commanding, shooting, driving, reloading, using the radio and doing any maintenance needed. Only dwarves could do all that

@Narcan885 10 месяцев назад

@@thiagorodrigues5211 Why do you keep talking about things you obviously know nothing about?

@thiagorodrigues5211 10 месяцев назад

@@Narcan885 why are you triggered?

@matump9879 10 месяцев назад

@@thiagorodrigues5211 well, it's obvious that tank interiors don't belong to the spacious ones and this one is not any different and human of average height fits just right. Also crew wouldn't need to reload here because it is operated automatically

@TitaAguirreGarcia 10 месяцев назад

Well I still can ask you to make a link to the app??I’ve been requesting one for a while

@SYsimulations 10 месяцев назад

its engineering software called ansys :)

@oddy1637 10 месяцев назад

I think someone plays War Thunder

@Tax_Collector01 10 месяцев назад

The commie griddle tank is my new favorite tank, followed by the Swedish wedge door stopper in second.

@noahsawesomevids422 10 месяцев назад

Obj775 and obj279 are insanely op they need to get nerfed badly

@Fred_the_1996 10 месяцев назад

what?

@GAIJIN-p5d 2 месяца назад

"Non-Penetration"

@rzerizrz 10 месяцев назад

M1 Abrams with 105mm gun? interesting

@xxafrixx 10 месяцев назад

Very first versions of abrams actually had 105mm gun

@dominuslogik484 5 месяцев назад

yeah for the first 10 or so years the M1 used the 105mm gun before upgrading to the 120mm one.

@rzerizrz 5 месяцев назад

@@dominuslogik484 thx

@rzerizrz 5 месяцев назад

@@xxafrixx thx

@rjutomat3658 7 месяцев назад

Why range is not 1000?

@dominuslogik484 5 месяцев назад

round probably wouldn't make it to the textolite layer at 1000 and its more interesting to show an armor in a situation where its uncertain that it will stop the projectile.

@randonamedboosh 10 месяцев назад

What Simulator Do You Use

@Fred_the_1996 10 месяцев назад

ansys

@Antimanele104 10 месяцев назад

Javelin top attack mode: *BON JOUR!*

@darkninjacorporation 10 месяцев назад

WHAT THE-

@1KosovoJeSrbija1 10 месяцев назад

ok this is just absurd

@Addo666 10 месяцев назад

wowewowa

@ukuskota4106 10 месяцев назад

Get low Get low Get low Get low

@justhitreset858 10 месяцев назад

HESH?

@dominuslogik484 5 месяцев назад

the Textolite absorbs shock way too well for hesh to work against it.

@ugurkocadag4638 10 месяцев назад

war thunder players, ASSEMBLE!

@vincentvoncarnap 10 месяцев назад

Hate the TTS, please remove it.

@BladezAndrew 10 месяцев назад

the actual dumbest thing is that even DM53 from L55 cannon doesn't go through this thing's hull armor in war thunder if you shoot where the fuel tanks are behind it, in fact it doesn't even go through the front sides if the tank is angled either, another dogshit bias tank in russian bias simulator